🎯

Fixture360 only lists fixtures from a curated set of leagues, chosen specifically to keep our prediction model accurate.

📋

Poisson rates Everton de Vina at 42% — current form provides partial corroboration, though signals are mixed in this Cobresal vs Everton de Vina encounter.

✍️ Match Preview

Full Analysis

Estadio El Cobre de El Salvador plays host to Cobresal versus Everton de Vina in Primera División, Regular Season - 26. Kick-off: Sunday 1 November 2026 at 21:00 UTC.

Form & Momentum

Cobresal have collected 0.30 PPG across 10 Primera División outings this season: 1W 0D 9L. Last five: L W L L L. They are averaging 1.10 goals per game and conceding 2.50 — a modest attacking output that tempers optimism on the Over 2.5 market. However, 2.50 goals conceded per game is a concern — opposing attacks have exploited them regularly. 1 clean sheet from 10 outings provides some defensive foundation. Both teams have scored in 60% of their games — a high BTTS rate that carries real weight in the goals markets. This season is still relatively young for Cobresal, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Cobresal at Estadio El Cobre de El Salvador this season: 5W 0D 5L from 10 home games — 1.50 PPG on home soil. At home they are averaging 1.40 goals scored and 1.40 conceded per game. 4 home clean sheets from 10 games (40%) — a solid defensive base on their own ground. Their home PPG of 1.50 is noticeably stronger than their overall 0.30 — Cobresal are significantly better at Estadio El Cobre de El Salvador than their overall form suggests.

Everton de Vina (all games): 4W 4D 2L across 10 Primera División outings this term — 1.60 points per game. Last five: W W D W L. Their scoring rate of 1.30 per game is modest, conceding 0.90 — not a side to back heavily on the Over 2.5 from their form alone. 4 clean sheets in 10 outings (40%) underlines their defensive solidity. This season is still relatively young for Everton de Vina, so this record blends games from this season and last.

Everton de Vina's away record: 4W 1D 5L from 10 road trips in Primera División this season (1.30 PPG). Away from home they average 1.20 goals scored and 1.20 conceded per game. Away from home, both teams have scored in only 30% of games — a low rate that backs BTTS No when they travel.

Everton de Vina arrive in superior form — a 1.30 PPG advantage (1.60 vs 0.30) that offsets much of the home-ground benefit. The away side are the form pick, with draw protection the sensible way to manage the home-field uncertainty.

Head-to-Head

Neither side has dominated this fixture. The last 10 head-to-head meetings have produced 2 wins for Cobresal, 2 for Everton de Vina and 6 draws — an even split that leaves the H2H largely neutral as a betting input.

These two sides have produced goals at a consistent rate historically, averaging 3.9 per game across 10 meetings. That scoring profile provides genuine support for the Over 2.5 angle. The most recent clash, on 26 Apr 2026, ended 1–3 with Everton de Vina winning.

With the win record balanced, the strongest H2H-derived signal is in the goals market. At 3.9 goals per game historically, Over 2.5 is the cleaner angle to extract from the head-to-head data.

Trading

Cobresal half-time and goal-timing data (45 games, 22 at home): they score before half-time in 77% of fixtures in home games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 89% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 56% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 59% of their matches (home games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 54% of games (home games).

Everton de Vina half-time and goal-timing data (45 games, 22 at away): they score before half-time in 59% of fixtures in away games; when goalless at HT, a second-half goal follows 74% of the time; two or more arrive in the second half on 53% of those occasions; BTTS occurs in 36% of their matches (away games); Over 2.5 goals lands in 50% of games (away games); they fail to score in 47% of games.

BTTS rates are mixed from the trading data — Cobresal 58% versus Everton de Vina 42%; no strong lean in either direction. The over/under 2.5 picture is inconclusive from the in-play data (Cobresal 58% | Everton de Vina 44%).

Poisson Model

The Poisson distribution model projects Cobresal 1.26 xG and Everton de Vina 1.47 xG. These expected goals figures are the primary input: they feed a goal-probability matrix across all scoreline combinations to derive the result and market probabilities below. Underlying strength ratings: Cobresal attack 0.885 / defence 1.107 | Everton de Vina attack 1.104 / defence 0.884. League average goals — home 1.609 / away 1.198. Data: 45 Cobresal games / 45 Everton de Vina games used (CurrentSeason).

Result probabilities: Cobresal 33% | Draw 26% | Everton de Vina 42%. Fair-value odds: Cobresal 3.03 | Draw 3.85 | Everton de Vina 2.38. This is a low-confidence result — no outcome exceeds 45%. The draw at 26% is a primary outcome, not an afterthought.

Goals markets: Over 2.5 probability 51% | BTTS probability 55% | Total xG 2.72. Over/Under 2.5 is close to a coin-flip at 51%/49% — the total xG of 2.72 sits near the 2.5 margin; this is a low-edge market from a Poisson standpoint. BTTS probability of 55% is moderate — neither team is projected to score with enough certainty to make Yes a clear standalone call.

Verdict

The Poisson model's primary lean is Everton de Vina at 42% — marginal model lean. Current-season form corroborates the Poisson lean — partial multi-source support. Draw probability of 26% warrants consideration of Double Chance or Draw No Bet on Everton de Vina if the outright odds are short. The opposing side holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should be staked accordingly.

On the goals line, Poisson's 2.72 combined xG gives a 51% probability to Over 2.5 — reasonable, supported by H2H averaging 3.9 goals per meeting.

The Poisson model's BTTS call is Yes at 55%. This conflicts with form data: Cobresal 40% | Everton de Vina 30% from recent games — a notable divergence.

The outsider holds a 33% win probability per the model — this is not a banker and should not be treated as one. Proportionate stakes are appropriate given the genuine contest the data projects.

🔮 Your Prediction

Sign in to submit your prediction and see how it compares to the rest of the community.

💡 Key Insights