Sign in Register

Al-Ittihad FC 3-4 NEOM – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Pro League · Regular Season - 29

Kick-off

Wed 8 Apr 2026

19:00

Venue

King Abdullah Sports City

Competition

Pro League

Saudi-Arabia

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Al-Ittihad FC at 43%, yet other data sources diverge — this Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Pro League encounter, Regular Season - 29 sees NEOM travel to King Abdullah Sports City to take on Al-Ittihad FC. The game is scheduled for Wednesday 8 April 2026, 19:00 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Pro League games this season, Al-Ittihad FC have gone 4W 3D 3L from 10 outings — a 1.50 PPG return. Last five: D W L L W. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.30 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Al-Ittihad FC, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Al-Ittihad FC have posted 8W 0D 2L at King Abdullah Sports City — 2.40 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 0.50 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at King Abdullah Sports City. At home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle. Their home PPG of 2.40 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.50 — Al-Ittihad FC are significantly better at King Abdullah Sports City than their overall form suggests.

NEOM — All Games: 4W 3D 3L from 10 Pro League fixtures this season — 1.50 PPG. Last five: D L L D W. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 0.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Defensively, 0.80 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. This season is still relatively young for NEOM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

NEOM's away record: 3W 4D 3L from 10 road trips in Pro League this season (1.30 PPG). Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 1.10 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.50 PPG (Al-Ittihad FC) versus 1.50 (NEOM). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

H2H

The H2H landscape is flat: 1 previous encounters have yielded 1 wins for Al-Ittihad FC, 0 for NEOM and 0 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The 1 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 4.0 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 31 Dec 2025, ended 3–1 with Al-Ittihad FC winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading Patterns

Al-Ittihad FC in-play and half-time data (27 games, 13 at home): they score before half-time in 62% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; BTTS occurs in 31% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 31% of games (home games).

NEOM in-play and half-time data (27 games, 13 at away): they score before half-time in 54% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 91% of the time; BTTS occurs in 62% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 38% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al-Ittihad FC 56% versus NEOM 59%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al-Ittihad FC 44% | NEOM 52%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al-Ittihad FC 1.04 xG and NEOM 0.70 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al-Ittihad FC attack 0.823 / defence 0.676 | NEOM attack 0.737 / defence 0.818. League average goals — home 1.541 / away 1.406. Al-Ittihad FC's defence rating of 0.676 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 61 Al-Ittihad FC games / 27 NEOM games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Al-Ittihad FC 43% | Draw 33% | NEOM 24%. Fair-value odds: Al-Ittihad FC 2.33 | Draw 3.03 | NEOM 4.17. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 33% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 25% | BTTS probability 33% | Total xG 1.74. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 75% probability — total xG of 1.74 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS No has firm model support at 67% — NEOM's lower xG of 0.70 creates a meaningful probability of a scoring blank, which suppresses the BTTS Yes probability to 33%.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Al-Ittihad FC as the most likely outcome at 43% — marginal model lean. With a 33% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Al-Ittihad FC offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

On the goals line, Poisson's 1.74 combined xG gives a 25% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 2.0 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 33% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Al-Ittihad FC 30% | NEOM 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H suggests 4.00 goals/game but Poisson xG is only 1.74 — current-season defences are outperforming historical norms.
BTTS H2H BTTS history (100%) is contradicted by Poisson (33%) — recent defensive form has changed the dynamic.
Form NEOM Poisson xG (0.70) is below their form scoring rate (1.10) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Goals Form averages (~1.6 goals/game) and Poisson xG (1.74) both support Under 2.5 goals (75% probability).
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 33% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 25% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is only 33% — model leans towards a clean sheet for one side.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM | Competition: Pro League, Regular Season - 29 | Venue: King Abdullah Sports City • Kick-off: Wednesday 8 Apr 2026, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Al-Ittihad FC 43% | Draw 33% | NEOM 24% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 25% | BTTS 33% | xG Al-Ittihad FC 1.04 / NEOM 0.70 • Poisson strength factors: Al-Ittihad FC attack 0.823 / def 0.676 | NEOM attack 0.737 / def 0.818 | league avg home 1.541 / away 1.406 • Poisson stance: Al-Ittihad FC (43%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.04

Al-Ittihad FC xG

Expected Goals

0.70

NEOM xG

43%
33%
24%
Al-Ittihad FC Draw NEOM

33%

BTTS

52%

Over 1.5

25%

Over 2.5

10%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM kick off?

Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM kicked off at 19:00 on Wednesday 8 April 2026 at King Abdullah Sports City.

What was the final score in Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM?

Al-Ittihad FC 3 - 4 NEOM.

Where is Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM being played?

The match is being played at King Abdullah Sports City.

What competition is Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM part of?

Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM is a Regular Season - 29 fixture in the Pro League (Saudi-Arabia).

Who is favourite to win Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM?

Our statistical model gives Al-Ittihad FC a 43% chance of winning, NEOM a 24% chance, and a 33% chance of a draw — making Al-Ittihad FC the favourite.

Will both teams score in Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM?

Our model estimates a 33% probability that both Al-Ittihad FC and NEOM will score (BTTS).

Will Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 25%.

What is the head-to-head record between Al-Ittihad FC and NEOM?

Record (1 meetings): Al-Ittihad FC 1W | Draws 0 | NEOM 0W.

What form are Al-Ittihad FC and NEOM in?

Al-Ittihad FC (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.30 | L5 D-W-L-L-W. NEOM (all comps): 4W-3D-3L in 10 | 1.50 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 0.80 | L5 D-L-L-D-W.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Working from Al-Ittihad FC's attack rating (0.82) and NEOM's defence rating (0.82), the model arrives at 1.04 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, NEOM's attack versus Al-Ittihad FC's defence, projects 0.70 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 61/27 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 0-0 emerges as the single most likely result, at 19.2%. Close behind: 1-0 (16.6%), 1-1 (14.4%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 50% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Al-Ittihad FC Win

43%

Al-Ittihad FC

2.33

33%

Draw

3.04

24%

NEOM

4.12

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

18.2%

Home win

Most likely

0 – 0

17.6%

Draw

1 – 1

12.8%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.04

Al-Ittihad FC xG

Total xG

1.74

0.70

NEOM xG

43%
33%
24%
Al-Ittihad FCDrawNEOM

2.33

43%

Home win

3.04

33%

Draw

4.12

24%

Away win

Goals Markets

52%

Over 1.5

1.92

48%

Under 1.5

2.08

25%

Over 2.5

4.00

75%

Under 2.5

1.33

10%

Over 3.5

10.00

90%

Under 3.5

1.11

3%

Over 4.5

33.33

97%

Under 4.5

1.03

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

33%

BTTS Yes

3.07

67%

BTTS No

1.48

Clean Sheet

50%

Al-Ittihad FC

2.02

35%

NEOM

2.82

Win to Nil

21%

Al-Ittihad FC

4.71

9%

NEOM

11.63

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 17.6 12.3 4.3 1.0 0.2
1 18.2 12.8 4.5 1.0 0.2
2 9.5 6.6 2.3 0.5 0.1
3 3.3 2.3 0.8 0.2
4 0.8 0.6 0.2
5 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.038
λ Away (xG) 0.701
Total xG 1.739
League avg home goals 1.541
League avg away goals 1.406
Al-Ittihad FC attack strength 0.823
Al-Ittihad FC defence strength 0.676
NEOM attack strength 0.737
NEOM defence strength 0.818
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 61 / 27

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM?

Our Poisson model rates 0-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 19.2%.

How many goals are Al-Ittihad FC and NEOM expected to score?

The model projects 1.04 expected goals for Al-Ittihad FC and 0.70 for NEOM, a combined total of 1.74.

How confident is the prediction model for Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 43%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

Al-Ittihad FC's recent record stands at 13W 6D 8L from 27 games, a 1.67 PPG return, with D-W-L-L-W in the last five. The sample for Al-Ittihad FC is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

NEOM, meanwhile, have gone 10W 6D 11L across 27 games — 1.33 PPG, with D-L-L-D-W in their last five. The sample for NEOM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Form-wise this is close to level: Al-Ittihad FC on 1.67 PPG, NEOM on 1.33. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Venue Form

At home specifically, Al-Ittihad FC have managed 9W 0D 4L from 13 games — 2.08 PPG in front of their own supporters. That's noticeably better than their 1.67 PPG overall — Al-Ittihad FC are a different proposition at home than their general record suggests.

NEOM's away record stands at 5W 4D 4L across 13 trips, a 1.46 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Al-Ittihad FC come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

Al-Ittihad FC are averaging 1.56 goals scored and 1.26 conceded per game recently; NEOM are on 1.19 scored and 1.33 conceded.

Last 27 Results — Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Al-Ittihad FC

Al-Ittihad FC

Blended
D W L L W
NEOM

NEOM

Blended
D L L D W
27 Played 27
13/6/8 W / D / L 10/6/11
1.67 Points Per Game 1.33
1.56 Avg Goals Scored 1.19
1.26 Avg Goals Conceded 1.33
2.81 Avg Goals / Game 2.52
7 Clean Sheets 6
15 BTTS 16
12 Over 2.5 Games 14
Al-Ittihad FC

Al-Ittihad FC

W
H Al-Hazm
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Apr
L
A Al Riyadh
1–3 HT 1–0
13 Mar
L
A Al-Ahli Jeddah
1–3 HT 0–1
06 Mar
W
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–0 HT 0–0
27 Feb
D
A Al-Hazm
1–1 HT 0–0
24 Feb
D
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
1–1 HT 0–1
21 Feb
W
H Al-Fayha
2–1 HT 1–0
13 Feb
L
A Al-Nassr
0–2 HT 0–0
06 Feb
W
H Al Najma
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Feb
D
A Al-Fateh
2–2 HT 1–0
29 Jan
W
H Al Okhdood
2–1 HT 2–0
26 Jan
L
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
1–2 HT 1–1
22 Jan
L
H Al-Ettifaq
0–1 HT 0–0
16 Jan
D
A Damac
1–1 HT 1–1
13 Jan
W
A Al Kholood
4–0 HT 3–0
09 Jan
W
H Al Taawon
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jan
W
A NEOM
3–1 HT 1–1
31 Dec
W
H Al Shabab
2–0 HT 1–0
27 Dec
W
H Al Riyadh
2–1 HT 2–0
21 Nov
L
H Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Nov
D
A Al Khaleej Saihat
4–4 HT 0–3
01 Nov
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–2 HT 0–1
24 Oct
D
A Al-Fayha
1–1 HT 0–1
17 Oct
L
H Al-Nassr
0–2 HT 0–2
26 Sep
W
A Al Najma
1–0 HT 0–0
20 Sep
W
H Al-Fateh
4–2 HT 3–1
12 Sep
W
A Al Okhdood
5–2 HT 3–1
30 Aug
NEOM

NEOM

W
H Al-Fayha
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Apr
D
H Al Taawon
2–2 HT 1–0
12 Mar
L
A Al-Nassr
0–1 HT 0–0
07 Mar
L
H Al Kholood
1–2 HT 1–2
28 Feb
D
A Al-Fayha
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Feb
W
A Al Khaleej Saihat
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Feb
L
A Al-Qadisiyah FC
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Al Riyadh
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Feb
D
A Al Okhdood
1–1 HT 0–1
02 Feb
W
H Damac
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Jan
L
H Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–3 HT 0–0
24 Jan
D
A Al-Ettifaq
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Jan
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
1–2 HT 1–0
18 Jan
L
A Al Shabab
2–3 HT 1–1
14 Jan
L
H Al-Fateh
0–1 HT 0–1
10 Jan
W
A Al-Hazm
2–1 HT 0–0
04 Jan
L
H Al-Ittihad FC
1–3 HT 1–1
31 Dec
W
H Al Najma
2–1 HT 0–0
25 Dec
D
A Al Taawon
1–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
H Al-Nassr
1–3 HT 0–0
08 Nov
W
A Al Kholood
3–2 HT 2–1
30 Oct
D
H Al Khaleej Saihat
1–1 HT 1–1
24 Oct
L
H Al-Qadisiyah FC
1–3 HT 0–2
19 Oct
W
A Al Riyadh
3–2 HT 2–1
27 Sep
W
H Al Okhdood
1–0 HT 1–0
18 Sep
W
A Damac
2–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
L
A Al-Ahli Jeddah
0–1 HT 0–1
28 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Al-Ittihad FC and NEOM in coming into this match?

Al-Ittihad FC have gone 13W 6D 8L in their last 27 games (1.67 PPG), while NEOM have gone 10W 6D 11L in their last 27 (1.33 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Al-Ittihad FC at home or NEOM away?

Al-Ittihad FC's home record (2.08 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Al-Ittihad FC at home: 2.08 PPG; NEOM away: 1.46 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

2 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to December 2025. Every recorded meeting has come in Pro League. They last met on 8 April 2026, roughly 4 months ago.

Last 2 Meetings

Al-Ittihad FC

1

Al-Ittihad FC

0

Draws

NEOM

1

NEOM

Recent Meetings

Al-Ittihad FC
3–4
08 Apr 26
NEOM
NEOM
1–3
31 Dec 25
Al-Ittihad FC

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Al-Ittihad FC and NEOM?

From 2 meetings on record, Al-Ittihad FC have won 1, NEOM have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Al-Ittihad FC and NEOM last play each other?

They last met on 8 April 2026, when Al-Ittihad FC 3-4 NEOM.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

Al-Ittihad FC are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 62% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 46% of the time.

NEOM see a goal before the break in 54% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 31% of the time.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Al-Ittihad FC 31%, NEOM 62% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Low-scoring games have been more typical here — Over 2.5 sits at just 31% for Al-Ittihad FC and 38% for NEOM.

On the defensive side: Al-Ittihad FC keep a clean sheet in 38% of their matches; Al-Ittihad FC have failed to score in 31% of games; NEOM in 31%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Al-Ittihad FC home games / NEOM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Al-Ittihad FC Al-Ittihad FC Blended
Metric All
(27 games)
Venue
(13 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 19/27
(70.4%)
8/13
(61.5%)
2+ Goals Before HT 10/27
(37%)
4/13
(30.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/8
(100%)
5/5
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/8
(25%)
0/5
(0%)
Winning at HT 10/27
(37%)
6/13
(46.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/27
(7.4%)
0/13
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/27
(11.1%)
0/13
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 15/27
(55.6%)
4/13
(30.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 12/27
(44.4%)
4/13
(30.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 8/27
(29.6%)
1/13
(7.7%)
Clean Sheet 7/27
(25.9%)
5/13
(38.5%)
Failed to Score 5/27
(18.5%)
4/13
(30.8%)
NEOM NEOM Blended
Metric All
(27 games)
Venue
(13 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 16/27
(59.3%)
7/13
(53.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 8/27
(29.6%)
3/13
(23.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/11
(90.9%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/11
(45.5%)
2/6
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 8/27
(29.6%)
4/13
(30.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/27
(11.1%)
1/13
(7.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 1/27
(3.7%)
1/13
(7.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 16/27
(59.3%)
8/13
(61.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 14/27
(51.9%)
5/13
(38.5%)
Over 3.5 Goals 7/27
(25.9%)
3/13
(23.1%)
Clean Sheet 6/27
(22.2%)
2/13
(15.4%)
Failed to Score 6/27
(22.2%)
4/13
(30.8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Al-Ittihad FC play NEOM?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 31% of Al-Ittihad FC's recent matches and 62% of NEOM's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Al-Ittihad FC vs NEOM usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 31% of Al-Ittihad FC's recent games and 38% of NEOM's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Al-Ittihad FC and NEOM tend to score early?

Al-Ittihad FC have had a goal before half-time in 62% of their recent matches, NEOM in 54% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as NEOM defy the odds to beat Al-Ittihad FC 3-4.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

NEOM beat Al-Ittihad FC 3-4 at King Abdullah Sports City, Regular Season - 29, in the Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Al-Ittihad FC 1.04 xG and NEOM 0.70 xG, a combined 1.74. The scoreboard read 3-4 for 7 actual goals. Al-Ittihad FC beat their projection by 2.0 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. NEOM outscored their 0.70 projection by 3.3. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Al-Ittihad FC attack 0.82 / defence 0.68 against NEOM attack 0.74 / defence 0.82, drawn from 61/27 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Al-Ittihad FC 43% | Draw 33% | NEOM 24%, with Al-Ittihad FC to win its most likely call at 43%. Instead the game produced a NEOM win, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 25%. The game delivered 7, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 52% and landed. Over 3.5 was 10% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 33% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 48% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Al-Ittihad FC 44%, NEOM 52%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Al-Ittihad FC's trading profile (27 games, 13 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did.

NEOM's trading profile (27 games, 13 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Al-Ittihad FC 1.67 PPG, NEOM 1.33 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the NEOM win broke the near-deadlock. Al-Ittihad FC (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.23 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 4 against a 0.85 concession average — a leakier day than usual. NEOM (home/away splits) scored 4 against a 1.23 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 3 against a 1.15 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 25% Over 2.5 probability, but 7 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 33% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 48% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.