Sign in Register

Grimsby 0-0 AFC Wimbledon – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League Two · Regular Season - 1

Kick-off

Sat 5 Aug 2023

15:00

Venue

Blundell Park

Competition

League Two

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Grimsby at 41% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Blundell Park plays host to Grimsby versus AFC Wimbledon in League Two, Regular Season - 1. Kick-off: Saturday 5 August 2023 at 15:00 UTC.

Current Form

Grimsby's overall League Two record this term: 4W 2D 4L from 10 games (1.40 PPG). Last five: W L W L W. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Grimsby haven't played a League Two game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

Grimsby's form when playing at home: 4W 5D 1L across 10 games at Blundell Park this term (1.70 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 5 clean sheets from 10 home games (50%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at Blundell Park.

AFC Wimbledon (all games): 1W 2D 7L across 10 League Two outings this term — 0.50 points per game. Last five: L L L D L. Their scoring rate of 1.00 per game is modest, conceding 1.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. AFC Wimbledon haven't played a League Two game yet this season, so this record is entirely from last season.

AFC Wimbledon's away record: 0W 4D 6L from 10 road trips in League Two this season (0.40 PPG). Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context.

The points-per-game gap of 0.90 in Grimsby's favour (1.40 vs 0.50) is a statistically meaningful difference. The hosts are the form pick here, with draw protection the sensible hedge given the away side's competitiveness.

H2H History

The head-to-head record is closely matched — Grimsby lead 1W to 1W over the last 2 encounters, with 0 draws, though neither side has established a commanding advantage.

Scoring has been limited when these teams have met. The 2 previous contests averaged 1.0 goals, making the Under 2.5 the historically backed angle in the goals market. The most recent clash, on 8 May 2023, ended 1–0 with Grimsby winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading

Grimsby half-time and goal-timing data (46 games, 23 at home): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 76% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 35% of games (home games).

AFC Wimbledon half-time and goal-timing data (46 games, 23 at away): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 59% of the time; BTTS occurs in 56% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 52% of games (away games); they fail to score in 33% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Grimsby 50% versus AFC Wimbledon 52%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Grimsby 39% | AFC Wimbledon 44%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Grimsby 1.24 xG and AFC Wimbledon 0.99 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Grimsby attack 0.936 / defence 0.969 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.945 / defence 1.014. League average goals — home 1.302 / away 1.087. Data: 46 Grimsby games / 46 AFC Wimbledon games used (PrevSeason). Note: current-season sample is too small — prior-season data is carrying the calculation. Model confidence is reduced; treat probabilities as directional rather than precise.

Result probabilities: Grimsby 41% | Draw 31% | AFC Wimbledon 29%. Fair-value odds: Grimsby 2.44 | Draw 3.23 | AFC Wimbledon 3.45. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 31% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 39% | BTTS probability 46% | Total xG 2.23. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 61% — total xG of 2.23 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 46% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Grimsby at 41% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 31% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Grimsby if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 29% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

The Poisson model projects 2.23 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 39% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 2.0 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 46% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: Grimsby 50% | AFC Wimbledon 60%.

The Poisson model is drawing on PrevSeason data (46 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Form Grimsby lead on PPG: 1.40 vs 0.50 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form AFC Wimbledon Poisson xG (0.99) exceeds their form scoring rate (0.70) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Grimsby — Grimsby at 41% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 31% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 39% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.
Market Poisson model is using prior-season data only (46/46 games) — current-season form data is limited; weight form and market signals more heavily for this fixture.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon | Competition: League Two, Regular Season - 1 | Venue: Blundell Park • Kick-off: Saturday 5 Aug 2023, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Grimsby 41% | Draw 31% | AFC Wimbledon 29% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 39% | BTTS 46% | xG Grimsby 1.24 / AFC Wimbledon 0.99 • Poisson strength factors: Grimsby attack 0.936 / def 0.969 | AFC Wimbledon attack 0.945 / def 1.014 | league avg home 1.302 / away 1.087 • Poisson stance: Grimsby (41%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.24

Grimsby xG

Expected Goals

0.99

AFC Wimbledon xG

41%
31%
29%
Grimsby Draw AFC Wimbledon

46%

BTTS

66%

Over 1.5

39%

Over 2.5

19%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon kick off?

Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 5 August 2023 at Blundell Park.

What was the final score in Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?

Grimsby 0 - 0 AFC Wimbledon.

Where is Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon being played?

The match is being played at Blundell Park.

What competition is Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon part of?

Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon is a Regular Season - 1 fixture in the League Two (England).

Who is favourite to win Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our statistical model gives Grimsby a 41% chance of winning, AFC Wimbledon a 29% chance, and a 31% chance of a draw — making Grimsby the favourite.

Will both teams score in Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our model estimates a 46% probability that both Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon will score (BTTS).

Will Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 39%.

What is the head-to-head record between Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon?

Record (2 meetings): Grimsby 1W | Draws 0 | AFC Wimbledon 1W.

What form are Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon in?

No current-season fixtures available — form shown from previous season data. Grimsby (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.40 | L5 W-L-W-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Grimsby's attacking strength (0.94x league average) is weighed against AFC Wimbledon's defensive record (1.01x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.24. Flip it around — AFC Wimbledon's attack (0.94x) against Grimsby's defence (0.97x) — and the away total comes out at 0.99.

These ratings are built from 46/46 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 14.9%. Close behind: 0-0 (12.5%), 1-0 (11.6%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 39% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Grimsby Win

41%

Grimsby

2.46

31%

Draw

3.24

29%

AFC Wimbledon

3.50

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

13.3%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

13.2%

Draw

0 – 0

10.7%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.24

Grimsby xG

Total xG

2.23

0.99

AFC Wimbledon xG

41%
31%
29%
GrimsbyDrawAFC Wimbledon

2.46

41%

Home win

3.24

31%

Draw

3.50

29%

Away win

Goals Markets

65%

Over 1.5

1.54

35%

Under 1.5

2.86

39%

Over 2.5

2.56

61%

Under 2.5

1.64

19%

Over 3.5

5.26

81%

Under 3.5

1.23

8%

Over 4.5

12.50

92%

Under 4.5

1.09

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

46%

BTTS Yes

2.18

54%

BTTS No

1.85

Clean Sheet

37%

Grimsby

2.70

29%

AFC Wimbledon

3.44

Win to Nil

15%

Grimsby

6.67

8%

AFC Wimbledon

12.06

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 10.7 10.7 5.3 1.8 0.4 0.1
1 13.3 13.2 6.6 2.2 0.5 0.1
2 8.2 8.2 4.1 1.3 0.3 0.1
3 3.4 3.4 1.7 0.6 0.1
4 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.2
5 0.3 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.236
λ Away (xG) 0.995
Total xG 2.231
League avg home goals 1.302
League avg away goals 1.087
Grimsby attack strength 0.936
Grimsby defence strength 0.969
AFC Wimbledon attack strength 0.945
AFC Wimbledon defence strength 1.014
Data phase PrevSeason
Games used (H/A) 46 / 46

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.9%.

How many goals are Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon expected to score?

The model projects 1.24 expected goals for Grimsby and 0.99 for AFC Wimbledon, a combined total of 2.23.

How confident is the prediction model for Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 41%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 46 outings, Grimsby have picked up 1.33 PPG on a 16W 13D 17L record — W-L-W-L-W across the most recent five. Grimsby haven't played enough this season for a current-season-only sample, so this includes results carried over from last season.

AFC Wimbledon's form line: 11W 15D 20L from 46 games, 1.04 PPG, last five L-L-L-D-L. AFC Wimbledon haven't played enough this season for a current-season-only sample, so this includes results carried over from last season.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.33 PPG for Grimsby against 1.04 for AFC Wimbledon. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Grimsby have posted 1.35 PPG from 23 outings (7W 10D 6L).

On the road, AFC Wimbledon have gone 4W 8D 11L from 23 away games — 0.87 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Grimsby come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Grimsby are averaging 1.07 goals scored and 1.22 conceded per game recently; AFC Wimbledon are on 1.04 scored and 1.30 conceded.

Last 46 Results — League Two

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Grimsby

Grimsby

Pre-Season
W L W L W
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

Pre-Season
L L L D L
46 Played 46
16/13/17 W / D / L 11/15/20
1.33 Points Per Game 1.04
1.07 Avg Goals Scored 1.04
1.22 Avg Goals Conceded 1.30
2.28 Avg Goals / Game 2.35
15 Clean Sheets 14
23 BTTS 24
18 Over 2.5 Games 20
Grimsby

Grimsby

W
H AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 1–0
08 May
L
A Stevenage
0–2 HT 0–0
29 Apr
W
H Crewe
2–0 HT 1–0
25 Apr
L
A Tranmere
0–2 HT 0–1
22 Apr
W
H Barrow
1–0 HT 0–0
18 Apr
D
H Mansfield Town
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Apr
W
A Doncaster
2–1 HT 0–1
10 Apr
L
H Hartlepool
1–4 HT 0–1
07 Apr
L
A Bradford
2–3 HT 2–1
01 Apr
D
A Crawley Town
1–1 HT 1–0
28 Mar
D
H Walsall
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Mar
D
A Mansfield Town
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Mar
W
A Sutton Utd
1–0 HT 1–0
14 Mar
W
H Rochdale
1–0 HT 0–0
11 Mar
D
H Newport County
1–1 HT 1–0
07 Mar
L
A Carlisle
0–2 HT 0–2
04 Mar
D
H Leyton Orient
2–2 HT 0–1
25 Feb
D
H Harrogate Town
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Feb
W
A Northampton
2–1 HT 0–1
18 Feb
L
A Gillingham
1–2 HT 0–0
14 Feb
L
H Colchester
0–1 HT 0–1
11 Feb
W
A Crewe
3–0 HT 2–0
04 Feb
L
A Swindon Town
0–5 HT 0–1
14 Jan
W
H Stockport County
1–0 HT 0–0
01 Jan
L
H Salford City
1–4 HT 1–4
29 Dec
L
A Harrogate Town
2–3 HT 1–1
26 Dec
W
H Tranmere
2–1 HT 1–0
10 Dec
L
A AFC Wimbledon
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Dec
D
H Stevenage
1–1 HT 0–0
19 Nov
L
H Doncaster
1–3 HT 0–1
12 Nov
L
A Hartlepool
1–2 HT 1–0
29 Oct
L
A Barrow
0–1 HT 0–0
25 Oct
D
H Bradford
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Oct
W
A Stockport County
3–1 HT 2–1
15 Oct
W
H Crawley Town
3–0 HT 1–0
08 Oct
D
A Salford City
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Oct
L
H Carlisle
1–2 HT 0–2
27 Sep
L
H Swindon Town
1–2 HT 1–2
24 Sep
W
A Colchester
1–0 HT 0–0
17 Sep
D
H Gillingham
1–1 HT 1–1
13 Sep
W
A Newport County
2–0 HT 0–0
03 Sep
W
A Walsall
2–1 HT 0–1
27 Aug
D
H Sutton Utd
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Aug
W
A Rochdale
1–0 HT 0–0
13 Aug
D
H Northampton
1–1 HT 0–0
06 Aug
L
A Leyton Orient
0–2 HT 0–0
30 Jul
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

L
A Grimsby
0–1 HT 0–1
08 May
D
H Tranmere
1–1 HT 0–0
29 Apr
L
H Swindon Town
1–5 HT 1–3
22 Apr
L
A Stevenage
1–2 HT 1–1
15 Apr
L
H Salford City
2–3 HT 1–0
10 Apr
D
A Harrogate Town
2–2 HT 1–0
07 Apr
L
H Rochdale
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Apr
W
H Walsall
2–0 HT 0–0
28 Mar
L
A Barrow
1–2 HT 1–0
25 Mar
L
H Crawley Town
0–1 HT 0–1
18 Mar
D
A Newport County
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Mar
L
A Doncaster
1–2 HT 1–2
11 Mar
L
H Mansfield Town
1–3 HT 1–1
04 Mar
L
H Stevenage
2–3 HT 1–0
28 Feb
L
A Gillingham
1–2 HT 0–0
25 Feb
D
H Hartlepool
2–2 HT 1–0
18 Feb
D
A Northampton
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Feb
D
H Carlisle
0–0 HT 0–0
11 Feb
L
A Leyton Orient
0–1 HT 0–0
04 Feb
W
H Stockport County
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Jan
D
H Bradford
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jan
D
A Crewe
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jan
L
A Sutton Utd
1–2 HT 1–1
01 Jan
W
A Colchester
2–1 HT 0–0
29 Dec
D
H Newport County
1–1 HT 0–0
26 Dec
D
A Swindon Town
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Dec
W
H Grimsby
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Dec
W
A Tranmere
2–0 HT 1–0
19 Nov
D
A Salford City
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Nov
W
H Leyton Orient
2–0 HT 2–0
08 Nov
W
H Harrogate Town
3–2 HT 1–0
29 Oct
D
H Crewe
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Oct
W
A Rochdale
2–1 HT 1–0
22 Oct
L
H Sutton Utd
0–1 HT 0–1
15 Oct
L
A Walsall
1–3 HT 1–1
08 Oct
W
H Colchester
2–1 HT 0–1
01 Oct
D
A Bradford
2–2 HT 0–1
24 Sep
L
A Carlisle
1–2 HT 0–1
17 Sep
L
H Northampton
0–2 HT 0–1
13 Sep
L
A Stockport County
0–1 HT 0–1
03 Sep
L
H Barrow
0–1 HT 0–1
27 Aug
W
A Crawley Town
2–0 HT 2–0
20 Aug
L
A Mansfield Town
2–5 HT 2–2
16 Aug
D
H Doncaster
2–2 HT 0–0
13 Aug
D
A Hartlepool
0–0 HT 0–0
06 Aug
W
H Gillingham
2–0 HT 1–0
30 Jul

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon in coming into this match?

Grimsby have gone 16W 13D 17L in their last 46 games (1.33 PPG), while AFC Wimbledon have gone 11W 15D 20L in their last 46 (1.04 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Grimsby at home or AFC Wimbledon away?

Grimsby's home record (1.35 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Grimsby at home: 1.35 PPG; AFC Wimbledon away: 0.87 PPG.

Have Grimsby or AFC Wimbledon been keeping clean sheets recently?

Grimsby have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their recent games, AFC Wimbledon in 30%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 6 times since December 2022 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in League Two. It has been a while since the last meeting — 3 May 2025, some 2 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Records & Recent Trends

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Grimsby have gone 1W 1D 1L from 3 meetings on their own ground against AFC Wimbledon — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 6 Meetings

Grimsby

2

Grimsby

2

Draws

AFC Wimbledon

2

AFC Wimbledon

Recent Meetings

Grimsby
0–1
03 May 25
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
0–1
09 Nov 24
Grimsby
AFC Wimbledon
0–0
05 Mar 24
Grimsby
Grimsby
0–0
05 Aug 23
AFC Wimbledon
Grimsby
1–0
08 May 23
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
1–0
03 Dec 22
Grimsby

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon?

From 6 meetings on record, Grimsby have won 2, AFC Wimbledon have won 2, and 2 have been drawn.

When did Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon last play each other?

They last met on 3 May 2025, when Grimsby 0-1 AFC Wimbledon.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Grimsby are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 26% of the time.

AFC Wimbledon are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 26% of the time.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Grimsby 56%, AFC Wimbledon 56% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 35% (Grimsby) and 52% (AFC Wimbledon).

On the defensive side: Grimsby keep a clean sheet in 39% of their matches; AFC Wimbledon in 30%; AFC Wimbledon in 35%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Grimsby home games / AFC Wimbledon away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Grimsby Grimsby Pre-Season
Metric All
(46 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 29/46
(63%)
15/23
(65.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 10/46
(21.7%)
4/23
(17.4%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/17
(76.5%)
5/8
(62.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/17
(35.3%)
2/8
(25%)
Winning at HT 12/46
(26.1%)
6/23
(26.1%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/46
(10.9%)
2/23
(8.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/46
(10.9%)
2/23
(8.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 23/46
(50%)
13/23
(56.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 18/46
(39.1%)
8/23
(34.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 8/46
(17.4%)
4/23
(17.4%)
Clean Sheet 15/46
(32.6%)
9/23
(39.1%)
Failed to Score 12/46
(26.1%)
4/23
(17.4%)
AFC Wimbledon AFC Wimbledon Pre-Season
Metric All
(46 games)
Venue
(23 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 29/46
(63%)
15/23
(65.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 9/46
(19.6%)
6/23
(26.1%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/17
(58.8%)
3/8
(37.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 6/17
(35.3%)
2/8
(25%)
Winning at HT 13/46
(28.3%)
6/23
(26.1%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/46
(15.2%)
3/23
(13%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/46
(4.3%)
1/23
(4.3%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 24/46
(52.2%)
13/23
(56.5%)
Over 2.5 Goals 20/46
(43.5%)
12/23
(52.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 11/46
(23.9%)
4/23
(17.4%)
Clean Sheet 14/46
(30.4%)
7/23
(30.4%)
Failed to Score 15/46
(32.6%)
8/23
(34.8%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Grimsby play AFC Wimbledon?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 56% of Grimsby's games and 56% of AFC Wimbledon's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Grimsby vs AFC Wimbledon usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 35% of Grimsby's recent games and 52% of AFC Wimbledon's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon tend to score early?

Grimsby have had a goal before half-time in 65% of their recent matches, AFC Wimbledon in 65% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Stalemate at Grimsby's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Blundell Park, Regular Season - 1, as Grimsby and AFC Wimbledon drew 0-0 in the League Two. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Grimsby 1.24 xG and AFC Wimbledon 0.99 xG, a combined 2.23. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Grimsby fell 1.2 short of their projected output. AFC Wimbledon landed 1.0 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Grimsby attack 0.94 / defence 0.97 against AFC Wimbledon attack 0.94 / defence 1.01, drawn from 46/46 games (PrevSeason).

On the result, the model split it Grimsby 41% | Draw 31% | AFC Wimbledon 29%, with Grimsby to win its most likely call at 41%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 31%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 39%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 66% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 46% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 41% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Grimsby 39%, AFC Wimbledon 44%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Grimsby's trading profile (46 games, 23 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 33% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 26% of games, a blank that repeated today.

AFC Wimbledon's trading profile (46 games, 23 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 52% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 30% of the time, and duly kept one; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Grimsby 1.33 PPG, AFC Wimbledon 1.04 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Grimsby (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.04 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.09 average — tighter than their form line. AFC Wimbledon (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 0.96 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.30 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 39% Over 2.5 probability, 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 46% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 41% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.