Sign in Register

RWDM 0-1 AS Eupen – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Jupiler Pro League · Regular Season - 21

Kick-off

Wed 24 Jan 2024

18:15

Venue

Edmond Machtensstadion

Competition

Jupiler Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates RWDM at 46%, yet other data sources diverge — this RWDM vs AS Eupen fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

RWDM host AS Eupen at Edmond Machtensstadion in Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 21. Kick-off is scheduled for Wednesday 24 January 2024 at 18:15 UTC.

Form Guide

RWDM — All Games: 2W 3D 5L from 10 Jupiler Pro League outings this season, averaging 0.90 points per game. Last five: D L W L L. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for RWDM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

RWDM's form when playing at home: 3W 4D 3L across 10 games at Edmond Machtensstadion this term (1.30 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 1.70 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture.

Looking at all fixtures this season, AS Eupen stand at 1W 2D 7L from 10 Jupiler Pro League matches — 0.50 PPG. Last five: D L L L L. Their scoring rate of 0.80 per game is modest, conceding 2.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for AS Eupen, so this record blends games from this season and last.

AS Eupen away from home this season: 2W 1D 7L from 10 away games — 0.70 PPG on the road. Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game.

The form figures are too closely matched to derive a directional pick: RWDM 0.90 PPG, AS Eupen 0.50 PPG. Look to other data sets to build the analysis.

Head to Head

There is little to separate the sides historically. From 1 previous meetings, RWDM have won 1, AS Eupen 0, with 0 draws — a balanced ledger that offers no obvious directional steer on its own.

The 1 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 4.0 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 11 Nov 2023, ended 3–1 with RWDM winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 4.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

RWDM in-play tendencies (52 games, 26 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 87% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 58% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 58% of games (home games).

AS Eupen in-play tendencies (52 games, 26 at away): they score before half-time in 65% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 93% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 42%.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — RWDM 64% and AS Eupen 60% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (RWDM 64% | AS Eupen 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects RWDM 1.67 xG and AS Eupen 1.17 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: RWDM attack 0.840 / defence 1.321 | AS Eupen attack 0.738 / defence 1.218. League average goals — home 1.627 / away 1.198. AS Eupen bring a strong defensive rating of 1.218 — this is suppressing RWDM's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 20 RWDM games / 54 AS Eupen games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: RWDM 46% | Draw 30% | AS Eupen 24%. Fair-value odds: RWDM 2.17 | Draw 3.33 | AS Eupen 4.17. RWDM hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (30%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 2.83. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.83 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is RWDM at 46% — moderate model lean. With a 30% draw probability, Draw No Bet on RWDM offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win.

Poisson projects 2.83 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 54% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 2.8 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 59%. Form rates corroborate: RWDM 60% | AS Eupen 50% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–0D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (4.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.83) both back Over 2.5 goals (54% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 59% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form RWDM Poisson xG (1.67) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.20) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form AS Eupen Poisson xG (1.17) exceeds their form scoring rate (0.80) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.9 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.83 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 30% — tight contest expected.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: RWDM vs AS Eupen | Competition: Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 21 | Venue: Edmond Machtensstadion • Kick-off: Wednesday 24 Jan 2024, 18:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: RWDM 46% | Draw 30% | AS Eupen 24% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% | BTTS 59% | xG RWDM 1.67 / AS Eupen 1.17 • Poisson strength factors: RWDM attack 0.840 / def 1.321 | AS Eupen attack 0.738 / def 1.218 | league avg home 1.627 / away 1.198 • Poisson stance: RWDM (46%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.67

RWDM xG

Expected Goals

1.17

AS Eupen xG

46%
30%
24%
RWDM Draw AS Eupen

59%

BTTS

80%

Over 1.5

54%

Over 2.5

32%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does RWDM vs AS Eupen kick off?

RWDM vs AS Eupen kicked off at 18:15 on Wednesday 24 January 2024 at Edmond Machtensstadion.

What was the final score in RWDM vs AS Eupen?

RWDM 0 - 1 AS Eupen.

Where is RWDM vs AS Eupen being played?

The match is being played at Edmond Machtensstadion.

What competition is RWDM vs AS Eupen part of?

RWDM vs AS Eupen is a Regular Season - 21 fixture in the Jupiler Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win RWDM vs AS Eupen?

Our statistical model gives RWDM a 46% chance of winning, AS Eupen a 24% chance, and a 30% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.

Will both teams score in RWDM vs AS Eupen?

Our model estimates a 59% probability that both RWDM and AS Eupen will score (BTTS).

Will RWDM vs AS Eupen have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%.

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and AS Eupen?

Record (1 meetings): RWDM 1W | Draws 0 | AS Eupen 0W.

What form are RWDM and AS Eupen in?

RWDM (all comps): 2W-3D-5L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 2.00 | L5 D-L-W-L-L. AS Eupen (all comps): 1W-2D-7L in 10 | 0.50 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 2.10 | L5 D-L-L-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

RWDM's attacking strength (0.84x league average) is weighed against AS Eupen's defensive record (1.22x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 1.67. The same calculation in reverse, AS Eupen's attack versus RWDM's defence, projects 1.17 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 20/54 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 1-1, at 12.9%. Close behind: 2-1 (9.5%), 1-0 (8.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 31% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

RWDM Win

46%

RWDM

2.16

30%

Draw

3.36

24%

AS Eupen

4.16

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.4%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 0

9.8%

Home win

2 – 1

9.5%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.67

RWDM xG

Total xG

2.83

1.17

AS Eupen xG

46%
30%
24%
RWDMDrawAS Eupen

2.16

46%

Home win

3.36

30%

Draw

4.16

24%

Away win

Goals Markets

77%

Over 1.5

1.30

23%

Under 1.5

4.35

54%

Over 2.5

1.85

46%

Under 2.5

2.17

32%

Over 3.5

3.12

68%

Under 3.5

1.47

16%

Over 4.5

6.25

84%

Under 4.5

1.19

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

59%

BTTS Yes

1.71

41%

BTTS No

2.42

Clean Sheet

31%

RWDM

3.22

19%

AS Eupen

5.29

Win to Nil

14%

RWDM

6.97

5%

AS Eupen

21.98

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.9 6.9 4.0 1.6 0.5 0.1
1 9.8 11.4 6.7 2.6 0.8 0.2
2 8.1 9.5 5.6 2.2 0.6 0.1
3 4.5 5.3 3.1 1.2 0.4 0.1
4 1.9 2.2 1.3 0.5 0.1
5 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.665
λ Away (xG) 1.169
Total xG 2.834
League avg home goals 1.627
League avg away goals 1.198
RWDM attack strength 0.840
RWDM defence strength 1.321
AS Eupen attack strength 0.738
AS Eupen defence strength 1.218
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 20 / 54

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for RWDM vs AS Eupen?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.9%.

How many goals are RWDM and AS Eupen expected to score?

The model projects 1.67 expected goals for RWDM and 1.17 for AS Eupen, a combined total of 2.83.

How confident is the prediction model for RWDM vs AS Eupen?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 46%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

RWDM's recent record stands at 26W 12D 14L from 52 games, a 1.73 PPG return, with D-L-W-L-L in the last five. The sample for RWDM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

AS Eupen, meanwhile, have gone 10W 10D 32L across 52 games — 0.77 PPG, with D-L-L-L-L in their last five. The sample for AS Eupen is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

The points-per-game comparison favours RWDM by 0.96 — a real, if not enormous, edge over AS Eupen heading into this one.

Venue Form

At home specifically, RWDM have managed 15W 7D 4L from 26 games — 2.00 PPG in front of their own supporters.

AS Eupen's away record stands at 5W 4D 17L across 26 trips, a 0.73 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RWDM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

RWDM are averaging 1.67 goals scored and 1.33 conceded per game recently; AS Eupen are on 1.12 scored and 2.19 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: RWDM have seen both teams score in 63% of their recent games.

Last 52 Results — Jupiler Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

RWDM

RWDM

Blended
D L W L L
AS Eupen

AS Eupen

Blended
D L L L L
52 Played 52
26/12/14 W / D / L 10/10/32
1.73 Points Per Game 0.77
1.67 Avg Goals Scored 1.12
1.33 Avg Goals Conceded 2.19
3.00 Avg Goals / Game 3.31
14 Clean Sheets 7
33 BTTS 31
33 Over 2.5 Games 31
RWDM

RWDM

L
A KVC Westerlo
0–3 HT 0–1
26 Dec
L
H Club Brugge KV
1–6 HT 0–3
22 Dec
W
H St. Truiden
3–0 HT 1–0
16 Dec
L
A Gent
0–4 HT 0–2
09 Dec
D
H Charleroi
0–0 HT 0–0
02 Dec
L
A Anderlecht
1–2 HT 1–0
26 Nov
W
A AS Eupen
3–1 HT 1–1
11 Nov
D
H Kortrijk
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Nov
L
A St. Truiden
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Oct
D
H KVC Westerlo
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Oct
L
A Charleroi
1–2 HT 0–0
06 Oct
D
H Gent
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Oct
L
H Union St. Gilloise
2–3 HT 2–2
28 Sep
D
A Antwerp
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H Cercle Brugge
2–1 HT 1–1
16 Sep
D
A Standard Liege
1–1 HT 1–1
02 Sep
L
A Club Brugge KV
1–7 HT 1–2
20 Aug
W
H KV Mechelen
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Aug
W
A OH Leuven
2–1 HT 1–1
05 Aug
L
H Genk
0–4 HT 0–3
29 Jul
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
1–0 HT 1–0
13 May
W
A Club Brugge II
3–1 HT 2–0
06 May
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 2–0
22 Apr
D
H SK Beveren
1–1 HT 0–0
16 Apr
W
H Beerschot VA
4–0 HT 3–0
09 Apr
D
A Beerschot VA
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Apr
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
4–0 HT 1–0
18 Mar
W
H Club Brugge II
3–2 HT 0–1
12 Mar
L
A SK Beveren
1–2 HT 1–0
04 Mar
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–1 HT 0–0
26 Feb
W
A Beerschot VA
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Standard Liège II
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Feb
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
2–1 HT 2–0
29 Jan
W
H Deinze
2–1 HT 1–0
21 Jan
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
W
H Excelsior Virton
3–1 HT 2–1
11 Dec
L
H Club Brugge II
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Dec
L
A KRC Genk II
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Nov
D
A SK Beveren
1–1 HT 0–1
19 Nov
W
H Lommel United
5–0 HT 2–0
13 Nov
W
A Dender
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Oct
W
H SK Beveren
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Oct
W
A Standard Liège II
4–1 HT 1–0
14 Oct
W
H Beerschot VA
2–0 HT 1–0
08 Oct
L
A Lommel United
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Oct
D
H KRC Genk II
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Sep
W
A Deinze
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Sep
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Sep
L
A Club Brugge II
1–2 HT 0–1
28 Aug
W
H Dender
1–0 HT 1–0
20 Aug
D
A Excelsior Virton
1–1 HT 0–0
12 Aug
AS Eupen

AS Eupen

L
A OH Leuven
0–3 HT 0–2
26 Dec
L
H Union St. Gilloise
1–2 HT 0–2
23 Dec
L
A KVC Westerlo
0–2 HT 0–0
15 Dec
L
H Genk
1–3 HT 0–1
10 Dec
D
H Kortrijk
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Dec
L
A Cercle Brugge
0–2 HT 0–0
25 Nov
L
H RWDM
1–3 HT 1–1
11 Nov
D
A St. Truiden
1–1 HT 0–1
03 Nov
W
H Charleroi
2–0 HT 1–0
28 Oct
L
A Union St. Gilloise
1–4 HT 0–2
20 Oct
L
A Antwerp
1–4 HT 1–2
08 Oct
L
H Anderlecht
1–3 HT 1–1
30 Sep
L
A Gent
1–2 HT 1–0
24 Sep
L
H Standard Liege
1–3 HT 0–2
17 Sep
L
A KV Mechelen
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Sep
W
H OH Leuven
3–1 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
A Kortrijk
3–1 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
H Club Brugge KV
0–5 HT 0–3
13 Aug
W
A Genk
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Aug
D
H KVC Westerlo
2–2 HT 1–0
29 Jul
L
A Club Brugge KV
0–7 HT 0–4
23 Apr
L
H Zulte Waregem
1–5 HT 0–4
15 Apr
D
A Kortrijk
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Apr
L
H Anderlecht
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Apr
L
A Gent
0–3 HT 0–1
19 Mar
D
H Oostende
4–4 HT 1–1
11 Mar
L
A Union St. Gilloise
1–2 HT 0–1
05 Mar
D
H Cercle Brugge
2–2 HT 2–2
25 Feb
L
A Antwerp
0–2 HT 0–2
18 Feb
W
H KV Mechelen
2–1 HT 0–1
10 Feb
D
H KVC Westerlo
1–1 HT 0–1
04 Feb
D
H Genk
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Feb
L
A Standard Liege
1–3 HT 1–2
27 Jan
D
A OH Leuven
1–1 HT 0–1
17 Jan
L
H St. Truiden
0–2 HT 0–1
14 Jan
L
H Charleroi
1–2 HT 1–0
07 Jan
W
A Seraing United
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Dec
D
A Zulte Waregem
5–5 HT 3–2
12 Nov
W
H Standard Liege
2–0 HT 0–0
05 Nov
L
A Anderlecht
2–4 HT 1–2
30 Oct
L
A KV Mechelen
1–2 HT 1–1
22 Oct
W
H OH Leuven
4–2 HT 2–2
18 Oct
L
A Cercle Brugge
1–5 HT 1–3
15 Oct
L
H Gent
0–4 HT 0–2
09 Oct
W
A St. Truiden
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Oct
L
H Union St. Gilloise
1–2 HT 1–1
18 Sep
L
A Oostende
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Sep
L
H Kortrijk
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Sep
W
A KVC Westerlo
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Aug
L
H Seraing United
1–3 HT 0–3
19 Aug
L
H Antwerp
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Aug
L
A Genk
2–4 HT 1–3
06 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are RWDM and AS Eupen in coming into this match?

RWDM have gone 26W 12D 14L in their last 52 games (1.73 PPG), while AS Eupen have gone 10W 10D 32L in their last 52 (0.77 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — RWDM at home or AS Eupen away?

RWDM's home record (2.00 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — RWDM at home: 2.00 PPG; AS Eupen away: 0.73 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

8 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to November 2023. The pairing has crossed competitions too — Jupiler Pro League, Challenger Pro League all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 1 March 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Streaks & Records

The last 2 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.

RWDM's record when hosting AS Eupen specifically: 2W 1D 1L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

RWDM

4

RWDM

2

Draws

AS Eupen

2

AS Eupen

Recent Meetings

RWDM
2–2
01 Mar 26
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
2–2
04 Oct 25
RWDM
AS Eupen
0–1
18 Jan 25
RWDM
RWDM
2–1
30 Aug 24
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
2–0
11 May 24
RWDM
RWDM
3–1
13 Apr 24
AS Eupen
RWDM
0–1
24 Jan 24
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
1–3
11 Nov 23
RWDM

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between RWDM and AS Eupen?

From 8 meetings on record, RWDM have won 4, AS Eupen have won 2, and 2 have been drawn.

When did RWDM and AS Eupen last play each other?

They last met on 1 March 2026, when RWDM 2-2 AS Eupen.

Who has won more matches between RWDM and AS Eupen?

RWDM have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 77% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 42% of the time.

AS Eupen are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 65% of their matches.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — RWDM 58%, AS Eupen 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 58% (RWDM) and 54% (AS Eupen). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 42% and 35% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: RWDM keep a clean sheet in 35% of their matches; AS Eupen in 35%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = RWDM home games / AS Eupen away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

RWDM RWDM Blended
Metric All
(52 games)
Venue
(26 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 37/52
(71.2%)
20/26
(76.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/52
(34.6%)
10/26
(38.5%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/15
(86.7%)
5/6
(83.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/15
(66.7%)
4/6
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 18/52
(34.6%)
11/26
(42.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/52
(3.8%)
0/26
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/52
(7.7%)
2/26
(7.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 33/52
(63.5%)
15/26
(57.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 33/52
(63.5%)
15/26
(57.7%)
Over 3.5 Goals 17/52
(32.7%)
11/26
(42.3%)
Clean Sheet 14/52
(26.9%)
9/26
(34.6%)
Failed to Score 7/52
(13.5%)
3/26
(11.5%)
AS Eupen AS Eupen Blended
Metric All
(52 games)
Venue
(26 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 38/52
(73.1%)
17/26
(65.4%)
2+ Goals Before HT 24/52
(46.2%)
11/26
(42.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/14
(92.9%)
8/9
(88.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/14
(35.7%)
3/9
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 7/52
(13.5%)
3/26
(11.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/52
(7.7%)
2/26
(7.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/52
(7.7%)
2/26
(7.7%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 31/52
(59.6%)
13/26
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 31/52
(59.6%)
14/26
(53.8%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/52
(42.3%)
9/26
(34.6%)
Clean Sheet 7/52
(13.5%)
5/26
(19.2%)
Failed to Score 15/52
(28.8%)
9/26
(34.6%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when RWDM play AS Eupen?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 58% of RWDM's recent matches and 50% of AS Eupen's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is RWDM vs AS Eupen usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 58% of RWDM's matches and 54% of AS Eupen's.

Do RWDM and AS Eupen tend to score early?

RWDM have had a goal before half-time in 77% of their recent matches, AS Eupen in 65% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as AS Eupen defy the odds to beat RWDM 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

AS Eupen beat RWDM 0-1 at Edmond Machtensstadion, Regular Season - 21, in the Jupiler Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting RWDM 1.67 xG and AS Eupen 1.17 xG, a combined 2.83. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. RWDM fell 1.7 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of RWDM attack 0.84 / defence 1.32 against AS Eupen attack 0.74 / defence 1.22, drawn from 20/54 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it RWDM 46% | Draw 30% | AS Eupen 24%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 46%. Instead the game produced a AS Eupen win, an outcome the model had rated at just 24% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 80% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 59% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (RWDM 64%, AS Eupen 60%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 62%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

RWDM's trading profile (52 games, 26 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 64% of their matches — today it did not.

AS Eupen's trading profile (52 games, 26 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.73 PPG against 0.77. Form was overturned, with AS Eupen winning despite arriving in poorer recent shape. RWDM (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.88 scoring average — below par going forward. AS Eupen (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 2.27 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 54% Over 2.5 probability, but 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 59% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 62% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.