🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Genk edge out Dender 1-2.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Genk beat Dender 1-2 at Dender Football Complex, Regular Season - 23, in the Jupiler Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Dender 1.19 xG and Genk 1.44 xG, a combined 2.63. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Dender attack 0.82 / defence 1.21 against Genk attack 0.98 / defence 1.16, drawn from 52/52 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Dender 31% | Draw 27% | Genk 42%, with Genk to win its most likely call at 42%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 49%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 74% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 56% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Dender 53%, Genk 58%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 60%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Dender's trading profile (62 games, 31 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did.

Genk's trading profile (62 games, 31 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Genk arrived the stronger side — 1.73 PPG against 1.00. That form edge translated into the three points.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights