🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Patro Eisden edge out AS Eupen 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Patro Eisden beat AS Eupen 1-0 at Patrostadion, Regular Season - 30, in the Challenger Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Patro Eisden 1.91 xG and AS Eupen 0.92 xG, a combined 2.82. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Patro Eisden fell 0.9 short of their projected output. AS Eupen landed 0.9 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Patro Eisden attack 1.18 / defence 0.99 against AS Eupen attack 0.75 / defence 1.17, drawn from 58/27 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Patro Eisden 61% | Draw 22% | AS Eupen 18%, with Patro Eisden to win its most likely call at 61%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 77% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 56% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Patro Eisden 55%, AS Eupen 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Patro Eisden's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and duly kept one.

AS Eupen's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 37% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Patro Eisden arrived the stronger side — 1.67 PPG against 0.90. Form held, and they took the win. Patro Eisden (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.97 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.30 average — tighter than their form line. AS Eupen (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.87 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.83 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights