🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Shock result as Patro Eisden defy the odds to beat KAA Gent II 2-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Patro Eisden beat KAA Gent II 2-1 at Patrostadion, Regular Season - 15, in the Challenger Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Patro Eisden 1.14 xG and KAA Gent II 1.19 xG, a combined 2.33. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Patro Eisden beat their projection by 0.9 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Patro Eisden attack 0.93 / defence 0.82 against KAA Gent II attack 1.07 / defence 0.96, drawn from 42/13 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Patro Eisden 33% | Draw 32% | KAA Gent II 35%, with KAA Gent II to win its most likely call at 35%. The actual Patro Eisden win had been the model's second-ranked read at 33%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 41%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 70% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 49% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 42% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Patro Eisden 46%, KAA Gent II 38%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 38%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Patro Eisden's trading profile (13 games, 6 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.

KAA Gent II's trading profile (13 games, 6 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 31% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Patro Eisden 1.62 PPG, KAA Gent II 1.38 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Patro Eisden win broke the near-deadlock. Patro Eisden (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.17 average — above their attacking norm. KAA Gent II (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 2.00 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 2 against a 1.00 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights