Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Shock result as Rapid Vienna defy the odds to beat Wolfsberger AC 1-2.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Rapid Vienna beat Wolfsberger AC 1-2 at Lavanttal-Arena, Regular Season - 4, in the Bundesliga. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Wolfsberger AC 1.47 xG and Rapid Vienna 1.26 xG, a combined 2.73. The scoreboard read 1-2 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wolfsberger AC attack 1.06 / defence 0.97 against Rapid Vienna attack 1.06 / defence 0.94, drawn from 25/25 games (Blended).
On the result, the model split it Wolfsberger AC 41% | Draw 27% | Rapid Vienna 32%, with Wolfsberger AC to win its most likely call at 41%. The actual Rapid Vienna win had been the model's second-ranked read at 32%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 51%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 76% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 56% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wolfsberger AC 57%, Rapid Vienna 54%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 56%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Wolfsberger AC's trading profile (35 games, 17 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.
Rapid Vienna's trading profile (35 games, 17 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 31% of the time, and conceded here.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — Wolfsberger AC 1.74 PPG, Rapid Vienna 1.43 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Rapid Vienna win broke the near-deadlock. Wolfsberger AC (home/away splits) shipped 2 against a 1.18 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Rapid Vienna (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.06 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 1 against a 1.88 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.