NAC Breda 1-3 PEC Zwolle – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson model rates NAC Breda at 43% — neither recent form nor the head-to-head data gives a clear steer either way as NAC Breda face PEC Zwolle.
✍️ Match Preview
Analysis
PEC Zwolle make the trip to Rat Verlegh Stadion to face NAC Breda in Eredivisie (matchday 31). The match kicks off on Sunday 4 May 2025 at 12:15 UK time.
Form & Momentum
NAC Breda have collected 0.70 PPG across their last 10 games: 0W 7D 3L. Last five: D D L D D. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings (10%). Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.
NAC Breda at home: 2W 5D 3L from their last 10 home games — 1.10 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.
PEC Zwolle (all games): 1W 5D 4L across their last 10 — 0.80 points per game. Last five: D W D D L. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings (10%). Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market.
PEC Zwolle away from home: 1W 5D 4L from their last 10 away games — 0.80 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.
A near-identical PPG reading — 0.70 for NAC Breda, 0.80 for PEC Zwolle — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.
In terms of goals, both squads have been finding the net consistently (from NAC Breda's last 10 home games and PEC Zwolle's last 10 away games) — NAC Breda have seen both teams score in 70% of their games, PEC Zwolle in 60%. That combined rate is a strong statistical case for BTTS Yes as a standalone play.
Head-to-Head
Neither side has dominated the 3 H2H matches in our data: 1 wins for NAC Breda, 2 for PEC Zwolle and 0 draws — leaving the H2H largely neutral. With only 3 H2H matches to go on, treat this as a light input.
The 3 H2H matches in our data averaged 2.3 goals per game — a neutral rate that gives no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent of those, on 20 Oct 2024, ended NAC Breda 2–1 PEC Zwolle — a NAC Breda win.
The head-to-head data offers no strong steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the model and current market pricing should carry more weight for this fixture.
Trading
NAC Breda half-time and goal-timing data (last 64 games, 32 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 66% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 90% of the time; of the 22 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 41%; of the 19 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 32%; BTTS occurs in 69% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 38%.
PEC Zwolle half-time and goal-timing data (last 64 games, 32 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 72% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 95% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 65% of those occasions; of the 15 games they led at half-time, they failed to win 47%; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 39%.
From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — NAC Breda 64% and PEC Zwolle 61% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (NAC Breda 55% | PEC Zwolle 55%). Note also that PEC Zwolle surrender HT leads in 47% of cases while NAC Breda recover from half-time deficits to draw or win 32% of the time — a dynamic that could influence in-play positioning.
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects NAC Breda 1.50 xG and PEC Zwolle 1.20 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: NAC Breda attack 0.738 / defence 1.020 | PEC Zwolle attack 0.914 / defence 1.239. League average goals — home 1.646 / away 1.288. NAC Breda's attack rating of 0.738 is below the league average, which holds their xG down at 1.50. PEC Zwolle's defence rating of 1.239 (above 1 = concedes more than average) is pushing NAC Breda's projected output up. Data: built from NAC Breda's last 30 games and PEC Zwolle's last 64.
Result probabilities: NAC Breda 43% | Draw 28% | PEC Zwolle 29%. Fair-value odds: NAC Breda 2.33 | Draw 3.57 | PEC Zwolle 3.44. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 28% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 51% | BTTS Yes probability 56% | Total xG 2.71. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 51%/49% — the total xG of 2.71 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS Yes at 56% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.
Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is NAC Breda at 43% — marginal model lean. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on NAC Breda if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.
Poisson projects 2.71 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 51% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by recent form (NAC Breda's last 10 home games and PEC Zwolle's last 10 away games) averaging 2.8 goals per game.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 56% on Yes. Form rates corroborate — both teams scored in: NAC Breda 70% (last 10 home games) | PEC Zwolle 60% (last 10 away games).
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle | Competition: Eredivisie, matchday 31 | Venue: Rat Verlegh Stadion • Kick-off: Sunday 4 May 2025 at 12:15 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: NAC Breda 43% | Draw 28% | PEC Zwolle 29% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 51% (Under 49%) | BTTS Yes 56% (No 44%) | xG NAC Breda 1.50 / PEC Zwolle 1.20 • Poisson strength factors: NAC Breda attack 0.738 / def 1.020 | PEC Zwolle attack 0.914 / def 1.239 | league avg home 1.646 / away 1.288 • Poisson stance: NAC Breda (43%) — low confidence — close contest
🧮 Prediction Model
1.50
NAC Breda xG
Expected Goals
1.20
PEC Zwolle xG
56%
BTTS
76%
Over 1.5
51%
Over 2.5
29%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle FAQs
What time does NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle kick off?
NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle kicked off at 12:15 UK time on Sunday 4 May 2025 at Rat Verlegh Stadion.
What was the final score in NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle?
NAC Breda 1 - 3 PEC Zwolle.
Where is NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle being played?
The match is being played at Rat Verlegh Stadion.
What competition is NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle part of?
NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle is a Eredivisie fixture (matchday 31) (Netherlands).
Who is favourite to win NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle?
Our statistical model gives NAC Breda a 43% chance of winning, PEC Zwolle a 29% chance, and a 28% chance of a draw — making NAC Breda the favourite.
Will both teams score in NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle?
Our model estimates a 56% probability that both NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle will score, so it leans towards BTTS Yes.
Will NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 51%, so it leans towards over 2.5 goals.
🧮 Model Insight
Where the Numbers Come From
The model rates NAC Breda's attack at 0.74x the league average against PEC Zwolle's defence at 1.24x — combine the two and it projects 1.50 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — PEC Zwolle's attack (0.91x) against NAC Breda's defence (1.02x) — and the away total comes out at 1.20.
These ratings are built from NAC Breda's last 30 games and PEC Zwolle's last 64 — a full enough recent sample to trust.
Scoreline Breakdown
Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 13.6% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (9.1%), 1-0 (8.5%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.
Most Likely Outcome
NAC Breda Win
43%
2.33
28%
3.57
29%
3.44
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 β 1
12.1%
Draw
Most likely
1 β 0
10.1%
Home win
2 β 1
9.1%
Home win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.50
NAC Breda xG
Total xG
2.71
1.20
PEC Zwolle xG
2.33
43%
Home win
3.57
28%
Draw
3.44
29%
Away win
Goals Markets
75%
Over 1.5
1.33
25%
Under 1.5
4.00
51%
Over 2.5
1.96
49%
Under 2.5
2.04
29%
Over 3.5
3.45
71%
Under 3.5
1.41
14%
Over 4.5
7.14
86%
Under 4.5
1.16
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
56%
BTTS Yes
1.80
44%
BTTS No
2.25
Clean Sheet
30%
3.32
22%
4.50
Win to Nil
13%
7.72
6%
15.52
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6.7 | 8.0 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 1 | 10.1 | 12.1 | 7.2 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.2 |
| 2 | 7.6 | 9.1 | 5.5 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 3 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 4 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | – |
| 5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 | – | – |
Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle Prediction FAQs
What is the most likely scoreline for NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.6%.
How many goals are NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle expected to score?
The model projects 1.50 expected goals for NAC Breda and 1.20 for PEC Zwolle, a combined total of 2.71.
How confident is the prediction model for NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle?
Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 43%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.
📈 Form Insight
Recent Form Overview
Across their last 64 outings, NAC Breda have picked up 1.36 PPG on a 23W 18D 23L record — D-D-L-D-D across the most recent five.
PEC Zwolle's form line: 16W 19D 29L from 64 games, 1.05 PPG, last five D-W-D-D-L.
There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.36 PPG for NAC Breda against 1.05 for PEC Zwolle. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.
How They Fare by Venue
On home soil, NAC Breda have posted 1.56 PPG from their last 32 home games (13W 11D 8L).
On the road, PEC Zwolle have gone 5W 13D 14L from their last 32 away games — 0.88 PPG when travelling.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, NAC Breda come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
Attack vs Defence
NAC Breda are averaging 1.50 goals scored and 1.47 conceded per game recently; PEC Zwolle are on 1.25 scored and 1.80 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: NAC Breda have seen both teams score in 64% of their recent games; PEC Zwolle in 61%.
Last 64 Results
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
NAC Breda
Current Season
PEC Zwolle
Current Season
NAC Breda (Home) vs PEC Zwolle (Away)
Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side
NAC Breda
Current Season
PEC Zwolle
Current Season
❓ NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle Form FAQs
What form are NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle in coming into this match?
NAC Breda have gone 23W 18D 23L in their last 64 games (1.36 PPG), while PEC Zwolle have gone 16W 19D 29L in their last 64 (1.05 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — NAC Breda at home or PEC Zwolle away?
NAC Breda's home record (1.56 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — NAC Breda at home: 1.56 PPG; PEC Zwolle away: 0.88 PPG.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
The Rivalry So Far
Our data holds 6 H2H matches between NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle, the earliest from November 2022. They cover more than one competition — Eerste Divisie, Eredivisie. The most recent was on 21 March 2026, roughly 7 months ago.
Notable Numbers
Specifically as hosts in this fixture, NAC Breda have gone 0W 1D 2L from the 3 H2H matches in our data played on their own ground against PEC Zwolle — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.
Last 6 Meetings
1
NAC Breda
1
Draws
4
PEC Zwolle
Recent Meetings
❓ NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle H2H FAQs
What is the head-to-head record between NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle?
Across the 6 head-to-head matches in our data, NAC Breda have won 1, PEC Zwolle have won 4, and 1 has been drawn.
When did NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle last play each other?
The most recent meeting in our data was on 21 March 2026: PEC Zwolle 2-1 NAC Breda.
Who has won more matches between NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle?
PEC Zwolle have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from the 6 head-to-head matches in our data.
📈 Trading Insight
Early Goal Trends
NAC Breda are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 66% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 38% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 42% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 44% of those situations.
PEC Zwolle are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 72% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 62% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 18% of those situations.
Full-Time Markets
BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 69% for NAC Breda, 62% for PEC Zwolle — a strong two-way scoring signal.
Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 50% (NAC Breda) and 56% (PEC Zwolle).
On the defensive side: PEC Zwolle in 31%.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = NAC Breda home games / PEC Zwolle away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β shown as β where unavailable.
❓ NAC Breda vs PEC Zwolle Trading FAQs
Do both teams usually score in NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle matches?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 69% of NAC Breda's games and 62% of PEC Zwolle's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Are NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle matches usually high-scoring?
Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 50% of NAC Breda's recent games and 56% of PEC Zwolle's, pointing to a tighter contest.
Do NAC Breda and PEC Zwolle matches tend to have early goals?
There has been at least one first-half goal in 66% of NAC Breda's recent matches and 72% of PEC Zwolle's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
PEC Zwolle cruise to a comfortable 1-3 victory over NAC Breda.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
PEC Zwolle beat NAC Breda 1-3 at Rat Verlegh Stadion, Regular Season - 31, in the Eredivisie. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting NAC Breda 1.50 xG and PEC Zwolle 1.20 xG, a combined 2.71. The scoreboard read 1-3 for 4 actual goals. PEC Zwolle outscored their 1.20 projection by 1.8. Those figures were built on strength ratings of NAC Breda attack 0.74 / defence 1.02 against PEC Zwolle attack 0.91 / defence 1.24, drawn from 30/64 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it NAC Breda 43% | Draw 28% | PEC Zwolle 29%, with NAC Breda to win its most likely call at 43%. The actual PEC Zwolle win had been the model's second-ranked read at 29%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 51%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 76% and landed. Over 3.5 was 29% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 56% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 55% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (NAC Breda 55%, PEC Zwolle 55%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which matched the both-scored outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
NAC Breda's trading profile (64 games, 32 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did.
PEC Zwolle's trading profile (64 games, 32 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did.
Form vs Result
The form lines were close — NAC Breda 1.36 PPG, PEC Zwolle 1.05 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the PEC Zwolle win broke the near-deadlock. NAC Breda (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.22 concession average — a leakier day than usual. PEC Zwolle (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.25 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 1 against a 2.03 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.