Sign in Register

Meizhou Kejia 2-4 SHANGHAI SIPG – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 19

Kick-off

Sat 2 Aug 2025

13:00

Venue

Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours SHANGHAI SIPG (70%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as Meizhou Kejia face SHANGHAI SIPG.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Meizhou Kejia host SHANGHAI SIPG at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre in Super League, Regular Season - 19. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 2 August 2025 at 13:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Meizhou Kejia — All Games: 0W 2D 8L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 0.20 points per game. Last five: L L L D L. They are averaging 0.50 goals per game and conceding 2.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.40 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. This season is still relatively young for Meizhou Kejia, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Meizhou Kejia's home record at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre: 4W 0D 6L from 10 Super League appearances (1.20 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 2.20 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Their home PPG of 1.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.20 — Meizhou Kejia are significantly better at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre than their overall form suggests.

Across all Super League games this season, SHANGHAI SIPG have recorded 6W 3D 1L from 10 outings — 2.10 PPG. Last five: W W W W D. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.20 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for SHANGHAI SIPG, so this record blends games from this season and last.

SHANGHAI SIPG's away record: 7W 2D 1L from 10 road trips in Super League this season (2.30 PPG). They are averaging 2.40 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 80% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour SHANGHAI SIPG — 1.90 PPG ahead of the hosts (2.10 vs 0.20). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.

The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Meizhou Kejia register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, SHANGHAI SIPG in 80% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.

H2H

The previous 7 encounters between these sides heavily favour SHANGHAI SIPG, who boast 6 victories compared to 0 for Meizhou Kejia.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 7 meetings have averaged 3.9 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 2 Apr 2025, ended 1–2 with SHANGHAI SIPG winning.

The H2H provides genuine backing for the away side. SHANGHAI SIPG have won 6 of 7 previous encounters, and at 3.9 goals per game, the goals market also points upward. The away win and Over 2.5 combination has a historical case worth noting.

In-Play Profile

Meizhou Kejia in-play tendencies (48 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; BTTS occurs in 65% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 74% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 38%; they fail to score in 33% of games.

SHANGHAI SIPG in-play tendencies (48 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 87% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 78% of those occasions; they lead at the break 58% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 74% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 58%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Meizhou Kejia 58% and SHANGHAI SIPG 67% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Meizhou Kejia 65% | SHANGHAI SIPG 75%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Meizhou Kejia 1.22 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 2.77 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Meizhou Kejia attack 0.823 / defence 1.434 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.456 / defence 0.840. League average goals — home 1.767 / away 1.326. SHANGHAI SIPG have an above-average attack strength of 1.456 — the away xG of 2.77 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 48 Meizhou Kejia games / 48 SHANGHAI SIPG games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 14% | Draw 16% | SHANGHAI SIPG 70%. Fair-value odds: Meizhou Kejia 7.14 | Draw 6.25 | SHANGHAI SIPG 1.43. The model has a clear lean to SHANGHAI SIPG (70%) — a 56pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 76% | BTTS probability 66% | Total xG 3.99. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 76% — a total xG of 3.99 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 66% reflects that both xG figures (1.22 / 2.77) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Analysis Verdict

On the Poisson output, SHANGHAI SIPG are the pick at 70% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support.

Poisson projects 3.99 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 76% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.8 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.9 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 66%. Form rates corroborate: Meizhou Kejia 60% | SHANGHAI SIPG 80% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H SHANGHAI SIPG have been the dominant side historically, winning 6 of 7 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to SHANGHAI SIPG — H2H win rate 86% vs Poisson 70%.
Goals H2H (3.86 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.99) both back Over 2.5 goals (76% Poisson probability).
Form SHANGHAI SIPG lead on PPG: 2.10 vs 0.20 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Meizhou Kejia Poisson xG (1.22) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.50) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form SHANGHAI SIPG Poisson xG (2.77) exceeds their form scoring rate (2.40) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form averages (~2.8 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.99) both support Over 2.5 goals at 76%.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Meizhou Kejia 6/10, SHANGHAI SIPG 8/10) and Poisson model (66%).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour SHANGHAI SIPG — SHANGHAI SIPG at 70% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours SHANGHAI SIPG at 70% away win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 76% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 66% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 19 | Venue: Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre • Kick-off: Saturday 2 Aug 2025, 13:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Meizhou Kejia 14% | Draw 16% | SHANGHAI SIPG 70% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 76% | BTTS 66% | xG Meizhou Kejia 1.22 / SHANGHAI SIPG 2.77 • Poisson strength factors: Meizhou Kejia attack 0.823 / def 1.434 | SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.456 / def 0.840 | league avg home 1.767 / away 1.326 • Poisson stance: SHANGHAI SIPG (70%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.22

Meizhou Kejia xG

Expected Goals

2.77

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

16%
70%
Meizhou Kejia Draw SHANGHAI SIPG

66%

BTTS

91%

Over 1.5

76%

Over 2.5

56%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG kick off?

Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG kicked off at 13:00 on Saturday 2 August 2025 at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre.

What was the final score in Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Meizhou Kejia 2 - 4 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Where is Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG being played?

The match is being played at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre.

What competition is Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG part of?

Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG is a Regular Season - 19 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our statistical model gives Meizhou Kejia a 14% chance of winning, SHANGHAI SIPG a 70% chance, and a 16% chance of a draw — making SHANGHAI SIPG the favourite.

Will both teams score in Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our model estimates a 66% probability that both Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG will score (BTTS).

Will Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 76%.

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG?

Record (7 meetings): Meizhou Kejia 0W | Draws 1 | SHANGHAI SIPG 6W.

What form are Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG in?

Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 0W-2D-8L in 10 | 0.20 PPG | GF 0.50 / GA 2.40 | L5 L-L-L-D-L. SHANGHAI SIPG (all comps): 6W-3D-1L in 10 | 2.10 PPG | GF 2.20 / GA 1.10 | L5 W-W-W-W-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Meizhou Kejia's attacking strength (0.82x league average) is weighed against SHANGHAI SIPG's defensive record (0.84x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.22. The same calculation in reverse, SHANGHAI SIPG's attack versus Meizhou Kejia's defence, projects 2.77 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 48/48 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-2, at 8.7%. Close behind: 1-3 (8.0%), 0-2 (7.1%). Together the top three scorelines make up 24% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

SHANGHAI SIPG Win

14%

Meizhou Kejia

6.96

16%

Draw

6.31

70%

SHANGHAI SIPG

1.43

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 2

8.7%

Away win

Most likely

1 – 3

8.0%

Away win

0 – 2

7.1%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.22

Meizhou Kejia xG

Total xG

3.99

2.77

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

14%
16%
70%
Meizhou KejiaDrawSHANGHAI SIPG

6.96

14%

Home win

6.31

16%

Draw

1.43

70%

Away win

Goals Markets

91%

Over 1.5

1.10

9%

Under 1.5

11.11

76%

Over 2.5

1.32

24%

Under 2.5

4.17

56%

Over 3.5

1.79

44%

Under 3.5

2.27

37%

Over 4.5

2.70

63%

Under 4.5

1.59

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

66%

BTTS Yes

1.51

34%

BTTS No

2.95

Clean Sheet

6%

Meizhou Kejia

15.94

29%

SHANGHAI SIPG

3.39

Win to Nil

1%

Meizhou Kejia

110.94

21%

SHANGHAI SIPG

4.86

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1.8 5.1 7.1 6.5 4.5 2.5
1 2.3 6.3 8.7 8.0 5.5 3.1
2 1.4 3.8 5.3 4.9 3.4 1.9
3 0.6 1.6 2.2 2.0 1.4 0.8
4 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.2
5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.222
λ Away (xG) 2.769
Total xG 3.991
League avg home goals 1.767
League avg away goals 1.326
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 0.823
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 1.434
SHANGHAI SIPG attack strength 1.456
SHANGHAI SIPG defence strength 0.840
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 48 / 48

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Our Poisson model rates 1-2 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 8.7%.

How many goals are Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG expected to score?

The model projects 1.22 expected goals for Meizhou Kejia and 2.77 for SHANGHAI SIPG, a combined total of 3.99.

How confident is the prediction model for Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 70%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Meizhou Kejia come into this having played 48 games, going 9W 13D 26L for 0.83 points per game. Their last five reads L-L-L-D-L. The sample for Meizhou Kejia is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

On the other side, SHANGHAI SIPG sit at 2.42 PPG from 48 outings (36W 8D 4L), a run that reads W-W-W-W-D across their last five. The sample for SHANGHAI SIPG is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

SHANGHAI SIPG carry the stronger recent form of the two, 1.59 PPG clear of Meizhou Kejia — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

Home Ground vs the Road

Meizhou Kejia's home form reads 7W 5D 11L across 23 games on their own ground, a 1.13 PPG return.

Away from home, SHANGHAI SIPG have taken 2.39 points per game from 23 outings (17W 4D 2L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, SHANGHAI SIPG come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

Meizhou Kejia are averaging 1.06 goals scored and 1.96 conceded per game recently; SHANGHAI SIPG are on 2.85 scored and 1.10 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: SHANGHAI SIPG in 67%.

Last 48 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Blended
L L L D L
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

Blended
W W W W D
48 Played 48
9/13/26 W / D / L 36/8/4
0.83 Points Per Game 2.42
1.06 Avg Goals Scored 2.85
1.96 Avg Goals Conceded 1.10
3.02 Avg Goals / Game 3.96
9 Clean Sheets 16
28 BTTS 32
31 Over 2.5 Games 36
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

L
A Shandong Luneng
0–3 HT 0–0
27 Jul
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–0
19 Jul
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–2
29 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–4 HT 0–2
25 Jun
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–1 HT 0–0
13 Jun
L
A Yunnan Yukun
0–2 HT 0–1
16 May
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–4 HT 0–3
10 May
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–3 HT 0–0
06 May
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–3 HT 0–1
02 May
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 1–0
27 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 0–2
16 Apr
L
H Changchun Yatai
1–3 HT 0–2
11 Apr
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 0–1
06 Apr
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–2
02 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
3–4 HT 3–1
29 Mar
W
H Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 1–0
01 Mar
D
A Tianjin Teda
2–2 HT 1–0
23 Feb
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Nov
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Oct
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Oct
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Sep
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–3 HT 0–1
20 Sep
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 0–2
14 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 2–0
17 Aug
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–7 HT 1–4
09 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
03 Aug
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–4 HT 1–2
28 Jul
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–3 HT 1–3
21 Jul
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–1 HT 0–1
13 Jul
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–4 HT 0–3
07 Jul
L
H Henan Jianye
0–3 HT 0–0
30 Jun
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–3 HT 0–1
26 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jun
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
25 May
D
H Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
21 May
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–4 HT 0–1
17 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–0
11 May
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–1
05 May
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
30 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Apr
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–0
31 Mar
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 1–1
09 Mar
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
03 Mar
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

D
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 1–0
26 Jul
W
A Changchun Yatai
3–1 HT 1–0
18 Jul
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 0–1
30 Jun
W
H Dalian Zhixing
3–0 HT 2–0
26 Jun
W
A Henan Jianye
3–1 HT 3–0
18 Jun
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 1–0
14 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 0–0
17 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–1 HT 1–1
09 May
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 2–0
05 May
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 1–1
01 May
W
A Yunnan Yukun
3–2 HT 1–0
25 Apr
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–2
20 Apr
W
A Tianjin Teda
4–1 HT 3–0
16 Apr
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–3 HT 1–3
28 Mar
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–0 HT 0–0
28 Feb
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Feb
W
H Tianjin Teda
5–0 HT 2–0
02 Nov
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
27 Oct
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–3 HT 1–3
18 Oct
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–1 HT 1–0
28 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–3 HT 3–1
21 Sep
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
2–0 HT 1–0
13 Sep
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–3 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
H Meizhou Kejia
7–2 HT 4–1
09 Aug
W
A Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Aug
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
8–1 HT 4–0
26 Jul
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
H Beijing Guoan
5–1 HT 3–1
12 Jul
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Jul
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Jun
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–0 HT 2–0
14 Jun
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 1–1
26 May
W
H Chengdu Better City
2–0 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
5–3 HT 3–1
18 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
5–2 HT 3–1
10 May
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
6–0 HT 3–0
05 May
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 2–0
01 May
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
W
H Shandong Luneng
4–3 HT 2–3
14 Apr
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–0 HT 2–0
09 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–1
05 Apr
W
H Henan Jianye
3–1 HT 0–0
30 Mar
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 1–1
01 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG in coming into this match?

Meizhou Kejia have gone 9W 13D 26L in their last 48 games (0.83 PPG), while SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 36W 8D 4L in their last 48 (2.42 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Meizhou Kejia at home or SHANGHAI SIPG away?

SHANGHAI SIPG's away record (2.39 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Meizhou Kejia at home: 1.13 PPG; SHANGHAI SIPG away: 2.39 PPG.

Have Meizhou Kejia or SHANGHAI SIPG been keeping clean sheets recently?

Meizhou Kejia have kept a clean sheet in 19% of their recent games, SHANGHAI SIPG in 33%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG runs to 8 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 2 August 2025, some 2 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Digging Into the Numbers

SHANGHAI SIPG go into this on the back of 4 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 24 Oct 2022, when SHANGHAI SIPG won 7-0 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

Meizhou Kejia's record when hosting SHANGHAI SIPG specifically: 0W 0D 4L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

Meizhou Kejia

0

Meizhou Kejia

1

Draws

SHANGHAI SIPG

7

SHANGHAI SIPG

Recent Meetings

Meizhou Kejia
2–4
02 Aug 25
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1
02 Apr 25
Meizhou Kejia
SHANGHAI SIPG
7–2
09 Aug 24
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–2
18 Jun 24
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
1–1
18 Aug 23
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
0–2
20 May 23
SHANGHAI SIPG
Meizhou Kejia
0–1
15 Dec 22
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
7–0
24 Oct 22
Meizhou Kejia

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG?

From 8 meetings on record, Meizhou Kejia have won 0, SHANGHAI SIPG have won 7, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG last play each other?

They last met on 2 August 2025, when Meizhou Kejia 2-4 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Who has won more matches between Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG?

SHANGHAI SIPG have the better head-to-head record, with 7 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 17% of those situations.

SHANGHAI SIPG are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 87% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 70% of the time.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Meizhou Kejia 65%, SHANGHAI SIPG 56% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 74% for Meizhou Kejia and 74% for SHANGHAI SIPG. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 39% and 56% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: SHANGHAI SIPG in 44%; Meizhou Kejia have failed to score in 26% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Meizhou Kejia home games / SHANGHAI SIPG away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Blended
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 31/48
(64.6%)
15/23
(65.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 16/48
(33.3%)
6/23
(26.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 12/17
(70.6%)
5/8
(62.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 8/17
(47.1%)
5/8
(62.5%)
Winning at HT 8/48
(16.7%)
5/23
(21.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/48
(8.3%)
1/23
(4.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/48
(12.5%)
4/23
(17.4%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 28/48
(58.3%)
15/23
(65.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 31/48
(64.6%)
17/23
(73.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/48
(37.5%)
9/23
(39.1%)
Clean Sheet 9/48
(18.8%)
5/23
(21.7%)
Failed to Score 16/48
(33.3%)
6/23
(26.1%)
SHANGHAI SIPG SHANGHAI SIPG Blended
Metric All
(48 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 39/48
(81.2%)
20/23
(87%)
2+ Goals Before HT 27/48
(56.2%)
13/23
(56.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/9
(88.9%)
2/3
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/9
(77.8%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 28/48
(58.3%)
16/23
(69.6%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/48
(8.3%)
2/23
(8.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/48
(6.2%)
2/23
(8.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/48
(66.7%)
13/23
(56.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/48
(75%)
17/23
(73.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 28/48
(58.3%)
13/23
(56.5%)
Clean Sheet 16/48
(33.3%)
10/23
(43.5%)
Failed to Score 1/48
(2.1%)
1/23
(4.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Meizhou Kejia play SHANGHAI SIPG?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 65% of Meizhou Kejia's games and 56% of SHANGHAI SIPG's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Meizhou Kejia vs SHANGHAI SIPG usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 74% of Meizhou Kejia's matches and 74% of SHANGHAI SIPG's.

Do Meizhou Kejia and SHANGHAI SIPG tend to score early?

Meizhou Kejia have had a goal before half-time in 65% of their recent matches, SHANGHAI SIPG in 87% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

SHANGHAI SIPG cruise to a comfortable 2-4 victory over Meizhou Kejia.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

SHANGHAI SIPG beat Meizhou Kejia 2-4 at Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre, Regular Season - 19, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Meizhou Kejia 1.22 xG and SHANGHAI SIPG 2.77 xG, a combined 3.99. The scoreboard read 2-4 for 6 actual goals. SHANGHAI SIPG outscored their 2.77 projection by 1.2. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Meizhou Kejia attack 0.82 / defence 1.43 against SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.46 / defence 0.84, drawn from 48/48 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Meizhou Kejia 14% | Draw 16% | SHANGHAI SIPG 70%, with SHANGHAI SIPG to win its most likely call at 70%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 76%. The game delivered 6, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 91% and landed. Over 3.5 was 56% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 66% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 70% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Meizhou Kejia 65%, SHANGHAI SIPG 75%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (48 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did.

SHANGHAI SIPG's trading profile (48 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, SHANGHAI SIPG arrived the stronger side — 2.42 PPG against 0.83. Form held, and they took the win. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) shipped 4 against a 1.83 concession average — a leakier day than usual. SHANGHAI SIPG (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 2.57 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 2 against a 1.13 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 4 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A strong night for the model: the result sat comfortably inside what the pre-match data projected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 76% Over 2.5 probability, 6 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 66% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 70% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.