🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Teplice at 46%, yet other data sources diverge — this Teplice vs Mlada Boleslav fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis

Mlada Boleslav make the trip to AGC Arena Na Stinadlech to face Teplice in Czech Liga, Regular Season - 8. The match kicks off on Saturday 13 September 2025 at 14:00 UTC.

Form

Teplice (all games): 4W 0D 6L across 10 Czech Liga fixtures this term — 1.20 PPG. Last five: W L L L L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes. Teplice have played only a handful of Czech Liga games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

At home at AGC Arena Na Stinadlech, Teplice have gone 6W 1D 3L this season (10 games, 1.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at AGC Arena Na Stinadlech. At home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 1.90 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.20 — Teplice are significantly better at AGC Arena Na Stinadlech than their overall form suggests.

Mlada Boleslav's overall Czech Liga record this term: 2W 2D 6L from 10 games (0.80 PPG). Last five: L L W L L. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 2.60. Conceding 2.60 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. Mlada Boleslav have played only a handful of Czech Liga games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Mlada Boleslav's away record: 2W 0D 8L from 10 road trips in Czech Liga this season (0.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.30 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 1.20 PPG for Teplice against 0.80 for Mlada Boleslav. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Teplice lead 2W to 4W over the last 7 encounters, with 1 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

The 7 previous meetings have averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 4 May 2025, ended 0–1 with Mlada Boleslav winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading & In-Play

Teplice — key trading statistics (41 games, 19 at home): they score before half-time in 74% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; BTTS occurs in 42% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 47% of games (home games).

Mlada Boleslav — key trading statistics (41 games, 19 at away): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; BTTS occurs in 68% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 68% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 42%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Teplice 51% versus Mlada Boleslav 58%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Teplice 49% | Mlada Boleslav 66%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Teplice 1.71 xG and Mlada Boleslav 1.34 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Teplice attack 0.983 / defence 0.993 | Mlada Boleslav attack 1.129 / defence 1.252. League average goals — home 1.387 / away 1.197. Mlada Boleslav bring a strong defensive rating of 1.252 — this is suppressing Teplice's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 36 Teplice games / 36 Mlada Boleslav games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Teplice 46% | Draw 24% | Mlada Boleslav 30%. Fair-value odds: Teplice 2.17 | Draw 4.17 | Mlada Boleslav 3.33. Teplice hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (24%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 59% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 3.05. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 59% — the 3.05 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (1.71 / 1.34) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Teplice as the most likely outcome at 46% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 24% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Teplice if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.05 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 59% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 2.7 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 61% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: Teplice 20% | Mlada Boleslav 70%.

The outsider holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights