🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at KRC Genk II's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Cegeka Arena, Regular Season - 3, as KRC Genk II and Seraing United drew 0-0 in the Challenger Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting KRC Genk II 1.47 xG and Seraing United 1.20 xG, a combined 2.67. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. KRC Genk II fell 1.5 short of their projected output. Seraing United landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of KRC Genk II attack 0.99 / defence 1.11 against Seraing United attack 0.83 / defence 1.15, drawn from 30/31 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it KRC Genk II 43% | Draw 26% | Seraing United 31%, with KRC Genk II to win its most likely call at 43%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 26%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 50%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 75% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 63% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (KRC Genk II 70%, Seraing United 57%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

KRC Genk II's trading profile (30 games, 14 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 37% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Seraing United's trading profile (30 games, 14 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — KRC Genk II 0.47 PPG, Seraing United 0.73 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. KRC Genk II (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.21 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 2.07 average — tighter than their form line. Seraing United (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.07 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.79 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights