Sign in Register

AS Eupen 2-0 RWDM – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Jupiler Pro League · Relegation Round - 6

Kick-off

Sat 11 May 2024

17:15

Venue

Kehrwegstadion

Competition

Jupiler Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates AS Eupen at 51%, yet other data sources diverge — this AS Eupen vs RWDM fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Jupiler Pro League encounter, Relegation Round - 6 sees RWDM travel to Kehrwegstadion to take on AS Eupen. The game is scheduled for Saturday 11 May 2024, 17:15 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, AS Eupen stand at 1W 1D 8L from 10 Jupiler Pro League matches — 0.40 PPG. Last five: D L L L L. They are averaging 0.40 goals per game and conceding 1.70 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes.

AS Eupen's form when playing at home: 2W 2D 6L across 10 games at Kehrwegstadion this term (0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.70 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game.

RWDM — All Games: 2W 2D 6L from 10 Jupiler Pro League fixtures this season — 0.80 PPG. Last five: D W W L L. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 2.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.

When travelling in Jupiler Pro League this season, RWDM have posted 1W 1D 8L from 10 away outings — 0.40 PPG. Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.70 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — AS Eupen at 0.40 PPG versus RWDM's 0.80. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

H2H

The H2H landscape is flat: 3 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for AS Eupen, 2 for RWDM and 0 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 3 meetings have averaged 3.0 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 13 Apr 2024, ended 1–3 with RWDM winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

AS Eupen in-play tendencies (67 games, 33 at home): they score before half-time in 76% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 95% of the time; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 37%; they fail to score in 36% of games.

RWDM in-play tendencies (67 games, 33 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 61% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 70% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 73% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 40%.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — AS Eupen 51% versus RWDM 63%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (AS Eupen 52% | RWDM 66%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects AS Eupen 1.71 xG and RWDM 1.13 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: AS Eupen attack 0.718 / defence 1.115 | RWDM attack 0.860 / defence 1.510. League average goals — home 1.572 / away 1.175. AS Eupen's attack strength of 0.718 is below the league average — the 1.71 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. RWDM bring a strong defensive rating of 1.510 — this is suppressing AS Eupen's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 64 AS Eupen games / 30 RWDM games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: AS Eupen 51% | Draw 24% | RWDM 25%. Fair-value odds: AS Eupen 1.96 | Draw 4.17 | RWDM 4.00. AS Eupen hold a narrow Poisson edge at 51% — the draw (24%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 55% | Total xG 2.83. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.83 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 55% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates AS Eupen as the most likely outcome at 51% — moderate model lean. With a 24% draw probability, Draw No Bet on AS Eupen offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

Poisson projects 2.83 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 54% probability — strong conviction, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 55%. Form rates corroborate: AS Eupen 50% | RWDM 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.83) both back Over 2.5 goals (54% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 67% and Poisson BTTS 55% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form AS Eupen Poisson xG (1.71) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (0.70) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Goals Form only shows ~1.9 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.83 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: AS Eupen vs RWDM | Competition: Jupiler Pro League, Relegation Round - 6 | Venue: Kehrwegstadion • Kick-off: Saturday 11 May 2024, 17:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: AS Eupen 51% | Draw 24% | RWDM 25% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% | BTTS 55% | xG AS Eupen 1.71 / RWDM 1.13 • Poisson strength factors: AS Eupen attack 0.718 / def 1.115 | RWDM attack 0.860 / def 1.510 | league avg home 1.572 / away 1.175 • Poisson stance: AS Eupen (51%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.71

AS Eupen xG

Expected Goals

1.13

RWDM xG

51%
24%
25%
AS Eupen Draw RWDM

55%

BTTS

77%

Over 1.5

54%

Over 2.5

32%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does AS Eupen vs RWDM kick off?

AS Eupen vs RWDM kicked off at 17:15 on Saturday 11 May 2024 at Kehrwegstadion.

What was the final score in AS Eupen vs RWDM?

AS Eupen 2 - 0 RWDM.

Where is AS Eupen vs RWDM being played?

The match is being played at Kehrwegstadion.

What competition is AS Eupen vs RWDM part of?

AS Eupen vs RWDM is a Relegation Round - 6 fixture in the Jupiler Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win AS Eupen vs RWDM?

Our statistical model gives AS Eupen a 51% chance of winning, RWDM a 25% chance, and a 24% chance of a draw — making AS Eupen the favourite.

Will both teams score in AS Eupen vs RWDM?

Our model estimates a 55% probability that both AS Eupen and RWDM will score (BTTS).

Will AS Eupen vs RWDM have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%.

What is the head-to-head record between AS Eupen and RWDM?

Record (3 meetings): AS Eupen 1W | Draws 0 | RWDM 2W.

What form are AS Eupen and RWDM in?

AS Eupen (all comps): 1W-1D-8L in 10 | 0.40 PPG | GF 0.40 / GA 1.70 | L5 D-L-L-L-L. RWDM (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 2.10 | L5 D-W-W-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

The model rates AS Eupen's attack at 0.72x the league average against RWDM's defence at 1.51x — combine the two and it projects 1.71 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, RWDM's attack versus AS Eupen's defence, projects 1.13 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 64/30 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.8% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (9.6%), 1-0 (8.6%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

AS Eupen Win

51%

AS Eupen

1.96

24%

Draw

4.18

25%

RWDM

3.98

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.3%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

10.1%

Home win

2 – 1

9.6%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.71

AS Eupen xG

Total xG

2.83

1.13

RWDM xG

51%
24%
25%
AS EupenDrawRWDM

1.96

51%

Home win

4.18

24%

Draw

3.98

25%

Away win

Goals Markets

77%

Over 1.5

1.30

23%

Under 1.5

4.35

54%

Over 2.5

1.85

46%

Under 2.5

2.17

31%

Over 3.5

3.23

69%

Under 3.5

1.45

16%

Over 4.5

6.25

84%

Under 4.5

1.19

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

55%

BTTS Yes

1.81

45%

BTTS No

2.24

Clean Sheet

32%

AS Eupen

3.08

18%

RWDM

5.50

Win to Nil

17%

AS Eupen

6.06

5%

RWDM

21.89

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.9 6.6 3.7 1.4 0.4 0.1
1 10.1 11.3 6.4 2.4 0.7 0.2
2 8.6 9.6 5.4 2.0 0.6 0.1
3 4.9 5.5 3.1 1.2 0.3 0.1
4 2.1 2.3 1.3 0.5 0.1
5 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.2

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.705
λ Away (xG) 1.126
Total xG 2.831
League avg home goals 1.572
League avg away goals 1.175
AS Eupen attack strength 0.718
AS Eupen defence strength 1.115
RWDM attack strength 0.860
RWDM defence strength 1.510
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 64 / 30

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for AS Eupen vs RWDM?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.8%.

How many goals are AS Eupen and RWDM expected to score?

The model projects 1.71 expected goals for AS Eupen and 1.13 for RWDM, a combined total of 2.83.

How confident is the prediction model for AS Eupen vs RWDM?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 51%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 67 outings, AS Eupen have picked up 0.75 PPG on a 13W 11D 43L record — D-L-L-L-L across the most recent five.

RWDM's form line: 28W 15D 24L from 67 games, 1.48 PPG, last five D-W-W-L-L.

Put side by side, RWDM are the form team by 0.73 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against AS Eupen.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, AS Eupen have posted 0.85 PPG from 33 outings (7W 7D 19L).

On the road, RWDM have gone 12W 6D 15L from 33 away games — 1.27 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RWDM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

AS Eupen are averaging 0.96 goals scored and 2.04 conceded per game recently; RWDM are on 1.55 scored and 1.54 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: RWDM in 63%.

Last 67 Results — Jupiler Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

AS Eupen

AS Eupen

Current Season
D L L L L
RWDM

RWDM

Current Season
D W W L L
67 Played 67
13/11/43 W / D / L 28/15/24
0.75 Points Per Game 1.48
0.96 Avg Goals Scored 1.55
2.04 Avg Goals Conceded 1.54
3.00 Avg Goals / Game 3.09
10 Clean Sheets 15
34 BTTS 42
35 Over 2.5 Games 44
AS Eupen

AS Eupen

L
A Kortrijk
0–1 HT 0–1
05 May
L
H Charleroi
1–2 HT 0–2
26 Apr
L
A Charleroi
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
L
A RWDM
1–3 HT 1–1
13 Apr
D
H Kortrijk
1–1 HT 0–0
07 Apr
L
A Standard Liege
0–4 HT 0–2
16 Mar
W
H St. Truiden
1–0 HT 1–0
10 Mar
L
A Anderlecht
0–1 HT 0–1
03 Mar
L
H Cercle Brugge
0–2 HT 0–0
25 Feb
L
H Gent
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Feb
L
A Club Brugge KV
0–4 HT 0–2
10 Feb
L
H KV Mechelen
0–1 HT 0–0
04 Feb
L
A Charleroi
0–1 HT 0–0
31 Jan
W
H Antwerp
1–0 HT 1–0
28 Jan
W
A RWDM
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Jan
L
A OH Leuven
0–3 HT 0–2
26 Dec
L
H Union St. Gilloise
1–2 HT 0–2
23 Dec
L
A KVC Westerlo
0–2 HT 0–0
15 Dec
L
H Genk
1–3 HT 0–1
10 Dec
D
H Kortrijk
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Dec
L
A Cercle Brugge
0–2 HT 0–0
25 Nov
L
H RWDM
1–3 HT 1–1
11 Nov
D
A St. Truiden
1–1 HT 0–1
03 Nov
W
H Charleroi
2–0 HT 1–0
28 Oct
L
A Union St. Gilloise
1–4 HT 0–2
20 Oct
L
A Antwerp
1–4 HT 1–2
08 Oct
L
H Anderlecht
1–3 HT 1–1
30 Sep
L
A Gent
1–2 HT 1–0
24 Sep
L
H Standard Liege
1–3 HT 0–2
17 Sep
L
A KV Mechelen
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Sep
W
H OH Leuven
3–1 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
A Kortrijk
3–1 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
H Club Brugge KV
0–5 HT 0–3
13 Aug
W
A Genk
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Aug
D
H KVC Westerlo
2–2 HT 1–0
29 Jul
L
A Club Brugge KV
0–7 HT 0–4
23 Apr
L
H Zulte Waregem
1–5 HT 0–4
15 Apr
D
A Kortrijk
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Apr
L
H Anderlecht
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Apr
L
A Gent
0–3 HT 0–1
19 Mar
D
H Oostende
4–4 HT 1–1
11 Mar
L
A Union St. Gilloise
1–2 HT 0–1
05 Mar
D
H Cercle Brugge
2–2 HT 2–2
25 Feb
L
A Antwerp
0–2 HT 0–2
18 Feb
W
H KV Mechelen
2–1 HT 0–1
10 Feb
D
H KVC Westerlo
1–1 HT 0–1
04 Feb
D
H Genk
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Feb
L
A Standard Liege
1–3 HT 1–2
27 Jan
D
A OH Leuven
1–1 HT 0–1
17 Jan
L
H St. Truiden
0–2 HT 0–1
14 Jan
L
H Charleroi
1–2 HT 1–0
07 Jan
W
A Seraing United
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Dec
D
A Zulte Waregem
5–5 HT 3–2
12 Nov
W
H Standard Liege
2–0 HT 0–0
05 Nov
L
A Anderlecht
2–4 HT 1–2
30 Oct
L
A KV Mechelen
1–2 HT 1–1
22 Oct
W
H OH Leuven
4–2 HT 2–2
18 Oct
L
A Cercle Brugge
1–5 HT 1–3
15 Oct
L
H Gent
0–4 HT 0–2
09 Oct
W
A St. Truiden
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Oct
L
H Union St. Gilloise
1–2 HT 1–1
18 Sep
L
A Oostende
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Sep
L
H Kortrijk
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Sep
W
A KVC Westerlo
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Aug
L
H Seraing United
1–3 HT 0–3
19 Aug
L
H Antwerp
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Aug
L
A Genk
2–4 HT 1–3
06 Aug
RWDM

