🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model favours Chengdu Better City (44%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Tianjin Teda face Chengdu Better City.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Tianjin Teda host Chengdu Better City at Olympic Sports Center Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 17. Kick-off is scheduled for Friday 18 July 2025 at 12:35 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Super League games this season, Tianjin Teda have gone 5W 0D 5L from 10 outings — a 1.50 PPG return. Last five: L W W L W. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Tianjin Teda, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Tianjin Teda have posted 6W 2D 2L at Olympic Sports Center Stadium — 2.00 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Olympic Sports Center Stadium. Their home PPG of 2.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.50 — Tianjin Teda are significantly better at Olympic Sports Center Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Chengdu Better City — All Games: 6W 3D 1L from 10 Super League fixtures this season — 2.10 PPG. Last five: W D L W D. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.30 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Super League this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 5W 3D 2L from 10 away outings — 1.80 PPG. They are averaging 1.90 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

Form points away from home here. Chengdu Better City's 2.10 PPG return is 0.60 points per game ahead of Tianjin Teda's 1.50 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 1 wins apiece for Tianjin Teda, 3 for Chengdu Better City and 3 shared spoils from 7 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The 7 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 2.9 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 2 Mar 2025, ended 2–1 with Tianjin Teda winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 2.9 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

Tianjin Teda in-play tendencies (46 games, 22 at home): they score before half-time in 73% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 46% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 46% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

Chengdu Better City in-play tendencies (46 games, 22 at away): they score before half-time in 86% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; they lead at the break 52% of the time; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Tianjin Teda 61% versus Chengdu Better City 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Tianjin Teda 63% | Chengdu Better City 61%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Tianjin Teda 1.22 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.50 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Tianjin Teda attack 0.850 / defence 0.888 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.276 / defence 0.863. League average goals — home 1.656 / away 1.319. Chengdu Better City have an above-average attack strength of 1.276 — the away xG of 1.50 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 46 Tianjin Teda games / 46 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Tianjin Teda 31% | Draw 25% | Chengdu Better City 44%. Fair-value odds: Tianjin Teda 3.23 | Draw 4.00 | Chengdu Better City 2.27. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 51% | BTTS probability 55% | Total xG 2.71. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 51%/49% — the total xG of 2.71 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 55% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 44% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 25% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Chengdu Better City offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.71 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 51% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game and H2H averaging 2.9 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 55% on Yes. Form rates are neutral: Tianjin Teda 40% | Chengdu Better City 60%.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights