🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Hangzhou Greentown's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Huizhou Olympic Stadium, Regular Season - 21, as Hangzhou Greentown and Shanghai Shenhua drew 0-0 in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Hangzhou Greentown 2.17 xG and Shanghai Shenhua 2.40 xG, a combined 4.57. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Hangzhou Greentown fell 2.2 short of their projected output. Shanghai Shenhua landed 2.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.30 / defence 1.27 against Shanghai Shenhua attack 1.38 / defence 0.93, drawn from 50/50 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Hangzhou Greentown 36% | Draw 20% | Shanghai Shenhua 44%, with Shanghai Shenhua to win its most likely call at 44%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 20% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 83%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 95% and missed. Over 3.5 was 67% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 81% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 73% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Hangzhou Greentown 78%, Shanghai Shenhua 68%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 63%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Hangzhou Greentown's trading profile (50 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 68% of their matches — today it did not.

Shanghai Shenhua's trading profile (50 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 40% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Shanghai Shenhua arrived the stronger side — 2.44 PPG against 1.34. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Hangzhou Greentown (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.52 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.72 average — tighter than their form line. Shanghai Shenhua (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.00 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 0.88 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights