Sign in Register

Hangzhou Greentown 2-3 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 23

Kick-off

Sat 15 Aug 2026

11:35

Venue

Huizhou Olympic Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Chengdu Better City at 41% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City meet at Huizhou Olympic Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 23. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 15 August 2026 at 11:35 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Hangzhou Greentown have collected 1.40 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 4W 2D 4L. Last five: L W D W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.90 goals per game, with 2.10 conceded. However, 2.10 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for Hangzhou Greentown, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Hangzhou Greentown's form when playing at home: 5W 3D 2L across 10 games at Huizhou Olympic Stadium this term (1.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Chengdu Better City (all games): 2W 5D 3L across 10 Super League outings this term — 1.10 points per game. Last five: D D D D L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Chengdu Better City, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Chengdu Better City have gone 6W 2D 2L from 10 away fixtures this term (2.00 PPG). Away from home they average 1.40 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 2.00 exceeds their overall 1.10 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

Neither side holds a meaningful form edge. The 1.40 vs 1.10 PPG split is negligible — model and market signals should carry more analytical weight for this one.

In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (using home/away splits) — Hangzhou Greentown have seen both teams score in 60% of their games, Chengdu Better City in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.

H2H Analysis

Across the last 9 meetings, Chengdu Better City have the stronger historical record — 5 wins to Hangzhou Greentown's 1, with 3 draws in the mix.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.2 per game across 9 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 25 Apr 2026, ended 0–4 with Chengdu Better City winning.

The H2H provides genuine backing for the away side. Chengdu Better City have won 5 of 9 previous encounters, and at 3.2 goals per game, the goals market also points upward. The away win and Over 2.5 combination has a historical case worth noting.

Trading Data

Hangzhou Greentown goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (51 games, 25 at home): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 72% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 68% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 51%.

Chengdu Better City goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (51 games, 25 at away): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 93% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 57% of those occasions; they lead at the break 45% of the time; BTTS occurs in 68% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 60% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Hangzhou Greentown 65% and Chengdu Better City 63% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Hangzhou Greentown 69% | Chengdu Better City 55%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Hangzhou Greentown 1.46 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.58 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.050 / defence 1.209 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.015 / defence 0.822. League average goals — home 1.693 / away 1.290. Data: 51 Hangzhou Greentown games / 52 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Hangzhou Greentown 35% | Draw 24% | Chengdu Better City 41%. Fair-value odds: Hangzhou Greentown 2.86 | Draw 4.17 | Chengdu Better City 2.44. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 24% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 59% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 3.04. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 59% — the 3.04 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (1.46 / 1.58) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chengdu Better City at 41% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 24% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Chengdu Better City if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 3.04 combined xG gives a 59% probability to Over 2.5 — strong, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.2 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 61%. Form rates corroborate: Hangzhou Greentown 60% | Chengdu Better City 60% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 35% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Chengdu Better City have been the dominant side historically, winning 5 of 9 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Chengdu Better City — H2H win rate 56% vs Poisson 41%.
Goals H2H (3.22 goals/game) and Poisson xG (3.04) both back Over 2.5 goals (59% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 67% and Poisson BTTS 61% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Hangzhou Greentown 6/10, Chengdu Better City 6/10) and Poisson model (61%).
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 61% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 23 | Venue: Huizhou Olympic Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 15 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Hangzhou Greentown 35% | Draw 24% | Chengdu Better City 41% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 59% | BTTS 61% | xG Hangzhou Greentown 1.46 / Chengdu Better City 1.58 • Poisson strength factors: Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.050 / def 1.209 | Chengdu Better City attack 1.015 / def 0.822 | league avg home 1.693 / away 1.290 • Poisson stance: Chengdu Better City (41%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.46

Hangzhou Greentown xG

Expected Goals

1.58

Chengdu Better City xG

35%
24%
41%
Hangzhou Greentown Draw Chengdu Better City

61%

BTTS

81%

Over 1.5

59%

Over 2.5

36%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 11:35 on Saturday 15 August 2026 at Huizhou Olympic Stadium.

What was the final score in Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City?

Hangzhou Greentown 2 - 3 Chengdu Better City.

Where is Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at Huizhou Olympic Stadium.

What competition is Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City part of?

Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 23 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives Hangzhou Greentown a 35% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 41% chance, and a 24% chance of a draw — making Chengdu Better City the favourite.