RWDM

L
H Charleroi
1–3 HT 0–3
04 May
L
H Kortrijk
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Apr
W
A Kortrijk
4–2 HT 3–1
21 Apr
W
H AS Eupen
3–1 HT 1–1
13 Apr
D
A Charleroi
0–0 HT 0–0
06 Apr
L
A Cercle Brugge
0–4 HT 0–2
17 Mar
L
H Anderlecht
0–3 HT 0–3
09 Mar
L
A Kortrijk
2–3 HT 1–1
03 Mar
D
H OH Leuven
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Feb
L
A Genk
1–3 HT 1–2
17 Feb
L
H Antwerp
0–4 HT 0–3
11 Feb
D
H Standard Liege
2–2 HT 1–1
03 Feb
L
A Union St. Gilloise
2–3 HT 0–2
31 Jan
L
A KV Mechelen
1–3 HT 0–0
28 Jan
L
H AS Eupen
0–1 HT 0–0
24 Jan
L
A KVC Westerlo
0–3 HT 0–1
26 Dec
L
H Club Brugge KV
1–6 HT 0–3
22 Dec
W
H St. Truiden
3–0 HT 1–0
16 Dec
L
A Gent
0–4 HT 0–2
09 Dec
D
H Charleroi
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Dec
L
A Anderlecht
1–2 HT 1–0
26 Nov
W
A AS Eupen
3–1 HT 1–1
11 Nov
D
H Kortrijk
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Nov
L
A St. Truiden
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Oct
D
H KVC Westerlo
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Oct
L
A Charleroi
1–2 HT 0–0
06 Oct
D
H Gent
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Oct
L
H Union St. Gilloise
2–3 HT 2–2
28 Sep
D
A Antwerp
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H Cercle Brugge
2–1 HT 1–1
16 Sep
D
A Standard Liege
1–1 HT 1–1
02 Sep
L
A Club Brugge KV
1–7 HT 1–2
20 Aug
W
H KV Mechelen
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Aug
W
A OH Leuven
2–1 HT 1–1
05 Aug
L
H Genk
0–4 HT 0–3
29 Jul
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
1–0 HT 1–0
13 May
W
A Club Brugge II
3–1 HT 2–0
06 May
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 2–0
22 Apr
D
H SK Beveren
1–1 HT 0–0
16 Apr
W
H Beerschot VA
4–0 HT 3–0
09 Apr
D
A Beerschot VA
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Apr
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
4–0 HT 1–0
18 Mar
W
H Club Brugge II
3–2 HT 0–1
12 Mar
L
A SK Beveren
1–2 HT 1–0
04 Mar
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–1 HT 0–0
26 Feb
W
A Beerschot VA
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Standard Liège II
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Feb
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
2–1 HT 2–0
29 Jan
W
H Deinze
2–1 HT 1–0
21 Jan
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
W
H Excelsior Virton
3–1 HT 2–1
11 Dec
L
H Club Brugge II
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Dec
L
A KRC Genk II
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Nov
D
A SK Beveren
1–1 HT 0–1
19 Nov
W
H Lommel United
5–0 HT 2–0
13 Nov
W
A Dender
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Oct
W
H SK Beveren
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Oct
W
A Standard Liège II
4–1 HT 1–0
14 Oct
W
H Beerschot VA
2–0 HT 1–0
08 Oct
L
A Lommel United
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Oct
D
H KRC Genk II
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Sep
W
A Deinze
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Sep
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Sep
L
A Club Brugge II
1–2 HT 0–1
28 Aug
W
H Dender
1–0 HT 1–0
20 Aug
D
A Excelsior Virton
1–1 HT 0–0
12 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are AS Eupen and RWDM in coming into this match?

AS Eupen have gone 13W 11D 43L in their last 67 games (0.75 PPG), while RWDM have gone 28W 15D 24L in their last 67 (1.48 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — AS Eupen at home or RWDM away?

RWDM's away record (1.27 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — AS Eupen at home: 0.85 PPG; RWDM away: 1.27 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between AS Eupen and RWDM runs to 8 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to November 2023. The pairing has crossed competitions too — Jupiler Pro League, Challenger Pro League all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 1 March 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Digging Into the Numbers

The last 2 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.

