Bodo/Glimt 3-0 Ham-Kam – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates Bodo/Glimt at 55% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Pre-Match Analysis
Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam meet at Aspmyra Stadion in Eliteserien (matchday 2). This fixture gets under way on Saturday 5 April 2025 at 16:00 UK time.
Form
Bodo/Glimt (all games): 5W 3D 2L across their last 10 — 1.80 PPG. Last five: L D D W W. They are averaging 2.30 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches.
At home, Bodo/Glimt have gone 7W 2D 1L in their last 10 home games (2.30 PPG). They are averaging 3.50 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.
Ham-Kam have collected 0.90 PPG across their last 10 games: 2W 3D 5L. Last five: W D L L L. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.50 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in just 30% of their games, reflecting a regular tendency to keep or record clean sheets.
Ham-Kam away from home: 4W 2D 4L from their last 10 away games — 1.40 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.60 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game.
The form ledger tips toward Bodo/Glimt. A 0.90 PPG lead over Ham-Kam (1.80 vs 0.90) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.
H2H Analysis
The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 6 H2H matches in our data, Bodo/Glimt edge it 3 wins to 1, with 2 draws. Neither side has a commanding advantage.
These two sides have produced goals at a healthy rate, averaging 3.5 per game across the 6 H2H matches we hold. That scoring profile supports the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent of those, on 13 Sep 2024, ended Bodo/Glimt 3–0 Ham-Kam — a Bodo/Glimt win.
With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H signal is in the goals market — at 3.5 goals per game, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle from the head-to-head data.
Trading & In-Play
Bodo/Glimt — key trading statistics (last 60 games, 30 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 83% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 92% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 58% of those occasions; of the 14 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 57%; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 70% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 53%.
Ham-Kam — key trading statistics (last 60 games, 30 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 77% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; of the 14 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 43%; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (away games); they fail to score in 38% of games.
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Bodo/Glimt 58% versus Ham-Kam 42%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Bodo/Glimt 65% | Ham-Kam 48%). Note also that Ham-Kam surrender HT leads in 43% of cases while Bodo/Glimt recover from half-time deficits to draw or win 57% of the time — a dynamic that could influence in-play positioning.
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Bodo/Glimt 1.96 xG and Ham-Kam 1.20 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Bodo/Glimt attack 1.257 / defence 1.026 | Ham-Kam attack 1.003 / defence 1.012. League average goals — home 1.539 / away 1.165. Bodo/Glimt carry an above-average attack rating of 1.257 — their 1.96 xG reflects attacking quality above the league norm. Data: built from Bodo/Glimt's last 31 games and Ham-Kam's last 31. Some of those games are older results, so treat these probabilities as directional rather than precise.
Result probabilities: Bodo/Glimt 55% | Draw 22% | Ham-Kam 23%. Fair-value odds: Bodo/Glimt 1.82 | Draw 4.57 | Ham-Kam 4.33. The model has a clear lean to Bodo/Glimt (55%) — a 32pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 61% | BTTS Yes probability 60% | Total xG 3.16. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 61% — the 3.16 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 60% — both xG figures (1.96 / 1.20) are high enough that each side is projected to find the net.
Picks & Verdict
On the Poisson output, Bodo/Glimt are the pick at 55% — clear model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 22% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.
On the goals line, Poisson's 3.16 combined xG gives a 61% probability to Over 2.5 — strong conviction, supported by recent form (Bodo/Glimt's last 10 home games and Ham-Kam's last 10 away games) averaging 4.0 goals per game and the H2H data averaging 3.5 goals per game across 6 H2H matches.
The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 60%. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: Bodo/Glimt 70% (last 10 home games) | Ham-Kam 50% (last 10 away games).
The Poisson model's sample (Bodo/Glimt 31 games, Ham-Kam 31) includes some older results, so its projections carry extra uncertainty — weight recent form and the odds accordingly.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam | Competition: Eliteserien, matchday 2 | Venue: Aspmyra Stadion • Kick-off: Saturday 5 April 2025 at 16:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Bodo/Glimt 55% | Draw 22% | Ham-Kam 23% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 61% (Under 39%) | BTTS Yes 60% (No 40%) | xG Bodo/Glimt 1.96 / Ham-Kam 1.20 • Poisson strength factors: Bodo/Glimt attack 1.257 / def 1.026 | Ham-Kam attack 1.003 / def 1.012 | league avg home 1.539 / away 1.165 • Poisson stance: Bodo/Glimt (55%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
1.96
Bodo/Glimt xG
Expected Goals
1.20
Ham-Kam xG
60%
BTTS
82%
Over 1.5
61%
Over 2.5
39%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam FAQs
What time does Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam kick off?
Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam kicked off at 16:00 UK time on Saturday 5 April 2025 at Aspmyra Stadion.
What was the final score in Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?
Bodo/Glimt 3 - 0 Ham-Kam.
Where is Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam being played?
The match is being played at Aspmyra Stadion.
What competition is Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam part of?
Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam is a Eliteserien fixture (matchday 2) (Norway).
Who is favourite to win Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?
Our statistical model gives Bodo/Glimt a 55% chance of winning, Ham-Kam a 23% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making Bodo/Glimt the favourite.
Will both teams score in Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?
Our model estimates a 60% probability that both Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.
Will Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 61%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.
🧮 Model Insight
Behind the Numbers
Bodo/Glimt's attacking strength (1.26x league average) is weighed against Ham-Kam's defensive record (1.01x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.96. Flip it around — Ham-Kam's attack (1.00x) against Bodo/Glimt's defence (1.03x) — and the away total comes out at 1.20.
These ratings are built from Bodo/Glimt's last 31 games and Ham-Kam's last 31, a sample that still includes some older results.
Most Likely Scorelines
The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 11.3%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.8%), 2-0 (8.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
Bodo/Glimt Win
55%
1.82
22%
4.57
23%
4.33
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 β 1
10.0%
Draw
Most likely
2 β 1
9.8%
Home win
1 β 0
8.3%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.96
Bodo/Glimt xG
Total xG
3.16
1.20
Ham-Kam xG
1.82
55%
Home win
4.57
22%
Draw
4.33
23%
Away win
Goals Markets
82%
Over 1.5
1.22
18%
Under 1.5
5.56
61%
Over 2.5
1.64
39%
Under 2.5
2.56
39%
Over 3.5
2.56
61%
Under 3.5
1.64
21%
Over 4.5
4.76
79%
Under 4.5
1.27
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
60%
BTTS Yes
1.67
40%
BTTS No
2.50
Clean Sheet
30%
3.31
14%
7.09
Win to Nil
17%
6.02
3%
30.70
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.3 | 5.1 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 8.3 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 2 | 8.2 | 9.8 | 5.9 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 5.3 | 6.4 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 5 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.3%.
How many goals are Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam expected to score?
The model projects 1.96 expected goals for Bodo/Glimt and 1.20 for Ham-Kam, a combined total of 3.16.
How confident is the prediction model for Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 55%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
The Form Picture
Bodo/Glimt come into this having played 60 games, going 40W 12D 8L for 2.20 points per game. Their last five reads L-D-D-W-W.
On the other side, Ham-Kam sit at 1.12 PPG from 60 outings (18W 13D 29L), a run that reads W-D-L-L-L across their last five.
Bodo/Glimt carry the stronger recent form of the two, 1.08 PPG clear of Ham-Kam — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.
Home & Away Splits
Bodo/Glimt's home form reads 22W 6D 2L across their last 30 home games, a 2.40 PPG return.
Away from home, Ham-Kam have taken 1.00 points per game from their last 30 away games (8W 6D 16L).
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Bodo/Glimt come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Scoring & Defensive Trends
Bodo/Glimt are averaging 2.48 goals scored and 1.15 conceded per game recently; Ham-Kam are on 1.22 scored and 1.63 conceded.
Defensively: Bodo/Glimt have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.
Last 60 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Bodo/Glimt
Current Season
Ham-Kam
Current Season
Bodo/Glimt (Home) vs Ham-Kam (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
Bodo/Glimt
Current Season
Ham-Kam
Current Season
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam Form FAQs
What form are Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam in coming into this match?
Bodo/Glimt have gone 40W 12D 8L in their last 60 games (2.20 PPG), while Ham-Kam have gone 18W 13D 29L in their last 60 (1.12 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Bodo/Glimt at home or Ham-Kam away?
Bodo/Glimt's home record (2.40 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Bodo/Glimt at home: 2.40 PPG; Ham-Kam away: 1.00 PPG.
Have Bodo/Glimt or Ham-Kam been keeping clean sheets recently?
Bodo/Glimt have kept a clean sheet in 37% of their recent games, Ham-Kam in 23%.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
History of the Fixture
We have 10 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to July 2022 — enough to show some patterns. All of them came in Eliteserien. The most recent was as recently as 17 October 2026, so it is a fresh reference point.
Records & Recent Trends
Bodo/Glimt have won each of the latest 5 H2H matches we hold, a run that gives them the edge coming in.
For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Bodo/Glimt won Bodo/Glimt 3-0 Ham-Kam on 11 Jun 2023, the biggest margin in the H2H matches we hold.
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Bodo/Glimt have gone 4W 1D 0L from the 5 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against Ham-Kam — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 10 Meetings
7
Bodo/Glimt
2
Draws
1
Ham-Kam
Recent Meetings
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam?
Across the 10 head-to-head matches in our data, Bodo/Glimt have won 7, Ham-Kam have won 1, and 2 have been drawn.
When did Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 17 October 2026: Ham-Kam 0-2 Bodo/Glimt.
Who has won more matches between Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam?
Bodo/Glimt have the better head-to-head record, with 7 wins from the 10 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
How These Sides Start
Bodo/Glimt are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 83% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 50% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 80% of those situations.
Ham-Kam are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 15% of those situations.
Goals & Clean Sheets
BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Bodo/Glimt 57%, Ham-Kam 53% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 70% for Bodo/Glimt and 57% for Ham-Kam. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 60% and 27% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: Bodo/Glimt keep a clean sheet in 40% of their matches; Ham-Kam in 33%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Bodo/Glimt home games / Ham-Kam away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ Bodo/Glimt vs Ham-Kam Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 57% of Bodo/Glimt's games and 53% of Ham-Kam's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam matches usually high-scoring?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 70% of Bodo/Glimt's matches and 57% of Ham-Kam's.
Do Bodo/Glimt and Ham-Kam matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 83% of Bodo/Glimt's recent matches and 77% of Ham-Kam's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Dominant Bodo/Glimt run riot with a 3-0 hammering of Ham-Kam.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
Bodo/Glimt beat Ham-Kam 3-0 at Aspmyra Stadion, Regular Season - 2, in the Eliteserien. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Bodo/Glimt 1.96 xG and Ham-Kam 1.20 xG, a combined 3.16. The scoreboard read 3-0 for 3 actual goals. Bodo/Glimt beat their projection by 1.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Ham-Kam landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Bodo/Glimt attack 1.26 / defence 1.03 against Ham-Kam attack 1.00 / defence 1.01, drawn from 31/31 games (Blended).
On the result, the model split it Bodo/Glimt 55% | Draw 22% | Ham-Kam 23%, with Bodo/Glimt to win its most likely call at 55%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 61%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 82% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 60% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 57% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Bodo/Glimt 65%, Ham-Kam 48%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 50%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Bodo/Glimt's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and duly kept one.
Ham-Kam's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 42% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 38% of games, a blank that repeated today.
Form vs Result
On form, Bodo/Glimt arrived the stronger side — 2.20 PPG against 1.12. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Bodo/Glimt (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.03 average — tighter than their form line. Ham-Kam (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.23 scoring average — below par going forward and shipped 3 against a 1.97 concession average — a leakier day than usual.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.