🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📰

Shock result as Colo Colo defy the odds to beat O'Higgins 0-1.

📝 Match Report

How It Unfolded

Colo Colo beat O'Higgins 0-1 at Estadio El Teniente, Regular Season - 4, in the Primera División. With the result on the board, the sections below measure it against everything the model and the numbers projected in advance.

The Model vs The Result

The Poisson model went into this projecting O'Higgins 1.56 xG and Colo Colo 0.86 xG, a combined 2.42. The scoreboard read 0-1 for 1 actual goal. O'Higgins fell 1.6 short of their projected output. Those figures were built on strength ratings of O'Higgins attack 0.98 / defence 0.92 against Colo Colo attack 0.97 / defence 1.09, drawn from 33/33 games (Blended).

On the result, the model split it O'Higgins 54% | Draw 25% | Colo Colo 21%, with O'Higgins to win its most likely call at 54%. Instead the game produced a Colo Colo win, an outcome the model had rated at just 21% — a clear break from expectation and a genuine upset by the numbers.

Goals & Markets

The model rated Over 2.5 goals at 44%. The game delivered 1, so it stayed under — a call the model got right. Over 1.5 had been 70% and missed. On both teams to score, the model sat at 46% and the match did not — another call in the model's favour. Historically the two sides average 50% Over 2.5 across their same-competition games (O'Higgins 48%, Colo Colo 52%), a base rate that pointed the other way from today's under. Their combined BTTS history runs at 47%, which matched the one-sided outcome.

Trading Patterns vs Reality

O'Higgins's trading profile (60 games, 30 home) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did not; they fail to score in 30% of games, a blank that repeated today.

Colo Colo's trading profile (60 games, 30 away) set some clear expectations: BTTS lands in 47% of their matches — today it did not; they keep a clean sheet 37% of the time, and duly kept one.

Form vs Result

On form, Colo Colo arrived the stronger side — 1.85 PPG against 1.45. That form edge translated into the three points. O'Higgins (home/away splits) managed 0 against a 1.10 scoring average — below par going forward. Colo Colo (home/away splits) conceded 0 against a 1.00 average — tighter than their form line.

Verdict

Grading the result against the stored data, 3 of 4 pre-match signals came in: result (miss), Over 2.5 (hit), BTTS (hit), form (hit). The model got the gist right while missing on the margins.

💡 Key Insights