🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates TSV Hartberg at 50% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Grazer AK vs TSV Hartberg encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Grazer AK and TSV Hartberg meet at Merkur-Arena in Bundesliga, Regular Season - 10. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 18 October 2025 at 16:00 UTC.

Current Form

Grazer AK's overall Bundesliga record this term: 0W 6D 4L from 10 games (0.60 PPG). Last five: L L D D L. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Grazer AK, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Grazer AK's form when playing at home: 2W 5D 3L across 10 games at Merkur-Arena this term (1.10 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.80 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 1.10 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.60 — Grazer AK are significantly better at Merkur-Arena than their overall form suggests.

TSV Hartberg have collected 1.10 PPG across 10 Bundesliga outings this season: 3W 2D 5L. Last five: L W D L D. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 1.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for TSV Hartberg, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, TSV Hartberg have gone 5W 2D 3L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.70 PPG). Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. 5 away clean sheets from 10 games (50%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel. Their away PPG of 1.70 exceeds their overall 1.10 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

The travelling side arrive in better shape. TSV Hartberg are 0.50 PPG clear of Grazer AK in recent Bundesliga fixtures (1.10 vs 0.60). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Grazer AK lead 0W to 2W over the last 4 encounters, with 2 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

The 4 previous meetings have averaged 2.5 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 25 Apr 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading & In-Play

Grazer AK — key trading statistics (41 games, 21 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 54% of the time; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (home games); they fail to score in 34% of games.

TSV Hartberg — key trading statistics (41 games, 21 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 77% of the time; BTTS occurs in 43% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 48% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Grazer AK 61% versus TSV Hartberg 54%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Grazer AK 54% | TSV Hartberg 46%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Grazer AK 1.30 xG and TSV Hartberg 1.84 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Grazer AK attack 0.898 / defence 1.220 | TSV Hartberg attack 1.196 / defence 1.082. League average goals — home 1.338 / away 1.260. Data: 31 Grazer AK games / 31 TSV Hartberg games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Grazer AK 27% | Draw 23% | TSV Hartberg 50%. Fair-value odds: Grazer AK 3.70 | Draw 4.35 | TSV Hartberg 2.00. TSV Hartberg hold a narrow Poisson edge at 50% — the draw (23%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS probability 61% | Total xG 3.14. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.14 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 61% reflects that both xG figures (1.30 / 1.84) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Picks & Verdict

Form averages suggest only ~1.8 goals/game but Poisson projects Over 2.5 at 61% — underlying attack/defence strengths imply more goals than surface form shows.

On the Poisson output, TSV Hartberg are the pick at 50% — moderate model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 23% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on TSV Hartberg if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 3.14 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 61% — Poisson-only — limited corroboration confidence.

Poisson assigns a 61% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. This conflicts with form data: Grazer AK 50% | TSV Hartberg 30% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights