Sign in Register

Chongqing Lifan 4-0 Guangzhou R&F – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 9

Kick-off

Tue 27 Jul 2021

11:00

Venue

Huadu Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Guangzhou R&F at 43% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Super League encounter, Regular Season - 9 sees Guangzhou R&F travel to Huadu Stadium to take on Chongqing Lifan. The game is scheduled for Tuesday 27 July 2021, 11:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Super League games this season, Chongqing Lifan have gone 1W 1D 6L from 8 outings — a 0.50 PPG return. Last five: W L L L L. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 2.38 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.38 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. Both teams have scored in 62% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Chongqing Lifan, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Chongqing Lifan's form when playing at home: 1W 1D 2L across 4 games at Huadu Stadium this term (1.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.25 goals scored and 2.25 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 1.00 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.50 — Chongqing Lifan are significantly better at Huadu Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Guangzhou R&F stand at 2W 5D 1L from 8 Super League matches — 1.38 PPG. Last five: L D D D D. They are scoring at 1.50 per game and conceding 1.38. 3 clean sheets in 8 outings (38%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 62% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Guangzhou R&F, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Guangzhou R&F's form when playing away from home: 1W 2D 0L across 3 road games this term (1.67 PPG). Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.67 conceded per game. 2 away clean sheets from 3 games (67%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home.

Form points away from home here. Guangzhou R&F's 1.38 PPG return is 0.88 points per game ahead of Chongqing Lifan's 0.50 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.

Head to Head

The rivalry is an even one: 0 wins apiece for Chongqing Lifan, 1 for Guangzhou R&F and 0 shared spoils from 1 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 1 meetings have averaged 4.0 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 26 Apr 2021, ended 1–3 with Guangzhou R&F winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Data

Chongqing Lifan trading profile (8 games, 3 at home): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 75% of games; Over 3.5 in 62%; they fail to score in 38% of games.

Guangzhou R&F trading profile (8 games, 3 at away): they score before half-time in 50% of fixtures; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches; Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games; Over 3.5 in 50%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Chongqing Lifan 62% and Guangzhou R&F 62% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chongqing Lifan 75% | Guangzhou R&F 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chongqing Lifan 0.86 xG and Guangzhou R&F 1.30 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chongqing Lifan attack 0.952 / defence 1.484 | Guangzhou R&F attack 0.752 / defence 0.976. League average goals — home 0.925 / away 1.166. Data: 8 Chongqing Lifan games / 8 Guangzhou R&F games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chongqing Lifan 21% | Draw 36% | Guangzhou R&F 43%. Fair-value odds: Chongqing Lifan 4.76 | Draw 2.78 | Guangzhou R&F 2.33. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 36% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 37% | BTTS probability 46% | Total xG 2.16. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 63% — total xG of 2.16 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 46% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Guangzhou R&F as the most likely outcome at 43% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 36% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Guangzhou R&F offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.16 combined xG gives a 37% probability to Under 2.5 — Poisson-only — limited corroboration.

Poisson assigns a 46% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Chongqing Lifan 50% | Guangzhou R&F 33% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–0D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H suggests 4.00 goals/game but Poisson xG is only 2.16 — current-season defences are outperforming historical norms.
Form Guangzhou R&F lead on PPG: 1.38 vs 0.50 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Chongqing Lifan Poisson xG (0.86) is below their recent form scoring rate (1.25) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Guangzhou R&F Poisson xG (1.30) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.00) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form averages (~1.9 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.16) both support Under 2.5 goals (63% probability).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Guangzhou R&F — Guangzhou R&F at 43% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 36% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 37% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 9 | Venue: Huadu Stadium • Kick-off: Tuesday 27 Jul 2021, 11:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chongqing Lifan 21% | Draw 36% | Guangzhou R&F 43% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 37% | BTTS 46% | xG Chongqing Lifan 0.86 / Guangzhou R&F 1.30 • Poisson strength factors: Chongqing Lifan attack 0.952 / def 1.484 | Guangzhou R&F attack 0.752 / def 0.976 | league avg home 0.925 / away 1.166 • Poisson stance: Guangzhou R&F (43%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

0.86

Chongqing Lifan xG

Expected Goals

1.30

Guangzhou R&F xG

21%
36%
43%
Chongqing Lifan Draw Guangzhou R&F

46%

BTTS

67%

Over 1.5

37%

Over 2.5

17%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F kick off?

Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F kicked off at 11:00 on Tuesday 27 July 2021 at Huadu Stadium.

What was the final score in Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F?

Chongqing Lifan 4 - 0 Guangzhou R&F.

Where is Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F being played?

The match is being played at Huadu Stadium.

What competition is Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F part of?

Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F is a Regular Season - 9 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F?

Our statistical model gives Chongqing Lifan a 21% chance of winning, Guangzhou R&F a 43% chance, and a 36% chance of a draw — making Guangzhou R&F the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F?

