🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Stalemate at Palestino's ground as both sides cancel each other out in a goalless draw.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

The points were shared at Estadio Municipal de La Cisterna, Regular Season - 3, as Palestino and Universidad de Chile drew 0-0 in the Primera División. That is the final score; the rest of this report grades it against what the data forecast beforehand.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting Palestino 1.41 xG and Universidad de Chile 1.11 xG, a combined 2.52. The scoreboard read 0-0 for 0 actual goals. Palestino fell 1.4 short of their projected output. Universidad de Chile landed 1.1 under their projected return. Those figures were built on strength ratings of Palestino attack 0.96 / defence 1.05 against Universidad de Chile attack 1.06 / defence 0.96, drawn from 32/32 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it Palestino 44% | Draw 27% | Universidad de Chile 30%, with Palestino to win its most likely call at 44%. The actual draw had been the model's second-ranked read at 27%, so the result diverged from the top call without being a shock.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 46%. The game delivered 0, so it stayed under — the model's lean was correct. Over 1.5 had been 72% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 51% and the match did not — a miss on BTTS. Historically the two sides average 52% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (Palestino 52%, Universidad de Chile 52%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 51%, which did not match the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

Palestino's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 53% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 35% of the time, and duly kept one.

Universidad de Chile's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 48% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Universidad de Chile arrived the stronger side — 2.00 PPG against 1.58. The form guide was only half-right: the stronger side did not lose, but could not convert the edge into a win. Palestino (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.67 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.03 average — tighter than their form line. Universidad de Chile (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.70 scoring average — below par going forward and conceded 0 against a 1.10 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 1 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (miss), form (miss). A poor return for the projections: the match defied the majority of what the numbers expected.

💡 Key Insights