Sign in Register

Cercle Brugge 0-0 Dender – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Jupiler Pro League · Regular Season - 27

Kick-off

Sun 1 Mar 2026

18:15

Venue

Jan Breydel Stadion

Competition

Jupiler Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Dender at 44%, yet other data sources diverge — this Cercle Brugge vs Dender fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Cercle Brugge and Dender meet at Jan Breydel Stadion in Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 27. This fixture gets under way on Sunday 1 March 2026 at 18:15 UTC.

Form

Cercle Brugge (all games): 4W 2D 4L across 10 Jupiler Pro League fixtures this term — 1.40 PPG. Last five: D L W L W. Offensively they are averaging 1.50 goals per game, with 1.60 conceded. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Cercle Brugge, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Cercle Brugge's form when playing at home: 0W 3D 7L across 10 games at Jan Breydel Stadion this term (0.30 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 90% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 0.30 lags behind their overall 1.40 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at Jan Breydel Stadion this season.

Dender's overall Jupiler Pro League record this term: 2W 2D 6L from 10 games (0.80 PPG). Last five: D L L L L. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for Dender, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Jupiler Pro League this season, Dender have posted 2W 3D 5L from 10 away outings — 0.90 PPG. Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture.

Form favours the hosts. Cercle Brugge's 1.40 PPG return is 0.60 points per game ahead of Dender's 0.80 — a genuine gap in recent results that provides a statistically grounded case for backing the home side.

The BTTS picture is exceptionally clear (using home/away splits) — Cercle Brugge register both teams scoring in 90% of relevant games, Dender in 70%. Both sides above 70% makes BTTS Yes one of the strongest standalone angles in this fixture.

H2H Analysis

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 3 head-to-head meetings have produced 1 wins for Cercle Brugge, 0 for Dender and 2 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

Historically, goals have been at a premium in this fixture — just 0.3 per game from 3 meetings. The Under 2.5 has a clear base rate from the H2H record alone. The most recent clash, on 26 Jul 2025, ended 0–0 with a draw.

With a balanced win record and just 0.3 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

Trading & In-Play

Cercle Brugge — key trading statistics (64 games, 32 at home): they score before half-time in 75% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 58% of the time; BTTS occurs in 69% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games).

Dender — key trading statistics (64 games, 32 at away): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 56% of the time; BTTS occurs in 66% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 66% of games (away games); Over 3.5 in 36%; they fail to score in 33% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Cercle Brugge 61% versus Dender 58%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Cercle Brugge 50% | Dender 55%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Cercle Brugge 1.32 xG and Dender 1.60 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Cercle Brugge attack 0.937 / defence 1.420 | Dender attack 0.851 / defence 1.073. League average goals — home 1.318 / away 1.326. Data: 56 Cercle Brugge games / 56 Dender games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Cercle Brugge 31% | Draw 25% | Dender 44%. Fair-value odds: Cercle Brugge 3.23 | Draw 4.00 | Dender 2.27. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 56% | BTTS probability 59% | Total xG 2.93. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 56% — the 2.93 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS probability of 59% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Final Verdict

Poisson rates Dender as the most likely outcome at 44% — marginal model lean. Note a divergence: in-form Cercle Brugge (1.40 PPG) cuts against the Poisson lean — consider the strength-adjusted model over surface-level form results. Draw probability of 25% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Dender if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.93 combined xG gives a 56% probability to Over 2.5 — marginal — conflicting signals, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game — though H2H averaging only 0.3 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 59%. Form rates corroborate: Cercle Brugge 90% | Dender 70% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 31% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (1W–2D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H only shows 0.33 goals/game but Poisson xG is 2.93 — this season's attack strength ratings are elevating the goal expectation.
Form Cercle Brugge lead on PPG: 1.40 vs 0.80 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Form Dender Poisson xG (1.60) exceeds their form scoring rate (1.00) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (Cercle Brugge 9/10, Dender 7/10) and Poisson model (59%).
Form Form (PPG) favours Cercle Brugge but Poisson leans Dender (44%) — divergence worth monitoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Cercle Brugge vs Dender | Competition: Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 27 | Venue: Jan Breydel Stadion • Kick-off: Sunday 1 Mar 2026, 18:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Cercle Brugge 31% | Draw 25% | Dender 44% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 56% | BTTS 59% | xG Cercle Brugge 1.32 / Dender 1.60 • Poisson strength factors: Cercle Brugge attack 0.937 / def 1.420 | Dender attack 0.851 / def 1.073 | league avg home 1.318 / away 1.326 • Poisson stance: Dender (44%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.32

Cercle Brugge xG

Expected Goals

1.60

Dender xG

31%
25%
44%
Cercle Brugge Draw Dender

59%

BTTS

79%

Over 1.5

56%

Over 2.5

34%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Cercle Brugge vs Dender kick off?

Cercle Brugge vs Dender kicked off at 18:15 on Sunday 1 March 2026 at Jan Breydel Stadion.

What was the final score in Cercle Brugge vs Dender?

Cercle Brugge 0 - 0 Dender.

Where is Cercle Brugge vs Dender being played?

The match is being played at Jan Breydel Stadion.

What competition is Cercle Brugge vs Dender part of?

Cercle Brugge vs Dender is a Regular Season - 27 fixture in the Jupiler Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win Cercle Brugge vs Dender?

Our statistical model gives Cercle Brugge a 31% chance of winning, Dender a 44% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Dender the favourite.

Will both teams score in Cercle Brugge vs Dender?

Our model estimates a 59% probability that both Cercle Brugge and Dender will score (BTTS).

Will Cercle Brugge vs Dender have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 56%.

What is the head-to-head record between Cercle Brugge and Dender?

Record (3 meetings): Cercle Brugge 1W | Draws 2 | Dender 0W.

What form are Cercle Brugge and Dender in?

Cercle Brugge (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.50 / GA 1.60 | L5 D-L-W-L-W. Dender (all comps): 2W-2D-6L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 1.80 | L5 D-L-L-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

The model rates Cercle Brugge's attack at 0.94x the league average against Dender's defence at 1.07x — combine the two and it projects 1.32 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Dender's attack (0.85x) against Cercle Brugge's defence (1.42x) — and the away total comes out at 1.60.

These ratings are built from 56/56 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 12.9% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-2 (9.1%), 2-1 (7.5%). Together the top three scorelines make up 29% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

Dender Win

31%

Cercle Brugge

3.18

25%

Draw

4.01

44%

Dender

2.29

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.4%

Draw

Most likely

1 – 2

9.1%

Away win

0 – 1

8.6%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.32

Cercle Brugge xG

Total xG

2.93

1.60

Dender xG

31%
25%
44%
Cercle BruggeDrawDender

3.18

31%

Home win

4.01

25%

Draw

2.29

44%

Away win

Goals Markets

79%

Over 1.5

1.27

21%

Under 1.5

4.76

56%

Over 2.5

1.79

44%

Under 2.5

2.27

34%

Over 3.5

2.94

66%

Under 3.5

1.52

17%

Over 4.5

5.88

83%

Under 4.5

1.20

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

59%

BTTS Yes

1.70

41%

BTTS No

2.43

Clean Sheet

20%

Cercle Brugge

4.96

27%

Dender

3.76

Win to Nil

6%

Cercle Brugge

15.79

12%

Dender

8.62

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.4 8.6 6.9 3.7 1.5 0.5
1 7.1 11.4 9.1 4.9 1.9 0.6
2 4.7 7.5 6.0 3.2 1.3 0.4
3 2.1 3.3 2.7 1.4 0.6 0.2
4 0.7 1.1 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1
5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.325
λ Away (xG) 1.601
Total xG 2.926
League avg home goals 1.318
League avg away goals 1.326
Cercle Brugge attack strength 0.937
Cercle Brugge defence strength 1.420
Dender attack strength 0.851
Dender defence strength 1.073
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 56 / 56

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Cercle Brugge vs Dender?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 12.9%.

How many goals are Cercle Brugge and Dender expected to score?

The model projects 1.32 expected goals for Cercle Brugge and 1.60 for Dender, a combined total of 2.93.

How confident is the prediction model for Cercle Brugge vs Dender?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 44%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Cercle Brugge's recent record stands at 17W 21D 26L from 64 games, a 1.12 PPG return, with D-L-W-L-W in the last five. The sample for Cercle Brugge is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Dender, meanwhile, have gone 13W 19D 32L across 64 games — 0.91 PPG, with D-L-L-L-L in their last five. The sample for Dender is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.12 PPG for Cercle Brugge against 0.91 for Dender. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

How They Fare by Venue

At home specifically, Cercle Brugge have managed 9W 10D 13L from 32 games — 1.16 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Dender's away record stands at 5W 9D 18L across 32 trips, a 0.75 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Cercle Brugge come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

Cercle Brugge are averaging 1.27 goals scored and 1.55 conceded per game recently; Dender are on 1.12 scored and 1.80 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Cercle Brugge have seen both teams score in 61% of their recent games.

Last 64 Results — Jupiler Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

Blended
D L W L W
Dender

Dender

Blended
D L L L L
64 Played 64
17/21/26 W / D / L 13/19/32
1.12 Points Per Game 0.91
1.27 Avg Goals Scored 1.12
1.55 Avg Goals Conceded 1.80
2.81 Avg Goals / Game 2.92
13 Clean Sheets 13
39 BTTS 37
32 Over 2.5 Games 35
Cercle Brugge

Cercle Brugge

W
A Gent
1–0 HT 1–0
20 Feb
L
H Club Brugge KV
1–2 HT 0–0
15 Feb
W
A Charleroi
4–3 HT 3–1
07 Feb
L
H Antwerp
0–4 HT 0–2
31 Jan
D
A Genk
1–1 HT 0–1
25 Jan
W
A KVC Westerlo
2–0 HT 2–0
17 Jan
D
H Union St. Gilloise
1–1 HT 1–1
26 Dec
W
A OH Leuven
2–0 HT 2–0
21 Dec
L
H KV Mechelen
2–3 HT 0–2
13 Dec
L
H Standard Liege
1–2 HT 0–2
06 Dec
D
A Zulte Waregem
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Nov
L
A Union St. Gilloise
0–2 HT 0–1
22 Nov
L
H OH Leuven
1–2 HT 1–0
08 Nov
L
A RAAL La Louvière
1–2 HT 0–1
02 Nov
D
H Zulte Waregem
1–1 HT 0–1
26 Oct
D
H Genk
2–2 HT 1–1
19 Oct
D
A Antwerp
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Oct
L
H Gent
2–4 HT 2–2
28 Sep
D
A KV Mechelen
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
L
H Charleroi
2–3 HT 0–2
14 Sep
D
H St. Truiden
1–1 HT 1–1
29 Aug
W
A Standard Liege
3–0 HT 3–0
23 Aug
W
H KVC Westerlo
4–1 HT 3–0
17 Aug
L
A Club Brugge KV
0–2 HT 0–0
09 Aug
L
H Anderlecht
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Aug
D
A Dender
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Jul
W
H Patro Eisden
3–1 HT 2–0
23 May
W
A Patro Eisden
5–1 HT 2–0
18 May
L
A Beerschot VA
2–4 HT 1–0
10 May
L
H Kortrijk
0–2 HT 0–2
03 May
W
H St. Truiden
3–1 HT 2–0
26 Apr
L
A St. Truiden
1–3 HT 1–2
12 Apr
W
H Beerschot VA
2–1 HT 1–0
05 Apr
D
A Kortrijk
2–2 HT 0–1
30 Mar
L
A Anderlecht
0–3 HT 0–1
16 Mar
L
H Club Brugge KV
1–3 HT 0–3
09 Mar
D
H Antwerp
0–0 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
A Kortrijk
1–1 HT 0–1
23 Feb
D
H KVC Westerlo
1–1 HT 0–1
16 Feb
L
A Genk
1–2 HT 1–2
08 Feb
D
H Standard Liege
1–1 HT 0–0
01 Feb
D
A Charleroi
1–1 HT 1–1
25 Jan
W
A Dender
1–0 HT 1–0
18 Jan
W
H KV Mechelen
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Jan
D
A St. Truiden
1–1 HT 1–0
27 Dec
W
H OH Leuven
1–0 HT 0–0
22 Dec
D
A Gent
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Dec
D
H Union St. Gilloise
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Dec
L
A Beerschot VA
2–3 HT 2–0
01 Dec
L
A Standard Liege
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
H Anderlecht
0–5 HT 0–1
10 Nov
W
H Charleroi
2–0 HT 0–0
03 Nov
W
A Union St. Gilloise
3–1 HT 0–1
27 Oct
D
H Dender
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Oct
L
A Antwerp
0–3 HT 0–2
06 Oct
D
H St. Truiden
1–1 HT 1–0
29 Sep
W
H Gent
2–1 HT 0–0
26 Sep
L
A KV Mechelen
0–2 HT 0–1
22 Sep
L
H Genk
2–3 HT 2–2
14 Sep
L
A Club Brugge KV
0–3 HT 0–2
01 Sep
D
A OH Leuven
1–1 HT 1–1
18 Aug
W
H Beerschot VA
4–1 HT 3–1
11 Aug
L
H Kortrijk
1–2 HT 1–1
04 Aug
L
A KVC Westerlo
0–3 HT 0–1
28 Jul
Dender

Dender

L
H St. Truiden
1–4 HT 1–2
21 Feb
L
A OH Leuven
2–3 HT 1–2
14 Feb
L
A Zulte Waregem
0–1 HT 0–0
07 Feb
L
H Genk
1–2 HT 0–2
01 Feb
D
A Anderlecht
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Jan
W
H Antwerp
1–0 HT 1–0
18 Jan
D
A KV Mechelen
1–1 HT 0–1
27 Dec
L
H Standard Liege
0–1 HT 0–1
20 Dec
L
H Club Brugge KV
1–5 HT 1–1
14 Dec
W
A RAAL La Louvière
2–1 HT 1–1
05 Dec
D
H KVC Westerlo
2–2 HT 1–0
29 Nov
W
A Antwerp
2–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
H Zulte Waregem
2–2 HT 1–0
07 Nov
L
A Club Brugge KV
1–2 HT 0–2
01 Nov
D
A KVC Westerlo
1–1 HT 1–0
25 Oct
L
H KV Mechelen
1–3 HT 0–1
19 Oct
L
A Genk
1–2 HT 1–1
05 Oct
D
H RAAL La Louvière
0–0 HT 0–0
28 Sep
L
A Gent
0–3 HT 0–1
19 Sep
L
H Union St. Gilloise
0–1 HT 0–0
13 Sep
L
A Charleroi
1–3 HT 0–1
30 Aug
L
H OH Leuven
0–1 HT 0–0
24 Aug
L
H Anderlecht
0–2 HT 0–0
17 Aug
L
A St. Truiden
0–2 HT 0–1
08 Aug
D
A Standard Liege
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Aug
D
H Cercle Brugge
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Jul
D
H KV Mechelen
2–2 HT 2–2
24 May
D
A Standard Liege
0–0 HT 0–0
17 May
W
H OH Leuven
5–0 HT 4–0
11 May
L
A KVC Westerlo
2–4 HT 1–1
02 May
L
A Charleroi
1–4 HT 0–1
26 Apr
W
H Charleroi
2–1 HT 0–1
22 Apr
D
A OH Leuven
4–4 HT 1–3
19 Apr
D
H Standard Liege
1–1 HT 1–1
13 Apr
L
A KV Mechelen
2–5 HT 0–4
04 Apr
W
H KVC Westerlo
1–0 HT 1–0
30 Mar
L
A KV Mechelen
1–2 HT 0–0
16 Mar
L
H Genk
0–1 HT 0–0
08 Mar
L
A Union St. Gilloise
1–4 HT 0–2
01 Mar
D
H Beerschot VA
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
L
A OH Leuven
2–3 HT 2–1
15 Feb
W
H St. Truiden
2–1 HT 1–0
08 Feb
L
A Charleroi
0–5 HT 0–3
01 Feb
L
A Standard Liege
0–1 HT 0–1
26 Jan
L
H Cercle Brugge
0–1 HT 0–1
18 Jan
D
H Gent
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jan
W
A Anderlecht
3–2 HT 1–2
27 Dec
L
H Antwerp
1–3 HT 0–1
21 Dec
W
A Kortrijk
3–0 HT 3–0
14 Dec
W
H KVC Westerlo
1–0 HT 1–0
08 Dec
L
A Club Brugge KV
1–4 HT 1–2
30 Nov
D
A Antwerp
1–1 HT 1–0
22 Nov
D
H OH Leuven
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Nov
L
A KVC Westerlo
0–2 HT 0–1
01 Nov
L
H KV Mechelen
2–5 HT 0–0
26 Oct
D
A Cercle Brugge
0–0 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
H Charleroi
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Oct
D
H Anderlecht
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Sep
L
A Genk
0–4 HT 0–1
22 Sep
L
H Standard Liege
0–2 HT 0–1
13 Sep
W
A Beerschot VA
2–1 HT 2–0
31 Aug
L
H Club Brugge KV
1–2 HT 1–2
25 Aug
D
A St. Truiden
3–3 HT 1–2
17 Aug
W
H Kortrijk
4–1 HT 2–1
10 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Cercle Brugge and Dender in coming into this match?

Cercle Brugge have gone 17W 21D 26L in their last 64 games (1.12 PPG), while Dender have gone 13W 19D 32L in their last 64 (0.91 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Cercle Brugge at home or Dender away?

Cercle Brugge's home record (1.16 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Cercle Brugge at home: 1.16 PPG; Dender away: 0.75 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 6 times that we have on record, stretching back to October 2024 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 1 year. Every recorded meeting has come in Jupiler Pro League. They last met on 24 April 2026, roughly 4 months ago.

Notable Numbers

Cercle Brugge have won the last 2 meetings between these two, a run that gives them the psychological edge coming in.

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Cercle Brugge won 1-4 on 19 Apr 2026, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Cercle Brugge have gone 1W 2D 0L from 3 meetings on their own ground against Dender — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 6 Meetings

Cercle Brugge

3

Cercle Brugge

3

Draws

Dender

0

Dender

Recent Meetings

Cercle Brugge
2–1
24 Apr 26
Dender
Dender
1–4
19 Apr 26
Cercle Brugge
Cercle Brugge
0–0
01 Mar 26
Dender
Dender
0–0
26 Jul 25
Cercle Brugge
Dender
0–1
18 Jan 25
Cercle Brugge
Cercle Brugge
0–0
19 Oct 24
Dender

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Cercle Brugge and Dender?

From 6 meetings on record, Cercle Brugge have won 3, Dender have won 0, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Cercle Brugge and Dender last play each other?

They last met on 24 April 2026, when Cercle Brugge 2-1 Dender.

Who has won more matches between Cercle Brugge and Dender?

Cercle Brugge have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Cercle Brugge are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 75% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 25% of the time.

Dender are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 78% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 12% of those situations.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS has landed consistently for both sides recently — 69% for Cercle Brugge, 66% for Dender — a strong two-way scoring signal.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 56% for Cercle Brugge and 66% for Dender. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 38% and 41% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Dender in 31%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Cercle Brugge home games / Dender away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Cercle Brugge Cercle Brugge Blended
Metric All
(64 games)
Venue
(32 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 52/64
(81.2%)
24/32
(75%)
2+ Goals Before HT 29/64
(45.3%)
16/32
(50%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 7/12
(58.3%)
5/8
(62.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/12
(41.7%)
4/8
(50%)
Winning at HT 18/64
(28.1%)
8/32
(25%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/64
(7.8%)
2/32
(6.2%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 8/64
(12.5%)
2/32
(6.2%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 39/64
(60.9%)
22/32
(68.8%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/64
(50%)
18/32
(56.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 19/64
(29.7%)
12/32
(37.5%)
Clean Sheet 13/64
(20.3%)
6/32
(18.8%)
Failed to Score 17/64
(26.6%)
7/32
(21.9%)
Dender Dender Blended
Metric All
(64 games)
Venue
(32 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 48/64
(75%)
25/32
(78.1%)
2+ Goals Before HT 24/64
(37.5%)
15/32
(46.9%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/16
(56.2%)
4/7
(57.1%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 5/16
(31.2%)
3/7
(42.9%)
Winning at HT 14/64
(21.9%)
5/32
(15.6%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 5/64
(7.8%)
3/32
(9.4%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/64
(9.4%)
4/32
(12.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 37/64
(57.8%)
21/32
(65.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 35/64
(54.7%)
21/32
(65.6%)
Over 3.5 Goals 23/64
(35.9%)
13/32
(40.6%)
Clean Sheet 13/64
(20.3%)
4/32
(12.5%)
Failed to Score 21/64
(32.8%)
10/32
(31.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Cercle Brugge play Dender?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 69% of Cercle Brugge's games and 66% of Dender's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is Cercle Brugge vs Dender usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 56% of Cercle Brugge's matches and 66% of Dender's.

Do Cercle Brugge and Dender tend to score early?

Cercle Brugge have had a goal before half-time in 75% of their recent matches, Dender in 78% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Stalemate at Cercle Brugge's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Cercle Brugge and Dender finished level at 0-0 at Jan Breydel Stadion, Regular Season - 27, in the Jupiler Pro League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Cercle Brugge 1.32 xG and Dender 1.60 xG, a combined 2.93. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Cercle Brugge fell 1.3 short of their projected output. Dender landed 1.6 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Cercle Brugge attack 0.94 / defence 1.42 against Dender attack 0.85 / defence 1.07, drawn from 56/56 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Cercle Brugge 31% | Draw 25% | Dender 44%, with Dender to win its most likely call at 44%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 56%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 79% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 59% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 52% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Cercle Brugge 50%, Dender 55%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Cercle Brugge's trading profile (64 games, 32 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 61% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Dender's trading profile (64 games, 32 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 58% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 33% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Cercle Brugge 1.12 PPG, Dender 0.91 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Cercle Brugge (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.34 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.59 average — tighter than their form line. Dender (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.19 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 2.19 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 56% Over 2.5 probability, but 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 59% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 52% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.