Ham-Kam 1-0 Bodo/Glimt – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt at 68% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Pre-Match Analysis
Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt meet at Briskeby Arena in Eliteserien (matchday 9). This fixture gets under way on Monday 20 May 2024 at 17:00 UK time.
Form
Ham-Kam (all games): 3W 2D 5L across their last 10 — 1.10 PPG. Last five: L W W L D. They are averaging 1.00 goals per game and conceding 1.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings (30%).
Ham-Kam's home record over their last 10 home games: 4W 2D 4L (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game.
Bodo/Glimt have collected 2.50 PPG across their last 10 games: 8W 1D 1L. Last five: W W W L W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.60 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.
On the road, Bodo/Glimt have gone 5W 2D 3L in their last 10 away fixtures (1.70 PPG). They are averaging 2.60 goals per away game — strong road scoring that makes them a threat even without home support. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.70 is notably below their overall 2.50 — form away from home has been a clear weakness recently.
The travelling side arrive in better shape. Bodo/Glimt are 1.40 PPG clear of Ham-Kam over their recent games (2.50 vs 1.10). Backing the visitors outright or on Draw No Bet are both valid approaches where the price allows.
H2H Analysis
The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 4 H2H matches in our data, Bodo/Glimt edge it 2 wins to 0, with 2 draws. Neither side has a commanding advantage.
These two sides have produced goals at a healthy rate, averaging 4.2 per game across the 4 H2H matches we hold. That scoring profile supports the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent of those, on 3 Sep 2023, ended Ham-Kam 4–4 Bodo/Glimt — a draw.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H signal is in the goals market — at 4.2 goals per game, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle from the head-to-head data.
Trading
Ham-Kam half-time and goal-timing data (last 60 games, 30 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 67% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 76% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 59% of those occasions; of the 15 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 33%; of the 20 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 25%; BTTS occurs in 47% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games).
Bodo/Glimt half-time and goal-timing data (last 60 games, 30 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 87% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; they lead at the break 52% of the time; of the 14 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 50%; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 73% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 62%.
From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — Ham-Kam 57% and Bodo/Glimt 65% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Ham-Kam 57% | Bodo/Glimt 72%). There is an in-play dynamic worth noting: Ham-Kam surrender their half-time lead 33% of the time, while Bodo/Glimt have come from behind at the break to draw or win in 50% of cases — a combination that makes laying the hosts at HT a potential angle.
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Ham-Kam 1.01 xG and Bodo/Glimt 2.42 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Ham-Kam attack 0.859 / defence 0.988 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.611 / defence 0.895. League average goals — home 1.321 / away 1.521. Bodo/Glimt have an above-average attack rating of 1.611, which lifts their away xG to 2.42. Data: built from Ham-Kam's last 39 games and Bodo/Glimt's last 38.
Result probabilities: Ham-Kam 14% | Draw 18% | Bodo/Glimt 68%. Fair-value odds: Ham-Kam 7.10 | Draw 5.70 | Bodo/Glimt 1.46. The model has a clear lean to Bodo/Glimt (68%) — a 50pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 67% | BTTS Yes probability 58% | Total xG 3.44. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 67% — a total xG of 3.44 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 58% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is Bodo/Glimt at 68% — clear model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 18% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.
Poisson projects 3.44 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 67% probability — strong conviction, supported by recent form (Ham-Kam's last 10 home games and Bodo/Glimt's last 10 away games) averaging 3.8 goals per game and the H2H data averaging 4.2 goals per game across 4 H2H matches.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 58% on Yes. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: Ham-Kam 40% (last 10 home games) | Bodo/Glimt 70% (last 10 away games).
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt | Competition: Eliteserien, matchday 9 | Venue: Briskeby Arena • Kick-off: Monday 20 May 2024 at 17:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Ham-Kam 14% | Draw 18% | Bodo/Glimt 68% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 67% (Under 33%) | BTTS Yes 58% (No 42%) | xG Ham-Kam 1.01 / Bodo/Glimt 2.42 • Poisson strength factors: Ham-Kam attack 0.859 / def 0.988 | Bodo/Glimt attack 1.611 / def 0.895 | league avg home 1.321 / away 1.521 • Poisson stance: Bodo/Glimt (68%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
1.01
Ham-Kam xG
Expected Goals
2.42
Bodo/Glimt xG
58%
BTTS
86%
Over 1.5
67%
Over 2.5
45%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt FAQs
What time does Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt kick off?
Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt kicked off at 17:00 UK time on Monday 20 May 2024 at Briskeby Arena.
What was the final score in Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?
Ham-Kam 1 - 0 Bodo/Glimt.
Where is Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt being played?
The match is being played at Briskeby Arena.
What competition is Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt part of?
Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt is a Eliteserien fixture (matchday 9) (Norway).
Who is favourite to win Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our statistical model gives Ham-Kam a 14% chance of winning, Bodo/Glimt a 68% chance, and a 18% chance of a draw — making Bodo/Glimt the favourite.
Will both teams score in Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our model estimates a 58% probability that both Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.
Will Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 67%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Ham-Kam's attacking strength (0.86x league average) is weighed against Bodo/Glimt's defensive record (0.90x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.01. Flip it around — Bodo/Glimt's attack (1.61x) against Ham-Kam's defence (0.99x) — and the away total comes out at 2.42.
These ratings are built from Ham-Kam's last 39 games and Bodo/Glimt's last 38 — a full enough recent sample to trust.
Most Likely Scorelines
The model's single most probable exact score is 1-2, at 9.6%. Close behind: 0-2 (9.4%), 1-1 (8.9%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
Bodo/Glimt Win
14%
7.10
18%
5.70
68%
1.46
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 β 2
9.6%
Away win
Most likely
0 β 2
9.4%
Away win
1 β 1
7.9%
Draw
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.01
Ham-Kam xG
Total xG
3.44
2.42
Bodo/Glimt xG
7.10
14%
Home win
5.70
18%
Draw
1.46
68%
Away win
Goals Markets
86%
Over 1.5
1.16
14%
Under 1.5
7.14
67%
Over 2.5
1.49
33%
Under 2.5
3.03
45%
Over 3.5
2.22
55%
Under 3.5
1.82
26%
Over 4.5
3.85
74%
Under 4.5
1.35
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
58%
BTTS Yes
1.72
42%
BTTS No
2.39
Clean Sheet
9%
11.27
36%
2.76
Win to Nil
1%
79.97
25%
4.04
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3.2 | 7.8 | 9.4 | 7.6 | 4.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 | 3.3 | 7.9 | 9.6 | 7.7 | 4.7 | 2.3 |
| 2 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 4.9 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 4 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 5 | – | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?
Our Poisson model rates 1-2 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.6%.
How many goals are Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt expected to score?
The model projects 1.01 expected goals for Ham-Kam and 2.42 for Bodo/Glimt, a combined total of 3.44.
How confident is the prediction model for Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 68%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Ham-Kam's recent record stands at 16W 17D 27L from 60 games, a 1.08 PPG return, with L-W-W-L-D in the last five.
Bodo/Glimt, meanwhile, have gone 40W 10D 10L across 60 games — 2.17 PPG, with W-W-W-L-W in their last five.
The points-per-game comparison favours Bodo/Glimt by 1.09 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Ham-Kam heading into this one.
Home & Away Splits
At home specifically, Ham-Kam have managed 10W 9D 11L from their last 30 home games — 1.30 PPG in front of their own supporters.
Bodo/Glimt's away record stands at 20W 2D 8L across their last 30 away games, a 2.07 PPG haul.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Bodo/Glimt come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Ham-Kam are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game recently; Bodo/Glimt are on 2.73 scored and 1.32 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: Bodo/Glimt in 65%.
Last 60 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Ham-Kam
Current Season
Bodo/Glimt
Current Season
Ham-Kam (Home) vs Bodo/Glimt (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
Ham-Kam
Current Season
Bodo/Glimt
Current Season
❓ Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt Form FAQs
What form are Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt in coming into this match?
Ham-Kam have gone 16W 17D 27L in their last 60 games (1.08 PPG), while Bodo/Glimt have gone 40W 10D 10L in their last 60 (2.17 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Ham-Kam at home or Bodo/Glimt away?
Bodo/Glimt's away record (2.07 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Ham-Kam at home: 1.30 PPG; Bodo/Glimt away: 2.07 PPG.
Have Ham-Kam or Bodo/Glimt been keeping clean sheets recently?
Ham-Kam have kept a clean sheet in 22% of their recent games, Bodo/Glimt in 30%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
We have 10 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to July 2022 — enough to show some patterns. All of them came in Eliteserien. The most recent was as recently as 17 October 2026, so it is a fresh reference point.
Records & Recent Trends
Bodo/Glimt have won each of the latest 5 H2H matches we hold, a run that gives them the edge coming in.
For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Bodo/Glimt won Bodo/Glimt 3-0 Ham-Kam on 11 Jun 2023, the biggest margin in the H2H matches we hold.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Ham-Kam have gone 1W 1D 3L from the 5 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against Bodo/Glimt — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 10 Meetings
1
Ham-Kam
2
Draws
7
Bodo/Glimt
Recent Meetings
❓ Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt?
Across the 10 head-to-head matches in our data, Ham-Kam have won 1, Bodo/Glimt have won 7, and 2 have been drawn.
When did Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 17 October 2026: Ham-Kam 0-2 Bodo/Glimt.
Who has won more matches between Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt?
Bodo/Glimt have the better head-to-head record, with 7 wins from the 10 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Ham-Kam are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 27% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 25% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 33% of those situations.
Bodo/Glimt are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 87% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 50% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 17% of those situations.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Ham-Kam 47%, Bodo/Glimt 67% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 50% for Ham-Kam and 73% for Bodo/Glimt. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 17% and 60% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: Ham-Kam have failed to score in 33% of games.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Ham-Kam home games / Bodo/Glimt away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Ham-Kam vs Bodo/Glimt Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 47% of Ham-Kam's games and 67% of Bodo/Glimt's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt matches usually high-scoring?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 50% of Ham-Kam's matches and 73% of Bodo/Glimt's.
Do Ham-Kam and Bodo/Glimt matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 67% of Ham-Kam's recent matches and 87% of Bodo/Glimt's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Shock result as Ham-Kam defy the odds to beat Bodo/Glimt 1-0.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Ham-Kam beat Bodo/Glimt 1-0 at Briskeby Arena, Regular Season - 9, in the Eliteserien. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Ham-Kam 1.01 xG and Bodo/Glimt 2.42 xG, a combined 3.44. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Bodo/Glimt landed 2.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Ham-Kam attack 0.86 / defence 0.99 against Bodo/Glimt attack 1.61 / defence 0.90, drawn from 39/38 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Ham-Kam 14% | Draw 18% | Bodo/Glimt 68%, with Bodo/Glimt to win its most likely call at 68%. Instead the game produced a Ham-Kam win, an outcome the model had rated at just 14% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 67%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 86% and missed. Over 3.5 was 45% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 64% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Ham-Kam 57%, Bodo/Glimt 72%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 61%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Ham-Kam's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not.
Bodo/Glimt's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 65% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and conceded here.
Form vs Result
On form, Bodo/Glimt arrived the stronger side — 2.17 PPG against 1.08. Form was overturned, with Ham-Kam winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. Ham-Kam (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.30 average — tighter than their form line. Bodo/Glimt (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 2.60 scoring average — below par going forward.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.