Sign in Register

AFC Wimbledon 1-0 Notts County – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

League Two · Promotion Play-offs - Semi-finals

Kick-off

Sat 17 May 2025

12:30

Venue

The Cherry Red Records Stadium

Competition

League Two

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Notts County at 36%, yet other data sources diverge — this AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

AFC Wimbledon host Notts County at The Cherry Red Records Stadium in League Two, Promotion Play-offs - Semi-finals. Kick-off is scheduled for Saturday 17 May 2025 at 12:30 UTC.

Recent Form

Across all League Two games this season, AFC Wimbledon have gone 3W 4D 3L from 10 outings — a 1.30 PPG return. Last five: D L L W W. They are averaging 0.80 goals per game and conceding 0.90 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 4 clean sheets in 10 games (40%) reflects a solid defensive base.

In front of their own supporters this season, AFC Wimbledon have posted 5W 2D 3L at The Cherry Red Records Stadium — 1.70 PPG. At home they are averaging 1.10 goals scored and 0.70 conceded per game. 6 clean sheets from 10 home games (60%) — they are an exceptionally hard side to score against at The Cherry Red Records Stadium. At home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Notts County — All Games: 3W 2D 5L from 10 League Two fixtures this season — 1.10 PPG. Last five: D L W L L. Their scoring rate of 1.20 per game is modest, conceding 1.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 3 clean sheets from 10 outings suggests some defensive organisation.

When travelling in League Two this season, Notts County have posted 5W 2D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.70 PPG. Away from home they average 1.50 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. Their away PPG of 1.70 exceeds their overall 1.10 — they actually perform better on the road than their aggregate form implies.

The form comparison is too close to call — 1.30 PPG (AFC Wimbledon) versus 1.10 (Notts County). When the figures are this level, no pick can be reliably derived from recent results alone.

H2H

The historical ledger comes down firmly in favour of AFC Wimbledon: 4 wins from 5 previous clashes against 1 for Notts County, with 0 draws across those contests.

The 5 previous meetings have averaged 2.4 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 10 May 2025, ended 1–0 with AFC Wimbledon winning.

The historical record gives AFC Wimbledon a meaningful edge here — 4 wins from 5 meetings is the kind of ledger that should not be discounted when the form picture is inconclusive. Even away from home, the visitors have struggled to impose themselves in this fixture.

Trading Patterns

AFC Wimbledon in-play and half-time data (93 games, 46 at home): they score before half-time in 61% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; BTTS occurs in 39% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 39% of games (home games); they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time; they fail to score in 32% of games.

Notts County in-play and half-time data (93 games, 46 at away): they score before half-time in 78% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 83% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 52% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 61% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — AFC Wimbledon 39% versus Notts County 59%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (AFC Wimbledon 34% | Notts County 59%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects AFC Wimbledon 1.09 xG and Notts County 1.13 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: AFC Wimbledon attack 0.907 / defence 0.792 | Notts County attack 1.253 / defence 0.935. League average goals — home 1.284 / away 1.138. Notts County have an above-average attack strength of 1.253 — the away xG of 1.13 is driven by genuine attacking quality on the road. AFC Wimbledon's defence rating of 0.792 is below average — the home backline is amplifying the visitor's projected output. Data: 92 AFC Wimbledon games / 92 Notts County games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: AFC Wimbledon 34% | Draw 30% | Notts County 36%. Fair-value odds: AFC Wimbledon 2.94 | Draw 3.33 | Notts County 2.78. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 30% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 38% | BTTS probability 45% | Total xG 2.22. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 62% — total xG of 2.22 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 45% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Our Verdict

Poisson rates Notts County as the most likely outcome at 36% — marginal model lean. With a 30% draw probability, Draw No Bet on Notts County offers a more defensible entry point than the straight win. The opposing side holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.22 combined xG gives a 38% probability to Under 2.5 — reasonable, supported by form averaging 2.1 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 45% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: AFC Wimbledon 20% | Notts County 40% BTTS from recent games.

The outsider holds a 34% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H AFC Wimbledon hold a strong historical advantage, winning 4 of 5 meetings.
H2H H2H history favours AFC Wimbledon but Poisson model leans Notts County — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Form Notts County Poisson xG (1.13) is below their form scoring rate (1.50) — home defensive strength is discounting away goal expectation.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 30% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 38% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County | Competition: League Two, Promotion Play-offs - Semi-finals | Venue: The Cherry Red Records Stadium • Kick-off: Saturday 17 May 2025, 12:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: AFC Wimbledon 34% | Draw 30% | Notts County 36% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 38% | BTTS 45% | xG AFC Wimbledon 1.09 / Notts County 1.13 • Poisson strength factors: AFC Wimbledon attack 0.907 / def 0.792 | Notts County attack 1.253 / def 0.935 | league avg home 1.284 / away 1.138 • Poisson stance: Notts County (36%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

1.09

AFC Wimbledon xG

Expected Goals

1.13

Notts County xG

34%
30%
36%
AFC Wimbledon Draw Notts County

45%

BTTS

66%

Over 1.5

38%

Over 2.5

18%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County kick off?

AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County kicked off at 12:30 on Saturday 17 May 2025 at The Cherry Red Records Stadium.

What was the final score in AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County?

AFC Wimbledon 1 - 0 Notts County.

Where is AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County being played?

The match is being played at The Cherry Red Records Stadium.

What competition is AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County part of?

AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County is a Promotion Play-offs - Semi-finals fixture in the League Two (England).

Who is favourite to win AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County?

Our statistical model gives AFC Wimbledon a 34% chance of winning, Notts County a 36% chance, and a 30% chance of a draw — making Notts County the favourite.

Will both teams score in AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County?

Our model estimates a 45% probability that both AFC Wimbledon and Notts County will score (BTTS).

Will AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 38%.

What is the head-to-head record between AFC Wimbledon and Notts County?

Record (5 meetings): AFC Wimbledon 4W | Draws 0 | Notts County 1W.

What form are AFC Wimbledon and Notts County in?

AFC Wimbledon (all comps): 3W-4D-3L in 10 | 1.30 PPG | GF 0.80 / GA 0.90 | L5 D-L-L-W-W. Notts County (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.20 / GA 1.10 | L5 D-L-W-L-L.

🧮 Model Insight

How the Model Works This Match

Working from AFC Wimbledon's attack rating (0.91) and Notts County's defence rating (0.94), the model arrives at 1.09 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Notts County's attack versus AFC Wimbledon's defence, projects 1.13 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 92/92 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 1-1 emerges as the single most likely result, at 15.1%. Close behind: 0-0 (12.6%), 0-1 (10.6%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 38% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Notts County Win

34%

AFC Wimbledon

2.95

30%

Draw

3.33

36%

Notts County

2.78

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 1

13.4%

Draw

Most likely

0 – 1

12.3%

Away win

1 – 0

11.8%

Home win

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.09

AFC Wimbledon xG

Total xG

2.22

1.13

Notts County xG

34%
30%
36%
AFC WimbledonDrawNotts County

2.95

34%

Home win

3.33

30%

Draw

2.78

36%

Away win

Goals Markets

65%

Over 1.5

1.54

35%

Under 1.5

2.86

38%

Over 2.5

2.63

62%

Under 2.5

1.61

18%

Over 3.5

5.56

82%

Under 3.5

1.22

7%

Over 4.5

14.29

93%

Under 4.5

1.08

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

45%

BTTS Yes

2.20

55%

BTTS No

1.83

Clean Sheet

32%

AFC Wimbledon

3.10

34%

Notts County

2.97

Win to Nil

11%

AFC Wimbledon

9.12

12%

Notts County

8.24

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 10.9 12.3 6.9 2.6 0.7 0.2
1 11.8 13.4 7.6 2.8 0.8 0.2
2 6.4 7.3 4.1 1.5 0.4 0.1
3 2.3 2.6 1.5 0.6 0.2
4 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.2
5 0.1 0.2 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.088
λ Away (xG) 1.130
Total xG 2.218
League avg home goals 1.284
League avg away goals 1.138
AFC Wimbledon attack strength 0.907
AFC Wimbledon defence strength 0.792
Notts County attack strength 1.253
Notts County defence strength 0.935
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 92 / 92

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County?

Our Poisson model rates 1-1 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 15.1%.

How many goals are AFC Wimbledon and Notts County expected to score?

The model projects 1.09 expected goals for AFC Wimbledon and 1.13 for Notts County, a combined total of 2.22.

How confident is the prediction model for AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 36%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Form at a Glance

AFC Wimbledon's recent record stands at 38W 27D 28L from 93 games, a 1.52 PPG return, with D-L-L-W-W in the last five.

Notts County, meanwhile, have gone 38W 19D 36L across 93 games — 1.43 PPG, with D-L-W-L-L in their last five.

Form-wise this is close to level: AFC Wimbledon on 1.52 PPG, Notts County on 1.43. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Venue Form

At home specifically, AFC Wimbledon have managed 24W 11D 11L from 46 games — 1.80 PPG in front of their own supporters.

Notts County's away record stands at 16W 12D 18L across 46 trips, a 1.30 PPG haul.

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, AFC Wimbledon come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Goals in Recent Form

AFC Wimbledon are averaging 1.30 goals scored and 0.92 conceded per game recently; Notts County are on 1.69 scored and 1.46 conceded.

Defensively: AFC Wimbledon have kept a clean sheet in 41% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 93 Results — League Two

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

Current Season
D L L W W
Notts County

Notts County

Current Season
D L W L L
93 Played 93
38/27/28 W / D / L 38/19/36
1.52 Points Per Game 1.43
1.30 Avg Goals Scored 1.69
0.92 Avg Goals Conceded 1.46
2.23 Avg Goals / Game 3.15
38 Clean Sheets 24
36 BTTS 55
32 Over 2.5 Games 55
AFC Wimbledon

AFC Wimbledon

W
A Notts County
1–0 HT 0–0
10 May
W
A Grimsby
1–0 HT 0–0
03 May
L
H Port Vale
0–2 HT 0–0
26 Apr
L
A Gillingham
0–1 HT 0–0
21 Apr
D
H Chesterfield
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Apr
D
A Doncaster
1–1 HT 1–0
12 Apr
W
H Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Apr
L
A Swindon Town
1–2 HT 0–0
01 Apr
D
A Walsall
1–1 HT 0–0
29 Mar
D
H Barrow
2–2 HT 0–0
22 Mar
W
A Carlisle
2–1 HT 1–0
15 Mar
L
H Cheltenham
1–2 HT 1–1
11 Mar
W
H Notts County
2–0 HT 2–0
08 Mar
L
A Morecambe
0–1 HT 0–1
04 Mar
L
H Bromley
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Mar
D
A Colchester
1–1 HT 1–0
22 Feb
D
A Fleetwood Town
0–0 HT 0–0
18 Feb
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Feb
W
H Crewe
3–0 HT 2–0
11 Feb
D
A Accrington ST
0–0 HT 0–0
08 Feb
W
H Bradford
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Feb
D
A Crewe
1–1 HT 1–1
28 Jan
D
A Milton Keynes Dons
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Jan
W
H Tranmere
2–0 HT 0–0
18 Jan
W
A Newport County
2–1 HT 0–0
02 Jan
W
H Gillingham
1–0 HT 0–0
30 Dec
D
H Swindon Town
1–1 HT 0–1
26 Dec
L
A Chesterfield
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Dec
W
H Doncaster
1–0 HT 1–0
14 Dec
W
A Harrogate Town
3–0 HT 2–0
07 Dec
D
H Newport County
2–2 HT 2–1
03 Dec
W
A Tranmere
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Nov
L
H Walsall
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
H Accrington ST
2–2 HT 0–0
19 Nov
W
A Barrow
3–1 HT 1–1
16 Nov
L
H Grimsby
0–1 HT 0–1
09 Nov
L
A Port Vale
2–3 HT 0–2
26 Oct
W
H Morecambe
3–0 HT 0–0
22 Oct
L
A Notts County
0–1 HT 0–0
19 Oct
W
H Carlisle
4–0 HT 3–0
12 Oct
L
A Salford City
0–1 HT 0–0
05 Oct
D
A Bradford
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Sep
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
3–0 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Fleetwood Town
1–0 HT 1–0
31 Aug
W
A Cheltenham
1–0 HT 0–0
24 Aug
L
A Bromley
0–2 HT 0–1
17 Aug
W
H Colchester
4–2 HT 3–2
10 Aug
W
H Walsall
5–1 HT 2–1
27 Apr
L
A Tranmere
2–3 HT 0–2
20 Apr
L
A Swindon Town
2–3 HT 1–0
13 Apr
W
H Salford City
1–0 HT 0–0
06 Apr
L
A Stockport County
0–1 HT 0–0
01 Apr
D
H Harrogate Town
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Mar
D
A Crewe
1–1 HT 1–1
23 Mar
L
H Newport County
0–2 HT 0–1
16 Mar
W
H Gillingham
2–0 HT 1–0
12 Mar
W
A Notts County
2–0 HT 0–0
09 Mar
D
H Grimsby
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Mar
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
1–0 HT 0–0
02 Mar
L
A Doncaster
0–1 HT 0–1
24 Feb
L
H Crawley Town
0–1 HT 0–0
20 Feb
D
H Morecambe
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Feb
L
A Accrington ST
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Feb
W
H Barrow
2–0 HT 2–0
10 Feb
D
A Bradford
0–0 HT 0–0
03 Feb
W
H Mansfield Town
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Jan
L
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–3 HT 0–3
23 Jan
L
A Wrexham
0–2 HT 0–0
13 Jan
D
A Forest Green
1–1 HT 1–1
01 Jan
W
H Colchester
5–3 HT 2–2
29 Dec
L
H Sutton Utd
0–1 HT 0–0
26 Dec
W
A Crawley Town
2–1 HT 2–0
22 Dec
D
A Salford City
0–0 HT 0–0
16 Dec
W
H Swindon Town
4–0 HT 1–0
09 Dec
L
A Gillingham
0–1 HT 0–0
28 Nov
W
H Notts County
4–2 HT 2–0
25 Nov
W
H Doncaster
2–0 HT 1–0
11 Nov
L
A Morecambe
1–4 HT 0–0
28 Oct
L
H Accrington ST
2–4 HT 0–2
24 Oct
D
A Barrow
0–0 HT 0–0
21 Oct
L
H Bradford
0–1 HT 0–0
14 Oct
D
A Mansfield Town
0–0 HT 0–0
07 Oct
W
A Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 1–0
03 Oct
W
H Tranmere
4–1 HT 2–1
30 Sep
W
A Walsall
3–1 HT 1–0
23 Sep
D
H Crewe
2–2 HT 2–0
16 Sep
L
H Stockport County
1–2 HT 1–0
09 Sep
D
A Newport County
2–2 HT 2–1
02 Sep
D
H Forest Green
1–1 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
A Sutton Utd
3–0 HT 0–0
19 Aug
W
A Colchester
2–0 HT 0–0
15 Aug
D
H Wrexham
1–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
D
A Grimsby
0–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
Notts County

Notts County

L
H AFC Wimbledon
0–1 HT 0–0
10 May
L
H Doncaster
1–2 HT 0–2
03 May
W
A Harrogate Town
3–1 HT 1–1
26 Apr
L
H Cheltenham
1–2 HT 1–0
21 Apr
D
A Bradford
1–1 HT 0–0
17 Apr
L
H Salford City
1–3 HT 0–1
11 Apr
L
A Colchester
0–1 HT 0–1
05 Apr
W
H Milton Keynes Dons
3–0 HT 0–0
02 Apr
W
A Newport County
2–0 HT 1–0
29 Mar
D
H Crewe
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Mar
L
H Chesterfield
1–2 HT 0–0
15 Mar
W
A Grimsby
2–0 HT 0–0
11 Mar
L
A AFC Wimbledon
0–2 HT 0–2
08 Mar
L
H Barrow
1–2 HT 0–1
04 Mar
D
A Fleetwood Town
2–2 HT 1–0
01 Mar
W
H Tranmere
2–1 HT 0–0
22 Feb
D
H Colchester
1–1 HT 1–0
18 Feb
L
A Port Vale
0–1 HT 0–0
13 Feb
W
H Morecambe
2–0 HT 0–0
08 Feb
W
A Gillingham
2–1 HT 2–0
01 Feb
W
H Carlisle
1–0 HT 1–0
28 Jan
D
H Bromley
1–1 HT 0–0
25 Jan
W
A Accrington ST
3–0 HT 2–0
18 Jan
W
H Swindon Town
2–0 HT 2–0
04 Jan
L
H Walsall
1–2 HT 1–0
01 Jan
W
A Cheltenham
5–3 HT 2–1
29 Dec
W
A Milton Keynes Dons
2–0 HT 0–0
26 Dec
W
H Bradford
3–0 HT 3–0
21 Dec
L
A Salford City
0–3 HT 0–2
14 Dec
L
A Walsall
2–3 HT 0–0
03 Dec
D
H Newport County
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Nov
L
A Crewe
0–2 HT 0–1
16 Nov
D
A Doncaster
1–1 HT 1–0
09 Nov
W
H Harrogate Town
1–0 HT 0–0
26 Oct
D
A Barrow
1–1 HT 0–1
22 Oct
W
H AFC Wimbledon
1–0 HT 0–0
19 Oct
D
A Chesterfield
2–2 HT 1–1
12 Oct
L
H Port Vale
0–1 HT 0–1
05 Oct
W
A Carlisle
2–0 HT 2–0
01 Oct
D
A Morecambe
1–1 HT 0–1
28 Sep
L
H Gillingham
0–1 HT 0–1
21 Sep
W
A Bromley
4–2 HT 1–2
14 Sep
W
H Accrington ST
2–0 HT 1–0
07 Sep
W
A Swindon Town
2–1 HT 1–1
31 Aug
W
H Grimsby
4–1 HT 3–1
22 Aug
D
H Fleetwood Town
2–2 HT 0–1
18 Aug
D
A Tranmere
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Aug
L
A Forest Green
0–1 HT 0–0
27 Apr
W
H Colchester
1–0 HT 0–0
20 Apr
L
H Stockport County
2–5 HT 0–3
16 Apr
W
A Walsall
3–1 HT 2–0
13 Apr
W
H Harrogate Town
3–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
D
H Milton Keynes Dons
3–3 HT 1–1
01 Apr
L
A Swindon Town
1–2 HT 0–1
29 Mar
L
H Salford City
1–2 HT 0–1
23 Mar
W
A Bradford
3–0 HT 1–0
19 Mar
D
A Accrington ST
2–2 HT 2–1
16 Mar
L
A Crawley Town
1–2 HT 1–0
12 Mar
L
H AFC Wimbledon
0–2 HT 0–0
09 Mar
L
H Sutton Utd
3–4 HT 2–2
27 Feb
L
H Crewe
1–3 HT 0–2
24 Feb
L
A Wrexham
0–1 HT 0–1
17 Feb
W
A Newport County
3–1 HT 2–0
13 Feb
L
H Gillingham
1–3 HT 1–2
09 Feb
L
A Mansfield Town
0–1 HT 0–1
03 Feb
D
H Barrow
1–1 HT 1–1
27 Jan
D
A Grimsby
5–5 HT 2–2
13 Jan
L
A Tranmere
2–4 HT 2–2
01 Jan
W
H Morecambe
5–0 HT 4–0
29 Dec
W
H Doncaster
3–0 HT 2–0
26 Dec
L
A Stockport County
1–2 HT 0–1
22 Dec
L
A Harrogate Town
1–3 HT 0–2
16 Dec
L
H Walsall
1–2 HT 1–0
09 Dec
W
H Crawley Town
3–1 HT 1–1
28 Nov
L
A AFC Wimbledon
2–4 HT 0–2
25 Nov
W
H Bradford
4–2 HT 4–0
18 Nov
L
A Crewe
0–1 HT 0–0
11 Nov
L
H Wrexham
0–2 HT 0–0
28 Oct
W
H Newport County
3–0 HT 2–0
24 Oct
W
A Gillingham
2–1 HT 1–0
21 Oct
L
H Mansfield Town
1–4 HT 1–1
14 Oct
D
A Barrow
1–1 HT 1–0
07 Oct
W
H Swindon Town
3–1 HT 3–0
03 Oct
L
A Colchester
4–5 HT 1–3
30 Sep
W
H Forest Green
4–3 HT 2–0
23 Sep
W
A Salford City
2–0 HT 1–0
15 Sep
D
A Milton Keynes Dons
1–1 HT 0–0
09 Sep
W
H Accrington ST
3–1 HT 1–1
02 Sep
W
H Tranmere
2–1 HT 1–0
26 Aug
W
A Doncaster
3–1 HT 1–0
19 Aug
D
A Morecambe
0–0 HT 0–0
15 Aug
W
H Grimsby
3–2 HT 1–2
12 Aug
L
A Sutton Utd
1–5 HT 0–2
05 Aug

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are AFC Wimbledon and Notts County in coming into this match?

AFC Wimbledon have gone 38W 27D 28L in their last 93 games (1.52 PPG), while Notts County have gone 38W 19D 36L in their last 93 (1.43 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — AFC Wimbledon at home or Notts County away?

AFC Wimbledon's home record (1.80 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — AFC Wimbledon at home: 1.80 PPG; Notts County away: 1.30 PPG.

Have AFC Wimbledon or Notts County been keeping clean sheets recently?

AFC Wimbledon have kept a clean sheet in 41% of their recent games, Notts County in 26%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

Fixture History

6 meetings separate these sides on the data we hold, the series stretching back to November 2023. Every recorded meeting has come in League Two. It has been a while since the last meeting — 17 May 2025, some 1 year back — so squads and form on both sides may look very different now.

Streaks & Records

AFC Wimbledon go into this on the back of 3 straight wins in the series — the current momentum sits squarely with them.

AFC Wimbledon's record when hosting Notts County specifically: 3W 0D 0L from 3 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 6 Meetings

AFC Wimbledon

5

AFC Wimbledon

0

Draws

Notts County

1

Notts County

Recent Meetings

AFC Wimbledon
1–0
17 May 25
Notts County
Notts County
0–1
10 May 25
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
2–0
08 Mar 25
Notts County
Notts County
1–0
19 Oct 24
AFC Wimbledon
Notts County
0–2
09 Mar 24
AFC Wimbledon
AFC Wimbledon
4–2
25 Nov 23
Notts County

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between AFC Wimbledon and Notts County?

From 6 meetings on record, AFC Wimbledon have won 5, Notts County have won 1, and 0 have been drawn.

When did AFC Wimbledon and Notts County last play each other?

They last met on 17 May 2025, when AFC Wimbledon 1-0 Notts County.

Who has won more matches between AFC Wimbledon and Notts County?

AFC Wimbledon have the better head-to-head record, with 5 wins from 6 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

First-Half Patterns

AFC Wimbledon are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 61% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 44% of the time.

Notts County are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 78% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 35% of the time.

Full-Time Trends

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — AFC Wimbledon 39%, Notts County 61% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 39% (AFC Wimbledon) and 54% (Notts County).

On the defensive side: AFC Wimbledon keep a clean sheet in 44% of their matches.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = AFC Wimbledon home games / Notts County away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

AFC Wimbledon AFC Wimbledon Current Season
Metric All
(93 games)
Venue
(46 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 49/93
(52.7%)
28/46
(60.9%)
2+ Goals Before HT 23/93
(24.7%)
13/46
(28.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 33/44
(75%)
16/18
(88.9%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 15/44
(34.1%)
6/18
(33.3%)
Winning at HT 30/93
(32.3%)
20/46
(43.5%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 8/93
(8.6%)
4/46
(8.7%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 3/93
(3.2%)
3/46
(6.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 36/93
(38.7%)
18/46
(39.1%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/93
(34.4%)
18/46
(39.1%)
Over 3.5 Goals 20/93
(21.5%)
12/46
(26.1%)
Clean Sheet 38/93
(40.9%)
20/46
(43.5%)
Failed to Score 30/93
(32.3%)
10/46
(21.7%)
Notts County Notts County Current Season
Metric All
(93 games)
Venue
(46 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 70/93
(75.3%)
36/46
(78.3%)
2+ Goals Before HT 39/93
(41.9%)
19/46
(41.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 19/23
(82.6%)
8/10
(80%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 12/23
(52.2%)
5/10
(50%)
Winning at HT 33/93
(35.5%)
16/46
(34.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 9/93
(9.7%)
5/46
(10.9%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 5/93
(5.4%)
3/46
(6.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 55/93
(59.1%)
28/46
(60.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 55/93
(59.1%)
25/46
(54.3%)
Over 3.5 Goals 32/93
(34.4%)
16/46
(34.8%)
Clean Sheet 24/93
(25.8%)
9/46
(19.6%)
Failed to Score 18/93
(19.4%)
11/46
(23.9%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when AFC Wimbledon play Notts County?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 39% of AFC Wimbledon's recent matches and 61% of Notts County's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is AFC Wimbledon vs Notts County usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 39% of AFC Wimbledon's recent games and 54% of Notts County's, pointing to a tighter contest.

Do AFC Wimbledon and Notts County tend to score early?

AFC Wimbledon have had a goal before half-time in 61% of their recent matches, Notts County in 78% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Shock result as AFC Wimbledon defy the odds to beat Notts County 1-0.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

AFC Wimbledon beat Notts County 1-0 at The Cherry Red Records Stadium, Promotion Play-offs - Semi-finals, in the League Two. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting AFC Wimbledon 1.09 xG and Notts County 1.13 xG, a combined 2.22. The scoreboard read 1-0 for 1 actual goal. Notts County landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of AFC Wimbledon attack 0.91 / defence 0.79 against Notts County attack 1.25 / defence 0.94, drawn from 92/92 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it AFC Wimbledon 34% | Draw 30% | Notts County 36%, with Notts County to win its most likely call at 36%. The actual AFC Wimbledon win had been the model's second-ranked read at 34%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 38%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — in line with the projection. Over 1.5 had been 66% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 45% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 47% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (AFC Wimbledon 34%, Notts County 59%), a base rate that agreed with today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 49%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

AFC Wimbledon's trading profile (93 games, 46 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 39% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 41% of the time, and duly kept one.

Notts County's trading profile (93 games, 46 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 59% of their matches — today it did not.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — AFC Wimbledon 1.52 PPG, Notts County 1.43 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the AFC Wimbledon win broke the near-deadlock. AFC Wimbledon (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 0.89 average — tighter than their form line. Notts County (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.63 scoring average — below par going forward.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 2 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit). Partial vindication: some calls landed, others slipped.

💡 Key Insights

Model Over/Under 2.5 landed as modelled — 38% Over 2.5 probability, 1 goal scored.
Model BTTS matched the model — 45% projected, both teams did not both score.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 47% Over 2.5 historically, and this game stayed under.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.