Our model estimates a 46% probability that both Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F will score (BTTS).

Will Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 37%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F?

Record (1 meetings): Chongqing Lifan 0W | Draws 0 | Guangzhou R&F 1W.

What form are Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F in?

Chongqing Lifan (all comps): 1W-1D-6L in 8 | 0.50 PPG | GF 1.00 / GA 2.38 | L5 W-L-L-L-L. Guangzhou R&F (all comps): 2W-5D-1L in 8 | 1.38 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.38 | L5 L-D-D-D-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Chongqing Lifan's attacking strength (0.95x league average) is weighed against Guangzhou R&F's defensive record (0.98x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 0.86. The same calculation in reverse, Guangzhou R&F's attack versus Chongqing Lifan's defence, projects 1.30 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 8/8 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 14.6%. Close behind: 0-1 (13.3%), 0-0 (13.2%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 41% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Guangzhou R&F Win

21%

Chongqing Lifan

4.81

36%

Draw

2.76

43%

Guangzhou R&F

2.33

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

0 – 1

15.0%

Away win

Most likely

1 – 1

12.9%

Draw

0 – 0

11.5%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

0.86

Chongqing Lifan xG

Total xG

2.16

1.30

Guangzhou R&F xG

21%
36%
43%
Chongqing LifanDrawGuangzhou R&F

4.81

21%

Home win

2.76

36%

Draw

2.33

43%

Away win

Goals Markets

64%

Over 1.5

1.56

36%

Under 1.5

2.78

37%

Over 2.5

2.70

63%

Under 2.5

1.59

17%

Over 3.5

5.88

83%

Under 3.5

1.20

7%

Over 4.5

14.29

93%

Under 4.5

1.08

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

46%

BTTS Yes

2.18

54%

BTTS No

1.85

Clean Sheet

27%

Chongqing Lifan

3.68

42%

Guangzhou R&F

2.36

Win to Nil

6%

Chongqing Lifan

17.70

18%

Guangzhou R&F

5.49

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 11.5 15.0 9.8 4.2 1.4 0.4
1 9.9 12.9 8.4 3.6 1.2 0.3
2 4.3 5.5 3.6 1.6 0.5 0.1
3 1.2 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.1
4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1
5 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 0.860
λ Away (xG) 1.302
Total xG 2.162
League avg home goals 0.925
League avg away goals 1.166
Chongqing Lifan attack strength 0.952
Chongqing Lifan defence strength 1.484
Guangzhou R&F attack strength 0.752
Guangzhou R&F defence strength 0.976
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 8 / 8

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.6%.

How many goals are Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F expected to score?

The model projects 0.86 expected goals for Chongqing Lifan and 1.30 for Guangzhou R&F, a combined total of 2.16.

How confident is the prediction model for Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 43%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 8 outings, Chongqing Lifan have picked up 0.50 PPG on a 1W 1D 6L record — W-L-L-L-L across the most recent five. The sample for Chongqing Lifan is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Guangzhou R&F's form line: 2W 5D 1L from 8 games, 1.38 PPG, last five L-D-D-D-D. The sample for Guangzhou R&F is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, Guangzhou R&F are the form team by 0.88 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Chongqing Lifan.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Chongqing Lifan have posted 1.33 PPG from 3 outings (1W 1D 1L). That's noticeably better than their 0.50 PPG overall — Chongqing Lifan are a different proposition at home than their general record suggests.

On the road, Guangzhou R&F have gone 1W 2D 0L from 3 away games — 1.67 PPG when travelling.

The Goals Picture

Chongqing Lifan are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 2.38 conceded per game recently; Guangzhou R&F are on 1.50 scored and 1.38 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Chongqing Lifan have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games; Guangzhou R&F in 62%.

Defensively: Guangzhou R&F in 38% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 8 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chongqing Lifan

Chongqing Lifan

Blended
W L L L L
Guangzhou R&F

Guangzhou R&F

Blended
L D D D D
8 Played 8
1/1/6 W / D / L 2/5/1
0.50 Points Per Game 1.38
1.00 Avg Goals Scored 1.50
2.38 Avg Goals Conceded 1.38
3.38 Avg Goals / Game 2.88
0 Clean Sheets 3
5 BTTS 5
6 Over 2.5 Games 4
Chongqing Lifan

Chongqing Lifan

L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 0–2
24 Jul
L
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–3 HT 0–3
21 Jul
L
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–3 HT 1–2
18 Jul
L
A Qingdao Huanghai
0–1 HT 0–0
15 May
W
H Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 0–1
09 May
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–2 HT 2–2
03 May
L
A Guangzhou R&F
1–3 HT 0–0
26 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–2 HT 0–0
20 Apr
Guangzhou R&F

Guangzhou R&F

D
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
3–3 HT 2–2
24 Jul
D
H Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–1
21 Jul
D
A Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
14 May
L
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–4 HT 0–3
08 May
W
A Qingdao Huanghai
1–0 HT 0–0
03 May
W
H Chongqing Lifan
3–1 HT 0–0
26 Apr
D
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–2 HT 1–1
20 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F in coming into this match?

Chongqing Lifan have gone 1W 1D 6L in their last 8 games (0.50 PPG), while Guangzhou R&F have gone 2W 5D 1L in their last 8 (1.38 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chongqing Lifan at home or Guangzhou R&F away?

Guangzhou R&F's away record (1.67 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chongqing Lifan at home: 1.33 PPG; Guangzhou R&F away: 1.67 PPG.

Have Chongqing Lifan or Guangzhou R&F been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chongqing Lifan have kept a clean sheet in 0% of their recent games, Guangzhou R&F in 38%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F runs to 2 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to April 2021. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 27 July 2021, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Last 2 Meetings

Chongqing Lifan

1

Chongqing Lifan

0

Draws

Guangzhou R&F

1

Guangzhou R&F

Recent Meetings

Chongqing Lifan
4–0
27 Jul 21
Guangzhou R&F
Guangzhou R&F
3–1
26 Apr 21
Chongqing Lifan

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F?

From 2 meetings on record, Chongqing Lifan have won 1, Guangzhou R&F have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F last play each other?

They last met on 27 July 2021, when Chongqing Lifan 4-0 Guangzhou R&F.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Chongqing Lifan are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 100% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 33% of those situations.

Guangzhou R&F see a goal before the break in 33% of their matches.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chongqing Lifan 67%, Guangzhou R&F 33% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 100% for Chongqing Lifan and 33% for Guangzhou R&F. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 67% and 33% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Guangzhou R&F in 67%; Chongqing Lifan have failed to score in 33% of games; Guangzhou R&F in 33%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chongqing Lifan home games / Guangzhou R&F away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chongqing Lifan Chongqing Lifan Blended
Metric All
(8 games)
Venue
(3 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 5/8
(62.5%)
3/3
(100%)
2+ Goals Before HT 4/8
(50%)
2/3
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 3/3
(100%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/3
(66.7%)
β€”
Winning at HT 0/8
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/8
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/8
(12.5%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 5/8
(62.5%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 6/8
(75%)
3/3
(100%)
Over 3.5 Goals 5/8
(62.5%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Clean Sheet 0/8
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Failed to Score 3/8
(37.5%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Guangzhou R&F Guangzhou R&F Blended
Metric All
(8 games)
Venue
(3 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 4/8
(50%)
1/3
(33.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 3/8
(37.5%)
1/3
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 2/4
(50%)
1/2
(50%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/4
(25%)
0/2
(0%)
Winning at HT 0/8
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/8
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/8
(12.5%)
0/3
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 5/8
(62.5%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 4/8
(50%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 4/8
(50%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Clean Sheet 3/8
(37.5%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Failed to Score 2/8
(25%)
1/3
(33.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chongqing Lifan play Guangzhou R&F?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 67% of Chongqing Lifan's recent matches and 33% of Guangzhou R&F's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Chongqing Lifan vs Guangzhou R&F usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 100% of Chongqing Lifan's matches and 33% of Guangzhou R&F's.

Do Chongqing Lifan and Guangzhou R&F tend to score early?

Chongqing Lifan have had a goal before half-time in 100% of their recent matches, Guangzhou R&F in 33% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant Chongqing Lifan run riot with a 4-0 hammering of Guangzhou R&F.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chongqing Lifan beat Guangzhou R&F 4-0 at Huadu Stadium, Regular Season - 9, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chongqing Lifan 0.86 xG and Guangzhou R&F 1.30 xG, a combined 2.16. The scoreboard read 4-0 for 4 actual goals. Chongqing Lifan beat their projection by 3.1 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Guangzhou R&F landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chongqing Lifan attack 0.95 / defence 1.48 against Guangzhou R&F attack 0.75 / defence 0.98, drawn from 8/8 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chongqing Lifan 21% | Draw 36% | Guangzhou R&F 43%, with Guangzhou R&F to win its most likely call at 43%. Instead the game produced a Chongqing Lifan win, an outcome the model had rated at just 21% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 37%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 67% and landed. Over 3.5 was 17% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 46% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chongqing Lifan 75%, Guangzhou R&F 50%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chongqing Lifan's trading profile (8 games, 3 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not.

Guangzhou R&F's trading profile (8 games, 3 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here; they fail to score in 25% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Guangzhou R&F arrived the stronger side — 1.38 PPG against 0.50. Form was overturned, with Chongqing Lifan winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Chongqing Lifan (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.67 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 2.33 average — tighter than their form line. Guangzhou R&F (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.00 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 4 against a 0.67 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 37% Over 2.5 probability, but 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 46% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 62% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.