🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as RWDM edge out KRC Genk II 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

RWDM beat KRC Genk II 1-0 at Edmond Machtensstadion, Regular Season - 19, in the Challenger Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 1.90 xG and KRC Genk II 1.23 xG, a combined 3.13. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. RWDM fell 0.9 short of their projected output. KRC Genk II landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 1.01 / defence 0.95 against KRC Genk II attack 0.93 / defence 1.34, drawn from 18/47 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it RWDM 53% | Draw 22% | KRC Genk II 25%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 53%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 61%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 82% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 60% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 69% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 66%, KRC Genk II 72%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 66%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

RWDM's trading profile (47 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not.

KRC Genk II's trading profile (47 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 70% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — RWDM 1.19 PPG, KRC Genk II 1.04 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the RWDM win broke the near-deadlock. RWDM (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.48 average — tighter than their form line. KRC Genk II (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.48 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 2.00 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights