🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Shanghai Shenhua cruise to a comfortable 0-2 victory over Qingdao Jonoon.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Shanghai Shenhua beat Qingdao Jonoon 0-2 at Qingdao Youth Football Stadium, Regular Season - 22, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Qingdao Jonoon 1.50 xG and Shanghai Shenhua 1.49 xG, a combined 2.98. The scoreboard read 0-2 for 2 actual goals. Qingdao Jonoon fell 1.5 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Qingdao Jonoon attack 1.04 / defence 0.90 against Shanghai Shenhua attack 1.23 / defence 0.83, drawn from 51/51 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Qingdao Jonoon 36% | Draw 28% | Shanghai Shenhua 36%, with Qingdao Jonoon to win its most likely call at 36%. The actual Shanghai Shenhua win had been the model's second-ranked read at 36%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 57%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 82% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 53% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Qingdao Jonoon 39%, Shanghai Shenhua 67%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 48%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Qingdao Jonoon's trading profile (51 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 39% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 49% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Shanghai Shenhua's trading profile (51 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Shanghai Shenhua arrived the stronger side — 2.41 PPG against 0.86. That form edge translated into the three points. Qingdao Jonoon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.36 scoring average — below par going forward. Shanghai Shenhua (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 0.88 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights