AS Eupen 0-1 RWDM – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates RWDM at 60% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this AS Eupen vs RWDM encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Analysis & Preview
RWDM travel to Kehrwegstadion to take on AS Eupen in Challenger Pro League (matchday 18). The game is scheduled for Saturday 18 January 2025 at 15:00 UK time.
Form Analysis
Looking at their last 10 matches, AS Eupen stand at 3W 2D 5L — 1.10 PPG. Last five: L W L L L. Offensively they are averaging 1.70 goals per game, with 1.80 conceded. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings (10%). Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.
AS Eupen's form when playing at home: 2W 2D 6L across their last 10 home games (0.80 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.
RWDM — last 10 games: 5W 2D 3L — 1.70 PPG. Last five: D W W D W. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 1.50. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.
When travelling, RWDM have posted 5W 2D 3L from their last 10 away outings — 1.70 PPG. They are averaging 2.10 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.
Despite the home advantage, the form figures favour RWDM — 0.60 PPG ahead of the hosts (1.70 vs 1.10). That gap is large enough to take seriously. Draw No Bet on the visitors neutralises home-ground risk while maintaining the form-backed selection.
The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Both teams have scored in 60% of AS Eupen's games and 60% of RWDM's (from AS Eupen's last 10 home games and RWDM's last 10 away games) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.
H2H
The H2H picture is flat: the 5 H2H matches we hold have produced 2 wins for AS Eupen, 3 for RWDM and 0 draws. Form and model data should carry more weight here.
These two sides have produced goals at a healthy rate, averaging 2.8 per game across the 5 H2H matches we hold. That scoring profile supports the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent of those, on 30 Aug 2024, ended AS Eupen 1–2 RWDM — a RWDM win.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H signal is in the goals market — at 2.8 goals per game, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle from the head-to-head data.
In-Play Profile
AS Eupen in-play tendencies (last 51 games, 25 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 72% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 64% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 41%; they fail to score in 35% of games.
RWDM in-play tendencies (last 51 games, 25 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 68% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 71% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 57% of those occasions; of the 8 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 38%; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 76% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 35%.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — AS Eupen 49% versus RWDM 63%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (AS Eupen 57% | RWDM 65%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects AS Eupen 1.31 xG and RWDM 2.32 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: AS Eupen attack 0.824 / defence 1.432 | RWDM attack 1.167 / defence 1.105. League average goals — home 1.439 / away 1.387. AS Eupen's defence rating of 1.432 (above 1 = concedes more than average) is pushing RWDM's projected output up. Data: built from AS Eupen's last 15 games and RWDM's last 17.
Result probabilities: AS Eupen 21% | Draw 19% | RWDM 60%. Fair-value odds: AS Eupen 4.84 | Draw 5.17 | RWDM 1.67. The model has a clear lean to RWDM (60%) — a 39pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 70% | BTTS Yes probability 66% | Total xG 3.63. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 70% — a total xG of 3.63 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 66% — both xG figures (1.31 / 2.32) are high enough that each side is projected to find the net.
Our Verdict
Poisson rates RWDM as the most likely outcome at 60% — clear model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 19% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.
Poisson projects 3.63 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 70% probability — strong conviction, supported by recent form (AS Eupen's last 10 home games and RWDM's last 10 away games) averaging 3.4 goals per game and the H2H data averaging 2.8 goals per game across 5 H2H matches.
The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 66%. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: AS Eupen 60% (last 10 home games) | RWDM 60% (last 10 away games).
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: AS Eupen vs RWDM | Competition: Challenger Pro League, matchday 18 | Venue: Kehrwegstadion • Kick-off: Saturday 18 January 2025 at 15:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: AS Eupen 21% | Draw 19% | RWDM 60% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 70% (Under 30%) | BTTS Yes 66% (No 34%) | xG AS Eupen 1.31 / RWDM 2.32 • Poisson strength factors: AS Eupen attack 0.824 / def 1.432 | RWDM attack 1.167 / def 1.105 | league avg home 1.439 / away 1.387 • Poisson stance: RWDM (60%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
1.31
AS Eupen xG
Expected Goals
2.32
RWDM xG
66%
BTTS
88%
Over 1.5
70%
Over 2.5
49%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ AS Eupen vs RWDM FAQs
What time does AS Eupen vs RWDM kick off?
AS Eupen vs RWDM kicked off at 15:00 UK time on Saturday 18 January 2025 at Kehrwegstadion.
What was the final score in AS Eupen vs RWDM?
AS Eupen 0 - 1 RWDM.
Where is AS Eupen vs RWDM being played?
The match is being played at Kehrwegstadion.
What competition is AS Eupen vs RWDM part of?
AS Eupen vs RWDM is a Challenger Pro League fixture (matchday 18) (Belgium).
Who is favourite to win AS Eupen vs RWDM?
Our statistical model gives AS Eupen a 21% chance of winning, RWDM a 60% chance, and a 19% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.
Will both teams score in AS Eupen vs RWDM?
Our model estimates a 66% probability that both AS Eupen and RWDM will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.
Will AS Eupen vs RWDM have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 70%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.
🧮 Model Insight
Model Mechanics
The model rates AS Eupen's attack at 0.82x the league average against RWDM's defence at 1.10x — combine the two and it projects 1.31 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, RWDM's attack versus AS Eupen's defence, projects 2.32 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from AS Eupen's last 15 games and RWDM's last 17 — a full enough recent sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 1-2 carries the highest individual probability at 9.4% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-1 (9.1%), 1-3 (7.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 26% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
RWDM Win
21%
4.84
19%
5.17
60%
1.67
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 2
9.4%
Away win
Most likely
1 – 1
8.1%
Draw
1 – 3
7.2%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.31
AS Eupen xG
Total xG
3.63
2.32
RWDM xG
4.84
21%
Home win
5.17
19%
Draw
1.67
60%
Away win
Goals Markets
88%
Over 1.5
1.14
12%
Under 1.5
8.33
70%
Over 2.5
1.43
30%
Under 2.5
3.33
49%
Over 3.5
2.04
51%
Under 3.5
1.96
30%
Over 4.5
3.33
70%
Under 4.5
1.43
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
66%
BTTS Yes
1.52
34%
BTTS No
2.93
Clean Sheet
10%
10.15
27%
3.71
Win to Nil
2%
49.06
16%
6.18
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.7 | 6.2 | 7.1 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 1.5 |
| 1 | 3.5 | 8.1 | 9.4 | 7.2 | 4.2 | 1.9 |
| 2 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 6.1 | 4.7 | 2.7 | 1.3 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ AS Eupen vs RWDM Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for AS Eupen vs RWDM?
Our Poisson model rates 1-2 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.4%.
How many goals are AS Eupen and RWDM expected to score?
The model projects 1.31 expected goals for AS Eupen and 2.32 for RWDM, a combined total of 3.63.
How confident is the prediction model for AS Eupen vs RWDM?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 60%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
Where Both Sides Stand
Across their last 51 outings, AS Eupen have picked up 0.84 PPG on a 12W 7D 32L record — L-W-L-L-L across the most recent five.
RWDM's form line: 16W 13D 22L from 51 games, 1.20 PPG, last five D-W-W-D-W.
Form-wise this is close to level: AS Eupen on 0.84 PPG, RWDM on 1.20. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.
Home Ground vs the Road
On home soil, AS Eupen have posted 0.88 PPG from their last 25 home games (6W 4D 15L).
On the road, RWDM have gone 6W 5D 14L from their last 25 away games — 0.92 PPG when travelling.
The Goals Picture
AS Eupen are averaging 1.04 goals scored and 1.84 conceded per game recently; RWDM are on 1.35 scored and 1.76 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: RWDM in 63%.
Last 51 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
AS Eupen
Blended
RWDM
Blended
AS Eupen (Home) vs RWDM (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
AS Eupen
Blended
RWDM
Blended
❓ AS Eupen vs RWDM Form FAQs
What form are AS Eupen and RWDM in coming into this match?
AS Eupen have gone 12W 7D 32L in their last 51 games (0.84 PPG), while RWDM have gone 16W 13D 22L in their last 51 (1.20 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — AS Eupen at home or RWDM away?
RWDM's away record (0.92 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — AS Eupen at home: 0.88 PPG; RWDM away: 0.92 PPG.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
A Look Back
The head-to-head numbers here are drawn from the 8 H2H matches in our data, going back to November 2023. They cover more than one competition — Jupiler Pro League, Challenger Pro League. The most recent was on 1 March 2026, roughly 8 months ago.
Digging Into the Numbers
The most recent 2 H2H matches in our data have all been drawn — an unusually settled run for this fixture.
AS Eupen's record when hosting RWDM specifically: 1W 1D 2L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.
Last 8 Meetings
2
AS Eupen
2
Draws
4
RWDM
Recent Meetings
❓ AS Eupen vs RWDM H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between AS Eupen and RWDM?
Across the 8 head-to-head matches in our data, AS Eupen have won 2, RWDM have won 4, and 2 have been drawn.
When did AS Eupen and RWDM last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 1 March 2026: RWDM 2-2 AS Eupen.
Who has won more matches between AS Eupen and RWDM?
RWDM have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from the 8 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
Half-Time Trends
AS Eupen are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 72% of their matches.
RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 68% of their matches.
The Numbers That Matter
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — AS Eupen 56%, RWDM 64% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 56% for AS Eupen and 76% for RWDM. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 48% and 44% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: AS Eupen have failed to score in 28% of games; RWDM in 28%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = AS Eupen home games / RWDM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ AS Eupen vs RWDM Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in AS Eupen and RWDM matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 56% of AS Eupen's games and 64% of RWDM's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are AS Eupen and RWDM matches usually high-scoring?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 56% of AS Eupen's matches and 76% of RWDM's.
Do AS Eupen and RWDM matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 72% of AS Eupen's recent matches and 68% of RWDM's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Prediction vindicated as RWDM edge out AS Eupen 0-1.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
RWDM beat AS Eupen 0-1 at Kehrwegstadion, Regular Season - 18, in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting AS Eupen 1.31 xG and RWDM 2.32 xG, a combined 3.63. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. AS Eupen fell 1.3 short of their projected output. RWDM landed 1.3 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AS Eupen attack 0.82 / defence 1.43 against RWDM attack 1.17 / defence 1.10, drawn from 15/17 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it AS Eupen 21% | Draw 19% | RWDM 60%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 60%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 70%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 88% and missed. Over 3.5 was 49% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 66% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 61% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AS Eupen 57%, RWDM 65%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 56%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
AS Eupen's trading profile (51 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 49% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 35% of games, a blank that repeated today.
RWDM's trading profile (51 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 63% of their matches — today it did not.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — AS Eupen 0.84 PPG, RWDM 1.20 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the RWDM win broke the near-deadlock. AS Eupen (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.12 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 1.88 average — tighter than their form line. RWDM (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 2.08 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.