Sign in Register
🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Challenger Pro League · Regular Season - 20

Kick-off

Sat 1 Feb 2025

19:00

Venue

AsterX Group-f Arena

Competition

Challenger Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
📰

Stalemate at K. Lierse S.K.'s ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

K. Lierse S.K. and RWDM finished level at 0-0 at AsterX Group-f Arena, Regular Season - 20, in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting K. Lierse S.K. 1.55 xG and RWDM 1.55 xG, a combined 3.09. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. K. Lierse S.K. fell 1.5 short of their projected output. RWDM landed 1.5 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of K. Lierse S.K. attack 1.08 / defence 1.05 against RWDM attack 1.07 / defence 1.03, drawn from 49/19 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it K. Lierse S.K. 38% | Draw 24% | RWDM 38%, with K. Lierse S.K. to win its most likely call at 38%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 60%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 81% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 65% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (K. Lierse S.K. 67%, RWDM 63%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 61%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

K. Lierse S.K.'s trading profile (49 games, 24 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did not.

RWDM's trading profile (49 games, 24 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 26% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — K. Lierse S.K. 1.24 PPG, RWDM 1.22 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. K. Lierse S.K. (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.71 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.58 average — tighter than their form line. RWDM (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.42 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.83 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 60% Over 2.5 probability, but 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 62% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 65% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.