Dender 0-1 RWDM – Result & Analysis
Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.
Poisson rates RWDM at 61% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Dender vs RWDM encounter.
✍️ Match Preview
Fixture Analysis
It is a Challenger Pro League clash, Regular Season - 12 as Dender welcome RWDM to Dender Football Complex. Kick-off is set for Friday 4 November 2022 at 19:00 UTC.
Form Analysis
Looking at all fixtures this season, Dender stand at 4W 2D 4L from 10 Challenger Pro League matches — 1.40 PPG. Last five: W L D W W. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.20 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. This season is still relatively young for Dender, so this record blends games from this season and last.
Dender's home record at Dender Football Complex: 1W 0D 4L from 5 Challenger Pro League appearances (0.60 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 2.60 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their home matches — a rate that supports the Yes angle in this fixture. Somewhat surprisingly, their home PPG of 0.60 lags behind their overall 1.40 — the home advantage has not translated into superior results at Dender Football Complex this season.
RWDM — All Games: 6W 2D 2L from 10 Challenger Pro League fixtures this season — 2.00 PPG. Last five: L W W W W. Their attacking form is sharp — 2.00 goals per game is a high-output rate that commands respect in the goals markets. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 70% of their games — a noteworthy BTTS rate that supports the Yes market. This season is still relatively young for RWDM, so this record blends games from this season and last.
When travelling in Challenger Pro League this season, RWDM have posted 3W 4D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.30 PPG. Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. BTTS has landed in 60% of their away games — meaningful support for the Yes angle in this specific context. Their away PPG of 1.30 is notably below their overall 2.00 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.
The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. RWDM are 0.60 PPG ahead (2.00 vs 1.40), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.
The BTTS market is worth targeting here. Dender register both teams scoring in 60% of relevant matches, RWDM in 60% (using home/away splits) — both sides above the 60% threshold gives BTTS Yes firm statistical grounding.
H2H
The rivalry is an even one: 0 wins apiece for Dender, 1 for RWDM and 0 shared spoils from 1 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.
The last 1 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.0 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 20 Aug 2022, ended 0–1 with RWDM winning.
With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.
Trading Patterns
Dender in-play and half-time data (11 games, 5 at home): they score before half-time in 80% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 67% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 80% of games (home games).
RWDM in-play and half-time data (11 games, 5 at away): they score before half-time in 60% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 100% of those occasions; they lead at the break 46% of the time; BTTS occurs in 100% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 80% of games (away games).
BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Dender 46% versus RWDM 73%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Dender 36% | RWDM 64%).
Poisson Model
The Poisson distribution model projects Dender 1.14 xG and RWDM 2.25 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Dender attack 0.790 / defence 1.445 | RWDM attack 1.071 / defence 0.946. League average goals — home 1.530 / away 1.453. Dender's attack strength of 0.790 is below the league average — the 1.14 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Data: 11 Dender games / 39 RWDM games used (CurrentSeason).
Result probabilities: Dender 17% | Draw 22% | RWDM 61%. Fair-value odds: Dender 5.88 | Draw 4.55 | RWDM 1.64. The model has a clear lean to RWDM (61%) — a 44pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.
Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 66% | BTTS probability 62% | Total xG 3.39. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 66% — a total xG of 3.39 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 62% reflects that both xG figures (1.14 / 2.25) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.
Summary & Verdict
The Poisson model's primary lean is RWDM at 61% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw No Bet is worth pricing alongside the outright: 22% draw probability makes the stalemate a live outcome even at this conviction level.
The Poisson model projects 3.39 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 66% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 3.1 goals per game.
On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 62% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: Dender 60% | RWDM 60% BTTS from recent games.
🔮 Your Prediction
Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.
💡 Key Insights
🏟️ Match Context
• Fixture: Dender vs RWDM | Competition: Challenger Pro League, Regular Season - 12 | Venue: Dender Football Complex • Kick-off: Friday 4 Nov 2022, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing
📊 Statistical Prediction
• Poisson result probabilities: Dender 17% | Draw 22% | RWDM 61% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 66% | BTTS 62% | xG Dender 1.14 / RWDM 2.25 • Poisson strength factors: Dender attack 0.790 / def 1.445 | RWDM attack 1.071 / def 0.946 | league avg home 1.530 / away 1.453 • Poisson stance: RWDM (61%) — strong lean
🧮 Prediction Model
1.14
Dender xG
Expected Goals
2.25
RWDM xG
62%
BTTS
86%
Over 1.5
66%
Over 2.5
44%
Over 3.5
Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓
⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What time does Dender vs RWDM kick off?
Dender vs RWDM kicked off at 19:00 on Friday 4 November 2022 at Dender Football Complex.
What was the final score in Dender vs RWDM?
Dender 0 - 1 RWDM.
Where is Dender vs RWDM being played?
The match is being played at Dender Football Complex.
What competition is Dender vs RWDM part of?
Dender vs RWDM is a Regular Season - 12 fixture in the Challenger Pro League (Belgium).
Who is favourite to win Dender vs RWDM?
Our statistical model gives Dender a 17% chance of winning, RWDM a 61% chance, and a 22% chance of a draw — making RWDM the favourite.
Will both teams score in Dender vs RWDM?
Our model estimates a 62% probability that both Dender and RWDM will score (BTTS).
Will Dender vs RWDM have over 2.5 goals?
Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 66%.
What is the head-to-head record between Dender and RWDM?
Record (1 meetings): Dender 0W | Draws 0 | RWDM 1W.
What form are Dender and RWDM in?
Dender (all comps): 4W-2D-4L in 10 | 1.40 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.20 | L5 W-L-D-W-W. RWDM (all comps): 6W-2D-2L in 10 | 2.00 PPG | GF 2.00 / GA 1.00 | L5 L-W-W-W-W.
🧮 Model Insight
Model Mechanics
Working from Dender's attack rating (0.79) and RWDM's defence rating (0.95), the model arrives at 1.14 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, RWDM's attack versus Dender's defence, projects 2.25 expected goals for the visitors.
These ratings are built from 11/39 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.
The Exact-Score Picture
Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 9.8%. Close behind: 1-2 (9.7%), 0-2 (8.5%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.
Most Likely Outcome
RWDM Win
17%
5.81
22%
4.63
61%
1.63
Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines
1 – 2
9.7%
Away win
Most likely
1 – 1
8.7%
Draw
0 – 2
8.5%
Away win
Expected Goals & Win Odds
1.14
Dender xG
Total xG
3.39
2.25
RWDM xG
5.81
17%
Home win
4.63
22%
Draw
1.63
61%
Away win
Goals Markets
85%
Over 1.5
1.18
15%
Under 1.5
6.67
66%
Over 2.5
1.52
34%
Under 2.5
2.94
44%
Over 3.5
2.27
56%
Under 3.5
1.79
25%
Over 4.5
4.00
75%
Under 4.5
1.33
Match Markets
Both Teams to Score
62%
BTTS Yes
1.61
38%
BTTS No
2.63
Clean Sheet
11%
9.46
32%
3.14
Win to Nil
2%
55.00
19%
5.13
Score Probability Matrix (%)
| H \ A | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3.4 | 7.6 | 8.5 | 6.4 | 3.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 | 3.9 | 8.7 | 9.7 | 7.3 | 4.1 | 1.8 |
| 2 | 2.2 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 4.2 | 2.3 | 1.1 |
| 3 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| 5 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | – |
Green = home win · Grey = draw · Amber = away win · White ring = most likely score
▶ Model Internals
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most likely scoreline for Dender vs RWDM?
Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 9.8%.
How many goals are Dender and RWDM expected to score?
The model projects 1.14 expected goals for Dender and 2.25 for RWDM, a combined total of 3.39.
How confident is the prediction model for Dender vs RWDM?
Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 61%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.
📈 Form Insight
Where Both Sides Stand
Across their last 11 outings, Dender have picked up 1.27 PPG on a 4W 2D 5L record — W-L-D-W-W across the most recent five. The sample for Dender is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
RWDM's form line: 6W 3D 2L from 11 games, 1.91 PPG, last five L-W-W-W-W. The sample for RWDM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.
Put side by side, RWDM are the form team by 0.64 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Dender.
Home Ground vs the Road
On home soil, Dender have posted 0.60 PPG from 5 outings (1W 0D 4L). That actually lags their 1.27 PPG overall record — home advantage hasn't been translating into results for them lately.
On the road, RWDM have gone 2W 1D 2L from 5 away games — 1.40 PPG when travelling. That's a step down from their 1.91 PPG overall record — away form has been the weaker part of RWDM's season.
Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RWDM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.
The Goals Picture
Dender are averaging 1.27 goals scored and 1.45 conceded per game recently; RWDM are on 1.91 scored and 1.00 conceded.
On BTTS specifically: RWDM in 73%.
Last 11 Results — Challenger Pro League
Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)
Dender
Blended
RWDM
Blended
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What form are Dender and RWDM in coming into this match?
Dender have gone 4W 2D 5L in their last 11 games (1.27 PPG), while RWDM have gone 6W 3D 2L in their last 11 (1.91 PPG).
Which team has the better venue record — Dender at home or RWDM away?
RWDM's away record (1.40 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Dender at home: 0.60 PPG; RWDM away: 1.40 PPG.
⚔️ Rivalry Insight
A Look Back
The fixture history between Dender and RWDM runs to 2 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to August 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Challenger Pro League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 4 November 2022, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.
Last 2 Meetings
0
Dender
0
Draws
2
RWDM
Recent Meetings
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What is the head-to-head record between Dender and RWDM?
From 2 meetings on record, Dender have won 0, RWDM have won 2, and 0 have been drawn.
When did Dender and RWDM last play each other?
They last met on 4 November 2022, when Dender 0-1 RWDM.
Who has won more matches between Dender and RWDM?
RWDM have the better head-to-head record, with 2 wins from 2 meetings.
📈 Trading Insight
Half-Time Trends
Dender are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 80% of their matches.
RWDM are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 60% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 20% of those situations.
The Numbers That Matter
Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — Dender at 60%, RWDM at 100%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.
Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 80% for Dender and 80% for RWDM. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 60% and 20% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.
On the defensive side: Dender have failed to score in 40% of games.
Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue | Venue = Dender home games / RWDM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data — shown as — where unavailable.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Do both teams usually score when Dender play RWDM?
Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 60% of Dender's games and 100% of RWDM's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.
Is Dender vs RWDM usually a high-scoring fixture?
Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 80% of Dender's matches and 80% of RWDM's.
Do Dender and RWDM tend to score early?
Dender have had a goal before half-time in 80% of their recent matches, RWDM in 60% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.
Prediction vindicated as RWDM edge out Dender 0-1.
📝 Match Report
How It Unfolded
RWDM beat Dender 0-1 at Dender Football Complex, Regular Season - 12, in the Challenger Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.
The Model vs The Result
The Poisson model went into this projecting Dender 1.14 xG and RWDM 2.25 xG, a combined 3.39. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. Dender fell 1.1 short of their projected output. RWDM landed 1.2 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Dender attack 0.79 / defence 1.45 against RWDM attack 1.07 / defence 0.95, drawn from 11/39 games (CurrentSeason).
On the result, the model split it Dender 17% | Draw 22% | RWDM 61%, with RWDM to win its most likely call at 61%. The scoreboard confirmed the model's leading pick.
Goals & Markets
The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 66%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a miss for the goals model. Over 1.5 had been 86% and missed. Over 3.5 was 44% and did not. On both teams to score, the model sat at 62% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Dender 36%, RWDM 64%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 59%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.
Trading Patterns vs Reality
Dender's trading profile (11 games, 5 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.
RWDM's trading profile (11 games, 5 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 73% of their matches — today it did not.
Form vs Result
On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.91 PPG against 1.27. The form guide was vindicated by the result. Dender (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.20 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 1 against a 2.60 average — tighter than their form line. RWDM (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.80 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.40 average — tighter than their form line.
Verdict
Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (hit). A mixed scorecard — the data caught the broad shape of the game but not every market.
💡 Key Insights
⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.