AS Eupen's record when hosting RWDM specifically: 1W 1D 2L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

AS Eupen

2

AS Eupen

2

Draws

RWDM

4

RWDM

Recent Meetings

RWDM
2–2
01 Mar 26
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
2–2
04 Oct 25
RWDM
AS Eupen
0–1
18 Jan 25
RWDM
RWDM
2–1
30 Aug 24
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
2–0
11 May 24
RWDM
RWDM
3–1
13 Apr 24
AS Eupen
RWDM
0–1
24 Jan 24
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
1–3
11 Nov 23
RWDM

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between AS Eupen and RWDM?

From 8 meetings on record, AS Eupen have won 2, RWDM have won 4, and 2 have been drawn.

When did AS Eupen and RWDM last play each other?

They last met on 1 March 2026, when RWDM 2-2 AS Eupen.

Who has won more matches between AS Eupen and RWDM?

RWDM have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

AS Eupen are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 76% of their matches.

RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches.

The Numbers That Matter

Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — AS Eupen at 61%, RWDM at 70%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 54% for AS Eupen and 73% for RWDM. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 39% and 36% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: AS Eupen have failed to score in 27% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = AS Eupen home games / RWDM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

AS Eupen AS Eupen Current Season
Metric All
(67 games)
Venue
(33 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 48/67
(71.6%)
25/33
(75.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 28/67
(41.8%)
14/33
(42.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 18/19
(94.7%)
8/8
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/19
(36.8%)
4/8
(50%)
Winning at HT 9/67
(13.4%)
6/33
(18.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/67
(6%)
2/33
(6.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/67
(6%)
2/33
(6.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 34/67
(50.7%)
20/33
(60.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 35/67
(52.2%)
18/33
(54.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 25/67
(37.3%)
13/33
(39.4%)
Clean Sheet 10/67
(14.9%)
4/33
(12.1%)
Failed to Score 24/67
(35.8%)
9/33
(27.3%)
RWDM RWDM Current Season
Metric All
(67 games)
Venue
(33 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 49/67
(73.1%)
22/33
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 29/67
(43.3%)
13/33
(39.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 15/18
(83.3%)
9/11
(81.8%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 11/18
(61.1%)
7/11
(63.6%)
Winning at HT 19/67
(28.4%)
8/33
(24.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/67
(3%)
2/33
(6.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/67
(6%)
2/33
(6.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 42/67
(62.7%)
23/33
(69.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 44/67
(65.7%)
24/33
(72.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 27/67
(40.3%)
12/33
(36.4%)
Clean Sheet 15/67
(22.4%)
6/33
(18.2%)
Failed to Score 13/67
(19.4%)
6/33
(18.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when AS Eupen play RWDM?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 61% of AS Eupen's games and 70% of RWDM's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is AS Eupen vs RWDM usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 54% of AS Eupen's matches and 73% of RWDM's.

Do AS Eupen and RWDM tend to score early?

AS Eupen have had a goal before half-time in 76% of their recent matches, RWDM in 67% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

AS Eupen cruise to a comfortable 2-0 victory over RWDM.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

AS Eupen beat RWDM 2-0 at Kehrwegstadion, Relegation Round - 6, in the Jupiler Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting AS Eupen 1.71 xG and RWDM 1.13 xG, a combined 2.83. The scoreboard read 2-0 for 2 actual goals. RWDM landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AS Eupen attack 0.72 / defence 1.11 against RWDM attack 0.86 / defence 1.51, drawn from 64/30 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it AS Eupen 51% | Draw 24% | RWDM 25%, with AS Eupen to win its most likely call at 51%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 77% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 55% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 59% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AS Eupen 52%, RWDM 66%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

AS Eupen's trading profile (67 games, 33 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 51% of their matches — today it did not.

RWDM's trading profile (67 games, 33 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.48 PPG against 0.75. Form was overturned, with AS Eupen winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. AS Eupen (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.12 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.91 average — tighter than their form line. RWDM (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.45 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 54% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 55% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 59% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.