Sign in Register

Shenzhen Ruby FC 2-1 Chongqing Lifan – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 14

Kick-off

Wed 11 Aug 2021

11:00

Venue

Yuexiushan Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Shenzhen Ruby FC at 44% — recent form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Yuexiushan Stadium plays host to Shenzhen Ruby FC versus Chongqing Lifan in Super League (matchday 14). Kick-off: Wednesday 11 August 2021 at 12:00 UK time.

Form

Shenzhen Ruby FC (all games): 5W 2D 3L across their last 10 — 1.70 PPG. Last five: W W L L L. They are averaging 2.00 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Shenzhen Ruby FC's form when playing at home: 2W 3D 1L across their last 6 home games (1.50 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 0.83 conceded per game.

Chongqing Lifan have collected 1.00 PPG across their last 10 games: 3W 1D 6L. Last five: W D L W L. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%).

Chongqing Lifan's form when playing away from home: 0W 1D 5L across their last 6 road games (0.17 PPG). Away from home they average 0.67 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 67% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 0.17 is notably below their overall 1.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness recently.

The form ledger tips toward Shenzhen Ruby FC. A 0.70 PPG lead over Chongqing Lifan (1.70 vs 1.00) is a consistent enough margin to carry weight. If the win odds appear compressed, Draw No Bet offers draw insurance at a lower cost than a full switch to Double Chance.

H2H Analysis

The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 1 H2H match in our data, Shenzhen Ruby FC edge it 1 wins to 0, with 0 draws. Neither side has a commanding advantage. With only 1 H2H match to go on, treat this as a light input.

These two sides have produced goals at a healthy rate, averaging 3.0 per game across the 1 H2H match we hold. That scoring profile supports the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent of those, on 21 Jul 2021, ended Shenzhen Ruby FC 3–0 Chongqing Lifan — a Shenzhen Ruby FC win.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H signal is in the goals market — at 3.0 goals per game, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Shenzhen Ruby FC half-time and goal-timing data (last 13 games, 6 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 50% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 33% of the time; of the 5 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 40%; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (home games); they fail to score in 31% of games.

Chongqing Lifan half-time and goal-timing data (last 13 games, 6 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 67% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; of the 7 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 29%; BTTS occurs in 67% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 54%; they fail to score in 31% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Shenzhen Ruby FC 62% versus Chongqing Lifan 54%; no strong lean in either direction. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Shenzhen Ruby FC 69% | Chongqing Lifan 62%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.26 xG and Chongqing Lifan 0.79 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 0.837 / defence 0.929 | Chongqing Lifan attack 0.645 / defence 1.409. League average goals — home 1.066 / away 1.318. Chongqing Lifan's defence rating of 1.409 (above 1 = concedes more than average) is pushing Shenzhen Ruby FC's projected output up. Chongqing Lifan's attack rating of 0.645 is below the league average, which holds their xG down at 0.79. Data: built from Shenzhen Ruby FC's last 13 games and Chongqing Lifan's last 13.

Result probabilities: Shenzhen Ruby FC 44% | Draw 35% | Chongqing Lifan 20%. Fair-value odds: Shenzhen Ruby FC 2.25 | Draw 2.85 | Chongqing Lifan 4.89. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome reaches 45%. The draw at 35% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 34% | BTTS Yes probability 42% | Total xG 2.05. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 66% probability — total xG of 2.05 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match. BTTS No at 58% is only a slight lean — the model gives both sides a fair chance of scoring, so No isn't a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Shenzhen Ruby FC as the most likely outcome at 44% — marginal model lean. Recent form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 35% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Shenzhen Ruby FC if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 2.05 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 66% — a Poisson-only call with no corroboration from form or H2H.

Poisson assigns a 58% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral — both teams scored in: Shenzhen Ruby FC 50% (last 6 home games) | Chongqing Lifan 67% (last 6 away games).

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (Shenzhen Ruby FC 1W, 0D, Chongqing Lifan 0W from the 1 H2H match in our data), with no clear advantage.
Goals The H2H data averages 3.00 goals/game but Poisson xG is only 2.05 — the model's defensive ratings are pulling the projection below the head-to-head norm.
BTTS H2H BTTS 0% and Poisson BTTS No 58% — BTTS No has double-source support.
Form Shenzhen Ruby FC lead on PPG: 1.70 vs 1.00 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Shenzhen Ruby FC Poisson xG (1.26) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.00 over their last 6 home games) — against this opponent, the model expects more than their recent scoring rate.
Goals Form averages (~1.5 goals/game from Shenzhen Ruby FC's last 6 home games and Chongqing Lifan's last 6 away games) and Poisson xG (2.05) both support Under 2.5 goals (66% probability).
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Shenzhen Ruby FC — Shenzhen Ruby FC at 44% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 35% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 34% — the model points to Under 2.5 (66%).

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan | Competition: Super League, matchday 14 | Venue: Yuexiushan Stadium • Kick-off: Wednesday 11 August 2021 at 12:00 UK time • Data inputs: head-to-head data, recent form (overall and home/away), the Poisson prediction model and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Shenzhen Ruby FC 44% | Draw 35% | Chongqing Lifan 20% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 34% (Under 66%) | BTTS Yes 42% (No 58%) | xG Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.26 / Chongqing Lifan 0.79 • Poisson strength factors: Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 0.837 / def 0.929 | Chongqing Lifan attack 0.645 / def 1.409 | league avg home 1.066 / away 1.318 • Poisson stance: Shenzhen Ruby FC (44%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.26

Shenzhen Ruby FC xG

Expected Goals

0.79

Chongqing Lifan xG

44%
35%
20%
Shenzhen Ruby FC Draw Chongqing Lifan

42%

BTTS

64%

Over 1.5

34%

Over 2.5

15%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan FAQs

What time does Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan kick off?

Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan kicked off at 12:00 UK time on Wednesday 11 August 2021 at Yuexiushan Stadium.

What was the final score in Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan?

Shenzhen Ruby FC 2 - 1 Chongqing Lifan.

Where is Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan being played?

The match is being played at Yuexiushan Stadium.

What competition is Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan part of?

Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan is a Super League fixture (matchday 14) (China).

Who is favourite to win Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan?

Our statistical model gives Shenzhen Ruby FC a 44% chance of winning, Chongqing Lifan a 20% chance, and a 35% chance of a draw — making Shenzhen Ruby FC the favourite.

Will both teams score in Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan?

Our model estimates a 42% probability that both Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan will score, so it leans towards BTTS No (58%).

Will Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 34%, so it leans towards under 2.5 goals (66%).

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

Working from Shenzhen Ruby FC's attack rating (0.84) and Chongqing Lifan's defence rating (1.41), the model arrives at 1.26 expected goals for the home side. Flip it around — Chongqing Lifan's attack (0.65x) against Shenzhen Ruby FC's defence (0.93x) — and the away total comes out at 0.79.

These ratings are built from Shenzhen Ruby FC's last 13 games and Chongqing Lifan's last 13 — a full enough recent sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 0-0 emerges as the single most likely result, at 14.6%. Close behind: 1-0 (14.6%), 1-1 (14.5%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 44% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Shenzhen Ruby FC Win

44%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

2.25

35%

Draw

2.85

20%

Chongqing Lifan

4.89

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

16.2%

Home win

Most likely

0 – 0

12.9%

Draw

1 – 1

12.8%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.26

Shenzhen Ruby FC xG

Total xG

2.05

0.79

Chongqing Lifan xG

44%
35%
20%
Shenzhen Ruby FCDrawChongqing Lifan

2.25

44%

Home win

2.85

35%

Draw

4.89

20%

Away win

Goals Markets

61%

Over 1.5

1.64

39%

Under 1.5

2.56

34%

Over 2.5

2.94

66%

Under 2.5

1.52

15%

Over 3.5

6.67

85%

Under 3.5

1.18

6%

Over 4.5

16.67

94%

Under 4.5

1.06

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

42%

BTTS Yes

2.38

58%

BTTS No

1.72

Clean Sheet

45%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

2.20

28%

Chongqing Lifan

3.52

Win to Nil

20%

Shenzhen Ruby FC

4.95

6%

Chongqing Lifan

17.20

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 12.9 10.2 4.0 1.1 0.2 –
1 16.2 12.8 5.1 1.3 0.3 –
2 10.2 8.1 3.2 0.8 0.2 –
3 4.3 3.4 1.3 0.4 0.1 –
4 1.3 1.1 0.4 0.1 – –
5 0.3 0.3 0.1 – – –

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

▶ Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.258
λ Away (xG) 0.789
Total xG 2.047
League avg home goals 1.066
League avg away goals 1.318
Shenzhen Ruby FC attack strength 0.837
Shenzhen Ruby FC defence strength 0.929
Chongqing Lifan attack strength 0.645
Chongqing Lifan defence strength 1.409
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 13 / 13

❓ Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan Prediction FAQs

What is the most likely scoreline for Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan?

Our Poisson model rates 0-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.6%.

How many goals are Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan expected to score?

The model projects 1.26 expected goals for Shenzhen Ruby FC and 0.79 for Chongqing Lifan, a combined total of 2.05.

How confident is the prediction model for Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 44%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Across their last 13 outings, Shenzhen Ruby FC have picked up 1.62 PPG on a 6W 3D 4L record — W-W-L-L-L across the most recent five.

Chongqing Lifan's form line: 3W 2D 8L from 13 games, 0.85 PPG, last five W-D-L-W-L.

Put side by side, Shenzhen Ruby FC are the form team by 0.77 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Chongqing Lifan.

Home & Away Splits

On home soil, Shenzhen Ruby FC have posted 1.50 PPG from their last 6 home games (2W 3D 1L).

On the road, Chongqing Lifan have gone 0W 1D 5L from their last 6 away games — 0.17 PPG when travelling. That's a step down from their 0.85 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of Chongqing Lifan's recent record.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Shenzhen Ruby FC come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Shenzhen Ruby FC are averaging 1.69 goals scored and 1.31 conceded per game recently; Chongqing Lifan are on 1.15 scored and 2.00 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Shenzhen Ruby FC have seen both teams score in 62% of their recent games.

Last 13 Results

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Blended
W W L L L
Chongqing Lifan

Chongqing Lifan

Blended
W D L W L
13 Played 13
6/3/4 W / D / L 3/2/8
1.62 Points Per Game 0.85
1.69 Avg Goals Scored 1.15
1.31 Avg Goals Conceded 2.00
3.00 Avg Goals / Game 3.15
3 Clean Sheets 2
8 BTTS 7
9 Over 2.5 Games 8
Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

L
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–2 HT 0–1
08 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
2–4 HT 2–4
05 Aug
L
H Guangzhou R&F
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Aug
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Jul
W
A Qingdao Huanghai
4–1 HT 3–0
27 Jul
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
24 Jul
W
A Chongqing Lifan
3–0 HT 3–0
21 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
D
H Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–1
14 May
W
A Guangzhou R&F
4–2 HT 3–0
08 May
L
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
0–2 HT 0–1
02 May
D
H Qingdao Huanghai
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
W
A Henan Jianye
2–1 HT 1–1
21 Apr
Chongqing Lifan

Chongqing Lifan

L
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–5 HT 1–3
08 Aug
W
H Qingdao Huanghai
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
L
A Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Aug
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–1
30 Jul
W
H Guangzhou R&F
4–0 HT 2–0
27 Jul
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 0–2
24 Jul
L
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–3 HT 0–3
21 Jul
L
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–3 HT 1–2
18 Jul
L
A Qingdao Huanghai
0–1 HT 0–0
15 May
W
H Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 0–1
09 May
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–2 HT 2–2
03 May
L
A Guangzhou R&F
1–3 HT 0–0
26 Apr
L
H Shandong Luneng
0–2 HT 0–0
20 Apr

Shenzhen Ruby FC (Home) vs Chongqing Lifan (Away)

Home games only for the home side · Away games only for the away side

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC

Blended
D W D W L
Chongqing Lifan

Chongqing Lifan

Blended
L L L D L
6 Played 6
2/3/1 W / D / L 0/1/5
1.50 Points Per Game 0.17
1.00 Avg Goals Scored 0.67
0.83 Avg Goals Conceded 2.00
1.83 Avg Goals / Game 2.67
2 Clean Sheets 0
3 BTTS 4
3 Over 2.5 Games 3
Shenzhen Ruby FC

Shenzhen Ruby FC — Home

L
Guangzhou R&F
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Aug
W
Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Jul
D
Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
24 Jul
W
Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–1 HT 0–1
18 Jul
D
Shandong Luneng
2–2 HT 0–1
14 May
D
Qingdao Huanghai
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
Chongqing Lifan

Chongqing Lifan — Away

L
Henan Jianye
0–1 HT 0–1
02 Aug
D
Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–1
30 Jul
L
Shandong Luneng
1–3 HT 0–2
24 Jul
L
Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–3 HT 1–2
18 Jul
L
Qingdao Huanghai
0–1 HT 0–0
15 May
L
Guangzhou R&F
1–3 HT 0–0
26 Apr

❓ Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan Form FAQs

What form are Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan in coming into this match?

Shenzhen Ruby FC have gone 6W 3D 4L in their last 13 games (1.62 PPG), while Chongqing Lifan have gone 3W 2D 8L in their last 13 (0.85 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Shenzhen Ruby FC at home or Chongqing Lifan away?

Shenzhen Ruby FC's home record (1.50 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Shenzhen Ruby FC at home: 1.50 PPG; Chongqing Lifan away: 0.17 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

We have 2 H2H matches between these sides on record, dating back to July 2021 — a small sample, so read the trends with care. All of them came in Super League. The most recent in our data was on 11 August 2021, some 5 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Last 2 Meetings

Shenzhen Ruby FC

2

Shenzhen Ruby FC

0

Draws

Chongqing Lifan

0

Chongqing Lifan

Recent Meetings

Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–1
11 Aug 21
Chongqing Lifan
Chongqing Lifan
0–3
21 Jul 21
Shenzhen Ruby FC

❓ Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan H2H FAQs

What is the head-to-head record between Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan?

Across the 2 head-to-head matches in our data, Shenzhen Ruby FC have won 2, Chongqing Lifan have won 0, and 0 have been drawn.

When did Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan last play each other?

The most recent meeting in our data was on 11 August 2021: Shenzhen Ruby FC 2-1 Chongqing Lifan.

Who has won more matches between Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan?

Shenzhen Ruby FC have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from the 2 head-to-head matches in our data.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Shenzhen Ruby FC see a goal before the break in 50% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 100% of those situations.

Chongqing Lifan are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 67% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 25% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Shenzhen Ruby FC 50%, Chongqing Lifan 67% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 50% (Shenzhen Ruby FC) and 50% (Chongqing Lifan).

On the defensive side: Shenzhen Ruby FC keep a clean sheet in 33% of their matches; Shenzhen Ruby FC have failed to score in 50% of games; Chongqing Lifan in 33%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Shenzhen Ruby FC home games / Chongqing Lifan away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Shenzhen Ruby FC Shenzhen Ruby FC Blended
Metric All
(13 games)
Venue
(6 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 10/13
(76.9%)
3/6
(50%)
2+ Goals Before HT 6/13
(46.2%)
1/6
(16.7%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 1/3
(33.3%)
1/3
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 0/3
(0%)
0/3
(0%)
Winning at HT 3/13
(23.1%)
0/6
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/3
(0%)
β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/5
(40%)
2/2
(100%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 8/13
(61.5%)
3/6
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 9/13
(69.2%)
3/6
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 4/13
(30.8%)
1/6
(16.7%)
Clean Sheet 3/13
(23.1%)
2/6
(33.3%)
Failed to Score 4/13
(30.8%)
3/6
(50%)
Chongqing Lifan Chongqing Lifan Blended
Metric All
(13 games)
Venue
(6 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 9/13
(69.2%)
4/6
(66.7%)
2+ Goals Before HT 6/13
(46.2%)
2/6
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 4/4
(100%)
2/2
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/4
(50%)
1/2
(50%)
Winning at HT 1/13
(7.7%)
0/6
(0%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 0/1
(0%)
β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/7
(28.6%)
1/4
(25%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 7/13
(53.8%)
4/6
(66.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 8/13
(61.5%)
3/6
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 7/13
(53.8%)
3/6
(50%)
Clean Sheet 2/13
(15.4%)
0/6
(0%)
Failed to Score 4/13
(30.8%)
2/6
(33.3%)

❓ Shenzhen Ruby FC vs Chongqing Lifan Trading FAQs

Do both teams usually score in Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan matches?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 50% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's games and 67% of Chongqing Lifan's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Are Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan matches usually high-scoring?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 50% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's recent games and 50% of Chongqing Lifan's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Shenzhen Ruby FC and Chongqing Lifan matches tend to have early goals?

There has been at least one first-half goal in 50% of Shenzhen Ruby FC's recent matches and 67% of Chongqing Lifan's — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Prediction vindicated as Shenzhen Ruby FC edge out Chongqing Lifan 2-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Shenzhen Ruby FC beat Chongqing Lifan 2-1 at Yuexiushan Stadium, Regular Season - 14, in the Super League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Shenzhen Ruby FC 1.26 xG and Chongqing Lifan 0.79 xG, a combined 2.05. The scoreboard read 2-1 for 3 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Shenzhen Ruby FC attack 0.84 / defence 0.93 against Chongqing Lifan attack 0.65 / defence 1.41, drawn from 13/13 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Shenzhen Ruby FC 44% | Draw 35% | Chongqing Lifan 20%, with Shenzhen Ruby FC to win its most likely call at 44%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 34%. The game delivered 3, so it went over — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 64% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 42% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 65% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Shenzhen Ruby FC 69%, Chongqing Lifan 62%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 58%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Shenzhen Ruby FC's trading profile (13 games, 6 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.

Chongqing Lifan's trading profile (13 games, 6 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Shenzhen Ruby FC arrived the stronger side — 1.62 PPG against 0.85. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Shenzhen Ruby FC (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.00 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 34% Over 2.5 probability, but 3 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 42% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 65% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.

More Super League fixtures — matchday 14

All Super League fixtures →