Sign in Register

Grimsby 0-1 Chesterfield – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League Two · Regular Season - 16

Kick-off

Sat 15 Nov 2025

15:00

Venue

Blundell Park

Competition

League Two

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Grimsby at 58%, yet other data sources diverge — this Grimsby vs Chesterfield fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Grimsby and Chesterfield meet at Blundell Park in League Two, Regular Season - 16. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 15 November 2025 at 15:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Grimsby have collected 1.40 PPG across 10 League Two outings this season: 4W 2D 4L. Last five: W L W L D. Offensively they are averaging 1.90 goals per game, with 1.50 conceded. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Grimsby, so this record blends games from this season and last.

In front of their own supporters this season, Grimsby have posted 5W 1D 4L at Blundell Park — 1.60 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.80 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game.

Chesterfield's overall League Two record this term: 2W 6D 2L from 10 games (1.20 PPG). Last five: L W D D D. They are scoring at 1.80 per game and conceding 1.80. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for Chesterfield, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in League Two this season, Chesterfield have posted 3W 3D 4L from 10 away outings — 1.20 PPG. Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.40 for Grimsby, 1.20 for Chesterfield — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

H2H History

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 2 meetings: Grimsby 0W, Chesterfield 1W, 1D.

The 2 previous meetings have averaged 2.5 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 18 Jan 2025, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading

Grimsby half-time and goal-timing data (61 games, 30 at home): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; BTTS occurs in 57% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 57% of games (home games).

Chesterfield half-time and goal-timing data (61 games, 30 at away): they score before half-time in 67% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 88% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 43% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 53% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Grimsby 57% versus Chesterfield 56%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Grimsby 59% | Chesterfield 56%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Grimsby 2.15 xG and Chesterfield 1.22 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Grimsby attack 1.203 / defence 0.961 | Chesterfield attack 1.055 / defence 1.307. League average goals — home 1.366 / away 1.207. Chesterfield bring a strong defensive rating of 1.307 — this is suppressing Grimsby's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 61 Grimsby games / 61 Chesterfield games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Grimsby 58% | Draw 20% | Chesterfield 21%. Fair-value odds: Grimsby 1.72 | Draw 5.00 | Chesterfield 4.76. The model has a clear lean to Grimsby (58%) — a 37pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 65% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.37. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 65% — a total xG of 3.37 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (2.15 / 1.22) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Grimsby as the most likely outcome at 58% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 20% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

The Poisson model projects 3.37 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 65% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.0 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 62% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Grimsby 50% | Chesterfield 60% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 62% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Grimsby Poisson xG (2.15) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.80) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours Grimsby at 58% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 65% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 62% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Grimsby vs Chesterfield | Competition: League Two, Regular Season - 16 | Venue: Blundell Park • Kick-off: Saturday 15 Nov 2025, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Grimsby 58% | Draw 20% | Chesterfield 21% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 65% | BTTS 62% | xG Grimsby 2.15 / Chesterfield 1.22 • Poisson strength factors: Grimsby attack 1.203 / def 0.961 | Chesterfield attack 1.055 / def 1.307 | league avg home 1.366 / away 1.207 • Poisson stance: Grimsby (58%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

2.15

Grimsby xG

Expected Goals

1.22

Chesterfield xG

58%
20%
21%
Grimsby Draw Chesterfield

62%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

65%

Over 2.5

44%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Grimsby vs Chesterfield kick off?

Grimsby vs Chesterfield kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 15 November 2025 at Blundell Park.

What was the final score in Grimsby vs Chesterfield?

Grimsby 0 - 1 Chesterfield.

Where is Grimsby vs Chesterfield being played?

The match is being played at Blundell Park.

What competition is Grimsby vs Chesterfield part of?

Grimsby vs Chesterfield is a Regular Season - 16 fixture in the League Two (England).

Who is favourite to win Grimsby vs Chesterfield?

Our statistical model gives Grimsby a 58% chance of winning, Chesterfield a 21% chance, and a 20% chance of a draw — making Grimsby the favourite.

Will both teams score in Grimsby vs Chesterfield?

Our model estimates a 62% probability that both Grimsby and Chesterfield will score (BTTS).

Will Grimsby vs Chesterfield have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 65%.

What is the head-to-head record between Grimsby and Chesterfield?

Record (2 meetings): Grimsby 0W | Draws 1 | Chesterfield 1W.

What form are Grimsby and Chesterfield in?

Grimsby (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.90 / GA 1.50 | L5 W-L-W-L-D. Chesterfield (all comps): 2W-6D-2L in 10 | 1.20 PPG | GF 1.80 / GA 1.80 | L5 L-W-D-D-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Grimsby's attacking strength (1.20x league average) is weighed against Chesterfield's defensive record (1.31x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 2.15. Flip it around — Chesterfield's attack (1.05x) against Grimsby's defence (0.96x) — and the away total comes out at 1.22.

These ratings are built from 61/61 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 10.2%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.7%), 2-0 (7.9%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Grimsby Win

58%

Grimsby

1.71

20%

Draw

4.89

21%

Chesterfield

4.74

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

2 – 1

9.7%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

9.0%

Draw

2 – 0

7.9%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

2.15

Grimsby xG

Total xG

3.37

1.22

Chesterfield xG

58%
20%
21%
GrimsbyDrawChesterfield

1.71

58%

Home win

4.89

20%

Draw

4.74

21%

Away win

Goals Markets

85%

Over 1.5

1.18

15%

Under 1.5

6.67

65%

Over 2.5

1.54

35%

Under 2.5

2.86

44%

Over 3.5

2.27

56%

Under 3.5

1.79

25%

Over 4.5

4.00

75%

Under 4.5

1.33

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

62%

BTTS Yes

1.60

38%

BTTS No

2.66

Clean Sheet

29%

Grimsby

3.40

12%

Chesterfield

8.56

Win to Nil

17%

Grimsby

5.82

2%

Chesterfield

40.56

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 3.4 4.2 2.6 1.0 0.3 0.1
1 7.4 9.0 5.5 2.3 0.7 0.2
2 7.9 9.7 5.9 2.4 0.7 0.2
3 5.7 6.9 4.2 1.7 0.5 0.1
4 3.0 3.7 2.3 0.9 0.3 0.1
5 1.3 1.6 1.0 0.4 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 2.147
λ Away (xG) 1.224
Total xG 3.371
League avg home goals 1.366
League avg away goals 1.207
Grimsby attack strength 1.203
Grimsby defence strength 0.961
Chesterfield attack strength 1.055
Chesterfield defence strength 1.307
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 61 / 61

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Grimsby vs Chesterfield?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 10.2%.

How many goals are Grimsby and Chesterfield expected to score?

The model projects 2.15 expected goals for Grimsby and 1.22 for Chesterfield, a combined total of 3.37.

How confident is the prediction model for Grimsby vs Chesterfield?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 58%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Grimsby's recent record stands at 27W 12D 22L from 61 games, a 1.52 PPG return, with W-L-W-L-D in the last five. The sample for Grimsby is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Chesterfield, meanwhile, have gone 24W 18D 19L across 61 games — 1.48 PPG, with L-W-D-D-D in their last five. The sample for Chesterfield is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.52 PPG for Grimsby against 1.48 for Chesterfield. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

At home specifically, Grimsby have managed 14W 4D 12L from 30 games — 1.53 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Chesterfield's away record stands at 10W 5D 15L across 30 trips, a 1.17 PPG haul.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Grimsby are averaging 1.48 goals scored and 1.43 conceded per game recently; Chesterfield are on 1.56 scored and 1.33 conceded.

Last 61 Results — League Two

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Grimsby

Grimsby

Blended
W L W L D
Chesterfield

Chesterfield

Blended
L W D D D
61 Played 61
27/12/22 W / D / L 24/18/19
1.52 Points Per Game 1.48
1.48 Avg Goals Scored 1.56
1.43 Avg Goals Conceded 1.33
2.90 Avg Goals / Game 2.89
14 Clean Sheets 16
35 BTTS 34
36 Over 2.5 Games 34
Grimsby

Grimsby

D
A Barrow
2–2 HT 2–1
08 Nov
L
A Crewe
2–3 HT 2–2
25 Oct
W
H Gillingham
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Oct
L
H Colchester
1–2 HT 1–1
11 Oct
W
A Salford City
2–0 HT 2–0
04 Oct
W
H Cheltenham
7–1 HT 2–1
27 Sep
L
A Barnet
0–3 HT 0–1
20 Sep
D
H Cambridge United
1–1 HT 0–1
13 Sep
W
A Milton Keynes Dons
3–2 HT 3–0
06 Sep
L
H Bristol Rovers
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Aug
D
A Accrington ST
1–1 HT 1–0
23 Aug
W
A Walsall
1–0 HT 0–0
19 Aug
W
H Newport County
2–1 HT 1–0
16 Aug
D
A Harrogate Town
3–3 HT 0–0
09 Aug
W
H Crawley Town
3–0 HT 2–0
02 Aug
L
H AFC Wimbledon
0–1 HT 0–0
03 May
D
A Milton Keynes Dons
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
D
A Port Vale
2–2 HT 1–0
21 Apr
L
H Swindon Town
0–4 HT 0–2
18 Apr
D
A Harrogate Town
2–2 HT 2–0
12 Apr
W
H Morecambe
3–1 HT 1–1
05 Apr
L
A Crewe
0–2 HT 0–1
01 Apr
W
A Colchester
2–1 HT 0–0
28 Mar
W
H Newport County
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Mar
L
H Salford City
0–1 HT 0–0
15 Mar
L
H Notts County
0–2 HT 0–0
11 Mar
W
A Walsall
3–1 HT 2–1
08 Mar
D
H Tranmere
1–1 HT 0–1
04 Mar
D
A Cheltenham
1–1 HT 0–1
01 Mar
W
H Fleetwood Town
2–1 HT 1–0
22 Feb
W
A Doncaster
2–1 HT 1–0
15 Feb
W
H Carlisle
2–1 HT 0–1
08 Feb
W
A Bromley
2–0 HT 0–0
01 Feb
D
H Gillingham
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Jan
L
A Barrow
0–3 HT 0–1
25 Jan
D
H Chesterfield
1–1 HT 1–1
18 Jan
L
A Bradford
1–3 HT 0–1
04 Jan
L
A Accrington ST
2–3 HT 2–1
01 Jan
W
H Port Vale
3–0 HT 1–0
29 Dec
W
H Harrogate Town
2–1 HT 0–0
26 Dec
L
A Swindon Town
1–3 HT 0–2
21 Dec
L
H Crewe
0–2 HT 0–0
14 Dec
W
A Morecambe
3–0 HT 2–0
07 Dec
W
H Accrington ST
5–2 HT 4–0
03 Dec
L
H Colchester
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
A Newport County
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Nov
W
A AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 1–0
09 Nov
L
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–3 HT 1–0
26 Oct
W
A Tranmere
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Oct
L
H Walsall
1–4 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
A Salford City
2–1 HT 2–1
12 Oct
L
H Doncaster
0–3 HT 0–3
05 Oct
W
A Gillingham
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Oct
W
A Carlisle
3–2 HT 1–2
28 Sep
W
H Bromley
1–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
L
H Barrow
1–2 HT 1–2
14 Sep
L
A Chesterfield
1–2 HT 0–2
07 Sep
W
H Bradford
2–1 HT 1–0
31 Aug
L
A Notts County
1–4 HT 1–3
22 Aug
W
H Cheltenham
3–2 HT 1–0
17 Aug
L
A Fleetwood Town
0–1 HT 0–1
10 Aug
Chesterfield

Chesterfield

D
H Accrington ST
3–3 HT 1–2
08 Nov
D
A Tranmere
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Oct
D
H Fleetwood Town
1–1 HT 1–1
18 Oct
W
H Salford City
2–0 HT 0–0
11 Oct
L
A Colchester
2–6 HT 1–4
04 Oct
W
H Newport County
4–1 HT 2–0
27 Sep
D
A Bromley
2–2 HT 1–1
20 Sep
D
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–1 HT 0–1
13 Sep
L
A Walsall
0–1 HT 0–1
06 Sep
D
H Crawley Town
2–2 HT 0–2
30 Aug
W
A Harrogate Town
2–1 HT 1–0
23 Aug
L
A Gillingham
1–4 HT 0–1
19 Aug
W
H Bristol Rovers
3–1 HT 1–0
16 Aug
W
A Cheltenham
2–0 HT 0–0
09 Aug
W
H Barrow
1–0 HT 1–0
02 Aug
L
A Walsall
1–2 HT 0–0
16 May
L
H Walsall
0–2 HT 0–2
11 May
W
A Accrington ST
1–0 HT 1–0
03 May
W
H Morecambe
4–1 HT 1–0
26 Apr
D
H Bradford
3–3 HT 1–2
21 Apr
D
A AFC Wimbledon
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Apr
W
H Fleetwood Town
3–0 HT 0–0
12 Apr
D
H Gillingham
1–1 HT 0–1
08 Apr
L
A Tranmere
0–4 HT 0–0
05 Apr
W
H Carlisle
2–1 HT 0–0
01 Apr
W
A Barrow
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Mar
D
H Harrogate Town
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Mar
W
A Notts County
2–1 HT 0–0
15 Mar
W
A Salford City
4–0 HT 2–0
11 Mar
W
H Newport County
2–1 HT 2–1
08 Mar
L
A Colchester
0–1 HT 0–0
04 Mar
L
H Crewe
1–3 HT 0–2
01 Mar
L
A Swindon Town
0–1 HT 0–0
22 Feb
L
A Walsall
1–3 HT 1–0
15 Feb
W
H Doncaster
5–2 HT 2–1
06 Feb
L
A Cheltenham
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Feb
W
H Bromley
3–0 HT 1–0
28 Jan
D
H Port Vale
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Jan
D
A Grimsby
1–1 HT 1–1
18 Jan
L
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–2 HT 0–2
01 Jan
L
A Bradford
1–2 HT 1–1
29 Dec
L
A Fleetwood Town
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
W
H AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 1–0
21 Dec
W
A Carlisle
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Dec
W
H Tranmere
3–0 HT 2–0
07 Dec
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
0–3 HT 0–2
03 Dec
W
H Barrow
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
A Harrogate Town
1–2 HT 0–0
16 Nov
L
H Accrington ST
0–3 HT 0–1
09 Nov
W
A Morecambe
5–2 HT 1–1
26 Oct
D
H Colchester
1–1 HT 0–1
22 Oct
W
A Newport County
3–0 HT 1–0
18 Oct
D
H Notts County
2–2 HT 1–1
12 Oct
D
H Walsall
2–2 HT 1–1
05 Oct
D
A Bromley
2–2 HT 2–1
01 Oct
W
A Doncaster
3–0 HT 1–0
28 Sep
D
H Cheltenham
1–1 HT 1–0
21 Sep
L
A Port Vale
0–1 HT 0–1
14 Sep
W
H Grimsby
2–1 HT 2–0
07 Sep
L
A Gillingham
0–1 HT 0–1
31 Aug
D
H Salford City
1–1 HT 0–0
24 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Grimsby and Chesterfield in coming into this match?

Grimsby have gone 27W 12D 22L in their last 61 games (1.52 PPG), while Chesterfield have gone 24W 18D 19L in their last 61 (1.48 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Grimsby at home or Chesterfield away?

Grimsby's home record (1.53 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Grimsby at home: 1.53 PPG; Chesterfield away: 1.17 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 4 times since September 2024 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in League Two. They last met on 14 April 2026, roughly 4 months ago.

Records & Recent Trends

Chesterfield have won the last 2 meetings between these two, a run that gives them the psychological edge coming in.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Grimsby have gone 0W 1D 1L from 2 meetings on their own ground against Chesterfield — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 4 Meetings

Grimsby

0

Grimsby

1

Draws

Chesterfield

3

Chesterfield

Recent Meetings

Chesterfield
2–1
14 Apr 26
Grimsby
Grimsby
0–1
15 Nov 25
Chesterfield
Grimsby
1–1
18 Jan 25
Chesterfield
Chesterfield
2–1
07 Sep 24
Grimsby

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Grimsby and Chesterfield?

From 4 meetings on record, Grimsby have won 0, Chesterfield have won 3, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Grimsby and Chesterfield last play each other?

They last met on 14 April 2026, when Chesterfield 2-1 Grimsby.

Who has won more matches between Grimsby and Chesterfield?

Chesterfield have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 4 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Grimsby are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 13% of those situations.

Chesterfield are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Grimsby 57%, Chesterfield 43% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 57% (Grimsby) and 53% (Chesterfield). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 23% and 27% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Grimsby have failed to score in 27% of games; Chesterfield in 33%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Grimsby home games / Chesterfield away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Grimsby Grimsby Blended
Metric All
(61 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 44/61
(72.1%)
20/30
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 22/61
(36.1%)
9/30
(30%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 15/17
(88.2%)
10/10
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/17
(41.2%)
4/10
(40%)
Winning at HT 22/61
(36.1%)
9/30
(30%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 6/61
(9.8%)
1/30
(3.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/61
(9.8%)
4/30
(13.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 35/61
(57.4%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 36/61
(59%)
17/30
(56.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 19/61
(31.1%)
7/30
(23.3%)
Clean Sheet 14/61
(23%)
5/30
(16.7%)
Failed to Score 14/61
(23%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Chesterfield Chesterfield Blended
Metric All
(61 games)
Venue
(30 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 45/61
(73.8%)
20/30
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 22/61
(36.1%)
8/30
(26.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 14/16
(87.5%)
9/10
(90%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 9/16
(56.2%)
5/10
(50%)
Winning at HT 20/61
(32.8%)
9/30
(30%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/61
(6.6%)
3/30
(10%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 7/61
(11.5%)
0/30
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 34/61
(55.7%)
13/30
(43.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 34/61
(55.7%)
16/30
(53.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/61
(29.5%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Clean Sheet 16/61
(26.2%)
8/30
(26.7%)
Failed to Score 13/61
(21.3%)
10/30
(33.3%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Grimsby play Chesterfield?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 57% of Grimsby's recent matches and 43% of Chesterfield's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Grimsby vs Chesterfield usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 57% of Grimsby's matches and 53% of Chesterfield's.

Do Grimsby and Chesterfield tend to score early?

Grimsby have had a goal before half-time in 67% of their recent matches, Chesterfield in 67% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as Chesterfield defy the odds to beat Grimsby 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chesterfield beat Grimsby 0-1 at Blundell Park, Regular Season - 16, in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Grimsby 2.15 xG and Chesterfield 1.22 xG, a combined 3.37. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Grimsby fell 2.1 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Grimsby attack 1.20 / defence 0.96 against Chesterfield attack 1.05 / defence 1.31, drawn from 61/61 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Grimsby 58% | Draw 20% | Chesterfield 21%, with Grimsby to win its most likely call at 58%. Instead the game produced a Chesterfield win, an outcome the model had rated at just 21% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 65%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 85% and missed. Over 3.5 was 44% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 57% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Grimsby 59%, Chesterfield 56%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Grimsby's trading profile (61 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 57% of their matches — today it did not.

Chesterfield's trading profile (61 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Grimsby 1.52 PPG, Chesterfield 1.48 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the Chesterfield win broke the near-deadlock. Grimsby (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.50 scoring average — below par going forward. Chesterfield (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.47 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 65% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 62% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 57% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.