Sign in Register

Wuhan Zall 0-0 Meizhou Kejia – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 23

Kick-off

Fri 4 Nov 2022

11:30

Venue

Dongxihu Sports Centre

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Meizhou Kejia at 38% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Fixture Analysis

It is a Super League clash, Regular Season - 23 as Wuhan Zall welcome Meizhou Kejia to Dongxihu Sports Centre. Kick-off is set for Friday 4 November 2022 at 11:30 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Super League games this season, Wuhan Zall have gone 0W 1D 9L from 10 outings — a 0.10 PPG return. Last five: L L L L L. They are averaging 0.70 goals per game and conceding 2.60 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.60 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Wuhan Zall, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Wuhan Zall at Dongxihu Sports Centre this season: 1W 2D 7L from 10 home games — 0.50 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.00 goals scored and 2.40 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Looking at all fixtures this season, Meizhou Kejia stand at 4W 1D 5L from 10 Super League matches — 1.30 PPG. Last five: L L W L L. They are scoring at 1.70 per game and conceding 1.70. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Meizhou Kejia, so this record blends games from this season and last.

On the road, Meizhou Kejia have gone 3W 3D 4L from 10 away fixtures this term (1.20 PPG). Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 1.30 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

Form points away from home here. Meizhou Kejia's 1.30 PPG return is 1.20 points per game ahead of Wuhan Zall's 0.10 — the visitors are the form-based selection, and Double Chance is an alternative worth pricing if the outright looks tight.

H2H

The rivalry is an even one: 0 wins apiece for Wuhan Zall, 1 for Meizhou Kejia and 0 shared spoils from 1 past contests. Neither side holds a meaningful historical edge.

Goals have been a feature of this fixture. The last 1 meetings have averaged 3.0 per game — a rate that gives the Over 2.5 market a solid historical foundation. The most recent clash, on 7 Aug 2022, ended 1–2 with Meizhou Kejia winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.0 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

In-Play Profile

Wuhan Zall in-play tendencies (22 games, 10 at home): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; BTTS occurs in 70% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 90% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 36%.

Meizhou Kejia in-play tendencies (22 games, 10 at away): they score before half-time in 70% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 30% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 30% of games (away games); they fail to score in 32% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Zall 59% versus Meizhou Kejia 54%; no strong lean in either direction. Over 2.5 goals is well-supported by both sides' in-play profiles (Wuhan Zall 77% | Meizhou Kejia 54%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Zall 1.41 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.43 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Zall attack 0.757 / defence 1.515 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.720 / defence 1.284. League average goals — home 1.448 / away 1.311. Wuhan Zall's attack strength of 0.757 is below the league average — the 1.41 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Meizhou Kejia bring a strong defensive rating of 1.284 — this is suppressing Wuhan Zall's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 36 Wuhan Zall games / 22 Meizhou Kejia games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Zall 37% | Draw 25% | Meizhou Kejia 38%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Zall 2.70 | Draw 4.00 | Meizhou Kejia 2.63. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 25% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 54% | BTTS probability 58% | Total xG 2.84. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 54%/46% — the total xG of 2.84 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 58% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Meizhou Kejia as the most likely outcome at 38% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. With a 25% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Meizhou Kejia offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.84 combined xG gives a 54% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 2.7 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 58% probability to BTTS Yes based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates are neutral: Wuhan Zall 70% | Meizhou Kejia 30%.

The outsider holds a 37% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–0D–1W), with no clear historical advantage.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.84) both back Over 2.5 goals (54% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 100% and Poisson BTTS 58% — two-way scoring is the dominant historical and model-backed outcome.
Form Meizhou Kejia lead on PPG: 1.30 vs 0.10 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Wuhan Zall Poisson xG (1.41) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (1.00) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Form Meizhou Kejia Poisson xG (1.43) exceeds their form scoring rate (0.70) — matchup dynamics are elevating the model's expectation.
Goals Form only shows ~1.8 goals/game but Poisson xG sum is 2.84 — underlying strength metrics suggest more goals than form results indicate.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Meizhou Kejia — Meizhou Kejia at 38% win probability.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 23 | Venue: Dongxihu Sports Centre • Kick-off: Friday 4 Nov 2022, 11:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Zall 37% | Draw 25% | Meizhou Kejia 38% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 54% | BTTS 58% | xG Wuhan Zall 1.41 / Meizhou Kejia 1.43 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Zall attack 0.757 / def 1.515 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.720 / def 1.284 | league avg home 1.448 / away 1.311 • Poisson stance: Meizhou Kejia (38%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.41

Wuhan Zall xG

Expected Goals

1.43

Meizhou Kejia xG

37%
25%
38%
Wuhan Zall Draw Meizhou Kejia

58%

BTTS

78%

Over 1.5

54%

Over 2.5

32%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia kick off?

Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia kicked off at 11:30 on Friday 4 November 2022 at Dongxihu Sports Centre.

What was the final score in Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia?

Wuhan Zall 0 - 0 Meizhou Kejia.

Where is Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia being played?

The match is being played at Dongxihu Sports Centre.

What competition is Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia part of?

Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia is a Regular Season - 23 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our statistical model gives Wuhan Zall a 37% chance of winning, Meizhou Kejia a 38% chance, and a 25% chance of a draw — making Meizhou Kejia the favourite.

Will both teams score in Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our model estimates a 58% probability that both Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia will score (BTTS).

Will Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 54%.

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia?

Record (1 meetings): Wuhan Zall 0W | Draws 0 | Meizhou Kejia 1W.

What form are Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia in?

Wuhan Zall (all comps): 0W-1D-9L in 10 | 0.10 PPG | GF 0.70 / GA 2.60 | L5 L-L-L-L-L. Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 4W-1D-5L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 1.70 / GA 1.70 | L5 L-L-W-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

The model rates Wuhan Zall's attack at 0.76x the league average against Meizhou Kejia's defence at 1.28x — combine the two and it projects 1.41 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, Meizhou Kejia's attack versus Wuhan Zall's defence, projects 1.43 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 36/22 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 13.3% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-2 (8.4%), 2-1 (8.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 30% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Meizhou Kejia Win

37%

Wuhan Zall

2.71

25%

Draw

3.95

38%

Meizhou Kejia

2.64

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

11.8%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

8.4%

Away win

1 – 2

8.4%

Away win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.41

Wuhan Zall xG

Total xG

2.84

1.43

Meizhou Kejia xG

37%
25%
38%
Wuhan ZallDrawMeizhou Kejia

2.71

37%

Home win

3.95

25%

Draw

2.64

38%

Away win

Goals Markets

78%

Over 1.5

1.28

22%

Under 1.5

4.55

54%

Over 2.5

1.85

46%

Under 2.5

2.17

32%

Over 3.5

3.12

68%

Under 3.5

1.47

16%

Over 4.5

6.25

84%

Under 4.5

1.19

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

58%

BTTS Yes

1.74

42%

BTTS No

2.36

Clean Sheet

24%

Wuhan Zall

4.17

24%

Meizhou Kejia

4.09

Win to Nil

9%

Wuhan Zall

11.33

9%

Meizhou Kejia

10.81

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 5.9 8.4 6.0 2.9 1.0 0.3
1 8.3 11.8 8.4 4.0 1.4 0.4
2 5.8 8.3 5.9 2.8 1.0 0.3
3 2.7 3.9 2.8 1.3 0.5 0.1
4 1.0 1.4 1.0 0.5 0.2
5 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.408
λ Away (xG) 1.429
Total xG 2.837
League avg home goals 1.448
League avg away goals 1.311
Wuhan Zall attack strength 0.757
Wuhan Zall defence strength 1.515
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 0.720
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 1.284
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 36 / 22

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 13.3%.