Will both teams score in Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 61% probability that both Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 59%.

What is the head-to-head record between Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City?

Record (9 meetings): Hangzhou Greentown 1W | Draws 3 | Chengdu Better City 5W.

What form are Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City in?

Hangzhou Greentown (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.90 / GA 2.10 | L5 L-W-D-W-L. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 2W-5D-3L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 1.20 | L5 D-D-D-D-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

Hangzhou Greentown's attacking strength (1.05x league average) is weighed against Chengdu Better City's defensive record (0.82x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.46. Flip it around — Chengdu Better City's attack (1.01x) against Hangzhou Greentown's defence (1.21x) — and the away total comes out at 1.58.

These ratings are built from 51/52 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 12.4%. Close behind: 1-2 (8.7%), 2-1 (8.1%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Chengdu Better City Win

35%

Hangzhou Greentown

2.83

24%

Draw

4.16

41%

Chengdu Better City

2.46

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.0%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 2

8.7%

Away win

2 – 1

8.1%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.46

Hangzhou Greentown xG

Total xG

3.04

1.58

Chengdu Better City xG

35%
24%
41%
Hangzhou GreentownDrawChengdu Better City

2.83

35%

Home win

4.16

24%

Draw

2.46

41%

Away win

Goals Markets

81%

Over 1.5

1.23

19%

Under 1.5

5.26

59%

Over 2.5

1.69

41%

Under 2.5

2.44

36%

Over 3.5

2.78

64%

Under 3.5

1.56

19%

Over 4.5

5.26

81%

Under 4.5

1.23

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

61%

BTTS Yes

1.64

39%

BTTS No

2.57

Clean Sheet

21%

Hangzhou Greentown

4.87

23%

Chengdu Better City

4.31

Win to Nil

7%

Hangzhou Greentown

13.78

9%

Chengdu Better City

10.63

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.8 7.5 6.0 3.1 1.2 0.4
1 7.0 11.0 8.7 4.6 1.8 0.6
2 5.1 8.1 6.4 3.4 1.3 0.4
3 2.5 3.9 3.1 1.6 0.6 0.2
4 0.9 1.4 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.1
5 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.462
λ Away (xG) 1.583
Total xG 3.045
League avg home goals 1.693
League avg away goals 1.290
Hangzhou Greentown attack strength 1.050
Hangzhou Greentown defence strength 1.209
Chengdu Better City attack strength 1.015
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.822
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 51 / 52

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.4%.

How many goals are Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 1.46 expected goals for Hangzhou Greentown and 1.58 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 3.04.

How confident is the prediction model for Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 41%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Hangzhou Greentown's recent record stands at 18W 17D 16L from 51 games, a 1.39 PPG return, with L-W-D-W-L in the last five. The sample for Hangzhou Greentown is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Chengdu Better City, meanwhile, have gone 29W 15D 7L across 51 games — 2.00 PPG, with D-D-D-D-L in their last five. The sample for Chengdu Better City is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

The points-per-game comparison favours Chengdu Better City by 0.61 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Hangzhou Greentown heading into this one.

How They Fare by Venue

At home specifically, Hangzhou Greentown have managed 11W 11D 3L from 25 games — 1.76 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Chengdu Better City's away record stands at 13W 8D 4L across 25 trips, a 1.88 PPG haul.

Attack vs Defence

Hangzhou Greentown are averaging 1.78 goals scored and 1.71 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 1.98 scored and 0.98 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Hangzhou Greentown have seen both teams score in 65% of their recent games; Chengdu Better City in 63%.

Last 51 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Hangzhou Greentown

Hangzhou Greentown

Blended
L W D W L
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Blended
D D D D L
51 Played 51
18/17/16 W / D / L 29/15/7
1.39 Points Per Game 2.00
1.78 Avg Goals Scored 1.98
1.71 Avg Goals Conceded 0.98
3.49 Avg Goals / Game 2.96
9 Clean Sheets 16
33 BTTS 32
35 Over 2.5 Games 28
Hangzhou Greentown

Hangzhou Greentown

L
A Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 1–1
01 Aug
W
H Dalian Zhixing
3–2 HT 1–0
26 Jul
D
A Chongqing Tongliang Long
1–1 HT 1–0
18 Jul
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
3–2 HT 1–0
14 Jul
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–3 HT 0–1
05 Jul
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–3 HT 1–1
28 Jun
W
A Henan Jianye
2–0 HT 1–0
30 May
L
H Shenyang Urban
0–5 HT 0–2
24 May
W
H Shandong Luneng
4–1 HT 0–1
20 May
D
A SHANGHAI SIPG
2–2 HT 1–1
15 May
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 0–0
10 May
W
A Yunnan Yukun
2–1 HT 0–1
06 May
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
2–1 HT 1–1
02 May
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–4 HT 0–3
25 Apr
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–2 HT 0–1
21 Apr
D
H Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
17 Apr
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–3 HT 0–1
10 Apr
L
H Chongqing Tongliang Long
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
4–1 HT 0–1
20 Mar
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–1
14 Mar
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–0 HT 2–0
08 Mar
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–2 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–1
31 Oct
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 0–1
25 Oct
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 1–1
18 Oct
D
H Chengdu Better City
3–3 HT 2–3
26 Sep
D
A Changchun Yatai
3–3 HT 1–1
20 Sep
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–0 HT 0–0
13 Sep
D
A Meizhou Kejia
2–2 HT 2–1
24 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–0 HT 1–0
20 Aug
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
H Beijing Guoan
3–4 HT 2–1
10 Aug
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
4–2 HT 1–0
03 Aug
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–2 HT 0–1
27 Jul
W
H Yunnan Yukun
3–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Jun
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
3–0 HT 0–0
25 Jun
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–2 HT 0–1
14 Jun
D
H Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 2–1
16 May
L
A Shandong Luneng
2–4 HT 1–1
10 May
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 0–1
05 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–2 HT 3–1
01 May
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
2–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–2 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
H Meizhou Kejia
2–2 HT 2–0
16 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–3 HT 0–1
12 Apr
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–1
06 Apr
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
3–0 HT 1–0
01 Apr
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
4–0 HT 4–0
28 Mar
D
A Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
01 Mar
D
H Dalian Zhixing
1–1 HT 1–0
23 Feb
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

L
A Yunnan Yukun
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Aug
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 0–0
01 Aug
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 0–0
26 Jul
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
17 Jul
D
H Chongqing Tongliang Long
1–1 HT 1–0
11 Jul
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 0–0
05 Jul
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–2 HT 1–0
27 Jun
W
H Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 1–0
30 May
L
A Dalian Zhixing
0–2 HT 0–0
23 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–1 HT 0–0
19 May
W
A Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
15 May
W
H Henan Jianye
3–0 HT 1–0
09 May
W
A Shenyang Urban
1–0 HT 0–0
05 May
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
3–2 HT 1–2
01 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
4–0 HT 3–0
25 Apr
W
H Yunnan Yukun
2–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Apr
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 0–0
12 Apr
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
5–1 HT 2–0
03 Apr
D
A Chongqing Tongliang Long
3–3 HT 2–0
21 Mar
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Mar
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–1 HT 3–1
06 Mar
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 1–1
22 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
31 Oct
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
2–2 HT 0–1
26 Oct
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–1 HT 1–1
17 Oct
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–3 HT 3–2
26 Sep
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Sep
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
4–1 HT 3–1
30 Aug
W
A Yunnan Yukun
5–1 HT 1–1
23 Aug
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Aug
W
A Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Aug
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jul
D
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–2 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
5–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
2–3 HT 2–2
14 Jun
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 1–1
17 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
4–0 HT 3–0
10 May
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 1–0
05 May
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–0 HT 1–0
02 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Apr
D
H Yunnan Yukun
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Apr
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Dalian Zhixing
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Shandong Luneng
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–2 HT 1–1
02 Mar

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

Hangzhou Greentown have gone 18W 17D 16L in their last 51 games (1.39 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 29W 15D 7L in their last 51 (2.00 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Hangzhou Greentown at home or Chengdu Better City away?

Chengdu Better City's away record (1.88 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Hangzhou Greentown at home: 1.76 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 1.88 PPG.

Have Hangzhou Greentown or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

Hangzhou Greentown have kept a clean sheet in 18% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 31%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 10 times that we have on record, stretching back to October 2022 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 3 years. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 15 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Notable Numbers

Chengdu Better City have won the last 2 meetings between these two, a run that gives them the psychological edge coming in.

