🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at KAA Gent II's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

KAA Gent II and KRC Genk II finished level at 0-0 at Planet Group Arena, Regular Season - 14, in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting KAA Gent II 1.30 xG and KRC Genk II 1.28 xG, a combined 2.57. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. KAA Gent II fell 1.3 short of their projected output. KRC Genk II landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of KAA Gent II attack 0.83 / defence 1.07 against KRC Genk II attack 0.85 / defence 1.24, drawn from 12/40 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it KAA Gent II 35% | Draw 31% | KRC Genk II 34%, with KAA Gent II to win its most likely call at 35%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 47%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 75% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 54% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 54% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (KAA Gent II 42%, KRC Genk II 67%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

KAA Gent II's trading profile (12 games, 6 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 33% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 42% of games, a blank that repeated today.

KRC Genk II's trading profile (12 games, 6 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, KAA Gent II arrived the stronger side — 1.42 PPG against 0.92. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. KAA Gent II (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.83 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.33 average — tighter than their form line. KRC Genk II (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.00 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.83 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights