Chongqing Lifan 1-0 Qingdao Huanghai – Result & Analysis

📋

Poisson model rates Chongqing Lifan at 58% — neither recent form nor the head-to-head data gives a clear steer either way as Chongqing Lifan face Qingdao Huanghai.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Chongqing Lifan and Qingdao Huanghai meet at Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center Central Stadium in Super League (matchday 12). This fixture gets under way on Thursday 5 August 2021 at 14:00 UK time.

Current Form

Chongqing Lifan's record over their last 10 games: 2W 2D 6L (0.80 PPG). Last five: L L W D L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings (10%). Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets.

Chongqing Lifan's home record over their last 5 home games: 2W 1D 2L (1.40 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.80 goals scored and 1.80 conceded per game. Their home PPG of 1.40 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.80 — Chongqing Lifan are significantly better at home than their overall form suggests.

Qingdao Huanghai (all games): 1W 1D 8L across their last 10 — 0.40 points per game. Last five: L L L L L. Their scoring rate of 0.40 per game is modest, conceding 2.60 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.60 per game is a high rate — their defence has been exposed regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings (20%). Both teams have scored in only 20% of their fixtures — a very low rate that strongly backs BTTS No.

When travelling, Qingdao Huanghai have posted 0W 1D 4L from their last 5 away outings — 0.20 PPG. Away from home they average 0.40 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

Both sides are running at similar form levels — 0.80 PPG for Chongqing Lifan against 0.40 for Qingdao Huanghai. There is no clear form edge to exploit here; other signals need to take the lead.

Head-to-Head

The head-to-head record is closely matched — across the 1 H2H match in our data, Qingdao Huanghai edge it 1 wins to 0, with 0 draws. Neither side has a commanding advantage. With only 1 H2H match to go on, treat this as a light input.

The 1 H2H match in our data have been tight, averaging just 1.0 goals per game — a meaningful input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent of those, on 15 May 2021, ended Chongqing Lifan 0–1 Qingdao Huanghai — a Qingdao Huanghai win.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game, the H2H data points toward a tight, low-scoring contest — Under 2.5 is the stronger head-to-head angle regardless of which side wins.

Trading

Chongqing Lifan half-time and goal-timing data (last 11 games, 5 of them at home): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 80% of their matches in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; of the 6 games they trailed at half-time, they recovered to draw or win 33%; BTTS occurs in 40% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 80% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 54%; they fail to score in 36% of games.

Qingdao Huanghai half-time and goal-timing data (last 11 games, 5 of them away): at least one goal arrives before half-time in 60% of their matches in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; BTTS occurs in 20% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 20% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 36%; they fail to score in 64% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chongqing Lifan 54% versus Qingdao Huanghai 27%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chongqing Lifan 64% | Qingdao Huanghai 46%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chongqing Lifan 2.00 xG and Qingdao Huanghai 0.98 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chongqing Lifan attack 1.201 / defence 1.253 | Qingdao Huanghai attack 0.626 / defence 1.598. League average goals — home 1.040 / away 1.252. Qingdao Huanghai's defence rating of 1.598 (above 1 = concedes more than average) is pushing Chongqing Lifan's projected output up. Qingdao Huanghai's attack rating of 0.626 is below the league average, which holds their xG down at 0.98. Chongqing Lifan's defence rating of 1.253 (above 1 = concedes more than average) is pushing Qingdao Huanghai's projected output up. Data: built from Chongqing Lifan's last 11 games and Qingdao Huanghai's last 11.

Result probabilities: Chongqing Lifan 58% | Draw 27% | Qingdao Huanghai 15%. Fair-value odds: Chongqing Lifan 1.72 | Draw 3.71 | Qingdao Huanghai 6.65. The model has a clear lean to Chongqing Lifan (58%) — a 31pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 57% | BTTS Yes probability 57% | Total xG 2.98. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 57% — the 2.98 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 57% is only a slight lean — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chongqing Lifan at 58% — clear model lean. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 27% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.98 combined xG gives a 57% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable conviction, supported by recent form (Chongqing Lifan's last 5 home games and Qingdao Huanghai's last 5 away games) averaging 3.0 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 57%. This conflicts with form data — both teams scored in: Chongqing Lifan 40% (last 5 home games) | Qingdao Huanghai 20% (last 5 away games), a notable divergence.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights