Sign in Register

SHANGHAI SIPG 7-2 Meizhou Kejia – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 22

Kick-off

Fri 9 Aug 2024

12:35

Venue

SAIC Motor Pudong Arena

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model favours SHANGHAI SIPG (88%) — form and H2H data both point in the same direction as SHANGHAI SIPG face Meizhou Kejia.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

SHANGHAI SIPG host Meizhou Kejia at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena in Super League, Regular Season - 22. Kick-off is scheduled for Friday 9 August 2024 at 12:35 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all Super League games this season, SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 10W 0D 0L from 10 outings — a 3.00 PPG return. Last five: W W W W W. They are averaging 3.40 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. Defensively, conceding just 0.50 per game is an exceptional defensive record — one of the tightest in the division. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches. This season is still relatively young for SHANGHAI SIPG, so this record blends games from this season and last.

SHANGHAI SIPG's home record at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena: 9W 1D 0L from 10 Super League appearances (2.80 PPG). They are averaging 4.00 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. Both teams have scored in 80% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

Meizhou Kejia — All Games: 3W 2D 5L from 10 Super League fixtures this season — 1.10 PPG. Last five: L W D L W. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 2.20 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.20 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. This season is still relatively young for Meizhou Kejia, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Super League this season, Meizhou Kejia have posted 2W 3D 5L from 10 away outings — 0.90 PPG. Away from home they average 1.10 goals scored and 2.00 conceded per game.

On current form, SHANGHAI SIPG have the edge — a 1.90 PPG advantage (3.00 vs 1.10) represents a meaningful gap. That momentum makes them the form-based pick, though if the outright price looks short, Draw No Bet is worth comparing.

Head to Head

SHANGHAI SIPG hold a clear advantage in this fixture, picking up 4 wins from 5 previous encounters compared to 0 for Meizhou Kejia, with 1 draws in between.

The 5 previous encounters between these sides have been high-scoring affairs — 3.0 goals per contest on average. Historical precedent backs the Over 2.5 goals market. The most recent clash, on 18 Jun 2024, ended 2–1 with SHANGHAI SIPG winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both SHANGHAI SIPG and goals. The home side's 4 wins from 5 meetings, combined with an average of 3.0 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

In-Play Data

SHANGHAI SIPG trading profile (52 games, 25 at home): they score before half-time in 64% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 87% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 73% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 80% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 68% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 42%.

Meizhou Kejia trading profile (52 games, 25 at away): they score before half-time in 68% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 69% of the time; BTTS occurs in 60% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games); they fail to score in 31% of games.

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — SHANGHAI SIPG 60% and Meizhou Kejia 62% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (SHANGHAI SIPG 65% | Meizhou Kejia 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects SHANGHAI SIPG 4.10 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.06 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.858 / defence 0.869 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.928 / defence 1.221. League average goals — home 1.808 / away 1.312. SHANGHAI SIPG carry an above-average attack strength of 1.858 — their λ of 4.10 reflects genuine attacking quality above the league norm. Meizhou Kejia bring a strong defensive rating of 1.221 — this is suppressing SHANGHAI SIPG's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 52 SHANGHAI SIPG games / 52 Meizhou Kejia games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: SHANGHAI SIPG 88% | Draw 8% | Meizhou Kejia 5%. Fair-value odds: SHANGHAI SIPG 1.14 | Draw 12.50 | Meizhou Kejia 20.00. The model has a clear lean to SHANGHAI SIPG (88%) — a 83pp gap over the next-most-likely outcome reflects a meaningful statistical advantage.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 89% | BTTS probability 64% | Total xG 5.16. Over 2.5 is the model's clear signal at 89% — a total xG of 5.16 means the expected score alone exceeds the 2.5 threshold, making the Over not just likely but structurally supported by both sides' attack/defence profiles. BTTS Yes at 64% reflects that both xG figures (4.10 / 1.06) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates SHANGHAI SIPG as the most likely outcome at 88% — clear model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support.

The Poisson model projects 5.16 xG in total — Over 2.5 at 89% — strong confidence, supported by form averaging 4.1 goals per game and H2H averaging 3.0 goals per meeting.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 64% on Yes. Form rates corroborate: SHANGHAI SIPG 80% | Meizhou Kejia 40% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H SHANGHAI SIPG hold a strong historical advantage, winning 4 of 5 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to SHANGHAI SIPG — H2H win rate 80% vs Poisson 88%.
Goals H2H (3.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (5.16) both back Over 2.5 goals (89% Poisson probability).
Form SHANGHAI SIPG lead on PPG: 3.00 vs 1.10 — stronger form across the last 10 games.
Goals Form averages (~3.3 goals/game) and Poisson xG (5.16) both support Over 2.5 goals at 89%.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour SHANGHAI SIPG — SHANGHAI SIPG at 88% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model strongly favours SHANGHAI SIPG at 88% home win probability.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 89% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 64% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 22 | Venue: SAIC Motor Pudong Arena • Kick-off: Friday 9 Aug 2024, 12:35 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: SHANGHAI SIPG 88% | Draw 8% | Meizhou Kejia 5% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 89% | BTTS 64% | xG SHANGHAI SIPG 4.10 / Meizhou Kejia 1.06 • Poisson strength factors: SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.858 / def 0.869 | Meizhou Kejia attack 0.928 / def 1.221 | league avg home 1.808 / away 1.312 • Poisson stance: SHANGHAI SIPG (88%) — strong lean

🧮 Prediction Model

4.10

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

Expected Goals

1.06

Meizhou Kejia xG

88%
SHANGHAI SIPG Draw Meizhou Kejia

64%

BTTS

97%

Over 1.5

89%

Over 2.5

76%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia kick off?

SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia kicked off at 12:35 on Friday 9 August 2024 at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena.

What was the final score in SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia?

SHANGHAI SIPG 7 - 2 Meizhou Kejia.

Where is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia being played?

The match is being played at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena.

What competition is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia part of?

SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia is a Regular Season - 22 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our statistical model gives SHANGHAI SIPG a 88% chance of winning, Meizhou Kejia a 5% chance, and a 8% chance of a draw — making SHANGHAI SIPG the favourite.

Will both teams score in SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our model estimates a 64% probability that both SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia will score (BTTS).

Will SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 89%.

What is the head-to-head record between SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia?

Record (5 meetings): SHANGHAI SIPG 4W | Draws 1 | Meizhou Kejia 0W.

What form are SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia in?

SHANGHAI SIPG (all comps): 10W-0D-0L in 10 | 3.00 PPG | GF 3.40 / GA 0.50 | L5 W-W-W-W-W. Meizhou Kejia (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 2.20 | L5 L-W-D-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

SHANGHAI SIPG's attacking strength (1.86x league average) is weighed against Meizhou Kejia's defensive record (1.22x) to produce a home expected-goals figure of 4.10. The same calculation in reverse, Meizhou Kejia's attack versus SHANGHAI SIPG's defence, projects 1.06 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 52/52 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Most Likely Scorelines

The model's single most probable exact score is 4-1, at 7.2%. Close behind: 3-1 (7.0%), 4-0 (6.8%). Together the top three scorelines make up 21% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

SHANGHAI SIPG Win

88%

SHANGHAI SIPG

1.14

8%

Draw

12.99

5%

Meizhou Kejia

21.14

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

4 – 1

7.2%

Home win

Most likely

3 – 1

7.0%

Home win

4 – 0

6.8%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

4.10

SHANGHAI SIPG xG

Total xG

5.16

1.06

Meizhou Kejia xG

88%
SHANGHAI SIPGDrawMeizhou Kejia

1.14

88%

Home win

12.99

8%

Draw

21.14

5%

Away win

Goals Markets

96%

Over 1.5

1.04

4%

Under 1.5

25.00

89%

Over 2.5

1.12

11%

Under 2.5

9.09

76%

Over 3.5

1.32

24%

Under 3.5

4.17

59%

Over 4.5

1.69

41%

Under 4.5

2.44

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

64%

BTTS Yes

1.56

36%

BTTS No

2.80

Clean Sheet

35%

SHANGHAI SIPG

2.88

2%

Meizhou Kejia

60.40

Win to Nil

30%

SHANGHAI SIPG

3.29

0%

Meizhou Kejia

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.1
1 2.4 2.5 1.3 0.5 0.1
2 4.8 5.1 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.1
3 6.6 7.0 3.7 1.3 0.3 0.1
4 6.8 7.2 3.8 1.3 0.4 0.1
5 5.6 5.9 3.1 1.1 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 4.101
λ Away (xG) 1.058
Total xG 5.159
League avg home goals 1.808
League avg away goals 1.312
SHANGHAI SIPG attack strength 1.858
SHANGHAI SIPG defence strength 0.869
Meizhou Kejia attack strength 0.928
Meizhou Kejia defence strength 1.221
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 52 / 52

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia?

Our Poisson model rates 4-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 7.2%.

How many goals are SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia expected to score?

The model projects 4.10 expected goals for SHANGHAI SIPG and 1.06 for Meizhou Kejia, a combined total of 5.16.

How confident is the prediction model for SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia?

Reasonably confident — the model's leading outcome is rated at 88%, a clear lean rather than a toss-up.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

SHANGHAI SIPG's recent record stands at 38W 9D 5L from 52 games, a 2.37 PPG return, with W-W-W-W-W in the last five. The sample for SHANGHAI SIPG is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Meizhou Kejia, meanwhile, have gone 13W 15D 24L across 52 games — 1.04 PPG, with L-W-D-L-W in their last five. The sample for Meizhou Kejia is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

The points-per-game comparison favours SHANGHAI SIPG by 1.33 — a real, if not enormous, edge over Meizhou Kejia heading into this one.

Venue Form

At home specifically, SHANGHAI SIPG have managed 17W 5D 3L from 25 games — 2.24 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Meizhou Kejia's away record stands at 4W 7D 14L across 25 trips, a 0.76 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, SHANGHAI SIPG come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

SHANGHAI SIPG are averaging 2.58 goals scored and 0.92 conceded per game recently; Meizhou Kejia are on 1.21 scored and 1.77 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: Meizhou Kejia in 62%.

Defensively: SHANGHAI SIPG have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 52 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

Blended
W W W W W
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

Blended
L W D L W
52 Played 52
38/9/5 W / D / L 13/15/24
2.37 Points Per Game 1.04
2.58 Avg Goals Scored 1.21
0.92 Avg Goals Conceded 1.77
3.50 Avg Goals / Game 2.98
20 Clean Sheets 9
31 BTTS 32
34 Over 2.5 Games 31
SHANGHAI SIPG

SHANGHAI SIPG

W
A Shandong Luneng
1–0 HT 0–0
03 Aug
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
8–1 HT 4–0
26 Jul
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 0–0
21 Jul
W
H Beijing Guoan
5–1 HT 3–1
12 Jul
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Jul
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–1 HT 1–1
29 Jun
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 2–0
25 Jun
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Jun
W
A Tianjin Teda
3–0 HT 2–0
14 Jun
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–1 HT 1–1
26 May
W
H Chengdu Better City
2–0 HT 0–0
22 May
W
A Qingdao Youth Island
5–3 HT 3–1
18 May
W
H Changchun Yatai
5–2 HT 3–1
10 May
W
A Sichuan Jiuniu
6–0 HT 3–0
05 May
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 2–0
01 May
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
W
H Shandong Luneng
4–3 HT 2–3
14 Apr
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
3–0 HT 2–0
09 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
2–2 HT 1–1
05 Apr
W
H Henan Jianye
3–1 HT 0–0
30 Mar
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 1–1
01 Mar
W
A Dalian Aerbin
3–2 HT 0–1
04 Nov
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
29 Oct
L
H Beijing Guoan
1–2 HT 0–1
20 Oct
W
A Nantong Zhiyun
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Sep
L
A Chengdu Better City
1–2 HT 0–1
23 Sep
W
H Changchun Yatai
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Sep
L
A Henan Jianye
1–3 HT 0–1
25 Aug
D
H Meizhou Kejia
1–1 HT 0–0
18 Aug
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
3–4 HT 2–1
12 Aug
W
A Qingdao Jonoon
5–0 HT 1–0
08 Aug
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–1
03 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
5–0 HT 2–0
29 Jul
W
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
3–0 HT 1–0
21 Jul
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–1 HT 1–1
16 Jul
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
3–1 HT 0–0
12 Jul
D
H Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 1–1
08 Jul
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 0–1
03 Jul
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–1 HT 1–0
29 Jun
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–1 HT 0–1
09 Jun
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Jun
W
A Changchun Yatai
3–0 HT 3–0
29 May
W
H Henan Jianye
3–2 HT 2–1
24 May
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–0 HT 1–0
20 May
W
A Hangzhou Greentown
2–1 HT 0–0
14 May
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
2–1 HT 0–0
10 May
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
06 May
D
H Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
30 Apr
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
3–2 HT 1–0
22 Apr
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Apr
Meizhou Kejia

