🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson model rates WSG Wattens at 38%, yet in-form TSV Hartberg provide a compelling counter-argument — this WSG Wattens vs TSV Hartberg fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Tivoli Stadion Tirol plays host to WSG Wattens versus TSV Hartberg in Bundesliga, Regular Season - 1. Kick-off: Saturday 2 August 2025 at 16:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

WSG Wattens have collected 1.10 PPG across 10 Bundesliga outings this season: 3W 2D 5L. Last five: L L W L D. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.90 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. WSG Wattens haven't played a Bundesliga game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

At home at Tivoli Stadion Tirol, WSG Wattens have gone 2W 4D 4L this season (10 games, 1.00 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game.

TSV Hartberg's overall Bundesliga record this term: 5W 3D 2L from 10 games (1.80 PPG). Last five: W D W W L. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 0.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Defensively, 0.80 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. TSV Hartberg haven't played a Bundesliga game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

On the road, TSV Hartberg have gone 4W 4D 2L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.60 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 0.80 conceded per game. 6 away clean sheets from 10 games (60%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

On a straight form reading, TSV Hartberg are the stronger side — 0.70 PPG clear of the hosts (1.80 vs 1.10). Backing them with draw insurance is the conservative play if the outright away price appears short.

H2H Analysis

Across the last 8 meetings, TSV Hartberg have the stronger historical record — 5 wins to WSG Wattens's 1, with 2 draws in the mix.

The 8 previous meetings have averaged 2.6 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 17 May 2025, ended 2–3 with TSV Hartberg winning.

It is worth noting that TSV Hartberg have a superior record in this fixture despite their visitor status — 5 wins from 8 meetings. Home advantage alone is not a sufficient reason to dismiss that track record.

Trading Data

WSG Wattens goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (32 games, 16 at home): they score before half-time in 56% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 58% of the time; BTTS occurs in 44% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (home games); they fail to score in 41% of games.

TSV Hartberg goal-timing and half-time pattern breakdown (32 games, 16 at away): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 73% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 54% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 44% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — WSG Wattens 50% versus TSV Hartberg 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (WSG Wattens 53% | TSV Hartberg 44%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects WSG Wattens 1.40 xG and TSV Hartberg 1.23 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: WSG Wattens attack 0.923 / defence 1.017 | TSV Hartberg attack 0.946 / defence 1.017. League average goals — home 1.495 / away 1.275. Data: 22 WSG Wattens games / 22 TSV Hartberg games used (PrevSeason). Note: current-season sample is too small — prior-season data is carrying the calculation. Model confidence is reduced; treat probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: WSG Wattens 38% | Draw 32% | TSV Hartberg 30%. Fair-value odds: WSG Wattens 2.63 | Draw 3.12 | TSV Hartberg 3.33. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 32% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 49% | BTTS probability 56% | Total xG 2.63. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 49%/51% — the total xG of 2.63 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 56% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates WSG Wattens as the most likely outcome at 38% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form TSV Hartberg (1.80 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 32% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on WSG Wattens if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 30% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.63 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 49% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence.

Poisson assigns a 56% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: WSG Wattens 50% | TSV Hartberg 30% from recent games — a notable divergence.

The Poisson model is drawing on PrevSeason data (22 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights