Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Kortrijk and Cercle Brugge share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
The points were shared at Guldensporenstadion, Regular Season - 27, as Kortrijk and Cercle Brugge drew 1-1 in the Jupiler Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Kortrijk 1.07 xG and Cercle Brugge 1.31 xG, a combined 2.39. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Kortrijk attack 0.74 / defence 1.22 against Cercle Brugge attack 0.93 / defence 0.99, drawn from 56/56 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Kortrijk 28% | Draw 33% | Cercle Brugge 39%, with Cercle Brugge to win its most likely call at 39%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 33%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 43%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 72% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 52% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Kortrijk 56%, Cercle Brugge 47%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Kortrijk's trading profile (64 games, 32 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 45% of their matches — today it did.
Cercle Brugge's trading profile (64 games, 32 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 55% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
On form, Cercle Brugge arrived the stronger side — 1.36 PPG against 0.88. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.