How many goals are Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia expected to score?

The model projects 1.41 expected goals for Wuhan Zall and 1.43 for Meizhou Kejia, a combined total of 2.84.

How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 38%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Wuhan Zall come into this having played 22 games, going 5W 2D 15L for 0.77 points per game. Their last five reads L-L-L-L-L. The sample for Wuhan Zall is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

On the other side, Meizhou Kejia sit at 1.50 PPG from 22 outings (9W 6D 7L), a run that reads L-L-W-L-L across their last five. The sample for Meizhou Kejia is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Meizhou Kejia carry the stronger recent form of the two, 0.73 PPG clear of Wuhan Zall — worth weighing alongside whatever the head-to-head and market data say.

Home Ground vs the Road

Wuhan Zall's home form reads 1W 2D 7L across 10 games on their own ground, a 0.50 PPG return.

Away from home, Meizhou Kejia have taken 1.20 points per game from 10 outings (3W 3D 4L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Meizhou Kejia come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

Wuhan Zall are averaging 1.09 goals scored and 2.09 conceded per game recently; Meizhou Kejia are on 1.45 scored and 1.23 conceded.

Last 22 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Wuhan Zall

Wuhan Zall

Blended
L L L L L
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Blended
L L W L L
22 Played 22
5/2/15 W / D / L 9/6/7
0.77 Points Per Game 1.50
1.09 Avg Goals Scored 1.45
2.09 Avg Goals Conceded 1.23
3.18 Avg Goals / Game 2.68
3 Clean Sheets 6
13 BTTS 12
17 Over 2.5 Games 12
Wuhan Zall

Wuhan Zall

L
A Dalian Aerbin
1–2 HT 1–1
30 Oct
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–3 HT 0–1
24 Oct
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–3 HT 0–0
09 Oct
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–4 HT 1–3
29 Sep
L
A Changchun Yatai
0–2 HT 0–1
24 Sep
L
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–3 HT 0–1
20 Sep
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Aug
D
H Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 2–1
21 Aug
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–4 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Guangzhou R&F
5–0 HT 4–0
13 Aug
L
A Meizhou Kejia
1–2 HT 0–1
07 Aug
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
2–2 HT 2–1
12 Jul
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
0–5 HT 0–2
08 Jul
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
L
A Hebei Zhongji
1–2 HT 0–1
30 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–1
25 Jun
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–1
20 Jun
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–3 HT 0–2
15 Jun
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
1–0 HT 0–0
11 Jun
W
H Hebei Zhongji
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Jun
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Jun
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

L
A Changchun Yatai
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–7 HT 0–3
24 Oct
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
3–1 HT 2–0
09 Oct
L
H Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–0
20 Sep
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Sep
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 1–0
10 Sep
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–2 HT 1–1
28 Aug
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–2
22 Aug
W
H Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
13 Aug
W
H Wuhan Zall
2–1 HT 1–0
07 Aug
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 1–0
11 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Jul
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 2–0
29 Jun
L
A Tianjin Teda
0–1 HT 0–1
25 Jun
D
A Chengdu Better City
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
H Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–2
17 Jun
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–1 HT 1–0
13 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Jun
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia in coming into this match?

Wuhan Zall have gone 5W 2D 15L in their last 22 games (0.77 PPG), while Meizhou Kejia have gone 9W 6D 7L in their last 22 (1.50 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Zall at home or Meizhou Kejia away?

Meizhou Kejia's away record (1.20 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Zall at home: 0.50 PPG; Meizhou Kejia away: 1.20 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia runs to 2 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to August 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 4 November 2022, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Last 2 Meetings

Wuhan Zall

0

Wuhan Zall

1

Draws

Meizhou Kejia

1

Meizhou Kejia

Recent Meetings

Wuhan Zall
0–0
04 Nov 22
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
2–1
07 Aug 22
Wuhan Zall

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia?

