🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 56% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Qingdao Youth Island vs Chengdu Better City encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Qingdao Youth Island host Chengdu Better City at Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center in Super League, Regular Season - 28. Kick-off is scheduled for Sunday 26 October 2025 at 10:30 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, Qingdao Youth Island stand at 4W 2D 4L from 10 Super League matches — 1.40 PPG. Last five: L W W W L. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Qingdao Youth Island, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Qingdao Youth Island's home record at Qingdao Guzhenkou University City Sports Center: 4W 2D 4L from 10 Super League appearances (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground.

Across all Super League games this season, Chengdu Better City have recorded 7W 3D 0L from 10 outings — 2.40 PPG. Last five: W W D D W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.30 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. Defensively, 0.80 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Chengdu Better City away from home this season: 5W 3D 2L from 10 away games — 1.80 PPG on the road. They are averaging 2.50 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.80 is notably below their overall 2.40 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour Chengdu Better City — 1.00 PPG ahead of the hosts (2.40 vs 1.40). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.

Head to Head

The rivalry is an even one: 0 wins apiece for Qingdao Youth Island, 1 for Chengdu Better City and 2 shared spoils from 3 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

The 3 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 3.7 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 17 May 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.7 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Patterns

Qingdao Youth Island in-play and half-time data (57 games, 28 at home): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

Chengdu Better City in-play and half-time data (57 games, 28 at away): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; they lead at the break 49% of the time; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 61% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Qingdao Youth Island 61% versus Chengdu Better City 56%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Qingdao Youth Island 58% | Chengdu Better City 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Qingdao Youth Island 1.17 xG and Chengdu Better City 2.03 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Qingdao Youth Island attack 0.756 / defence 1.066 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.352 / defence 0.845. League average goals — home 1.828 / away 1.409. Qingdao Youth Island's attack strength of 0.756 is below the league average — the 1.17 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Chengdu Better City have an above-average attack strength of 1.352 — the away xG of 2.03 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 57 Qingdao Youth Island games / 57 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Qingdao Youth Island 20% | Draw 23% | Chengdu Better City 56%. Fair-value odds: Qingdao Youth Island 5.00 | Draw 4.35 | Chengdu Better City 1.79. The model has a clear lean to Chengdu Better City (56%) — a 36pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 62% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 3.20. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 62% — the 3.20 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (1.17 / 2.03) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 56% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 23% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.20 combined xG gives a 62% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 3.2 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.7 goals per meeting.

Poisson assigns a 61% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Qingdao Youth Island 50% | Chengdu Better City 80% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights