Sign in Register

AS Eupen 1-3 RWDM – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Jupiler Pro League · Regular Season - 14

Kick-off

Sat 11 Nov 2023

17:15

Venue

Kehrwegstadion

Competition

Jupiler Pro League

Belgium

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates AS Eupen at 45%, yet other data sources diverge — this AS Eupen vs RWDM fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Analysis & Preview

A Jupiler Pro League encounter, Regular Season - 14 sees RWDM travel to Kehrwegstadion to take on AS Eupen. The game is scheduled for Saturday 11 November 2023, 17:15 UTC.

Form Analysis

Looking at all fixtures this season, AS Eupen stand at 3W 1D 6L from 10 Jupiler Pro League matches — 1.00 PPG. Last five: L L L W D. They are averaging 1.40 goals per game and conceding 2.00 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.00 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches — an extremely high rate that makes BTTS Yes a well-supported standalone angle from their form alone. This season is still relatively young for AS Eupen, so this record blends games from this season and last.

AS Eupen's form when playing at home: 2W 3D 5L across 10 games at Kehrwegstadion this term (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 1.60 goals scored and 2.60 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their home games — an outstanding BTTS rate that is a key data point for this fixture.

RWDM — All Games: 1W 5D 4L from 10 Jupiler Pro League fixtures this season — 0.80 PPG. Last five: D L D L D. Their scoring rate of 1.10 per game is modest, conceding 1.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Both teams have scored in 90% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play. This season is still relatively young for RWDM, so this record blends games from this season and last.

When travelling in Jupiler Pro League this season, RWDM have posted 4W 3D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.50 PPG. Away from home they average 1.70 goals scored and 1.50 conceded per game. Both teams have scored in 70% of their away matches — a high BTTS rate on the road that directly informs this fixture. Their away PPG of 1.50 exceeds their overall 0.80 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

There is minimal separation in the form figures — AS Eupen at 1.00 PPG versus RWDM's 0.80. The form guide is not providing a strong directional steer; the model and market data will carry more weight in the final assessment.

Both teams score in over 70% of each side's relevant games (using home/away splits). At that combined rate, BTTS Yes is as well-evidenced as it gets — the data strongly backs two-way scoring.

In-Play Profile

AS Eupen in-play tendencies (45 games, 22 at home): they score before half-time in 82% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 91% of the time; BTTS occurs in 64% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 44%.

RWDM in-play tendencies (45 games, 22 at away): they score before half-time in 59% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 93% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 71% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 73% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 64% of games (away games).

From a combined perspective, both sides have high BTTS rates — AS Eupen 60% and RWDM 67% — which reinforces the BTTS Yes angle from in-play data. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (AS Eupen 60% | RWDM 60%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects AS Eupen 1.79 xG and RWDM 1.40 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: AS Eupen attack 0.911 / defence 1.296 | RWDM attack 0.803 / defence 1.164. League average goals — home 1.690 / away 1.346. Data: 47 AS Eupen games / 13 RWDM games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: AS Eupen 45% | Draw 27% | RWDM 28%. Fair-value odds: AS Eupen 2.22 | Draw 3.70 | RWDM 3.57. AS Eupen hold a narrow Poisson edge at 45% — the draw (27%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 62% | BTTS probability 65% | Total xG 3.19. Over 2.5 holds a meaningful probability edge at 62% — the 3.19 total xG provides moderate support, though the model is not projecting a high-scoring game. BTTS Yes at 65% reflects that both xG figures (1.79 / 1.40) are above the threshold where scoring blanks become the primary outcome — both sides are projected to find the net.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates AS Eupen as the most likely outcome at 45% — moderate model lean. With a 27% draw probability, Draw No Bet on AS Eupen offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 28% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

Poisson projects 3.19 total expected goals, pointing to Over 2.5 at 62% probability — reasonable conviction, supported by form averaging 3.7 goals per game.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 65%. Form rates corroborate: AS Eupen 70% | RWDM 70% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

Form RWDM Poisson xG (1.40) is below their form scoring rate (1.70) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
BTTS BTTS Yes is supported by both form (AS Eupen 7/10, RWDM 7/10) and Poisson model (65%).
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is 62% — the model favours goals in this fixture.
BTTS Poisson BTTS probability is 65% — model favours both teams scoring.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: AS Eupen vs RWDM | Competition: Jupiler Pro League, Regular Season - 14 | Venue: Kehrwegstadion • Kick-off: Saturday 11 Nov 2023, 17:15 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: AS Eupen 45% | Draw 27% | RWDM 28% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 62% | BTTS 65% | xG AS Eupen 1.79 / RWDM 1.40 • Poisson strength factors: AS Eupen attack 0.911 / def 1.296 | RWDM attack 0.803 / def 1.164 | league avg home 1.690 / away 1.346 • Poisson stance: AS Eupen (45%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.79

AS Eupen xG

Expected Goals

1.40

RWDM xG

45%
27%
28%
AS Eupen Draw RWDM

65%

BTTS

85%

Over 1.5

62%

Over 2.5

40%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does AS Eupen vs RWDM kick off?

AS Eupen vs RWDM kicked off at 17:15 on Saturday 11 November 2023 at Kehrwegstadion.

What was the final score in AS Eupen vs RWDM?

AS Eupen 1 - 3 RWDM.

Where is AS Eupen vs RWDM being played?

The match is being played at Kehrwegstadion.

What competition is AS Eupen vs RWDM part of?

AS Eupen vs RWDM is a Regular Season - 14 fixture in the Jupiler Pro League (Belgium).

Who is favourite to win AS Eupen vs RWDM?

Our statistical model gives AS Eupen a 45% chance of winning, RWDM a 28% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making AS Eupen the favourite.

Will both teams score in AS Eupen vs RWDM?

Our model estimates a 65% probability that both AS Eupen and RWDM will score (BTTS).

Will AS Eupen vs RWDM have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 62%.

What is the head-to-head record between AS Eupen and RWDM?

No recorded head-to-head meetings available in the dataset.

What form are AS Eupen and RWDM in?

AS Eupen (all comps): 3W-1D-6L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 2.00 | L5 L-L-L-W-D. RWDM (all comps): 1W-5D-4L in 10 | 0.80 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.90 | L5 D-L-D-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

The model rates AS Eupen's attack at 0.91x the league average against RWDM's defence at 1.16x — combine the two and it projects 1.79 expected goals for the hosts. The same calculation in reverse, RWDM's attack versus AS Eupen's defence, projects 1.40 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 47/13 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 11.6% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 2-1 (9.2%), 1-2 (7.2%). Together the top three scorelines make up 28% of the probability — a moderately spread distribution, typical of a competitive match-up.

Most Likely Outcome

AS Eupen Win

45%

AS Eupen

2.23

27%

Draw

3.70

28%

RWDM

3.55

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

10.3%

Draw

Most likely

2 – 1

9.2%

Home win

1 – 0

7.4%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.79

AS Eupen xG

Total xG

3.19

1.40

RWDM xG

45%
27%
28%
AS EupenDrawRWDM

2.23

45%

Home win

3.70

27%

Draw

3.55

28%

Away win

Goals Markets

83%

Over 1.5

1.20

17%

Under 1.5

5.88

62%

Over 2.5

1.61

38%

Under 2.5

2.63

40%

Over 3.5

2.50

60%

Under 3.5

1.67

22%

Over 4.5

4.55

78%

Under 4.5

1.28

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

65%

BTTS Yes

1.54

35%

BTTS No

2.84

Clean Sheet

25%

AS Eupen

4.06

17%

RWDM

6.01

Win to Nil

11%

AS Eupen

9.06

5%

RWDM

21.32

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 4.1 5.7 4.0 1.9 0.7 0.2
1 7.4 10.3 7.2 3.4 1.2 0.3
2 6.6 9.2 6.5 3.0 1.1 0.3
3 3.9 5.5 3.9 1.8 0.6 0.2
4 1.8 2.5 1.7 0.8 0.3 0.1
5 0.6 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.793
λ Away (xG) 1.401
Total xG 3.194
League avg home goals 1.690
League avg away goals 1.346
AS Eupen attack strength 0.911
AS Eupen defence strength 1.296
RWDM attack strength 0.803
RWDM defence strength 1.164
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 47 / 13

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for AS Eupen vs RWDM?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 11.6%.

How many goals are AS Eupen and RWDM expected to score?

The model projects 1.79 expected goals for AS Eupen and 1.40 for RWDM, a combined total of 3.19.

How confident is the prediction model for AS Eupen vs RWDM?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 45%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 45 outings, AS Eupen have picked up 0.87 PPG on a 10W 9D 26L record — L-L-L-W-D across the most recent five. The sample for AS Eupen is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

RWDM's form line: 24W 11D 10L from 45 games, 1.84 PPG, last five D-L-D-L-D. The sample for RWDM is still a mix of this season and last, given how young the current campaign is.

Put side by side, RWDM are the form team by 0.97 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against AS Eupen.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, AS Eupen have posted 0.91 PPG from 22 outings (5W 5D 12L).

On the road, RWDM have gone 10W 5D 7L from 22 away games — 1.59 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, RWDM come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

The Goals Picture

AS Eupen are averaging 1.20 goals scored and 2.18 conceded per game recently; RWDM are on 1.76 scored and 1.18 conceded.

On BTTS specifically: AS Eupen have seen both teams score in 60% of their recent games; RWDM in 67%.

Last 45 Results — Jupiler Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

AS Eupen

AS Eupen

Blended
L L L W D
RWDM

RWDM

Blended
D L D L D
45 Played 45
10/9/26 W / D / L 24/11/10
0.87 Points Per Game 1.84
1.20 Avg Goals Scored 1.76
2.18 Avg Goals Conceded 1.18
3.38 Avg Goals / Game 2.93
7 Clean Sheets 12
27 BTTS 30
27 Over 2.5 Games 27
AS Eupen

AS Eupen

D
A St. Truiden
1–1 HT 0–1
03 Nov
W
H Charleroi
2–0 HT 1–0
28 Oct
L
A Union St. Gilloise
1–4 HT 0–2
20 Oct
L
A Antwerp
1–4 HT 1–2
08 Oct
L
H Anderlecht
1–3 HT 1–1
30 Sep
L
A Gent
1–2 HT 1–0
24 Sep
L
H Standard Liege
1–3 HT 0–2
17 Sep
L
A KV Mechelen
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Sep
W
H OH Leuven
3–1 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
A Kortrijk
3–1 HT 0–0
20 Aug
L
H Club Brugge KV
0–5 HT 0–3
13 Aug
W
A Genk
1–0 HT 1–0
05 Aug
D
H KVC Westerlo
2–2 HT 1–0
29 Jul
L
A Club Brugge KV
0–7 HT 0–4
23 Apr
L
H Zulte Waregem
1–5 HT 0–4
15 Apr
D
A Kortrijk
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Apr
L
H Anderlecht
0–1 HT 0–0
02 Apr
L
A Gent
0–3 HT 0–1
19 Mar
D
H Oostende
4–4 HT 1–1
11 Mar
L
A Union St. Gilloise
1–2 HT 0–1
05 Mar
D
H Cercle Brugge
2–2 HT 2–2
25 Feb
L
A Antwerp
0–2 HT 0–2
18 Feb
W
H KV Mechelen
2–1 HT 0–1
10 Feb
D
H KVC Westerlo
1–1 HT 0–1
04 Feb
D
H Genk
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Feb
L
A Standard Liege
1–3 HT 1–2
27 Jan
D
A OH Leuven
1–1 HT 0–1
17 Jan
L
H St. Truiden
0–2 HT 0–1
14 Jan
L
H Charleroi
1–2 HT 1–0
07 Jan
W
A Seraing United
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Dec
D
A Zulte Waregem
5–5 HT 3–2
12 Nov
W
H Standard Liege
2–0 HT 0–0
05 Nov
L
A Anderlecht
2–4 HT 1–2
30 Oct
L
A KV Mechelen
1–2 HT 1–1
22 Oct
W
H OH Leuven
4–2 HT 2–2
18 Oct
L
A Cercle Brugge
1–5 HT 1–3
15 Oct
L
H Gent
0–4 HT 0–2
09 Oct
W
A St. Truiden
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Oct
L
H Union St. Gilloise
1–2 HT 1–1
18 Sep
L
A Oostende
0–1 HT 0–0
10 Sep
L
H Kortrijk
0–1 HT 0–0
03 Sep
W
A KVC Westerlo
1–0 HT 0–0
28 Aug
L
H Seraing United
1–3 HT 0–3
19 Aug
L
H Antwerp
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Aug
L
A Genk
2–4 HT 1–3
06 Aug
RWDM

RWDM

D
H Kortrijk
1–1 HT 1–1
04 Nov
L
A St. Truiden
1–2 HT 0–0
27 Oct
D
H KVC Westerlo
1–1 HT 0–0
21 Oct
L
A Charleroi
1–2 HT 0–0
06 Oct
D
H Gent
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Oct
L
H Union St. Gilloise
2–3 HT 2–2
28 Sep
D
A Antwerp
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Sep
W
H Cercle Brugge
2–1 HT 1–1
16 Sep
D
A Standard Liege
1–1 HT 1–1
02 Sep
L
A Club Brugge KV
1–7 HT 1–2
20 Aug
W
H KV Mechelen
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Aug
W
A OH Leuven
2–1 HT 1–1
05 Aug
L
H Genk
0–4 HT 0–3
29 Jul
W
H RSC Anderlecht II
1–0 HT 1–0
13 May
W
A Club Brugge II
3–1 HT 2–0
06 May
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 2–0
22 Apr
D
H SK Beveren
1–1 HT 0–0
16 Apr
W
H Beerschot VA
4–0 HT 3–0
09 Apr
D
A Beerschot VA
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Apr
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
4–0 HT 1–0
18 Mar
W
H Club Brugge II
3–2 HT 0–1
12 Mar
L
A SK Beveren
1–2 HT 1–0
04 Mar
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–1 HT 0–0
26 Feb
W
A Beerschot VA
1–0 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
H Standard Liège II
3–1 HT 1–0
04 Feb
W
A K. Lierse S.K.
2–1 HT 2–0
29 Jan
W
H Deinze
2–1 HT 1–0
21 Jan
W
A RSC Anderlecht II
2–1 HT 0–0
18 Dec
W
H Excelsior Virton
3–1 HT 2–1
11 Dec
L
H Club Brugge II
0–2 HT 0–1
03 Dec
L
A KRC Genk II
0–2 HT 0–1
25 Nov
D
A SK Beveren
1–1 HT 0–1
19 Nov
W
H Lommel United
5–0 HT 2–0
13 Nov
W
A Dender
1–0 HT 0–0
04 Nov
W
H K. Lierse S.K.
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Oct
W
H SK Beveren
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Oct
W
A Standard Liège II
4–1 HT 1–0
14 Oct
W
H Beerschot VA
2–0 HT 1–0
08 Oct
L
A Lommel United
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Oct
D
H KRC Genk II
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Sep
W
A Deinze
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Sep
D
H RSC Anderlecht II
2–2 HT 0–1
02 Sep
L
A Club Brugge II
1–2 HT 0–1
28 Aug
W
H Dender
1–0 HT 1–0
20 Aug
D
A Excelsior Virton
1–1 HT 0–0
12 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are AS Eupen and RWDM in coming into this match?

AS Eupen have gone 10W 9D 26L in their last 45 games (0.87 PPG), while RWDM have gone 24W 11D 10L in their last 45 (1.84 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — AS Eupen at home or RWDM away?

RWDM's away record (1.59 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — AS Eupen at home: 0.91 PPG; RWDM away: 1.59 PPG.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between AS Eupen and RWDM runs to 8 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to November 2023. The pairing has crossed competitions too — Jupiler Pro League, Challenger Pro League all feature in the head-to-head log. They last met on 1 March 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Digging Into the Numbers

The last 2 meetings have all been drawn — an unusually settled recent run for this fixture.

AS Eupen's record when hosting RWDM specifically: 1W 1D 2L from 4 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 8 Meetings

AS Eupen

2

AS Eupen

2

Draws

RWDM

4

RWDM

Recent Meetings

RWDM
2–2
01 Mar 26
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
2–2
04 Oct 25
RWDM
AS Eupen
0–1
18 Jan 25
RWDM
RWDM
2–1
30 Aug 24
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
2–0
11 May 24
RWDM
RWDM
3–1
13 Apr 24
AS Eupen
RWDM
0–1
24 Jan 24
AS Eupen
AS Eupen
1–3
11 Nov 23
RWDM

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between AS Eupen and RWDM?

From 8 meetings on record, AS Eupen have won 2, RWDM have won 4, and 2 have been drawn.

When did AS Eupen and RWDM last play each other?

They last met on 1 March 2026, when RWDM 2-2 AS Eupen.

Who has won more matches between AS Eupen and RWDM?

RWDM have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

AS Eupen are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 82% of their matches.

RWDM see a goal before the break in 59% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 27% of the time.

The Numbers That Matter

Both teams scoring has been the norm for this pairing lately — AS Eupen at 64%, RWDM at 73%. That combined rate makes BTTS Yes a well-supported trading angle.

Goals have flowed in these teams' recent matches — Over 2.5 has landed at 64% for AS Eupen and 64% for RWDM. Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 50% and 18% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: AS Eupen have failed to score in 27% of games.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = AS Eupen home games / RWDM away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

AS Eupen AS Eupen Blended
Metric All
(45 games)
Venue
(22 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 34/45
(75.6%)
18/22
(81.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 21/45
(46.7%)
11/22
(50%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 10/11
(90.9%)
4/4
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/11
(18.2%)
1/4
(25%)
Winning at HT 7/45
(15.6%)
4/22
(18.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/45
(8.9%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/45
(8.9%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 27/45
(60%)
14/22
(63.6%)
Over 2.5 Goals 27/45
(60%)
14/22
(63.6%)
Over 3.5 Goals 20/45
(44.4%)
11/22
(50%)
Clean Sheet 7/45
(15.6%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Failed to Score 12/45
(26.7%)
6/22
(27.3%)
RWDM RWDM Blended
Metric All
(45 games)
Venue
(22 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 31/45
(68.9%)
13/22
(59.1%)
2+ Goals Before HT 15/45
(33.3%)
6/22
(27.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 13/14
(92.9%)
8/9
(88.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 10/14
(71.4%)
6/9
(66.7%)
Winning at HT 16/45
(35.6%)
6/22
(27.3%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 1/45
(2.2%)
1/22
(4.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/45
(8.9%)
2/22
(9.1%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 30/45
(66.7%)
16/22
(72.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 27/45
(60%)
14/22
(63.6%)
Over 3.5 Goals 14/45
(31.1%)
4/22
(18.2%)
Clean Sheet 12/45
(26.7%)
5/22
(22.7%)
Failed to Score 4/45
(8.9%)
2/22
(9.1%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when AS Eupen play RWDM?

Yes — based on recent matches, both teams have scored in 64% of AS Eupen's games and 73% of RWDM's, a combined rate that favours BTTS Yes.

Is AS Eupen vs RWDM usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 64% of AS Eupen's matches and 64% of RWDM's.

Do AS Eupen and RWDM tend to score early?

AS Eupen have had a goal before half-time in 82% of their recent matches, RWDM in 59% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

RWDM cruise to a comfortable 1-3 victory over AS Eupen.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

RWDM beat AS Eupen 1-3 at Kehrwegstadion, Regular Season - 14, in the Jupiler Pro League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting AS Eupen 1.79 xG and RWDM 1.40 xG, a combined 3.19. The scoreboard read 1-3 for 4 actual goals. RWDM outscored their 1.40 projection by 1.6. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AS Eupen attack 0.91 / defence 1.30 against RWDM attack 0.80 / defence 1.16, drawn from 47/13 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it AS Eupen 45% | Draw 27% | RWDM 28%, with AS Eupen to win its most likely call at 45%. The actual RWDM win had been the model's second-ranked read at 28%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 62%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 85% and landed. Over 3.5 was 40% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 65% and the match saw both sides score — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 60% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AS Eupen 60%, RWDM 60%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 63%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

AS Eupen's trading profile (45 games, 22 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 60% of their matches — today it did.

RWDM's trading profile (45 games, 22 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 67% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, RWDM arrived the stronger side — 1.84 PPG against 0.87. That form edge translated into the three points. AS Eupen (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 2.09 concession average — a leakier day than usual. RWDM (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 1.55 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 62% Over 2.5 probability, 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 65% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 60% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.