From 2 meetings on record, Wuhan Zall have won 0, Meizhou Kejia have won 1, and 1 have been drawn.

When did Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia last play each other?

They last met on 4 November 2022, when Wuhan Zall 0-0 Meizhou Kejia.

Who has won more matches between Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia?

Meizhou Kejia have the better head-to-head record, with 1 wins from 2 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Wuhan Zall are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 70% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time, though they've let that lead slip 20% of the time they've held it — worth watching if they're only ahead by one.

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 70% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 30% of the time.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Wuhan Zall 70%, Meizhou Kejia 30% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 90% for Wuhan Zall and 30% for Meizhou Kejia. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 40% and 20% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Wuhan Zall have failed to score in 30% of games; Meizhou Kejia in 60%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Wuhan Zall home games / Meizhou Kejia away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Wuhan Zall Wuhan Zall Blended
Metric All
(22 games)
Venue
(10 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 17/22
(77.3%)
7/10
(70%)
2+ Goals Before HT 7/22
(31.8%)
3/10
(30%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 5/5
(100%)
3/3
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/5
(40%)
2/3
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 5/22
(22.7%)
3/10
(30%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/22
(9.1%)
2/10
(20%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/22
(0%)
0/10
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 13/22
(59.1%)
7/10
(70%)
Over 2.5 Goals 17/22
(77.3%)
9/10
(90%)
Over 3.5 Goals 8/22
(36.4%)
4/10
(40%)
Clean Sheet 3/22
(13.6%)
0/10
(0%)
Failed to Score 6/22
(27.3%)
3/10
(30%)
Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Blended
Metric All
(22 games)
Venue
(10 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 16/22
(72.7%)
7/10
(70%)
2+ Goals Before HT 8/22
(36.4%)
3/10
(30%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 3/6
(50%)
1/3
(33.3%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/6
(16.7%)
0/3
(0%)
Winning at HT 7/22
(31.8%)
3/10
(30%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/22
(4.5%)
0/10
(0%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 2/22
(9.1%)
0/10
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 12/22
(54.5%)
3/10
(30%)
Over 2.5 Goals 12/22
(54.5%)
3/10
(30%)
Over 3.5 Goals 6/22
(27.3%)
2/10
(20%)
Clean Sheet 6/22
(27.3%)
3/10
(30%)
Failed to Score 7/22
(31.8%)
6/10
(60%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Wuhan Zall play Meizhou Kejia?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 70% of Wuhan Zall's recent matches and 30% of Meizhou Kejia's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Wuhan Zall vs Meizhou Kejia usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 90% of Wuhan Zall's matches and 30% of Meizhou Kejia's.

Do Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia tend to score early?

Wuhan Zall have had a goal before half-time in 70% of their recent matches, Meizhou Kejia in 70% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Stalemate at Wuhan Zall's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Wuhan Zall and Meizhou Kejia finished level at 0-0 at Dongxihu Sports Centre, Regular Season - 23, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Zall 1.41 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.43 xG, a combined 2.84. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Wuhan Zall fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Meizhou Kejia landed 1.4 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Zall attack 0.76 / defence 1.51 against Meizhou Kejia attack 0.72 / defence 1.28, drawn from 36/22 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Wuhan Zall 37% | Draw 25% | Meizhou Kejia 38%, with Meizhou Kejia to win its most likely call at 38%. Instead the game produced a draw, an outcome the model had rated at just 25% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 54%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 78% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 58% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 66% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Zall 77%, Meizhou Kejia 54%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 57%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Wuhan Zall's trading profile (22 games, 10 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 27% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (22 games, 10 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 54% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 32% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Form vs Result

On form, Meizhou Kejia arrived the stronger side — 1.50 PPG against 0.77. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Wuhan Zall (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.00 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 2.40 average — tighter than their form line. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.30 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss), form (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 54% Over 2.5 probability, but 0 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 58% projected, one side was shut out.
Trading Trading data bucked — 66% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.