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Chengdu Better City won 4-0 on 25 Apr 2026, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Hangzhou Greentown have gone 0W 2D 3L from 5 meetings on their own ground against Chengdu Better City — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 10 Meetings

Hangzhou Greentown

1

Hangzhou Greentown

3

Draws

Chengdu Better City

6

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Hangzhou Greentown
2–3
15 Aug 26
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
4–0
25 Apr 26
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
3–3
26 Sep 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–1
05 May 25
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
1–3
28 Jul 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
3–0
10 Apr 24
Hangzhou Greentown
Chengdu Better City
1–2
29 Jul 23
Hangzhou Greentown
Hangzhou Greentown
0–2
30 Apr 23
Chengdu Better City
Hangzhou Greentown
1–1
15 Dec 22
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–1
24 Oct 22
Hangzhou Greentown

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City?

From 10 meetings on record, Hangzhou Greentown have won 1, Chengdu Better City have won 6, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 15 August 2026, when Hangzhou Greentown 2-3 Chengdu Better City.

Who has won more matches between Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Hangzhou Greentown are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 40% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 16% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 24% of those situations.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 64% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 32% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 72% for Hangzhou Greentown, 68% for Chengdu Better City — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 68% for Hangzhou Greentown and 60% for Chengdu Better City. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 56% and 40% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Hangzhou Greentown home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Hangzhou Greentown Hangzhou Greentown Blended
Metric All
(51 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 43/51
(84.3%)
20/25
(80%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/51
(35.3%)
10/25
(40%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 6/8
(75%)
3/5
(60%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/8
(62.5%)
2/5
(40%)
Winning at HT 16/51
(31.4%)
10/25
(40%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/51
(13.7%)
4/25
(16%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 9/51
(17.6%)
6/25
(24%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 33/51
(64.7%)
18/25
(72%)
Over 2.5 Goals 35/51
(68.6%)
17/25
(68%)
Over 3.5 Goals 26/51
(51%)
14/25
(56%)
Clean Sheet 9/51
(17.6%)
5/25
(20%)
Failed to Score 11/51
(21.6%)
4/25
(16%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Blended
Metric All
(51 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 37/51
(72.5%)
16/25
(64%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/51
(39.2%)
11/25
(44%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/14
(92.9%)
9/9
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 8/14
(57.1%)
6/9
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 23/51
(45.1%)
8/25
(32%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/51
(9.8%)
2/25
(8%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/51
(9.8%)
3/25
(12%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/51
(62.7%)
17/25
(68%)
Over 2.5 Goals 28/51
(54.9%)
15/25
(60%)
Over 3.5 Goals 17/51
(33.3%)
10/25
(40%)
Clean Sheet 16/51
(31.4%)
6/25
(24%)
Failed to Score 4/51
(7.8%)
2/25
(8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Hangzhou Greentown play Chengdu Better City?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 72% of Hangzhou Greentown's games and 68% of Chengdu Better City's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Hangzhou Greentown vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 68% of Hangzhou Greentown's matches and 60% of Chengdu Better City's.

Do Hangzhou Greentown and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

Hangzhou Greentown have had a goal before half-time in 80% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 64% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Chengdu Better City edge out Hangzhou Greentown 2-3.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chengdu Better City beat Hangzhou Greentown 2-3 at Huizhou Olympic Stadium, Regular Season - 23, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Hangzhou Greentown 1.46 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.58 xG, a combined 3.04. The scoreboard read 2-3 for 5 actual goals. Chengdu Better City outscored their 1.58 projection by 1.4. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Hangzhou Greentown attack 1.05 / defence 1.21 against Chengdu Better City attack 1.01 / defence 0.82, drawn from 51/52 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Hangzhou Greentown 35% | Draw 24% | Chengdu Better City 41%, with Chengdu Better City to win its most likely call at 41%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 59%. The game delivered 5, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 81% and landed. Over 3.5 was 36% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 61% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Hangzhou Greentown 69%, Chengdu Better City 55%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 64%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Hangzhou Greentown's trading profile (51 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 65% of their matches — today it did.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (51 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

On form, Chengdu Better City arrived the stronger side — 2.00 PPG against 1.39. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Hangzhou Greentown (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.52 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.96 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 4 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The data earned its keep here, calling the bulk of the fixture correctly.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 59% Over 2.5 probability, 5 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 61% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 62% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.