🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Wuhan Three Towns at 49% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Wuhan Three Towns vs Meizhou Kejia encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Wuhan Sports Centre plays host to Wuhan Three Towns versus Meizhou Kejia in Super League, Regular Season - 20. Kick-off: Sunday 10 August 2025 at 13:00 UTC.

Current Form

Wuhan Three Towns's overall Super League record this term: 3W 4D 3L from 10 games (1.30 PPG). Last five: L D D L D. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Wuhan Three Towns, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Wuhan Three Towns's home record at Wuhan Sports Centre: 3W 5D 2L from 10 Super League appearances (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Meizhou Kejia (all games): 0W 1D 9L across 10 Super League outings this term — 0.10 points per game. Last five: L L D L L. Their scoring rate of 0.60 per game is modest, conceding 2.70 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.70 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. This season is still relatively young for Meizhou Kejia, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Meizhou Kejia away from home this season: 0W 4D 6L from 10 away games — 0.40 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.90 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

The points-per-game gap of 1.20 in Wuhan Three Towns's favour (1.30 vs 0.10) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Wuhan Three Towns have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Meizhou Kejia in 70%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Wuhan Three Towns lead 4W to 3W over the last 7 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

The 7 previous meetings have averaged 2.6 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 6 Apr 2025, ended 1–3 with Meizhou Kejia winning.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading Data

Wuhan Three Towns goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (49 games, 24 at home): they score before half-time in 79% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

Meizhou Kejia goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (49 games, 24 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 54% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 39%; they fail to score in 33% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 59% versus Meizhou Kejia 59%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 49% | Meizhou Kejia 65%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 1.57 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.01 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.866 / defence 1.014 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.722 / defence 1.019. League average goals — home 1.779 / away 1.374. Data: 49 Wuhan Three Towns games / 49 Meizhou Kejia games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 49% | Draw 27% | Meizhou Kejia 23%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 2.04 | Draw 3.70 | Meizhou Kejia 4.35. Wuhan Three Towns hold a narrow Poisson edge at 49% — the draw (27%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 48% | BTTS probability 51% | Total xG 2.58. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 48%/52% — the total xG of 2.58 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 51% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Wuhan Three Towns as the most likely outcome at 49% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Wuhan Three Towns if the outright odds are short.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.58 combined xG gives a 48% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration — though form averaging only 3.0 goals per game points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 51%. Form rates corroborate: Wuhan Three Towns 60% | Meizhou Kejia 70% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights