🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Leicester and Middlesbrough share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Leicester and Middlesbrough finished level at 1-1 at King Power Stadium, Regular Season - 14, in the Championship. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Leicester 1.00 xG and Middlesbrough 1.05 xG, a combined 2.05. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Leicester attack 0.75 / defence 1.00 against Middlesbrough attack 0.91 / defence 1.08, drawn from 13/59 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Leicester 34% | Draw 30% | Middlesbrough 36%, with Middlesbrough to win its most likely call at 36%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 30%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 61% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 41% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Leicester 55%, Middlesbrough 51%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 52%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Leicester's trading profile (51 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did.

Middlesbrough's trading profile (51 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Middlesbrough arrived the stronger side — 1.47 PPG against 0.82. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights