Sign in Register

Chelsea 2-2 Nottingham Forest – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Premier League · Regular Season - 36

Kick-off

Sat 13 May 2023

15:00

Venue

Stamford Bridge

Competition

Premier League

England

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📡 Chat 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model rates Chelsea at 50%, yet other data sources diverge — this Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest fixture contains genuine analytical tension.

✍️ Match Preview

Pre-Match Analysis

Chelsea and Nottingham Forest meet at Stamford Bridge in Premier League, Regular Season - 36. This fixture gets under way on Saturday 13 May 2023 at 15:00 UTC.

Current Form

Chelsea's overall Premier League record this term: 3W 2D 5L from 10 games (1.10 PPG). Last five: L L L L W. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 1.40 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. 2 clean sheets from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation.

Chelsea's form when playing at home: 2W 3D 5L across 10 games at Stamford Bridge this term (0.90 PPG). At home they are averaging 0.50 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. At home, both teams have scored in only 20% of games — reinforcing BTTS No as the home-venue-backed angle.

Nottingham Forest (all games): 2W 1D 7L across 10 Premier League outings this term — 0.70 points per game. Last five: L L W L W. Their scoring rate of 1.40 per game is modest, conceding 2.10 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. Conceding 2.10 per game is a high rate — their defensive vulnerabilities have been exposed regularly this season. Both teams have scored in 80% of their matches this season — one of the stronger BTTS rates in the division, making Yes a well-evidenced play.

Nottingham Forest's away record: 1W 1D 8L from 10 road trips in Premier League this season (0.40 PPG). Away from home they average 0.70 goals scored and 2.20 conceded per game.

A near-identical PPG reading — 1.10 for Chelsea, 0.70 for Nottingham Forest — means the form record is uninstructive on result selection. The goals and market sections will carry greater evidential weight.

Head-to-Head

Form and model data should carry more weight here — the historical record is too balanced to provide a directional steer. From 1 meetings: Chelsea 0W, Nottingham Forest 0W, 1D.

The 1 previous meetings have averaged 2.0 goals per game — a neutral rate that provides no strong lean on the goals market from the H2H alone. The most recent clash, on 1 Jan 2023, ended 1–1 with a draw.

The head-to-head offers no strong directional steer in either the result or goals markets. Form, the predictive model and current market pricing should carry more weight than the historical record for this fixture.

Trading

Chelsea half-time and goal-timing data (72 games, 36 at home): BTTS occurs in 50% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 44% of games (home games).

Nottingham Forest half-time and goal-timing data (72 games, 36 at away): they score before half-time in 63% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 75% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 58% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 42% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 39% of games (away games).

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Chelsea 47% versus Nottingham Forest 46%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Chelsea 47% | Nottingham Forest 44%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Chelsea 1.34 xG and Nottingham Forest 0.79 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Chelsea attack 0.626 / defence 0.918 | Nottingham Forest attack 0.654 / defence 1.349. League average goals — home 1.584 / away 1.309. Chelsea's attack strength of 0.626 is below the league average — the 1.34 xG projection reflects a team that scores at a discount to the division norm. Nottingham Forest bring a strong defensive rating of 1.349 — this is suppressing Chelsea's projected output below what their attack strength alone would suggest. Data: 72 Chelsea games / 35 Nottingham Forest games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Chelsea 50% | Draw 28% | Nottingham Forest 22%. Fair-value odds: Chelsea 2.00 | Draw 3.57 | Nottingham Forest 4.55. Chelsea hold a narrow Poisson edge at 50% — the draw (28%) is close enough to merit draw-inclusive market consideration.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 36% | BTTS probability 40% | Total xG 2.12. Under 2.5 has a narrow probability edge at 64% — total xG of 2.12 is below the line but not decisively so. BTTS probability of 40% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Chelsea at 50% — moderate model lean. Draw probability of 28% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Chelsea if the outright odds are short.

The Poisson model projects 2.12 xG in total — Under 2.5 at 36% — reasonable confidence, supported by form averaging 2.2 goals per game.

Poisson assigns a 40% probability to BTTS No based on the attack/defence strength model. Form rates corroborate: Chelsea 20% | Nottingham Forest 50% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–1D–0W), with no clear historical advantage.
BTTS H2H BTTS history (100%) is contradicted by Poisson (40%) — recent defensive form has changed the dynamic.
Form Chelsea Poisson xG (1.34) exceeds their recent form scoring rate (0.50) — the model sees more attacking threat than recent results show.
Goals Form averages (~1.4 goals/game) and Poisson xG (2.12) both support Under 2.5 goals (64% probability).
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 36% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest | Competition: Premier League, Regular Season - 36 | Venue: Stamford Bridge • Kick-off: Saturday 13 May 2023, 15:00 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Chelsea 50% | Draw 28% | Nottingham Forest 22% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 36% | BTTS 40% | xG Chelsea 1.34 / Nottingham Forest 0.79 • Poisson strength factors: Chelsea attack 0.626 / def 0.918 | Nottingham Forest attack 0.654 / def 1.349 | league avg home 1.584 / away 1.309 • Poisson stance: Chelsea (50%) — moderate lean

🧮 Prediction Model

1.34

Chelsea xG

Expected Goals

0.79

Nottingham Forest xG

50%
28%
22%
Chelsea Draw Nottingham Forest

40%

BTTS

63%

Over 1.5

36%

Over 2.5

17%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest kick off?

Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest kicked off at 15:00 on Saturday 13 May 2023 at Stamford Bridge.

What was the final score in Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Chelsea 2 - 2 Nottingham Forest.

Where is Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest being played?

The match is being played at Stamford Bridge.

What competition is Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest part of?

Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest is a Regular Season - 36 fixture in the Premier League (England).

Who is favourite to win Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our statistical model gives Chelsea a 50% chance of winning, Nottingham Forest a 22% chance, and a 28% chance of a draw — making Chelsea the favourite.

Will both teams score in Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our model estimates a 40% probability that both Chelsea and Nottingham Forest will score (BTTS).

Will Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 36%.

What is the head-to-head record between Chelsea and Nottingham Forest?

Record (1 meetings): Chelsea 0W | Draws 1 | Nottingham Forest 0W.

What form are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest in?

Chelsea (all comps): 3W-2D-5L in 10 | 1.10 PPG | GF 1.10 / GA 1.40 | L5 L-L-L-L-W. Nottingham Forest (all comps): 2W-1D-7L in 10 | 0.70 PPG | GF 1.40 / GA 2.10 | L5 L-L-W-L-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Behind the Numbers

The model rates Chelsea's attack at 0.63x the league average against Nottingham Forest's defence at 1.35x — combine the two and it projects 1.34 expected goals for the hosts. Flip it around — Nottingham Forest's attack (0.65x) against Chelsea's defence (0.92x) — and the away total comes out at 0.79.

These ratings are built from 72/35 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

Scoreline Breakdown

Of every possible scoreline, 1-0 carries the highest individual probability at 14.4% — still a long way from a near-certainty, which says something about how open this one is on paper. Close behind: 1-1 (14.2%), 0-0 (13.6%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 42% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Chelsea Win

50%

Chelsea

2.01

28%

Draw

3.54

22%

Nottingham Forest

4.55

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

1 – 0

16.0%

Home win

Most likely

1 – 1

12.6%

Draw

0 – 0

12.0%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

1.34

Chelsea xG

Total xG

2.12

0.79

Nottingham Forest xG

50%
28%
22%
ChelseaDrawNottingham Forest

2.01

50%

Home win

3.54

28%

Draw

4.55

22%

Away win

Goals Markets

63%

Over 1.5

1.59

37%

Under 1.5

2.70

36%

Over 2.5

2.78

64%

Under 2.5

1.56

17%

Over 3.5

5.88

83%

Under 3.5

1.20

6%

Over 4.5

16.67

94%

Under 4.5

1.06

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

40%

BTTS Yes

2.49

60%

BTTS No

1.67

Clean Sheet

46%

Chelsea

2.19

26%

Nottingham Forest

3.81

Win to Nil

23%

Chelsea

4.40

6%

Nottingham Forest

17.35

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 12.0 9.4 3.7 1.0 0.2
1 16.0 12.6 4.9 1.3 0.3
2 10.7 8.4 3.3 0.9 0.2
3 4.8 3.8 1.5 0.4 0.1
4 1.6 1.3 0.5 0.1
5 0.4 0.3 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· White ring = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 1.338
λ Away (xG) 0.785
Total xG 2.123
League avg home goals 1.584
League avg away goals 1.309
Chelsea attack strength 0.626
Chelsea defence strength 0.918
Nottingham Forest attack strength 0.654
Nottingham Forest defence strength 1.349
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 72 / 35

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Our Poisson model rates 1-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 14.4%.

How many goals are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest expected to score?

The model projects 1.34 expected goals for Chelsea and 0.79 for Nottingham Forest, a combined total of 2.12.

How confident is the prediction model for Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 50%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

The Form Picture

Chelsea come into this having played 72 games, going 32W 20D 20L for 1.61 points per game. Their last five reads L-L-L-L-W.

On the other side, Nottingham Forest sit at 1.46 PPG from 72 outings (29W 18D 25L), a run that reads L-L-W-L-W across their last five.

There isn't much between them on recent form — 1.61 PPG for Chelsea against 1.46 for Nottingham Forest. Neither side arrives with a clear form advantage.

Home & Away Splits

Chelsea's home form reads 15W 12D 9L across 36 games on their own ground, a 1.58 PPG return.

Away from home, Nottingham Forest have taken 1.08 points per game from 36 outings (10W 9D 17L).

Comparing the two in their relevant venue splits, Chelsea come out ahead — a more targeted read than the overall PPG figures above, since it strips out games played in the opposite context.

Scoring & Defensive Trends

Chelsea are averaging 1.53 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game recently; Nottingham Forest are on 1.32 scored and 1.29 conceded.

Defensively: Chelsea have kept a clean sheet in 36% of their games — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 72 Results — Premier League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Chelsea

Chelsea

Current Season
L L L L W
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

Current Season
L L W L W
72 Played 72
32/20/20 W / D / L 29/18/25
1.61 Points Per Game 1.46
1.53 Avg Goals Scored 1.32
1.00 Avg Goals Conceded 1.29
2.53 Avg Goals / Game 2.61
26 Clean Sheets 23
34 BTTS 33
34 Over 2.5 Games 32
Chelsea

Chelsea

W
A Bournemouth
3–1
06 May
L
A Arsenal
1–3
02 May
L
H Brentford
0–2
26 Apr
L
H Brighton
1–2
15 Apr
L
A Wolves
0–1
08 Apr
D
H Liverpool
0–0
04 Apr
L
H Aston Villa
0–2
01 Apr
D
H Everton
2–2
18 Mar
W
A Leicester
3–1
11 Mar
W
H Leeds
1–0
04 Mar
L
A Tottenham
0–2
26 Feb
L
H Southampton
0–1
18 Feb
D
A West Ham
1–1
11 Feb
D
H Fulham
0–0
03 Feb
D
A Liverpool
0–0
21 Jan
W
H Crystal Palace
1–0
15 Jan
L
A Fulham
1–2
12 Jan
L
H Manchester City
0–1
05 Jan
D
A Nottingham Forest
1–1
01 Jan
W
H Bournemouth
2–0
27 Dec
L
A Newcastle
0–1
12 Nov
L
H Arsenal
0–1
06 Nov
L
A Brighton
1–4
29 Oct
D
H Manchester United
1–1
22 Oct
D
A Brentford
0–0
19 Oct
W
A Aston Villa
2–0
16 Oct
W
H Wolves
3–0
08 Oct
W
A Crystal Palace
2–1
01 Oct
W
H West Ham
2–1
03 Sep
L
A Southampton
1–2
30 Aug
W
H Leicester
2–1
27 Aug
L
A Leeds
0–3
21 Aug
D
H Tottenham
2–2
14 Aug
W
A Everton
1–0
06 Aug
W
H Watford
2–1
22 May
D
H Leicester
1–1
19 May
W
A Leeds
3–0
11 May
D
H Wolves
2–2
07 May
L
A Everton
0–1
01 May
D
A Manchester United
1–1
28 Apr
W
H West Ham
1–0
24 Apr
L
H Arsenal
2–4
20 Apr
W
A Southampton
6–0
09 Apr
L
H Brentford
1–4
02 Apr
W
H Newcastle
1–0
13 Mar
W
A Norwich
3–1
10 Mar
W
A Burnley
4–0
05 Mar
W
A Crystal Palace
1–0
19 Feb
W
H Tottenham
2–0
23 Jan
D
A Brighton
1–1
18 Jan
L
A Manchester City
0–1
15 Jan
D
H Liverpool
2–2
02 Jan
D
H Brighton
1–1
29 Dec
W
A Aston Villa
3–1
26 Dec
D
A Wolves
0–0
19 Dec
D
H Everton
1–1
16 Dec
W
H Leeds
3–2
11 Dec
L
A West Ham
2–3
04 Dec
W
A Watford
2–1
01 Dec
D
H Manchester United
1–1
28 Nov
W
A Leicester
3–0
20 Nov
D
H Burnley
1–1
06 Nov
W
A Newcastle
3–0
30 Oct
W
H Norwich
7–0
23 Oct
W
A Brentford
1–0
16 Oct
W
H Southampton
3–1
02 Oct
L
H Manchester City
0–1
25 Sep
W
A Tottenham
3–0
19 Sep
W
H Aston Villa
3–0
11 Sep
D
A Liverpool
1–1
28 Aug
W
A Arsenal
2–0
22 Aug
W
H Crystal Palace
3–0
14 Aug
Nottingham Forest

Nottingham Forest

W
H Southampton
4–3
08 May
L
A Brentford
1–2
29 Apr
W
H Brighton
3–1
26 Apr
L
A Liverpool
2–3
22 Apr
L
H Manchester United
0–2
16 Apr
L
A Aston Villa
0–2
08 Apr
L
A Leeds
1–2
04 Apr
D
H Wolves
1–1
01 Apr
L
H Newcastle
1–2
17 Mar
L
A Tottenham
1–3
11 Mar
D
H Everton
2–2
05 Mar
L
A West Ham
0–4
25 Feb
D
H Manchester City
1–1
18 Feb
L
A Fulham
0–2
11 Feb
W
H Leeds
1–0
05 Feb
D
A Bournemouth
1–1
21 Jan
W
H Leicester
2–0
14 Jan
W
A Southampton
1–0
04 Jan
D
H Chelsea
1–1
01 Jan
L
A Manchester United
0–3
27 Dec
W
H Crystal Palace
1–0
12 Nov
D
H Brentford
2–2
05 Nov
L
A Arsenal
0–5
30 Oct
W
H Liverpool
1–0
22 Oct
D
A Brighton
0–0
18 Oct
L
A Wolves
0–1
15 Oct
D
H Aston Villa
1–1
10 Oct
L
A Leicester
0–4
03 Oct
L
H Fulham
2–3
16 Sep
L
H Bournemouth
2–3
03 Sep
L
A Manchester City
0–6
31 Aug
L
H Tottenham
0–2
28 Aug
D
A Everton
1–1
20 Aug
W
H West Ham
1–0
14 Aug
L
A Newcastle
0–2
06 Aug
W
A Huddersfield
1–0 HT 1–0
29 May
L
H Sheffield Utd
1–2 HT 1–0
17 May
W
A Sheffield Utd
2–1 HT 1–0
14 May
D
A Hull City
1–1 HT 0–0
07 May
L
A Bournemouth
0–1 HT 0–0
03 May
W
H Swansea
5–1 HT 1–1
30 Apr
W
A Fulham
1–0 HT 1–0
26 Apr
W
A Peterborough
1–0 HT 1–0
23 Apr
W
H West Brom
4–0 HT 3–0
18 Apr
L
A Luton
0–1 HT 0–1
15 Apr
W
H Birmingham
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Apr
W
H Coventry
2–0 HT 1–0
06 Apr
W
A Blackpool
4–1 HT 3–0
02 Apr
W
H QPR
3–1 HT 0–1
16 Mar
W
H Reading
4–0 HT 1–0
12 Mar
D
A Sheffield Utd
1–1 HT 0–0
04 Mar
W
H Bristol City
2–0 HT 1–0
26 Feb
D
A Preston
0–0 HT 0–0
22 Feb
D
H Stoke City
2–2 HT 0–0
12 Feb
W
A Blackburn
2–0 HT 1–0
09 Feb
L
A Cardiff
1–2 HT 0–1
30 Jan
W
H Barnsley
3–0 HT 2–0
25 Jan
W
H Derby
2–1 HT 0–0
22 Jan
W
A Millwall
1–0 HT 0–0
15 Jan
L
H Huddersfield
0–1 HT 0–1
30 Dec
L
A Middlesbrough
0–2 HT 0–1
26 Dec
W
H Hull City
2–1 HT 0–1
18 Dec
W
A Swansea
4–1 HT 0–0
11 Dec
W
H Peterborough
2–0 HT 0–0
04 Dec
D
A West Brom
0–0 HT 0–0
26 Nov
D
H Luton
0–0 HT 0–0
23 Nov
D
A Reading
1–1 HT 1–0
20 Nov
W
H Preston
3–0 HT 2–0
06 Nov
D
H Sheffield Utd
1–1 HT 0–0
02 Nov
D
A QPR
1–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
L
H Fulham
0–4 HT 0–1
24 Oct
W
A Bristol City
2–1 HT 0–1
19 Oct

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Chelsea and Nottingham Forest in coming into this match?

Chelsea have gone 32W 20D 20L in their last 72 games (1.61 PPG), while Nottingham Forest have gone 29W 18D 25L in their last 72 (1.46 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Chelsea at home or Nottingham Forest away?

Chelsea's home record (1.58 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Chelsea at home: 1.58 PPG; Nottingham Forest away: 1.08 PPG.

Have Chelsea or Nottingham Forest been keeping clean sheets recently?

Chelsea have kept a clean sheet in 36% of their recent games, Nottingham Forest in 32%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

History of the Fixture

On record, these two have faced off 8 times since January 2023 — enough meetings to establish some real patterns. Every recorded meeting has come in Premier League. The two were last together as recently as 4 May 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Records & Recent Trends

For context on how one-sided this fixture can get: Chelsea won 0-3 on 18 Oct 2025, the biggest margin either side has managed in the series.

Specifically as hosts in this fixture, Chelsea have gone 0W 2D 2L from 4 meetings on their own ground against Nottingham Forest — worth weighing alongside the overall series record.

Last 8 Meetings

Chelsea

3

Chelsea

3

Draws

Nottingham Forest

2

Nottingham Forest

Recent Meetings

Chelsea
1–3
04 May 26
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
0–3
18 Oct 25
Chelsea
Nottingham Forest
0–1
25 May 25
Chelsea
Chelsea
1–1
06 Oct 24
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
2–3
11 May 24
Chelsea
Chelsea
0–1
02 Sep 23
Nottingham Forest
Chelsea
2–2
13 May 23
Nottingham Forest
Nottingham Forest
1–1
01 Jan 23
Chelsea

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Chelsea and Nottingham Forest?

From 8 meetings on record, Chelsea have won 3, Nottingham Forest have won 2, and 3 have been drawn.

When did Chelsea and Nottingham Forest last play each other?

They last met on 4 May 2026, when Chelsea 1-3 Nottingham Forest.

Who has won more matches between Chelsea and Nottingham Forest?

Chelsea have the better head-to-head record, with 3 wins from 8 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

How These Sides Start

Nottingham Forest are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 63% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 37% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 10% of those situations.

Goals & Clean Sheets

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Chelsea 50%, Nottingham Forest 42% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 44% (Chelsea) and 39% (Nottingham Forest).

On the defensive side: Chelsea keep a clean sheet in 33% of their matches; Nottingham Forest in 42%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Chelsea home games / Nottingham Forest away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Chelsea Chelsea Current Season
Metric All
(72 games)
Venue
(36 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT β€” β€”
2+ Goals Before HT β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half β€” β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half β€” β€”
Winning at HT β€” β€”
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) β€” β€”
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) β€” β€”
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 34/72
(47.2%)
18/36
(50%)
Over 2.5 Goals 34/72
(47.2%)
16/36
(44.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 18/72
(25%)
9/36
(25%)
Clean Sheet 26/72
(36.1%)
12/36
(33.3%)
Failed to Score 17/72
(23.6%)
8/36
(22.2%)
Nottingham Forest Nottingham Forest Current Season
Metric All
(72 games)
Venue
(36 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 25/37
(67.6%)
12/19
(63.2%)
2+ Goals Before HT 5/37
(13.5%)
1/19
(5.3%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 9/12
(75%)
5/7
(71.4%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 7/12
(58.3%)
3/7
(42.9%)
Winning at HT 15/37
(40.5%)
7/19
(36.8%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 2/37
(5.4%)
1/19
(5.3%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 4/37
(10.8%)
2/19
(10.5%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 33/72
(45.8%)
15/36
(41.7%)
Over 2.5 Goals 32/72
(44.4%)
14/36
(38.9%)
Over 3.5 Goals 20/72
(27.8%)
8/36
(22.2%)
Clean Sheet 23/72
(31.9%)
9/36
(25%)
Failed to Score 20/72
(27.8%)
15/36
(41.7%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Chelsea play Nottingham Forest?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 50% of Chelsea's recent matches and 42% of Nottingham Forest's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Chelsea vs Nottingham Forest usually a high-scoring fixture?

Not particularly — Over 2.5 goals has come in for only 44% of Chelsea's recent games and 39% of Nottingham Forest's, pointing to a tighter contest.

📰

Chelsea and Nottingham Forest share the spoils in a 2-2 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Chelsea and Nottingham Forest finished level at 2-2 at Stamford Bridge, Regular Season - 36, in the Premier League. The remainder of the report sets that outcome against the pre-match model, the markets and the teams' data profiles.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Chelsea 1.34 xG and Nottingham Forest 0.79 xG, a combined 2.12. The scoreboard read 2-2 for 4 actual goals. Nottingham Forest outscored their 0.79 projection by 1.2. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Chelsea attack 0.63 / defence 0.92 against Nottingham Forest attack 0.65 / defence 1.35, drawn from 72/35 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Chelsea 50% | Draw 28% | Nottingham Forest 22%, with Chelsea to win its most likely call at 50%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 28%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 36%. The game delivered 4, so it went over — against the model's lean. Over 1.5 had been 63% and landed. Over 3.5 was 17% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 40% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 46% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Chelsea 47%, Nottingham Forest 44%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 46%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Chelsea's trading profile (72 games, 36 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 36% of the time, and conceded here.

Nottingham Forest's trading profile (72 games, 36 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 46% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 32% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Chelsea 1.61 PPG, Nottingham Forest 1.46 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Chelsea (home/away splits) shipped 2 against a 1.06 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Nottingham Forest (home/away splits) scored 2 against a 0.86 average — above their attacking norm.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 0 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). This one broke away from the data — most of the pre-match signals were overturned by how the ninety minutes actually played out.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 36% Over 2.5 probability, but 4 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 40% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data bucked — 46% historical Over 2.5 rate, but the game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.