Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Stalemate at Seraing United's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
The points were shared at Stade du Pairay, Regular Season - 28, as Seraing United and Zulte Waregem drew 0-0 in the Challenger Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Seraing United 1.04 xG and Zulte Waregem 2.02 xG, a combined 3.07. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Seraing United fell 1.0 short of their projected output. Zulte Waregem landed 2.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Seraing United attack 0.86 / defence 1.33 against Zulte Waregem attack 1.20 / defence 0.89, drawn from 56/56 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Seraing United 19% | Draw 21% | Zulte Waregem 60%, with Zulte Waregem to win its most likely call at 60%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 21% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 59%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 81% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 58% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Seraing United 57%, Zulte Waregem 59%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Seraing United's trading profile (56 games, 27 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 25% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Zulte Waregem's trading profile (56 games, 27 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did not.
Form vs Result
On form, Zulte Waregem arrived the stronger side — 1.88 PPG against 0.88. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Seraing United (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.11 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 2.07 average — tighter than their form line. Zulte Waregem (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.96 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.04 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.