Sign in Register

Al Shabab 1-1 Damac – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Pro League · Regular Season - 3

Kick-off

Fri 25 Aug 2023

19:00

Venue

Prince Faisal bin Fahd Stadium

Competition

Pro League

Saudi-Arabia

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson rates Al Shabab at 46% — the H2H record provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Al Shabab vs Damac encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Al Shabab and Damac meet at Prince Faisal bin Fahd Stadium in Pro League, Regular Season - 3. This fixture gets under way on Friday 25 August 2023 at 19:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Al Shabab have collected 1.00 PPG across 10 Pro League outings this season: 3W 1D 6L. Last five: L L W D L. They are averaging 1.30 goals per game and conceding 1.70 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. Al Shabab have played only a handful of Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

Al Shabab at Prince Faisal bin Fahd Stadium this season: 5W 2D 3L from 10 home games — 1.70 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. Their home PPG of 1.70 is noticeably stronger than their overall 1.00 — Al Shabab are significantly better at Prince Faisal bin Fahd Stadium than their overall form suggests.

Damac (all games): 2W 3D 5L across 10 Pro League outings this term — 0.90 points per game. Last five: W D L L D. Their scoring rate of 0.90 per game is modest, conceding 1.80 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation. Damac have played only a handful of Pro League games so far this season, so this record also draws on matches from last season.

On the road, Damac have gone 2W 1D 7L from 10 away fixtures this term (0.70 PPG). Away from home they average 0.80 goals scored and 1.90 conceded per game.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.00 for Al Shabab, 0.90 for Damac — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

Head-to-Head

Historically, Al Shabab have had the better of this match-up — 3 wins from 4 meetings, with Damac managing just 0 victories and 1 draws shared.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.2 per game across 4 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 31 May 2023, ended 4–1 with Al Shabab winning.

From a betting standpoint, the H2H backs both Al Shabab and goals. The home side's 3 wins from 4 meetings, combined with an average of 3.2 goals per game, gives the home win and Over 2.5 combination a historically grounded case.

Trading

Al Shabab half-time and goal-timing data (32 games, 16 at home): they score before half-time in 81% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 67% of the time; they lead at the break 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 31% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 56% of games (home games).

Damac half-time and goal-timing data (32 games, 16 at away): they score before half-time in 69% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 80% of the time; BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Al Shabab 56% versus Damac 53%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Al Shabab 66% | Damac 50%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Al Shabab 1.38 xG and Damac 0.99 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Al Shabab attack 1.007 / defence 0.932 | Damac attack 0.754 / defence 1.119. League average goals — home 1.227 / away 1.410. Data: 32 Al Shabab games / 32 Damac games used (Blended). A blend of current and prior-season data is applied to stabilise estimates early in the campaign.

Result probabilities: Al Shabab 46% | Draw 27% | Damac 27%. Fair-value odds: Al Shabab 2.17 | Draw 3.70 | Damac 3.70. Al Shabab hold a narrow Poisson edge at 46% — the draw (27%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 42% | BTTS probability 47% | Total xG 2.37. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 58% — total xG of 2.37 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 47% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Al Shabab at 46% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 27% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Al Shabab if the outright odds are short.

Poisson projects 2.37 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 42% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction — though H2H averaging only 3.2 goals per meeting points in the other direction.

On the BTTS market, Poisson puts 47% on No. Form rates corroborate: Al Shabab 40% | Damac 40% BTTS from recent games.

The Poisson model is drawing on Blended data (32 games minimum) — early-season projections carry additional uncertainty. Weight the live form and odds signals accordingly.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H Al Shabab hold a strong historical advantage, winning 3 of 4 meetings.
H2H H2H history and Poisson model both point to Al Shabab — H2H win rate 75% vs Poisson 46%.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Al Shabab vs Damac | Competition: Pro League, Regular Season - 3 | Venue: Prince Faisal bin Fahd Stadium • Kick-off: Friday 25 Aug 2023, 19:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Al Shabab 46% | Draw 27% | Damac 27% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 42% | BTTS 47% | xG Al Shabab 1.38 / Damac 0.99 • Poisson strength factors: Al Shabab attack 1.007 / def 0.932 | Damac attack 0.754 / def 1.119 | league avg home 1.227 / away 1.410 • Poisson stance: Al Shabab (46%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.38

Al Shabab xG

Expected Goals

0.99

Damac xG

46%
27%
27%
Al Shabab Draw Damac

47%

BTTS

69%

Over 1.5

42%

Over 2.5

22%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Al Shabab vs Damac kick off?

Al Shabab vs Damac kicked off at 19:00 on Friday 25 August 2023 at Prince Faisal bin Fahd Stadium.

What was the final score in Al Shabab vs Damac?

Al Shabab 1 - 1 Damac.

Where is Al Shabab vs Damac being played?

The match is being played at Prince Faisal bin Fahd Stadium.

What competition is Al Shabab vs Damac part of?

Al Shabab vs Damac is a Regular Season - 3 fixture in the Pro League (Saudi-Arabia).

Who is favourite to win Al Shabab vs Damac?

Our statistical model gives Al Shabab a 46% chance of winning, Damac a 27% chance, and a 27% chance of a draw — making Al Shabab the favourite.

Will both teams score in Al Shabab vs Damac?

Our model estimates a 47% probability that both Al Shabab and Damac will score (BTTS).

Will Al Shabab vs Damac have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 42%.

What is the head-to-head record between Al Shabab and Damac?

Record (4 meetings): Al Shabab 3W | Draws 1 | Damac 0W.

What form are Al Shabab and Damac in?

Al Shabab (all comps): 3W-1D-6L in 10 | 1.00 PPG | GF 1.30 / GA 1.70 | L5 L-L-W-D-L. Damac (all comps): 2W-3D-5L in 10 | 0.90 PPG | GF 0.90 / GA 1.80 | L5 W-D-L-L-D.

🧮 Model Insight

Where the Numbers Come From

The model rates Al Shabab's attack at 1.01x the league average against Damac's defence at 1.12x — combine the two and it projects 1.38 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Damac's attack (0.75x) against Al Shabab's defence (0.93x) — and the away total comes out at 0.99.

The sample (32/32 games) mixes this season and last, since the current campaign is still relatively young.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-1 carries the highest individual probability at 14.4% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-0 (11.2%), 0-0 (11.0%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 37% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Al Shabab Win

46%

Al Shabab

2.18

27%

Draw

3.66

27%

Damac

3.72

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

12.9%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

12.8%

Draw

0 – 0

9.3%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.38

Al Shabab xG

Total xG

2.37

0.99

Damac xG

46%
27%
27%
Al ShababDrawDamac

2.18

46%

Home win

3.66

27%

Draw

3.72

27%

Away win

Goals Markets

69%

Over 1.5

1.45

31%

Under 1.5

3.23

42%

Over 2.5

2.38

58%

Under 2.5

1.72

22%

Over 3.5

4.55

78%

Under 3.5

1.28

9%

Over 4.5

11.11

91%

Under 4.5

1.10

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

47%

BTTS Yes

2.12

53%

BTTS No

1.89

Clean Sheet

37%

Al Shabab

2.69

25%

Damac

3.99

Win to Nil

17%

Al Shabab

5.88

7%

Damac

14.84

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 9.3 9.2 4.6 1.5 0.4 0.1
1 12.9 12.8 6.3 2.1 0.5 0.1
2 8.9 8.8 4.4 1.4 0.4 0.1
3 4.1 4.1 2.0 0.7 0.2
4 1.4 1.4 0.7 0.2 0.1
5 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.383
λ Away (xG) 0.991
Total xG 2.374
League avg home goals 1.227
League avg away goals 1.410
Al Shabab attack strength 1.007
Al Shabab defence strength 0.932
Damac attack strength 0.754
Damac defence strength 1.119
Data phase Blended
Games used (H/A) 32 / 32

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Al Shabab vs Damac?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.4%.

How many goals are Al Shabab and Damac expected to score?

The model projects 1.38 expected goals for Al Shabab and 0.99 for Damac, a combined total of 2.37.

How confident is the prediction model for Al Shabab vs Damac?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 46%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Recent Form Overview

Across their last 32 outings, Al Shabab have picked up 1.78 PPG on a 17W 6D 9L record — L-L-W-D-L across the most recent five. It's still early in the season for Al Shabab, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Damac's form line: 9W 10D 13L from 32 games, 1.16 PPG, last five W-D-L-L-D. It's still early in the season for Damac, so this record blends in a handful of games from last season too.

Put side by side, Al Shabab are the form team by 0.62 points per game — a gap wide enough to matter, though form alone rarely tells the whole story against Damac.

How They Fare by Venue

On home soil, Al Shabab have posted 2.06 PPG from 16 outings (10W 3D 3L).

On the road, Damac have gone 4W 4D 8L from 16 away games — 1.00 PPG when travelling.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Al Shabab come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Attack vs Defence

Al Shabab are averaging 1.84 goals scored and 1.16 conceded per game recently; Damac are on 1.09 scored and 1.44 conceded.

Last 32 Results — Pro League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Al Shabab

Al Shabab

Early Season
L L W D L
Damac

Damac

Early Season
W D L L D
32 Played 32
17/6/9 W / D / L 9/10/13
1.78 Points Per Game 1.16
1.84 Avg Goals Scored 1.09
1.16 Avg Goals Conceded 1.44
3.00 Avg Goals / Game 2.53
11 Clean Sheets 8
18 BTTS 17
21 Over 2.5 Games 16
Al Shabab

Al Shabab

L
A Al Wehda Club
1–3 HT 0–2
18 Aug
D
H Al Okhdood
1–1 HT 0–1
14 Aug
W
A Damac
4–1 HT 1–1
31 May
L
H Al Taawon
0–3 HT 0–1
27 May
L
A Al-Nassr
2–3 HT 2–1
23 May
L
H Al Wehda Club
0–1 HT 0–1
18 May
L
A Al-Ettifaq
0–1 HT 0–1
14 May
W
H Al-Fateh
1–0 HT 0–0
03 May
L
A Al-Ittihad FC
1–2 HT 0–1
27 Apr
W
A Al Khaleej Saihat
3–2 HT 2–2
11 Apr
W
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
3–0 HT 0–0
07 Apr
D
A Al-Raed
2–2 HT 0–2
18 Mar
W
H Al-Fayha
3–2 HT 3–1
09 Mar
L
H Al-Adalah
1–2 HT 1–0
04 Mar
W
H Abha
2–0 HT 1–0
14 Feb
W
A Al Baten
4–2 HT 2–1
09 Feb
W
H Damac
2–1 HT 2–0
02 Feb
W
A Al Taee
2–1 HT 2–1
27 Jan
D
A Al Taawon
1–1 HT 1–0
20 Jan
D
H Al-Nassr
0–0 HT 0–0
14 Jan
D
H Al-Ittihad FC
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Jan
L
A Al Wehda Club
1–2 HT 1–0
05 Jan
W
H Al-Ettifaq
3–0 HT 2–0
30 Dec
L
A Al-Fateh
1–4 HT 0–1
26 Dec
W
H Al Khaleej Saihat
4–0 HT 1–0
15 Oct
D
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
1–1 HT 0–1
10 Oct
W
H Al-Raed
1–0 HT 1–0
06 Oct
W
A Al-Fayha
2–1 HT 0–1
02 Oct
W
A Al-Adalah
1–0 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Al Taee
4–0 HT 1–0
08 Sep
W
A Abha
4–0 HT 3–0
01 Sep
W
H Al Baten
3–0 HT 1–0
26 Aug
Damac

Damac

D
H Al Riyadh
2–2 HT 0–2
17 Aug
L
A Al Taee
0–1 HT 0–0
12 Aug
L
H Al Shabab
1–4 HT 1–1
31 May
D
A Al-Fateh
1–1 HT 0–1
27 May
W
H Abha
1–0 HT 0–0
22 May
L
H Al-Hilal Saudi FC
0–1 HT 0–0
19 May
L
A Al-Raed
0–5 HT 0–2
15 May
W
A Al Wehda Club
2–0 HT 0–0
03 May
L
A Al-Ettifaq
0–2 HT 0–0
28 Apr
D
H Al-Adalah
2–2 HT 2–2
10 Apr
L
A Al-Ittihad FC
0–3 HT 0–2
04 Apr
W
H Al Baten
1–0 HT 1–0
17 Mar
W
A Al Taee
3–1 HT 0–1
11 Mar
L
H Al Taawon
1–2 HT 0–1
04 Mar
L
H Al-Nassr
0–3 HT 0–3
25 Feb
L
A Al Khaleej Saihat
0–2 HT 0–2
18 Feb
D
H Al-Fayha
1–1 HT 1–0
10 Feb
L
A Al Shabab
1–2 HT 0–2
02 Feb
W
H Al-Fateh
3–1 HT 0–1
20 Jan
L
A Abha
1–2 HT 1–0
13 Jan
L
H Al-Raed
1–2 HT 0–2
05 Jan
D
A Al-Hilal Saudi FC
2–2 HT 0–1
31 Dec
D
H Al Wehda Club
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Dec
D
H Al-Ettifaq
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Dec
W
A Al-Adalah
2–0 HT 1–0
16 Oct
D
H Al-Ittihad FC
1–1 HT 0–1
11 Oct
D
A Al Baten
2–2 HT 1–0
06 Oct
W
H Al Taee
2–0 HT 0–0
01 Oct
D
A Al Taawon
1–1 HT 0–0
16 Sep
L
A Al-Nassr
1–2 HT 0–1
10 Sep
W
H Al Khaleej Saihat
2–1 HT 1–1
02 Sep
W
A Al-Fayha
1–0 HT 0–0
25 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Al Shabab and Damac in coming into this match?

Al Shabab have gone 17W 6D 9L in their last 32 games (1.78 PPG), while Damac have gone 9W 10D 13L in their last 32 (1.16 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Al Shabab at home or Damac away?

Al Shabab's home record (2.06 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Al Shabab at home: 2.06 PPG; Damac away: 1.00 PPG.

Have Al Shabab or Damac been keeping clean sheets recently?

Al Shabab have kept a clean sheet in 34% of their recent games, Damac in 25%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

The Rivalry So Far

These sides have met 10 times that we have on record, stretching back to September 2021 — a rivalry that has played out across roughly 4 years. Every recorded meeting has come in Pro League. They last met on 20 February 2026, roughly 5 months ago.

Notable Numbers

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Al Shabab won 1-4 on 31 May 2023, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Al Shabab have gone 3W 2D 0L from 5 meetings on their own ground against Damac — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 10 Meetings

Al Shabab

6

Al Shabab

3

Draws

Damac

1

Damac

Recent Meetings

Damac
1–3
20 Feb 26
Al Shabab
Al Shabab
1–1
25 Oct 25
Damac
Al Shabab
2–0
28 Feb 25
Damac
Damac
1–0
04 Oct 24
Al Shabab
Damac
0–1
16 Feb 24
Al Shabab
Al Shabab
1–1
25 Aug 23
Damac
Damac
1–4
31 May 23
Al Shabab
Al Shabab
2–1
02 Feb 23
Damac
Al Shabab
2–1
10 Feb 22
Damac
Damac
1–1
17 Sep 21
Al Shabab

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Al Shabab and Damac?

From 10 meetings on record, Al Shabab have won 6, Damac have won 1, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Al Shabab and Damac last play each other?

They last met on 20 February 2026, when Damac 1-3 Al Shabab.

Who has won more matches between Al Shabab and Damac?

Al Shabab have the better head-to-head record, with 6 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Early Goal Trends

Al Shabab are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 81% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 56% of the time.

Damac are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 69% of their matches. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 19% of those situations.

Full-Time Markets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Al Shabab 31%, Damac 50% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 56% (Al Shabab) and 50% (Damac).

On the defensive side: Al Shabab keep a clean sheet in 56% of their matches; Damac in 31%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Al Shabab home games / Damac away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Al Shabab Al Shabab Early Season
Metric All
(32 games)
Venue
(16 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 29/32
(90.6%)
13/16
(81.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 12/32
(37.5%)
4/16
(25%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 2/3
(66.7%)
2/3
(66.7%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/3
(33.3%)
1/3
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 16/32
(50%)
9/16
(56.2%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 4/32
(12.5%)
1/16
(6.2%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/32
(12.5%)
1/16
(6.2%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 18/32
(56.2%)
5/16
(31.2%)
Over 2.5 Goals 21/32
(65.6%)
9/16
(56.2%)
Over 3.5 Goals 11/32
(34.4%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Clean Sheet 11/32
(34.4%)
9/16
(56.2%)
Failed to Score 4/32
(12.5%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Damac Damac Early Season
Metric All
(32 games)
Venue
(16 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 22/32
(68.8%)
11/16
(68.8%)
2+ Goals Before HT 10/32
(31.2%)
4/16
(25%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 8/10
(80%)
5/5
(100%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 4/10
(40%)
3/5
(60%)
Winning at HT 5/32
(15.6%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/32
(9.4%)
2/16
(12.5%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/32
(18.8%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 17/32
(53.1%)
8/16
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 16/32
(50%)
8/16
(50%)
Over 3.5 Goals 8/32
(25%)
4/16
(25%)
Clean Sheet 8/32
(25%)
3/16
(18.8%)
Failed to Score 9/32
(28.1%)
5/16
(31.2%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Al Shabab play Damac?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 31% of Al Shabab's recent matches and 50% of Damac's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Al Shabab vs Damac usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 56% of Al Shabab's recent games and 50% of Damac's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do Al Shabab and Damac tend to score early?

Al Shabab have had a goal before half-time in 81% of their recent matches, Damac in 69% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Al Shabab and Damac share the spoils in a 1-1 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Al Shabab and Damac finished level at 1-1 at Prince Faisal bin Fahd Stadium, Regular Season - 3, in the Pro League. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Al Shabab 1.38 xG and Damac 0.99 xG, a combined 2.37. The scoreboard read 1-1 for 2 actual goals. Both sides finished within a goal of their individual projections, so the scoreline sat close to the model's expected shape. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Al Shabab attack 1.01 / defence 0.93 against Damac attack 0.75 / defence 1.12, drawn from 32/32 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Al Shabab 46% | Draw 27% | Damac 27%, with Al Shabab to win its most likely call at 46%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 42%. The game delivered 2, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 69% and landed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 47% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 58% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Al Shabab 66%, Damac 50%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 55%, which matched the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Al Shabab's trading profile (32 games, 16 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 56% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 34% of the time, and conceded here.

Damac's trading profile (32 games, 16 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did.

Form vs Result

On form, Al Shabab arrived the stronger side — 1.78 PPG against 1.16. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Al Shabab (home/away splits) managed 1 against a 1.81 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 42% Over 2.5 probability, 2 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 47% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 58% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.