Sign in Register

Wuhan Three Towns 2-0 Qingdao Jonoon – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 14

Kick-off

Fri 13 Jun 2025

13:00

Venue

Wuhan Sports Centre

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Wuhan Three Towns at 48% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon meet at Wuhan Sports Centre in Super League, Regular Season - 14. This fixture gets under way on Friday 13 June 2025 at 13:00 UTC.

Form

Wuhan Three Towns (all games): 2W 2D 6L across 10 Super League fixtures this term — 0.80 PPG. Last five: D W L L L. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in just 30% of their matches, indicating a tendency toward clean sheets or low-scoring outcomes.

Wuhan Three Towns's form when playing at home: 2W 1D 7L across 10 games at Wuhan Sports Centre this term (0.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.90 goals scored and 1.60 conceded per game.

Qingdao Jonoon have collected 1.00 PPG across 10 Super League outings this season: 3W 1D 6L. Last five: L L L L W. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

When travelling in Super League this season, Qingdao Jonoon have posted 1W 1D 8L from 10 away outings — 0.40 PPG. Away from home they average 0.60 goals scored and 2.70 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel. Their away PPG of 0.40 is notably below their overall 1.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 0.80 PPG for Wuhan Three Towns against 1.00 for Qingdao Jonoon. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

H2H Analysis

Historically, Wuhan Three Towns have had the better of this match-up — 3 wins from 4 meetings, with Qingdao Jonoon managing just 0 victories and 1 draws shared.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 4 previous contests averaged 1.8 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 15 Sep 2024, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The historical record gives Wuhan Three Towns a meaningful edge here — 3 wins from 4 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

Trading

Wuhan Three Towns half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 57% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 78% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 40% of games (home games).

Qingdao Jonoon half-time and goal-timing data (60 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 60% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 82% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 33% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 37% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 37%; they fail to score in 47% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 62% versus Qingdao Jonoon 40%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 48% | Qingdao Jonoon 43%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 1.85 xG and Qingdao Jonoon 1.40 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.002 / defence 1.248 | Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.787 / defence 1.110. League average goals — home 1.667 / away 1.425. Data: 42 Wuhan Three Towns games / 43 Qingdao Jonoon games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 48% | Draw 24% | Qingdao Jonoon 28%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 2.08 | Draw 4.17 | Qingdao Jonoon 3.57. Wuhan Three Towns hold a narrow Poisson edge at 48% — the draw (24%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 63% | BTTS probability 64% | Total xG 3.25. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 63% — the 3.25 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 64% reflects that both xG figures (1.85 / 1.40) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Wuhan Three Towns at 48% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 24% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Wuhan Three Towns if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 28% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.25 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 63% probability — marginal — conflicting signals conviction, supported by form averaging 2.9 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 1.8 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 64% on Yes. This conflicts with form data: Wuhan Three Towns 50% | Qingdao Jonoon 30% from recent games — a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Wuhan Three Towns hold a strong historical advantage, winning 3 of 4 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Wuhan Three Towns — H2H win rate 75% vs Poisson 48%.
Goals H2H only shows 1.75 goals/game but Poisson xG is 3.25 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (1.85) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (0.90) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Qingdao Jonoon Poisson xG (1.40) exceeds their form scoring rate (0.60) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.8 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 3.25 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 63% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 64% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 14 | Venue: Wuhan Sports Centre • Kick-off: Friday 13 Jun 2025, 13:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 48% | Draw 24% | Qingdao Jonoon 28% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 63% | BTTS 64% | xG Wuhan Three Towns 1.85 / Qingdao Jonoon 1.40 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.002 / def 1.248 | Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.787 / def 1.110 | league avg home 1.667 / away 1.425 • Poisson stance: Wuhan Three Towns (48%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.85

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Expected Goals

1.40

Qingdao Jonoon xG

48%
24%
28%
Wuhan Three Towns Draw Qingdao Jonoon

64%

BTTS

84%

Over 1.5

63%

Over 2.5

41%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon kick off?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon kicked off at 13:00 on Friday 13 June 2025 at Wuhan Sports Centre.

What was the final score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Wuhan Three Towns 2 - 0 Qingdao Jonoon.

Where is Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon being played?

The match is being played at Wuhan Sports Centre.

What competition is Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon part of?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon is a Regular Season - 14 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Our statistical model gives Wuhan Three Towns a 48% chance of winning, Qingdao Jonoon a 28% chance, and a 24% chance of a draw — making Wuhan Three Towns the favourite.

Will both teams score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Our model estimates a 64% probability that both Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon will score (BTTS).

Will Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 63%.

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon?

Record (4 meetings): Wuhan Three Towns 3W | Draws 1 | Qingdao Jonoon 0W.

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon in?

Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.70 / GA 1.30 | L5 D-W-L-L-L. Qingdao Jonoon (all comps): 3W-1D-6L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.90 | L5 L-L-L-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Wuhan Three Towns's attack at 1.00x the league average against Qingdao Jonoon's defence at 1.11x — combine the two and it projects 1.85 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Qingdao Jonoon's attack (0.79x) against Wuhan Three Towns's defence (1.25x) — and the away total comes out at 1.40.

These ratings are built from 42/43 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 11.3% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (9.3%), 1-2 (7.0%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Wuhan Three Towns Win

48%

Wuhan Three Towns

2.10

24%

Draw

4.18

28%

Qingdao Jonoon

3.51

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.0%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.3%

Home win

1 – 0

7.2%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.85

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Total xG

3.25

1.40

Qingdao Jonoon xG

48%
24%
28%
Wuhan Three TownsDrawQingdao Jonoon

2.10

48%

Home win

4.18

24%

Draw

3.51

28%

Away win

Goals Markets

84%

Over 1.5

1.19

16%

Under 1.5

6.25

63%

Over 2.5

1.59

37%

Under 2.5

2.70

41%

Over 3.5

2.44

59%

Under 3.5

1.69

23%

Over 4.5

4.35

77%

Under 4.5

1.30

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

64%

BTTS Yes

1.56

36%

BTTS No

2.79

Clean Sheet

25%

Wuhan Three Towns

4.06

16%

Qingdao Jonoon

6.39

Win to Nil

12%

Wuhan Three Towns

8.52

4%

Qingdao Jonoon

22.43

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.9 5.4 3.8 1.8 0.6 0.2
1 7.2 10.0 7.0 3.3 1.1 0.3
2 6.6 9.3 6.5 3.0 1.1 0.3
3 4.1 5.7 4.0 1.9 0.7 0.2
4 1.9 2.7 1.9 0.9 0.3 0.1
5 0.7 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.855
λ Away (xG) 1.400
Total xG 3.255
League avg home goals 1.667
League avg away goals 1.425
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 1.002
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 1.248
Qingdao Jonoon attack strength 0.787
Qingdao Jonoon defence strength 1.110
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 42 / 43

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.3%.

How many goals are Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon expected to score?

The model projects 1.85 expected goals for Wuhan Three Towns and 1.40 for Qingdao Jonoon, a combined total of 3.25.

How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 48%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Wuhan Three Towns's recent record stands at 22W 16D 22L from 60 games, a 1.37 PPG return, with D-W-L-L-L in the last five.

Qingdao Jonoon, meanwhile, have gone 15W 12D 33L across 60 games — 0.95 PPG, with L-L-L-L-W in their last five.

The points-per-game comparison favours Wuhan Three Towns by 0.42 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Qingdao Jonoon heading into this one.

Home & Away Splits

At home specifically, Wuhan Three Towns have managed 11W 7D 12L from 30 games — 1.33 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Qingdao Jonoon's away record stands at 2W 6D 22L across 30 trips, a 0.40 PPG haul. That's a step down from their 0.95 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of Qingdao Jonoon's season.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Wuhan Three Towns come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Wuhan Three Towns are averaging 1.37 goals scored and 1.32 conceded per game recently; Qingdao Jonoon are on 1.03 scored and 1.67 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Wuhan Three Towns have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games.

Last 60 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Current Season
D W L L L
Qingdao Jonoon

Qingdao Jonoon

Current Season
L L L L W
60 Played 60
22/16/22 W / D / L 15/12/33
1.37 Points Per Game 0.95
1.37 Avg Goals Scored 1.03
1.32 Avg Goals Conceded 1.67
2.68 Avg Goals / Game 2.70
13 Clean Sheets 12
37 BTTS 24
29 Over 2.5 Games 26
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

L
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–3 HT 0–2
02 Nov
L
A Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–2 HT 0–1
18 Oct
W
H Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
D
A Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
D
A Qingdao Jonoon
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Aug
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–2 HT 0–2
10 Aug
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
4–1 HT 3–0
03 Aug
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
29 Jul
D
H Chengdu Better City
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Jul
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
12 Jul
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Jul
L
H Nantong Zhiyun
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–2
25 Jun
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Jun
L
H Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–0
25 May
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–3 HT 1–2
21 May
W
A Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 2–1
17 May
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
11 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
05 May
D
A Chengdu Better City
2–2 HT 1–1
01 May
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
26 Apr
D
H Changchun Yatai
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
D
A Sichuan Jiuniu
1–1 HT 0–0
14 Apr
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–4 HT 0–2
09 Apr
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–3 HT 0–1
04 Apr
L
H Beijing Guoan
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Mar
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–1 HT 1–0
09 Mar
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 1–1
01 Mar
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–3 HT 4–1
04 Nov
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Oct
W
A Dalian Aerbin
3–1 HT 2–1
20 Oct
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–0
29 Sep
L
H Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–0 HT 2–0
15 Sep
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
4–2 HT 3–1
27 Aug
W
A Chengdu Better City
1–0 HT 1–0
19 Aug
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
13 Aug
W
H Henan Jianye
4–2 HT 1–0
09 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 1–2
04 Aug
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Jul
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 1–1
23 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–1
16 Jul
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–3 HT 0–0
12 Jul
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 0–0
08 Jul
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–1 HT 1–1
03 Jul
D
H Dalian Aerbin
0–0 HT 0–0
28 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Jun
L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 1–0
27 May
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
5–0 HT 2–0
23 May
D
H Chengdu Better City
3–3 HT 1–1
19 May
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–1
13 May
D
A Henan Jianye
1–1 HT 0–1
09 May
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
05 May
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
3–0 HT 2–0
29 Apr
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 1–1
25 Apr
D
H Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
20 Apr
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–0
15 Apr
Qingdao Jonoon

Qingdao Jonoon

W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
02 Nov
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–6 HT 0–2
19 Oct
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Sep
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–2 HT 0–1
22 Sep
D
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–1 HT 1–0
15 Sep
W
H Sichuan Jiuniu
1–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
L
H Henan Jianye
0–2 HT 0–0
10 Aug
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
3–4 HT 1–2
03 Aug
W
H Meizhou Kejia
4–2 HT 2–1
28 Jul
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–5 HT 0–0
21 Jul
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–1
13 Jul
W
H Qingdao Youth Island
3–1 HT 3–1
07 Jul
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–5 HT 0–2
30 Jun
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–5 HT 1–2
26 Jun
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
16 Jun
W
H Tianjin Teda
3–1 HT 2–0
26 May
D
H Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 0–0
21 May
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
15 May
D
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–2 HT 0–0
10 May
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–1
05 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–5 HT 0–2
01 May
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
3–1 HT 3–0
26 Apr
L
A Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Apr
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Apr
D
A Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
A Qingdao Youth Island
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Mar
L
H Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–2 HT 0–1
02 Mar
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
D
H Dalian Aerbin
2–2 HT 2–0
29 Oct
L
H Tianjin Teda
1–4 HT 0–2
22 Oct
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Sep
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
3–1 HT 0–0
24 Sep
L
A Shandong Luneng
2–4 HT 0–3
15 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 0–0
26 Aug
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Aug
L
A Meizhou Kejia
0–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–5 HT 0–1
08 Aug
W
H Chengdu Better City
3–2 HT 3–0
04 Aug
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–1 HT 0–0
30 Jul
L
A Beijing Guoan
0–2 HT 0–0
22 Jul
W
H Henan Jianye
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Jul
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
5–0 HT 1–0
12 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–0
07 Jul
D
A Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Jul
L
A Tianjin Teda
2–3 HT 1–2
28 Jun
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Jun
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
0–1 HT 0–0
04 Jun
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–1 HT 0–1
28 May
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
23 May
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–2 HT 2–0
19 May
W
H Meizhou Kejia
2–0 HT 0–0
14 May
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–0
10 May
L
A Chengdu Better City
2–3 HT 0–2
06 May
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
0–3 HT 0–2
29 Apr
W
H Beijing Guoan
3–1 HT 2–0
25 Apr
D
A Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Apr
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–2 HT 0–2
16 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon in coming into this match?

Wuhan Three Towns have gone 22W 16D 22L in their last 60 games (1.37 PPG), while Qingdao Jonoon have gone 15W 12D 33L in their last 60 (0.95 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Three Towns at home or Qingdao Jonoon away?

Wuhan Three Towns's home record (1.33 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Three Towns at home: 1.33 PPG; Qingdao Jonoon away: 0.40 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 8 times since April 2023 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 29 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Wuhan Three Towns won 1-5 on 29 Aug 2026, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 3W 0D 1L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Qingdao Jonoon — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

Wuhan Three Towns

5

Wuhan Three Towns

1

Draws

Qingdao Jonoon

2

Qingdao Jonoon

Recent Meetings

Qingdao Jonoon
1–5
29 Aug 26
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–3
06 May 26
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
1–0
02 Nov 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
2–0
13 Jun 25
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
1–1
15 Sep 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–0
05 May 24
Qingdao Jonoon
Wuhan Three Towns
1–0
30 Jul 23
Qingdao Jonoon
Qingdao Jonoon
0–3
29 Apr 23
Wuhan Three Towns

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon?

From 8 meetings on record, Wuhan Three Towns have won 5, Qingdao Jonoon have won 2, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon last play each other?

They last met on 29 August 2026, when Qingdao Jonoon 1-5 Wuhan Three Towns.

Who has won more matches between Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon?

Wuhan Three Towns have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Wuhan Three Towns see a goal before the break in 57% of their matches.

Qingdao Jonoon are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 60% of their matches.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Wuhan Three Towns 50%, Qingdao Jonoon 33% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 40% (Wuhan Three Towns) and 37% (Qingdao Jonoon).

On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns have failed to score in 33% of games; Qingdao Jonoon in 63%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Wuhan Three Towns home games / Qingdao Jonoon away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 42/60
(70%)
17/30
(56.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 26/60
(43.3%)
10/30
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 14/18
(77.8%)
10/13
(76.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/18
(38.9%)
4/13
(30.8%)
Winning at HT 15/60
(25%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/60
(1.7%)
0/30
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
0/30
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 37/60
(61.7%)
15/30
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 29/60
(48.3%)
12/30
(40%)
Over 3.5 Goals 17/60
(28.3%)
6/30
(20%)
Clean Sheet 13/60
(21.7%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Failed to Score 14/60
(23.3%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Qingdao Jonoon Qingdao Jonoon Current Season
Metric All
(60 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 38/60
(63.3%)
18/30
(60%)
2+ Goals Before HT 20/60
(33.3%)
9/30
(30%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 18/22
(81.8%)
8/12
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 11/22
(50%)
5/12
(41.7%)
Winning at HT 15/60
(25%)
2/30
(6.7%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/60
(5%)
0/30
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/60
(0%)
0/30
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 24/60
(40%)
10/30
(33.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 26/60
(43.3%)
11/30
(36.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/60
(36.7%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Clean Sheet 12/60
(20%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Failed to Score 28/60
(46.7%)
19/30
(63.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Wuhan Three Towns play Qingdao Jonoon?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 50% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent matches and 33% of Qingdao Jonoon's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Wuhan Three Towns vs Qingdao Jonoon usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 40% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent games and 37% of Qingdao Jonoon's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Wuhan Three Towns and Qingdao Jonoon tend to score early?

Wuhan Three Towns have had a goal before half-time in 57% of their recent matches, Qingdao Jonoon in 60% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Wuhan Three Towns cruise to a comfortable 2-0 victory over Qingdao Jonoon.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Wuhan Three Towns beat Qingdao Jonoon 2-0 at Wuhan Sports Centre, Regular Season - 14, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Three Towns 1.85 xG and Qingdao Jonoon 1.40 xG, a combined 3.25. The scoreboard read 2-0 for 2 actual goals. Qingdao Jonoon landed 1.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Three Towns attack 1.00 / defence 1.25 against Qingdao Jonoon attack 0.79 / defence 1.11, drawn from 42/43 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Wuhan Three Towns 48% | Draw 24% | Qingdao Jonoon 28%, with Wuhan Three Towns to win its most likely call at 48%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 63%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 84% and landed. Over 3.5 was 41% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 64% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Three Towns 48%, Qingdao Jonoon 43%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did not.

Qingdao Jonoon's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 40% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 47% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Wuhan Three Towns arrived the stronger side — 1.37 PPG against 0.95. Form held, and they took the win. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.20 average — above their attacking norm and conceded 0 against a 1.23 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 63% Over 2.5 probability, but 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 64% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 46% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.