🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates Hangzhou Greentown at 44%, yet other data sources diverge — this Hangzhou Greentown vs Qingdao Youth Island fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 9 sees Qingdao Youth Island travel to Huizhou Olympic Stadium to take on Hangzhou Greentown. The game is scheduled for Sunday 27 April 2025, 13:00 UTC.

Form Guide

Hangzhou Greentown — All Games: 2W 4D 4L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 1.00 points per game. Last five: D L W D D. They are averaging 2.10 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. However, 2.30 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone.

Hangzhou Greentown's home record at Huizhou Olympic Stadium: 6W 2D 2L from 10 Super League appearances (2.00 PPG). They are averaging 3.20 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 90% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Their home PPG of 2.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.00 — Hangzhou Greentown are significantly better at Huizhou Olympic Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Across all Super League games this season, Qingdao Youth Island have recorded 4W 3D 3L from 10 outings — 1.50 PPG. Last five: W L L D W. They are scoring at 1.60 per game and conceding 1.50. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

Qingdao Youth Island's form when playing away from home: 4W 0D 6L across 10 road games this term (1.20 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 2.10 conceded per game.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Qingdao Youth Island are 0.50 PPG ahead (1.50 vs 1.00), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 0 wins apiece for Hangzhou Greentown, 2 for Qingdao Youth Island and 0 shared spoils from 2 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 2 meetings have averaged 5.0 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 13 Jul 2024, ended 2–5 with Qingdao Youth Island winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 5.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Hangzhou Greentown trading profile (30 games, 15 at home): they score before half-time in 93% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 80% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 87% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 60%.

Qingdao Youth Island trading profile (30 games, 15 at away): they score before half-time in 93% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 73% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 43%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Hangzhou Greentown 67% and Qingdao Youth Island 63% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Hangzhou Greentown 80% | Qingdao Youth Island 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Hangzhou Greentown 2.01 xG and Qingdao Youth Island 1.73 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.079 / defence 1.032 | Qingdao Youth Island attack 1.163 / defence 1.087. League average goals — home 1.712 / away 1.441. Data: 38 Hangzhou Greentown games / 37 Qingdao Youth Island games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Hangzhou Greentown 44% | Draw 24% | Qingdao Youth Island 32%. Fair-value odds: Hangzhou Greentown 2.27 | Draw 4.17 | Qingdao Youth Island 3.12. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 24% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 72% | BTTS probability 73% | Total xG 3.74. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 72% — a total xG of 3.74 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 73% reflects that both xG figures (2.01 / 1.73) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Hangzhou Greentown as the most likely outcome at 44% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Qingdao Youth Island (1.50 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Hangzhou Greentown offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 3.74 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 72% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 4.2 goals per game.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 73% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Hangzhou Greentown 90% | Qingdao Youth Island 50% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 32% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights