RWDM 1-2 Kortrijk – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates RWDM at 43%, yet in-form Kortrijk provide a compelling counter-argument — this RWDM vs Kortrijk fixture contains genuine analytical tension.
✍️ Match Preview
Full Analysis
Edmond Machtens Stadium plays host to RWDM versus Kortrijk in Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 7. Kick-off: Wednesday 24 September 2025 at 19:00 UTC.
Form & Momentum
RWDM have collected 1.10 PPG across 10 Challenger Pro League outings this season: 3W 2D 5L. Last five: D W L W L. Offensively they are averaging 1.60 goals per game, with 1.60 conceded. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. RWDM have played only a handful of Challenger Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.
RWDM at Edmond Machtens Stadium this season: 7W 1D 2L from 10 home games — 2.20 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.80 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Edmond Machtens Stadium. At home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 2.20 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.10 — RWDM are significantly better at Edmond Machtens Stadium than their overall form suggests.
Kortrijk's overall Challenger Pro League record this term: 7W 2D 1L from 10 games (2.30 PPG). Last five: W W W W D. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.00 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Kortrijk have played only a handful of Challenger Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.
When travelling in Challenger Pro League this season, Kortrijk have posted 6W 1D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.90 PPG. They are averaging 2.00 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.
The travelling side arrive in better shape. Kortrijk are 1.20 PPG clear of RWDM in recent Challenger Pro League fixtures (2.30 vs 1.10). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.
H2H History
The head-to-head record is closely matched — RWDM lead 1W to 2W over the last 4 encounters, with 1 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.
Attacking output has been a hallmark of this fixture. At 3.5 goals per game across 4 meetings, the Over 2.5 has a statistically grounded case from the head-to-head record alone. The most recent clash, on 28 Apr 2024, ended 0–1 with Kortrijk winning.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.5 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.
Trading
RWDM half-time and goal-timing data (36 games, 18 at home): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 39% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 42% of the time.
Kortrijk half-time and goal-timing data (36 games, 18 at away): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 62% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 72% of games (away games).
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — RWDM 44% versus Kortrijk 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RWDM 47% | Kortrijk 64%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 1.81 xG and Kortrijk 1.57 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 1.487 / defence 1.008 | Kortrijk attack 1.218 / defence 1.051. League average goals — home 1.156 / away 1.277. RWDM carry an above-average attack strength of 1.487 — their λ of 1.81 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Kortrijk have an above-average attack strength of 1.218 — the away xG of 1.57 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. Data: 34 RWDM games / 6 Kortrijk games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: RWDM 43% | Draw 25% | Kortrijk 33%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 2.33 | Draw 4.00 | Kortrijk 3.03. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 66% | BTTS probability 67% | Total xG 3.37. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 66% — a total xG of 3.37 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 67% reflects that both xG figures (1.81 / 1.57) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is RWDM at 43% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Kortrijk (2.30 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on RWDM if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
The Poisson model projects 3.37 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 66% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.5 goals per meeting.
Poisson assigns a 67% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: RWDM 20% | Kortrijk 60% from recent games — a notable divergence.
The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: RWDM vs Kortrijk | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 7 | Venue: Edmond Machtens Stadium • Kick-off: Wednesday 24 Sep 2025, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 43% | Draw 25% | Kortrijk 33% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 66% | BTTS 67% | xG RWDM 1.81 / Kortrijk 1.57 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 1.487 / def 1.008 | Kortrijk attack 1.218 / def 1.051 | league avg home 1.156 / away 1.277 • Poisson stance: RWDM (43%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.81
RWDM xG
Expected Goals
1.57
Kortrijk xG
67%
BTTS
86%
Over 1.5
66%
Over 2.5
44%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does RWDM vs Kortrijk kick off?
RWDM vs Kortrijk kicked off at 19:00 on Wednesday 24 September 2025 at Edmond Machtens Stadium.
What was the final score in RWDM vs Kortrijk?
RWDM 1 - 2 Kortrijk.
Where is RWDM vs Kortrijk being played?
The match is being played at Edmond Machtens Stadium.
What competition is RWDM vs Kortrijk part of?
RWDM vs Kortrijk is a Regular Season - 7 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).
Who is favourite to win RWDM vs Kortrijk?
Our statistical model gives RWDM a 43% chance of winning, Kortrijk a 33% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.
Will both teams score in RWDM vs Kortrijk?
Our model estimates a 67% probability that both RWDM and Kortrijk will score (BTTS).
Will RWDM vs Kortrijk have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 66%.
What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Kortrijk?
Record (4 meetings): RWDM 1W | Draws 1 | Kortrijk 2W.
What form are RWDM and Kortrijk in?
RWDM (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.60 / GA 1.60 | L5 D-W-L-W-L. Kortrijk (all comps): 7W-2D-1L in 10 | 2.30 PPG | GF 2.00 / GA 0.90 | L5 W-W-W-W-D.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Working from RWDM's attack rating (1.49) and Kortrijk's defence rating (1.05), the model arrives at 1.81 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Kortrijk's attack (1.22x) against RWDM's defence (1.01x) — and the away total comes out at 1.57.
These ratings are built from 34/6 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 11.0%. Close behind: 2-1 (8.8%), 1-2 (7.6%). Together the top three scorelines make up 27% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
RWDM Win
43%
2.35
25%
4.01
33%
3.07
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 1
9.7%
Draw
Most likely
2 – 1
8.8%
Home win
1 – 2
7.6%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.81
RWDM xG
Total xG
3.37
1.57
Kortrijk xG
2.35
43%
Home win
4.01
25%
Draw
3.07
33%
Away win
Goals Markets
85%
Over 1.5
1.18
15%
Under 1.5
6.67
66%
Over 2.5
1.52
34%
Under 2.5
2.94
44%
Over 3.5
2.27
56%
Under 3.5
1.79
25%
Over 4.5
4.00
75%
Under 4.5
1.33
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
67%
BTTS Yes
1.49
33%
BTTS No
3.06
Clean Sheet
21%
4.79
16%
6.09
Win to Nil
9%
11.27
5%
18.70
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3.4 | 5.4 | 4.2 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| 1 | 6.2 | 9.7 | 7.6 | 4.0 | 1.6 | 0.5 |
| 2 | 5.6 | 8.8 | 6.9 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| 3 | 3.4 | 5.3 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 4 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for RWDM vs Kortrijk?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.0%.
How many goals are RWDM and Kortrijk expected to score?
The model projects 1.81 expected goals for RWDM and 1.57 for Kortrijk, a combined total of 3.37.
How confident is the prediction model for RWDM vs Kortrijk?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 43%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
RWDM's recent record stands at 21W 7D 8L from 36 games, a 1.94 PPG return, with D-W-L-W-L in the last five. It's still early in the season for RWDM, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.
Kortrijk, meanwhile, have gone 13W 7D 16L across 36 games — 1.28 PPG, with W-W-W-W-D in their last five. It's still early in the season for Kortrijk, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.
The points-per-game comparison favours RWDM by 0.66 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Kortrijk heading into this one.
Home & Away Splits
At home specifically, RWDM have managed 13W 2D 3L from 18 games — 2.28 PPG in front of their own supporters.
Kortrijk's away record stands at 6W 3D 9L across 18 trips, a 1.17 PPG haul.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RWDM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
RWDM are averaging 1.64 goals scored and 0.97 conceded per game recently; Kortrijk are on 1.33 scored and 1.61 conceded.
Defensively: RWDM have kept a clean sheet in 42% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 36 Results — Challenger Pro League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
RWDM
Early Season
Kortrijk
Early Season
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are RWDM and Kortrijk in coming into this match?
RWDM have gone 21W 7D 8L in their last 36 games (1.94 PPG), while Kortrijk have gone 13W 7D 16L in their last 36 (1.28 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — RWDM at home or Kortrijk away?
RWDM's home record (2.28 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — RWDM at home: 2.28 PPG; Kortrijk away: 1.17 PPG.
Have RWDM or Kortrijk been keeping clean sheets recently?
RWDM have kept a clean sheet in 42% of their recent games, Kortrijk in 19%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
On record, these two have faced off 6 times since November 2023 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. The pairing has crossed competitions too — Jupiler Pro League, Challenger Pro League all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 17 April 2026, roughly 4 months ago.
Records & Recent Trends
Kortrijk go into this on the back of 3 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, RWDM have gone 0W 1D 2L from 3 meetings on their own ground against Kortrijk — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 6 Meetings
1
RWDM
1
Draws
4
Kortrijk
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and Kortrijk?
From 6 meetings on record, RWDM have won 1, Kortrijk have won 4, and 1 have been drawn.
When did RWDM and Kortrijk last play each other?
They last met on 17 April 2026, when Kortrijk 3-1 RWDM.
Who has won more matches between RWDM and Kortrijk?
Kortrijk have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 6 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 78% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 56% of the time.
Kortrijk are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 78% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 28% of the time.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — RWDM 39%, Kortrijk 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 50% for RWDM and 72% for Kortrijk. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 22% and 39% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: RWDM keep a clean sheet in 44% of their matches; Kortrijk in 33%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = RWDM home games / Kortrijk away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when RWDM play Kortrijk?
Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 39% of RWDM's recent matches and 50% of Kortrijk's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.
Is RWDM vs Kortrijk usually a high-scoring fixture?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of RWDM's matches and 72% of Kortrijk's.
Do RWDM and Kortrijk tend to score early?
RWDM have had a goal before half-time in 78% of their recent matches, Kortrijk in 78% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Shock result as Kortrijk defy the odds to beat RWDM 1-2.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Kortrijk beat RWDM 1-2 at Edmond Machtens Stadium, Regular Season - 7, in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 1.81 xG and Kortrijk 1.57 xG, a combined 3.37. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. RWDM fell 0.8 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 1.49 / defence 1.01 against Kortrijk attack 1.22 / defence 1.05, drawn from 34/6 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it RWDM 43% | Draw 25% | Kortrijk 33%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 43%. The actual Kortrijk win had been the model's second-ranked read at 33%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 66%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 86% and landed. Over 3.5 was 44% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 67% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 56% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 47%, Kortrijk 64%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
RWDM's trading profile (36 games, 18 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 42% of the time, and conceded here.
Kortrijk's trading profile (36 games, 18 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.94 PPG against 1.28. Form was overturned, with Kortrijk winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. RWDM (home/away splits) shipped 2 against a 0.89 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Kortrijk (home/away splits) conceded 1 against a 1.83 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.