Meizhou Kejia

W
H Tianjin Teda
3–2 HT 1–0
03 Aug
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
2–4 HT 1–2
28 Jul
D
A Qingdao Youth Island
3–3 HT 1–3
21 Jul
W
H Nantong Zhiyun
2–1 HT 0–1
13 Jul
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–4 HT 0–3
07 Jul
L
H Henan Jianye
0–3 HT 0–0
30 Jun
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
0–3 HT 0–1
26 Jun
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
1–2 HT 0–0
18 Jun
D
H Shandong Luneng
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jun
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
25 May
D
H Sichuan Jiuniu
0–0 HT 0–0
21 May
L
H Chengdu Better City
1–4 HT 0–1
17 May
L
A Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–0
11 May
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 0–1
05 May
D
H Qingdao Youth Island
1–1 HT 0–1
30 Apr
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 0–0
26 Apr
D
A Tianjin Teda
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Apr
D
H Qingdao Jonoon
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Apr
L
A Nantong Zhiyun
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–0
31 Mar
D
A Henan Jianye
2–2 HT 1–1
09 Mar
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–2 HT 0–0
03 Mar
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–3 HT 0–2
04 Nov
L
H Nantong Zhiyun
0–4 HT 0–1
29 Oct
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–0
19 Oct
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–0 HT 0–0
29 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
5–1 HT 2–0
16 Sep
L
A Tianjin Teda
1–3 HT 0–2
26 Aug
D
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–1 HT 0–0
18 Aug
W
H Qingdao Jonoon
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Aug
W
H Changchun Yatai
4–2 HT 2–1
08 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–6 HT 0–3
04 Aug
W
H Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 2–1
29 Jul
L
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–1
23 Jul
L
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–2 HT 1–1
17 Jul
W
H Beijing Guoan
3–1 HT 3–0
12 Jul
W
H Chengdu Better City
3–1 HT 1–0
07 Jul
D
A Nantong Zhiyun
2–2 HT 1–0
02 Jul
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
0–3 HT 0–1
28 Jun
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
2–3 HT 1–1
09 Jun
L
A Henan Jianye
1–2 HT 1–0
03 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–3 HT 2–0
28 May
D
H Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
24 May
L
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–2 HT 0–1
20 May
L
A Qingdao Jonoon
0–2 HT 0–0
14 May
W
A Changchun Yatai
4–2 HT 1–2
10 May
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 0–1
06 May
D
A Dalian Aerbin
1–1 HT 0–0
01 May
L
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–2 HT 1–1
25 Apr
L
H Shanghai Shenhua
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Apr
D
A Beijing Guoan
1–1 HT 1–0
15 Apr

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia in coming into this match?

SHANGHAI SIPG have gone 38W 9D 5L in their last 52 games (2.37 PPG), while Meizhou Kejia have gone 13W 15D 24L in their last 52 (1.04 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — SHANGHAI SIPG at home or Meizhou Kejia away?

SHANGHAI SIPG's home record (2.24 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — SHANGHAI SIPG at home: 2.24 PPG; Meizhou Kejia away: 0.76 PPG.

Have SHANGHAI SIPG or Meizhou Kejia been keeping clean sheets recently?

SHANGHAI SIPG have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their recent games, Meizhou Kejia in 17%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

8 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. It has been a while since the last meeting — 2 August 2025, some 2 years back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Streaks & Records

SHANGHAI SIPG go into this on the back of 4 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.

The biggest gap between the sides came on 24 Oct 2022, when SHANGHAI SIPG won 7-0 — the largest margin of victory on record between these two.

SHANGHAI SIPG's record when hosting Meizhou Kejia specifically: 3W 1D 0L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

SHANGHAI SIPG

7

SHANGHAI SIPG

1

Draws

Meizhou Kejia

0

Meizhou Kejia

Recent Meetings

Meizhou Kejia
2–4
02 Aug 25
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1
02 Apr 25
Meizhou Kejia
SHANGHAI SIPG
7–2
09 Aug 24
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
1–2
18 Jun 24
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
1–1
18 Aug 23
Meizhou Kejia
Meizhou Kejia
0–2
20 May 23
SHANGHAI SIPG
Meizhou Kejia
0–1
15 Dec 22
SHANGHAI SIPG
SHANGHAI SIPG
7–0
24 Oct 22
Meizhou Kejia

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia?

From 8 meetings on record, SHANGHAI SIPG have won 7, Meizhou Kejia have won 0, and 1 have been drawn.

When did SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia last play each other?

They last met on 2 August 2025, when Meizhou Kejia 2-4 SHANGHAI SIPG.

Who has won more matches between SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia?

SHANGHAI SIPG have the better head-to-head record, with 7 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

SHANGHAI SIPG are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 64% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 32% of the time.

Meizhou Kejia are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 68% of their matches.

Full-Time Trends

Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — SHANGHAI SIPG at 80%, Meizhou Kejia at 60%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 68% for SHANGHAI SIPG and 64% for Meizhou Kejia. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 48% and 40% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Meizhou Kejia in 28%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = SHANGHAI SIPG home games / Meizhou Kejia away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

SHANGHAI SIPG SHANGHAI SIPG Blended
Metric All
(52 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 37/52
(71.2%)
16/25
(64%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/52
(40.4%)
11/25
(44%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/15
(86.7%)
9/9
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 11/15
(73.3%)
8/9
(88.9%)
Winning at HT 23/52
(44.2%)
8/25
(32%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/52
(5.8%)
3/25
(12%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/52
(7.7%)
2/25
(8%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 31/52
(59.6%)
20/25
(80%)
Over 2.5 Goals 34/52
(65.4%)
17/25
(68%)
Over 3.5 Goals 22/52
(42.3%)
12/25
(48%)
Clean Sheet 20/52
(38.5%)
4/25
(16%)
Failed to Score 3/52
(5.8%)
1/25
(4%)
Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia Blended
Metric All
(52 games)
Venue
(25 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 36/52
(69.2%)
17/25
(68%)
2+ Goals Before HT 18/52
(34.6%)
12/25
(48%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 11/16
(68.8%)
7/8
(87.5%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/16
(43.8%)
3/8
(37.5%)
Winning at HT 14/52
(26.9%)
5/25
(20%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 7/52
(13.5%)
5/25
(20%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/52
(11.5%)
2/25
(8%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 32/52
(61.5%)
15/25
(60%)
Over 2.5 Goals 31/52
(59.6%)
16/25
(64%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/52
(34.6%)
10/25
(40%)
Clean Sheet 9/52
(17.3%)
4/25
(16%)
Failed to Score 16/52
(30.8%)
7/25
(28%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when SHANGHAI SIPG play Meizhou Kejia?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 80% of SHANGHAI SIPG's games and 60% of Meizhou Kejia's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is SHANGHAI SIPG vs Meizhou Kejia usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 68% of SHANGHAI SIPG's matches and 64% of Meizhou Kejia's.

Do SHANGHAI SIPG and Meizhou Kejia tend to score early?

SHANGHAI SIPG have had a goal before half-time in 64% of their recent matches, Meizhou Kejia in 68% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Dominant SHANGHAI SIPG run riot with a 7-2 hammering of Meizhou Kejia.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

SHANGHAI SIPG beat Meizhou Kejia 7-2 at SAIC Motor Pudong Arena, Regular Season - 22, in the Super League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting SHANGHAI SIPG 4.10 xG and Meizhou Kejia 1.06 xG, a combined 5.16. The scoreboard read 7-2 for 9 actual goals. SHANGHAI SIPG beat their projection by 2.9 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Meizhou Kejia outscored their 1.06 projection by 0.9. Those figures were built on strength ratings of SHANGHAI SIPG attack 1.86 / defence 0.87 against Meizhou Kejia attack 0.93 / defence 1.22, drawn from 52/52 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it SHANGHAI SIPG 88% | Draw 8% | Meizhou Kejia 5%, with SHANGHAI SIPG to win its most likely call at 88%. The result followed the model's preferred path, landing its top-rated outcome.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 89%. The game delivered 9, so it went over — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 97% and landed. Over 3.5 was 76% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 64% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 62% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (SHANGHAI SIPG 65%, Meizhou Kejia 60%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 61%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

SHANGHAI SIPG's trading profile (52 games, 25 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 38% of the time, and conceded here.

Meizhou Kejia's trading profile (52 games, 25 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 62% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, SHANGHAI SIPG arrived the stronger side — 2.37 PPG against 1.04. Form held, and they took the win. SHANGHAI SIPG (home/away splits) scored 7 against a 2.72 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 2 against a 1.16 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Meizhou Kejia (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 1.12 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 7 against a 2.12 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 4 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). A strong night for the model: the result sat comfortably inside what the pre-match data projected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 89% Over 2.5 probability, 9 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 64% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 62% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.