Sign in Register

Wuhan Three Towns 3-3 Chengdu Better City – Result & Analysis

🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

Super League · Regular Season - 8

Kick-off

Fri 19 May 2023

10:30

Venue

Wuhan Sports Center Stadium

Competition

Super League

China

Status

FT
💬 Comment 📝 Notes
📋

Poisson model projects a closely fought contest — draw probability sits at 40% as Wuhan Three Towns take on Chengdu Better City.

✍️ Match Preview

Match Analysis

Wuhan Three Towns host Chengdu Better City at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium in Super League, Regular Season - 8. Kick-off is scheduled for Friday 19 May 2023 at 10:30 UTC.

Form Guide

Wuhan Three Towns — All Games: 6W 1D 3L from 10 Super League outings this season, averaging 1.90 points per game. Last five: D W L W W. They are averaging 2.20 goals per game — a high-scoring output that makes them a genuine attacking threat in any fixture. 5 clean sheets from 10 games (50%) is a standout defensive return — they are keeping their net clean in more than half their matches.

At home at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium, Wuhan Three Towns have gone 5W 1D 4L this season (10 games, 1.60 PPG). They are averaging 2.30 goals per home game — a prolific scoring rate in front of their own fans. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground.

Across all Super League games this season, Chengdu Better City have recorded 8W 2D 0L from 10 outings — 2.60 PPG. Last five: D D W W W. They are scoring at 1.90 per game and conceding 0.50. Defensively, 0.50 goals conceded per game is elite-level — a side this difficult to score against is a real threat to Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes. 6 clean sheets from 10 games (60%) is an exceptional defensive record — they are keeping clean sheets more often than not.

When travelling in Super League this season, Chengdu Better City have posted 6W 1D 3L from 10 away outings — 1.90 PPG. Away from home they average 1.00 goals scored and 0.90 conceded per game. 5 away clean sheets from 10 games (50%) — they are as difficult to score against on the road as they are at home. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel. Their away PPG of 1.90 is notably below their overall 2.60 — form away from home has been a clear weakness this season.

The form data does not support a straightforward home bias here. Chengdu Better City are 0.70 PPG ahead (2.60 vs 1.90), making them the form-guided selection despite the trip.

H2H Record

The H2H landscape is flat: 2 previous encounters have yielded 0 wins for Wuhan Three Towns, 2 for Chengdu Better City and 0 draws. A neutral reading in isolation.

The last 2 meetings have been tight affairs, averaging just 1.0 goals per game. That low-scoring pattern is a meaningful historical input for the Under 2.5 market. The most recent clash, on 23 Dec 2022, ended 0–1 with Chengdu Better City winning.

With a balanced win record and just 1.0 goals per game historically, the H2H points toward a tight, low-scoring contest. Under 2.5 goals has the strongest statistical grounding from the fixture history regardless of which side wins.

In-Play Data

Wuhan Three Towns trading profile (34 games, 17 at home): they score before half-time in 100% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 100% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 50% of those occasions; they lead at the break 70% of the time; BTTS occurs in 53% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 82% of games (home games); Over 3.5 in 44%; they keep a clean sheet 44% of the time.

Chengdu Better City trading profile (34 games, 17 at away): they score before half-time in 71% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 50% of the time; BTTS occurs in 35% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 29% of games (away games); they keep a clean sheet 47% of the time.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Wuhan Three Towns 50% versus Chengdu Better City 44%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Wuhan Three Towns 74% | Chengdu Better City 44%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Wuhan Three Towns 0.89 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.02 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.975 / defence 0.898 | Chengdu Better City attack 0.939 / defence 0.739. League average goals — home 1.237 / away 1.207. Chengdu Better City's defence strength of 0.739 is below average — they are conceding at a rate that inflates the home xG figure. Data: 41 Wuhan Three Towns games / 41 Chengdu Better City games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 27% | Draw 40% | Chengdu Better City 34%. Fair-value odds: Wuhan Three Towns 3.70 | Draw 2.50 | Chengdu Better City 2.94. The draw (40%) is the Poisson-preferred outcome — neither side is more likely to win than to draw, making draw-inclusive markets the most model-aligned approach.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 30% | BTTS probability 42% | Total xG 1.91. Under 2.5 is the strongly backed market at 70% probability — total xG of 1.91 sits well below the 2.5 threshold. The model is projecting a tight, low-scoring match based on both sides' defensive quality. BTTS probability of 42% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Summary & Verdict

The Poisson model's preferred outcome is the draw at 40% — neither side is more likely to win than to draw. Draw-inclusive markets are the most model-aligned approach. Home win at 27% and away win at 34% are close enough that backing either outright carries significant draw exposure.

Poisson projects 1.91 total expected goals, pointing to Under 2.5 at 30% probability — Poisson-only — limited corroboration conviction.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is No at 42%. Form rates corroborate: Wuhan Three Towns 50% | Chengdu Better City 30% BTTS from recent games.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights

H2H The H2H record is evenly balanced (0W–0D–2W), with no clear historical advantage.
H2H H2H history favours Chengdu Better City but Poisson model leans Draw — current-season strength data diverges from historical pattern.
Goals H2H (1.00 goals/game) and Poisson xG (1.91) both back Under 2.5 goals (70% Poisson probability).
BTTS H2H BTTS 0% and Poisson BTTS 42% — BTTS No has double-source support.
Form Chengdu Better City lead on PPG: 2.60 vs 1.90 — in-form visitors may prove difficult to contain.
Form Wuhan Three Towns Poisson xG (0.89) is below their recent form scoring rate (2.30) — opposition defensive quality is suppressing the model's expectation.
Form Form and Poisson model both favour Chengdu Better City — Chengdu Better City at 34% win probability.
Prediction Poisson model shows elevated draw probability at 40% — tight contest expected.
Goals Poisson Over 2.5 probability is only 30% — the model points to an Under 2.5 outcome.

🏟️ Match Context

• Fixture: Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City | Competition: Super League, Regular Season - 8 | Venue: Wuhan Sports Center Stadium • Kick-off: Friday 19 May 2023, 10:30 UTC • Data inputs: H2H history, form splits, prediction model signals, and market pricing

📊 Statistical Prediction

• Poisson result probabilities: Wuhan Three Towns 27% | Draw 40% | Chengdu Better City 34% • Poisson goal markets: Over 2.5 30% | BTTS 42% | xG Wuhan Three Towns 0.89 / Chengdu Better City 1.02 • Poisson strength factors: Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.975 / def 0.898 | Chengdu Better City attack 0.939 / def 0.739 | league avg home 1.237 / away 1.207 • Poisson stance: Draw (40%) — low confidence — close contest

🧮 Prediction Model

0.89

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Expected Goals

1.02

Chengdu Better City xG

27%
40%
34%
Wuhan Three Towns Draw Chengdu Better City

42%

BTTS

61%

Over 1.5

30%

Over 2.5

13%

Over 3.5

Full score-by-score matrix & model internals in the "Full Poisson Detail" section below ↓

⚠️ This analysis is generated algorithmically from statistical data and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute betting advice. Please gamble responsibly.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What time does Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City kick off?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City kicked off at 10:30 on Friday 19 May 2023 at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.

What was the final score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Wuhan Three Towns 3 - 3 Chengdu Better City.

Where is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City being played?

The match is being played at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium.

What competition is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City part of?

Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City is a Regular Season - 8 fixture in the Super League (China).

Who is favourite to win Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our statistical model gives Wuhan Three Towns a 27% chance of winning, Chengdu Better City a 34% chance, and a 40% chance of a draw, making this a very evenly-matched fixture.

Will both teams score in Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our model estimates a 42% probability that both Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City will score (BTTS).

Will Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City have over 2.5 goals?

Our model puts the probability of over 2.5 goals in this match at 30%.

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

Record (2 meetings): Wuhan Three Towns 0W | Draws 0 | Chengdu Better City 2W.

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City in?

Wuhan Three Towns (all comps): 6W-1D-3L in 10 | 1.90 PPG | GF 2.20 / GA 0.90 | L5 D-W-L-W-W. Chengdu Better City (all comps): 8W-2D-0L in 10 | 2.60 PPG | GF 1.90 / GA 0.50 | L5 D-D-W-W-W.

🧮 Model Insight

Model Mechanics

Working from Wuhan Three Towns's attack rating (0.97) and Chengdu Better City's defence rating (0.74), the model arrives at 0.89 expected goals for the home side. The same calculation in reverse, Chengdu Better City's attack versus Wuhan Three Towns's defence, projects 1.02 expected goals for the visitors.

These ratings are built from 41/41 games of current-season data — a full enough sample to trust.

The Exact-Score Picture

Run the expected-goals figures through the full scoreline distribution and 0-0 emerges as the single most likely result, at 16.6%. Close behind: 1-1 (15.2%), 0-1 (13.3%). Those top three scorelines alone account for 45% of the model's total probability mass — a relatively concentrated, predictable distribution for this fixture.

Most Likely Outcome

Draw

27%

Wuhan Three Towns

3.74

40%

Draw

2.52

34%

Chengdu Better City

2.98

Top 3 Most Likely Scorelines

0 – 1

15.1%

Away win

Most likely

0 – 0

14.8%

Draw

1 – 1

13.4%

Draw

Expected Goals & Win Odds

0.89

Wuhan Three Towns xG

Total xG

1.91

1.02

Chengdu Better City xG

27%
40%
34%
Wuhan Three TownsDrawChengdu Better City

3.74

27%

Home win

2.52

40%

Draw

2.98

34%

Away win

Goals Markets

57%

Over 1.5

1.75

43%

Under 1.5

2.33

30%

Over 2.5

3.33

70%

Under 2.5

1.43

13%

Over 3.5

7.69

87%

Under 3.5

1.15

4%

Over 4.5

25.00

96%

Under 4.5

1.04

Match Markets

Both Teams to Score

42%

BTTS Yes

2.40

58%

BTTS No

1.72

Clean Sheet

36%

Wuhan Three Towns

2.77

41%

Chengdu Better City

2.44

Win to Nil

10%

Wuhan Three Towns

10.34

14%

Chengdu Better City

7.27

Score Probability Matrix (%)

H \ A 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 14.8 15.1 7.7 2.6 0.7 0.1
1 13.2 13.4 6.8 2.3 0.6 0.1
2 5.9 6.0 3.0 1.0 0.3 0.1
3 1.7 1.8 0.9 0.3 0.1
4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1
5 0.1 0.1

Green = home win Β· Grey = draw Β· Amber = away win Β· Outlined cell = most likely score

Model Internals
λ Home (xG) 0.891
λ Away (xG) 1.018
Total xG 1.909
League avg home goals 1.237
League avg away goals 1.207
Wuhan Three Towns attack strength 0.975
Wuhan Three Towns defence strength 0.898
Chengdu Better City attack strength 0.939
Chengdu Better City defence strength 0.739
Data phase CurrentSeason
Games used (H/A) 41 / 41

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most likely scoreline for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Our Poisson model rates 0-0 as the single most likely exact scoreline, at 16.6%.

How many goals are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City expected to score?

The model projects 0.89 expected goals for Wuhan Three Towns and 1.02 for Chengdu Better City, a combined total of 1.91.

How confident is the prediction model for Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City?

Not very — the model's leading outcome sits at just 40%, meaning this is rated as a genuinely open contest with no dominant favourite.

📈 Form Insight

Where Both Sides Stand

Across their last 34 outings, Wuhan Three Towns have picked up 2.29 PPG on a 25W 3D 6L record — D-W-L-W-W across the most recent five.

Chengdu Better City's form line: 18W 11D 5L from 34 games, 1.91 PPG, last five D-D-W-W-W.

Form-wise this is close to level: Wuhan Three Towns on 2.29 PPG, Chengdu Better City on 1.91. Other factors will likely decide this one more than recent results.

Home Ground vs the Road

On home soil, Wuhan Three Towns have posted 2.18 PPG from 17 outings (12W 1D 4L).

On the road, Chengdu Better City have gone 9W 4D 4L from 17 away games — 1.82 PPG when travelling.

The Goals Picture

Wuhan Three Towns are averaging 2.68 goals scored and 0.82 conceded per game recently; Chengdu Better City are on 1.44 scored and 0.82 conceded. Wuhan Three Towns's scoring rate against Chengdu Better City's tighter defensive record is one of the more interesting match-ups in the goals markets here.

Defensively: Wuhan Three Towns have kept a clean sheet in 44% of their games; Chengdu Better City in 47% — worth knowing if you're weighing up clean-sheet or BTTS-No markets.

Last 34 Results — Super League

Current season: same league only · Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams)

Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

Current Season
D W L W W
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

Current Season
D D W W W
34 Played 34
25/3/6 W / D / L 18/11/5
2.29 Points Per Game 1.91
2.68 Avg Goals Scored 1.44
0.82 Avg Goals Conceded 0.82
3.50 Avg Goals / Game 2.26
15 Clean Sheets 16
17 BTTS 15
25 Over 2.5 Games 15
Wuhan Three Towns

Wuhan Three Towns

W
H Tianjin Teda
3–0
31 Dec
W
H Hangzhou Greentown
2–0 HT 1–0
27 Dec
L
A Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–0
23 Dec
W
A Dalian Aerbin
2–1 HT 0–0
14 Dec
D
H Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–1
09 Dec
W
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
4–0 HT 2–0
04 Dec
L
H Changchun Yatai
2–3 HT 0–1
30 Nov
W
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
4–0 HT 1–0
26 Nov
W
H Meizhou Kejia
3–0 HT 2–0
21 Nov
L
H Henan Jianye
1–3 HT 1–0
13 Nov
W
A Beijing Guoan
2–0 HT 1–0
08 Nov
W
H Guangzhou R&F
4–1 HT 2–1
03 Nov
L
H Chengdu Better City
0–1 HT 0–1
29 Oct
W
H Dalian Aerbin
4–0 HT 2–0
25 Oct
W
A Tianjin Teda
1–0 HT 0–0
08 Oct
L
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–2 HT 0–2
04 Oct
L
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
3–4 HT 1–2
24 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
2–1 HT 1–0
20 Sep
D
A Shandong Luneng
1–1 HT 1–0
14 Sep
W
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
5–1 HT 2–0
28 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 2–1
22 Aug
W
A Henan Jianye
3–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
H Beijing Guoan
5–1 HT 2–1
12 Aug
W
A Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
06 Aug
W
A SHANGHAI SIPG
1–0 HT 1–0
12 Jul
W
H Wuhan Zall
5–0 HT 2–0
08 Jul
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
4–2 HT 1–0
03 Jul
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 1–1
30 Jun
W
H Hebei Zhongji
5–0 HT 3–0
26 Jun
W
H SHANGHAI SIPG
2–1 HT 2–0
19 Jun
W
A Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 2–0
15 Jun
D
A Shanghai Shenhua
1–1 HT 1–0
12 Jun
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
6–0 HT 2–0
07 Jun
W
A Hebei Zhongji
4–0 HT 2–0
03 Jun
Chengdu Better City

Chengdu Better City

W
H Dalian Aerbin
3–0 HT 1–0
31 Dec
W
H Wuhan Zall
3–1 HT 0–1
27 Dec
W
H Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 0–0
23 Dec
D
A Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 0–1
15 Dec
D
H SHANGHAI SIPG
0–0 HT 0–0
10 Dec
W
A Henan Jianye
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Dec
W
H Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–0 HT 2–0
01 Dec
W
H Guangzhou R&F
3–0 HT 0–0
25 Nov
W
H Shandong Luneng
2–1 HT 2–1
21 Nov
W
H Shanghai Shenhua
3–2 HT 1–2
12 Nov
D
H Changchun Yatai
2–2 HT 1–2
07 Nov
W
H Hebei Zhongji
6–0 HT 2–0
03 Nov
W
A Wuhan Three Towns
1–0 HT 1–0
29 Oct
D
H Hangzhou Greentown
1–1 HT 1–0
24 Oct
L
A Dalian Aerbin
0–2 HT 0–1
09 Oct
W
A Wuhan Zall
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Oct
L
A SHANGHAI SIPG
0–3 HT 0–2
29 Sep
D
H Henan Jianye
0–0 HT 0–0
25 Sep
W
A Changchun Yatai
1–0 HT 1–0
01 Sep
W
A Guangzhou R&F
2–1 HT 1–0
27 Aug
L
A Shandong Luneng
1–2 HT 0–1
21 Aug
W
A Shanghai Shenhua
2–0 HT 1–0
17 Aug
W
A Guangzhou Evergrande FC
2–1 HT 0–1
12 Aug
W
A Hebei Zhongji
1–0 HT 0–0
05 Aug
W
A Meizhou Kejia
2–1 HT 0–1
11 Jul
W
H Tianjin Teda
2–1 HT 1–0
08 Jul
D
H Shijiazhuang Y. J.
1–1 HT 1–0
04 Jul
D
A Beijing Guoan
0–0 HT 0–0
30 Jun
D
H Shenzhen Ruby FC
2–2 HT 1–1
26 Jun
D
H Meizhou Kejia
0–0 HT 0–0
20 Jun
D
A Tianjin Teda
1–1 HT 1–0
16 Jun
D
A Shijiazhuang Y. J.
0–0 HT 0–0
12 Jun
L
H Beijing Guoan
2–3 HT 2–3
08 Jun
L
A Shenzhen Ruby FC
0–2 HT 0–1
04 Jun

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What form are Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City in coming into this match?

Wuhan Three Towns have gone 25W 3D 6L in their last 34 games (2.29 PPG), while Chengdu Better City have gone 18W 11D 5L in their last 34 (1.91 PPG).

Which team has the better venue record — Wuhan Three Towns at home or Chengdu Better City away?

Wuhan Three Towns's home record (2.18 PPG) is the stronger of the two venue-specific splits — Wuhan Three Towns at home: 2.18 PPG; Chengdu Better City away: 1.82 PPG.

Have Wuhan Three Towns or Chengdu Better City been keeping clean sheets recently?

Wuhan Three Towns have kept a clean sheet in 44% of their recent games, Chengdu Better City in 47%.

⚔️ Rivalry Insight

A Look Back

The fixture history between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City runs to 10 recorded meetings, the earliest dating back to October 2022. Every recorded meeting has come in Super League. The two were last together as recently as 1 August 2026, so this form is fresh in the memory.

Digging Into the Numbers

Wuhan Three Towns's record when hosting Chengdu Better City specifically: 0W 3D 2L from 5 games — a narrower, venue-specific slice of the head-to-head picture.

Last 10 Meetings

Wuhan Three Towns

1

Wuhan Three Towns

5

Draws

Chengdu Better City

4

Chengdu Better City

Recent Meetings

Chengdu Better City
1–1
01 Aug 26
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
17 Apr 26
Chengdu Better City
Wuhan Three Towns
2–2
29 Jun 25
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
22 Feb 25
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
1–1
20 Jul 24
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
2–2
01 May 24
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Better City
0–1
19 Aug 23
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
3–3
19 May 23
Chengdu Better City
Chengdu Better City
1–0
23 Dec 22
Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns
0–1
29 Oct 22
Chengdu Better City

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

What is the head-to-head record between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

From 10 meetings on record, Wuhan Three Towns have won 1, Chengdu Better City have won 4, and 5 have been drawn.

When did Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City last play each other?

They last met on 1 August 2026, when Chengdu Better City 1-1 Wuhan Three Towns.

Who has won more matches between Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City?

Chengdu Better City have the better head-to-head record, with 4 wins from 10 meetings.

📈 Trading Insight

Half-Time Trends

Wuhan Three Towns are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 100% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 75% of the time.

Chengdu Better City are typically involved in an early goal — the half-time board shows at least one in 71% of their matches. They've gone in front at half-time 29% of the time. They've also shown some fight from behind, salvaging a draw or win after trailing at half-time in 18% of those situations.

The Numbers That Matter

BTTS sits in mixed territory for this pairing — Wuhan Three Towns 53%, Chengdu Better City 35% — no strong lean either way from the trading data alone.

Over 2.5 has been close to a coin-flip for both sides — 82% (Wuhan Three Towns) and 29% (Chengdu Better City). Stepping up a level, Over 3.5 has also landed reasonably often — 65% and 0% respectively — worth a look for goal-hungry markets.

On the defensive side: Wuhan Three Towns keep a clean sheet in 41% of their matches; Chengdu Better City in 47%; Chengdu Better City in 29%.

📈

Current season: same league only. Previous season: all leagues (covers promoted/relegated teams). All = any venue  |  Venue = Wuhan Three Towns home games / Chengdu Better City away games. HT metrics require half-time score data β€” shown as β€” where unavailable.

Wuhan Three Towns Wuhan Three Towns Current Season
Metric All
(34 games)
Venue
(17 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 29/33
(87.9%)
16/16
(100%)
2+ Goals Before HT 17/33
(51.5%)
11/16
(68.8%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 4/4
(100%)
β€”
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 2/4
(50%)
β€”
Winning at HT 23/33
(69.7%)
12/16
(75%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/33
(9.1%)
1/16
(6.2%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 0/33
(0%)
0/16
(0%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 17/34
(50%)
9/17
(52.9%)
Over 2.5 Goals 25/34
(73.5%)
14/17
(82.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 15/34
(44.1%)
11/17
(64.7%)
Clean Sheet 15/34
(44.1%)
7/17
(41.2%)
Failed to Score 2/34
(5.9%)
1/17
(5.9%)
Chengdu Better City Chengdu Better City Current Season
Metric All
(34 games)
Venue
(17 games)
Half-Time Metrics
1+ Goal Before HT 24/34
(70.6%)
12/17
(70.6%)
2+ Goals Before HT 8/34
(23.5%)
1/17
(5.9%)
0-0 HT → 1+ Goal 2nd Half 5/10
(50%)
3/5
(60%)
0-0 HT → 2+ Goals 2nd Half 1/10
(10%)
0/5
(0%)
Winning at HT 12/34
(35.3%)
5/17
(29.4%)
Lost Lead (Win HT → No Win FT) 3/34
(8.8%)
1/17
(5.9%)
Came From Behind (Lose HT → Draw/Win FT) 6/34
(17.6%)
3/17
(17.6%)
Full-Time Metrics
BTTS 15/34
(44.1%)
6/17
(35.3%)
Over 2.5 Goals 15/34
(44.1%)
5/17
(29.4%)
Over 3.5 Goals 6/34
(17.6%)
0/17
(0%)
Clean Sheet 16/34
(47.1%)
8/17
(47.1%)
Failed to Score 8/34
(23.5%)
5/17
(29.4%)

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

Do both teams usually score when Wuhan Three Towns play Chengdu Better City?

Not especially — both teams scoring has occurred in only 53% of Wuhan Three Towns's recent matches and 35% of Chengdu Better City's, a rate that leans toward BTTS No.

Is Wuhan Three Towns vs Chengdu Better City usually a high-scoring fixture?

Recent trends suggest it could be — Over 2.5 goals has landed in 82% of Wuhan Three Towns's matches and 29% of Chengdu Better City's.

Do Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City tend to score early?

Wuhan Three Towns have had a goal before half-time in 100% of their recent matches, Chengdu Better City in 71% — a useful reference point for first-half goal markets.

📰

Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City share the spoils in a 3-3 draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Wuhan Three Towns and Chengdu Better City finished level at 3-3 at Wuhan Sports Center Stadium, Regular Season - 8, in the Super League. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Wuhan Three Towns 0.89 xG and Chengdu Better City 1.02 xG, a combined 1.91. The scoreboard read 3-3 for 6 actual goals. Wuhan Three Towns beat their projection by 2.1 — clinical relative to the chances the model priced in. Chengdu Better City outscored their 1.02 projection by 2.0. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Wuhan Three Towns attack 0.97 / defence 0.90 against Chengdu Better City attack 0.94 / defence 0.74, drawn from 41/41 games (CurrentSeason).

On the result, the model split it Wuhan Three Towns 27% | Draw 40% | Chengdu Better City 34%, with the draw its most likely call at 40%. That is exactly how it finished — the model's leading outcome was vindicated.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 30%. The game delivered 6, so it went over — the opposite of the projected direction. Over 1.5 had been 61% and landed. Over 3.5 was 13% and came in. On both teams to score, the model sat at 42% and the match saw both sides score — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 59% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Wuhan Three Towns 74%, Chengdu Better City 44%), a base rate that agreed with today's over. Their combined BTTS history runs at 47%, which did not match the both-scored outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Wuhan Three Towns's trading profile (34 games, 17 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 50% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 44% of the time, and conceded here.

Chengdu Better City's trading profile (34 games, 17 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 44% of their matches — today it did; they keep a clean sheet 47% of the time, and conceded here.

Form vs Result

The form lines were close — Wuhan Three Towns 2.29 PPG, Chengdu Better City 1.91 PPG — offering no strong steer, and the draw fit that even billing. Wuhan Three Towns (home/away splits) shipped 3 against a 1.06 concession average — a leakier day than usual. Chengdu Better City (home/away splits) scored 3 against a 0.94 average — above their attacking norm and shipped 3 against a 0.82 concession average — a leakier day than usual.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 3 pre-match signals came in: result (hit), Over 2.5 (miss), BTTS (miss). The data was on the wrong side of this result more often than not — a reminder that a single match sits well inside the model's variance.

💡 Key Insights

Model Goals market defied the model — 30% Over 2.5 probability, but 6 goals scored.
Model BTTS bucked the model — 42% projected, both teams scored.
Trading Trading data backed up — the sides average 59% Over 2.5 historically, and this game went over.

⚠️ This match report is generated algorithmically from the final score, our prediction model, and each team's historical form and trading data. Analysis is for informational purposes only.