🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at AS Eupen's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Kehrwegstadion, Regular Season - 6, as AS Eupen and Patro Eisden drew 0-0 in the Challenger Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting AS Eupen 1.27 xG and Patro Eisden 1.02 xG, a combined 2.29. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. AS Eupen fell 1.3 short of their projected output. Patro Eisden landed 1.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AS Eupen attack 1.11 / defence 0.80 against Patro Eisden attack 0.97 / defence 0.93, drawn from 33/34 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it AS Eupen 42% | Draw 29% | Patro Eisden 29%, with AS Eupen to win its most likely call at 42%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 29%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 40%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 67% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 46% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 58% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AS Eupen 64%, Patro Eisden 52%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

AS Eupen's trading profile (33 games, 16 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 30% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Patro Eisden's trading profile (33 games, 16 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Patro Eisden arrived the stronger side — 1.70 PPG against 1.21. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. AS Eupen (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.50 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.62 average — tighter than their form line. Patro Eisden (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.50 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.00 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (miss). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights