🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Reading cruise to a comfortable 1-3 victory over Cambridge United.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Reading beat Cambridge United 1-3 at Cledara Abbey Stadium, Regular Season - 24, in the League One. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cambridge United 1.59 xG and Reading 1.34 xG, a combined 2.93. The scoreboard read 1-3 for 4 actual goals. Reading outscored their 1.34 projection by 1.7. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cambridge United attack 0.98 / defence 1.17 against Reading attack 0.99 / defence 1.26, drawn from 68/68 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cambridge United 43% | Draw 25% | Reading 32%, with Cambridge United to win its most likely call at 43%. The actual Reading win had been the model's second-ranked read at 32%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 79% and landed. Over 3.5 was 34% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 59% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 49% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cambridge United 40%, Reading 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cambridge United's trading profile (68 games, 33 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 38% of their matches — today it did.

Reading's trading profile (68 games, 33 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 65% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Reading arrived the stronger side — 1.41 PPG against 0.96. Form held, and they took the win. Cambridge United (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.18 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Reading (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.27 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 1 against a 2.06 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights